Don't run coherence twice for future-compat lints
This commit is contained in:
parent
e6ec0d125e
commit
f66793757f
@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ impl<'tcx> Children {
|
||||
impl_def_id, simplified_self, possible_sibling,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let overlap_error = |overlap: traits::coherence::OverlapResult<'_>| {
|
||||
// Found overlap, but no specialization; error out.
|
||||
let create_overlap_error = |overlap: traits::coherence::OverlapResult<'_>| {
|
||||
let trait_ref = overlap.impl_header.trait_ref.unwrap();
|
||||
let self_ty = trait_ref.self_ty();
|
||||
|
||||
OverlapError {
|
||||
with_impl: possible_sibling,
|
||||
trait_desc: trait_ref.print_only_trait_path().to_string(),
|
||||
@ -106,21 +106,49 @@ impl<'tcx> Children {
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let allowed_to_overlap =
|
||||
tcx.impls_are_allowed_to_overlap(impl_def_id, possible_sibling);
|
||||
let report_overlap_error = |overlap: traits::coherence::OverlapResult<'_>,
|
||||
last_lint: &mut _| {
|
||||
// Found overlap, but no specialization; error out or report future-compat warning.
|
||||
|
||||
// Do we *still* get overlap if we disable the future-incompatible modes?
|
||||
let should_err = traits::overlapping_impls(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
possible_sibling,
|
||||
impl_def_id,
|
||||
traits::SkipLeakCheck::default(),
|
||||
|_| true,
|
||||
|| false,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let error = create_overlap_error(overlap);
|
||||
|
||||
if should_err {
|
||||
Err(error)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
*last_lint = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError {
|
||||
error,
|
||||
kind: FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind::LeakCheck,
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Ok((false, false))
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let last_lint_mut = &mut last_lint;
|
||||
let (le, ge) = traits::overlapping_impls(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
possible_sibling,
|
||||
impl_def_id,
|
||||
traits::SkipLeakCheck::default(),
|
||||
traits::SkipLeakCheck::Yes,
|
||||
|overlap| {
|
||||
if let Some(overlap_kind) = &allowed_to_overlap {
|
||||
if let Some(overlap_kind) =
|
||||
tcx.impls_are_allowed_to_overlap(impl_def_id, possible_sibling)
|
||||
{
|
||||
match overlap_kind {
|
||||
ty::ImplOverlapKind::Permitted { marker: _ } => {}
|
||||
ty::ImplOverlapKind::Issue33140 => {
|
||||
last_lint = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError {
|
||||
error: overlap_error(overlap),
|
||||
*last_lint_mut = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError {
|
||||
error: create_overlap_error(overlap),
|
||||
kind: FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind::Issue33140,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -132,7 +160,11 @@ impl<'tcx> Children {
|
||||
let le = tcx.specializes((impl_def_id, possible_sibling));
|
||||
let ge = tcx.specializes((possible_sibling, impl_def_id));
|
||||
|
||||
if le == ge { Err(overlap_error(overlap)) } else { Ok((le, ge)) }
|
||||
if le == ge {
|
||||
report_overlap_error(overlap, last_lint_mut)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok((le, ge))
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|| Ok((false, false)),
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
@ -153,27 +185,8 @@ impl<'tcx> Children {
|
||||
|
||||
replace_children.push(possible_sibling);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if let None = allowed_to_overlap {
|
||||
// Do future-compat checks for overlap.
|
||||
|
||||
if last_lint.is_none() {
|
||||
traits::overlapping_impls(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
possible_sibling,
|
||||
impl_def_id,
|
||||
traits::SkipLeakCheck::Yes,
|
||||
|overlap| {
|
||||
last_lint = Some(FutureCompatOverlapError {
|
||||
error: overlap_error(overlap),
|
||||
kind: FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind::LeakCheck,
|
||||
});
|
||||
},
|
||||
|| (),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// no overlap (error bailed already via ?)
|
||||
// Either there's no overlap, or the overlap was already reported by
|
||||
// `overlap_error`.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user