Auto merge of #76886 - Aaron1011:fix/ensure-stack-predicate, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Wrap recursive predicate evaluation with `ensure_sufficient_stack` I haven't been able to come up with a minimized test case for #76770, but this fixes a stack overflow in rustc as well.
This commit is contained in:
commit
fd702d2919
|
@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
None => self.check_recursion_limit(&obligation, &obligation)?,
|
None => self.check_recursion_limit(&obligation, &obligation)?,
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
ensure_sufficient_stack(|| {
|
||||||
match obligation.predicate.skip_binders() {
|
match obligation.predicate.skip_binders() {
|
||||||
ty::PredicateAtom::Trait(t, _) => {
|
ty::PredicateAtom::Trait(t, _) => {
|
||||||
let t = ty::Binder::bind(t);
|
let t = ty::Binder::bind(t);
|
||||||
|
@ -483,7 +484,10 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
) {
|
) {
|
||||||
Some(mut obligations) => {
|
Some(mut obligations) => {
|
||||||
self.add_depth(obligations.iter_mut(), obligation.recursion_depth);
|
self.add_depth(obligations.iter_mut(), obligation.recursion_depth);
|
||||||
self.evaluate_predicates_recursively(previous_stack, obligations.into_iter())
|
self.evaluate_predicates_recursively(
|
||||||
|
previous_stack,
|
||||||
|
obligations.into_iter(),
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
None => Ok(EvaluatedToAmbig),
|
None => Ok(EvaluatedToAmbig),
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
|
@ -557,7 +561,10 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ty::PredicateAtom::ConstEquate(c1, c2) => {
|
ty::PredicateAtom::ConstEquate(c1, c2) => {
|
||||||
debug!("evaluate_predicate_recursively: equating consts c1={:?} c2={:?}", c1, c2);
|
debug!(
|
||||||
|
"evaluate_predicate_recursively: equating consts c1={:?} c2={:?}",
|
||||||
|
c1, c2
|
||||||
|
);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let evaluate = |c: &'tcx ty::Const<'tcx>| {
|
let evaluate = |c: &'tcx ty::Const<'tcx>| {
|
||||||
if let ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(def, substs, promoted) = c.val {
|
if let ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(def, substs, promoted) = c.val {
|
||||||
|
@ -577,17 +584,23 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
match (evaluate(c1), evaluate(c2)) {
|
match (evaluate(c1), evaluate(c2)) {
|
||||||
(Ok(c1), Ok(c2)) => {
|
(Ok(c1), Ok(c2)) => {
|
||||||
match self.infcx().at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env).eq(c1, c2) {
|
match self
|
||||||
|
.infcx()
|
||||||
|
.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
|
||||||
|
.eq(c1, c2)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
Ok(_) => Ok(EvaluatedToOk),
|
Ok(_) => Ok(EvaluatedToOk),
|
||||||
Err(_) => Ok(EvaluatedToErr),
|
Err(_) => Ok(EvaluatedToErr),
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
(Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(ErrorReported)), _)
|
(Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(ErrorReported)), _)
|
||||||
| (_, Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(ErrorReported))) => Ok(EvaluatedToErr),
|
| (_, Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(ErrorReported))) => Ok(EvaluatedToErr),
|
||||||
(Err(ErrorHandled::Linted), _) | (_, Err(ErrorHandled::Linted)) => span_bug!(
|
(Err(ErrorHandled::Linted), _) | (_, Err(ErrorHandled::Linted)) => {
|
||||||
|
span_bug!(
|
||||||
obligation.cause.span(self.tcx()),
|
obligation.cause.span(self.tcx()),
|
||||||
"ConstEquate: const_eval_resolve returned an unexpected error"
|
"ConstEquate: const_eval_resolve returned an unexpected error"
|
||||||
),
|
)
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
(Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric), _) | (_, Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric)) => {
|
(Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric), _) | (_, Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric)) => {
|
||||||
Ok(EvaluatedToAmbig)
|
Ok(EvaluatedToAmbig)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -597,6 +610,7 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||||
bug!("TypeWellFormedFromEnv is only used for chalk")
|
bug!("TypeWellFormedFromEnv is only used for chalk")
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
fn evaluate_trait_predicate_recursively<'o>(
|
fn evaluate_trait_predicate_recursively<'o>(
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue