Replace closures_captures and upvar_capture with closure_min_captures
Removed all uses of closures_captures and upvar_capture and refactored code to work with closure_min_captures. This also involved removing functions that were no longer needed like the bridge.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/18
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `actix-web`
Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if
an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web`
crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of
`actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of
`pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use.
Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates
are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case,
bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of
`pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency
on a newer version of `syn`.
The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what
they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them
to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to
suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml`
The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears
to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the
`actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can
simply update `syn` themselves.
rustdoc: allow list syntax for #[doc(alias)] attributes
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81205.
It now allows to have:
```rust
#[doc(alias = "x")]
// and:
#[doc(alias("y", "z"))]
```
cc ``@jplatte``
r? ``@jyn514``
make changes to liveness to use closure_min_captures
use different span
borrow check uses new structures
rename to CapturedPlace
stop using upvar_capture in regionck
remove the bridge
cleanup from rebase + remove the upvar_capture reference from mutability_errors.rs
remove line from livenes test
make our unused var checking more consistent
update tests
adding more warnings to the tests
move is_ancestor_or_same_capture to rustc_middle/ty
update names to reflect the closures
add FIXME
check that all captures are immutable borrows before returning
add surrounding if statement like the original
move var out of the loop and rename
Co-authored-by: Logan Mosier <logmosier@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Roxane Fruytier <roxane.fruytier@hotmail.com>
Unlike the other cases of this lint, there's no simple way to detect if
an old version of the relevant crate (`syn`) is in use. The `actix-web`
crate only depends on `pin-project` v1.0.0, so checking the version of
`actix-web` does not guarantee that a new enough version of
`pin-project` (and therefore `syn`) is in use.
Instead, we rely on the fact that virtually all of the regressed crates
are pinned to a pre-1.0 version of `pin-project`. When this is the case,
bumping the `actix-web` dependency will pull in the *latest* version of
`pin-project`, which has an explicit dependency on a newer v dependency
on a newer version of `syn`.
The lint message tells users to update `actix-web`, since that's what
they're most likely to have control over. We could potentially tell them
to run `cargo update -p syn`, but I think it's more straightforward to
suggest an explicit change to the `Cargo.toml`
The `actori-web` fork had its last commit over a year ago, and appears
to just be a renamed fork of `actix-web`. Therefore, I've removed the
`actori-web` check entirely - any crates that actually get broken can
simply update `syn` themselves.
Allow registering tool lints with `register_tool`
Previously, there was no way to add a custom tool prefix, even if the tool
itself had registered a lint:
```rust
#![feature(register_tool)]
#![register_tool(xyz)]
#![warn(xyz::my_lint)]
```
```
$ rustc unknown-lint.rs --crate-type lib
error[E0710]: an unknown tool name found in scoped lint: `xyz::my_lint`
--> unknown-lint.rs:3:9
|
3 | #![warn(xyz::my_lint)]
| ^^^
```
This allows opting-in to lints from other tools using `register_tool`.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66079#issuecomment-788589193, ``@chorman0773``
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Extend `proc_macro_back_compat` lint to `procedural-masquerade`
We now lint on *any* use of `procedural-masquerade` crate. While this
crate still exists, its main reverse dependency (`cssparser`) no longer
depends on it. Any crates still depending off should stop doing so, as
it only exists to support very old Rust versions.
If a crate actually needs to support old versions of rustc via
`procedural-masquerade`, then they'll just need to accept the warning
until we remove it entirely (at the same time as the back-compat hack).
The latest version of `procedural-masquerade` does work with the
latest rustc, but trying to check for the version seems like more
trouble than it's worth.
While working on this, I realized that the `proc-macro-hack` check was
never actually doing anything. The corresponding enum variant in
`proc-macro-hack` is named `Value` or `Nested` - it has never been
called `Input`. Due to a strange Crater issue, the Crater run that
tested adding this did *not* end up testing it - some of the crates that
would have failed did not actually have their tests checked, making it
seem as though the `proc-macro-hack` check was working.
The Crater issue is being discussed at
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/Nearly.20identical.20Crater.20runs.20processed.20a.20crate.20differently/near/230406661
Despite the `proc-macro-hack` check not actually doing anything, we
haven't gotten any reports from users about their build being broken.
I went ahead and removed it entirely, since it's clear that no one is
being affected by the `proc-macro-hack` regression in practice.
Make source-based code coverage compatible with MIR inlining
When codegenning code coverage use the instance that coverage data was
originally generated for, to ensure basic level of compatibility with
MIR inlining.
Fixes#83061
Emit error when trying to use assembler syntax directives in `asm!`
The `.intel_syntax` and `.att_syntax` assembler directives should not be used, in favor of not specifying a syntax for intel, and in favor of the explicit `att_syntax` option using the inline assembly options.
Closes#79869
Deprecate `intrinsics::drop_in_place` and `collections::Bound`, which accidentally weren't deprecated
Fixes#82080.
I've taken the liberty of updating the `since` values to 1.52, since an unobservable deprecation isn't much of a deprecation (even the detailed release notes never bothered to mention these deprecations).
As mentioned in the issue I'm *pretty* sure that using a type alias for `Bound` is semantically equivalent to the re-export; [the reference implies](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/type-aliases.html) that type aliases only observably differ from types when used on unit structs or tuple structs, whereas `Bound` is an enum.
Don't warn about old rustdoc lint names (temporarily)
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80527, rustdoc users have an unpleasant situation: they can either use the new tool lint names (`rustdoc::non_autolinks`) or they can use the old names (`non_autolinks`). If they use the tool lints, they get a hard error on stable compilers, because rustc rejects all tool names it doesn't recognize (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66079#issuecomment-788589193). If they use the old name, they get a warning to rename the lint to the new name. The only way to compile without warnings is to add `#[allow(renamed_removed_lints)]`, which defeats the whole point of the change: we *want* people to switch to the new name.
To avoid people silencing the lint and never migrating to the tool lint, this avoids warning about the old name, while still allowing you to use the new name. Once the new `rustdoc` tool name makes it to the stable channel, we can change these lints to warn again.
This adds the new lint functions `register_alias` and `register_ignored` - I didn't see an existing way to do this.
r? `@Manishearth` cc `@rust-lang/rustdoc`
More precise spans for HIR paths
`Ty::assoc_item` is lowered to `<Ty>::assoc_item` in HIR, but `Ty` got span from the whole path.
This PR fixes that, and adjusts some diagnostic code that relied on `Ty` having the whole path span.
This is a pre-requisite for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82868 (we cannot report suggestions like `Tr::assoc` -> `<dyn Tr>::assoc` with the current imprecise spans).
r? ````@estebank````
Previously, there was no way to add a custom tool prefix, even if the tool
itself had registered a lint:
```
#![feature(register_tool)]
#![register_tool(xyz)]
#![warn(xyz::my_lint)]
```
```
$ rustc unknown-lint.rs --crate-type lib
error[E0710]: an unknown tool name found in scoped lint: `xyz::my_lint`
--> unknown-lint.rs:3:9
|
3 | #![warn(xyz::my_lint)]
| ^^^
```
This allows opting-in to lints from other tools using `register_tool`.
2229: Handle patterns within closures correctly when `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled
This PR fixes several issues related to handling patterns within closures when `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled.
1. Matching is always considered a use of the place, even with `_` patterns
2. Compiler ICE when capturing fields in closures through `let` assignments
To do so, we
- Introduced new Fake Reads
- Delayed use of `Place` in favor of `PlaceBuilder`
- Ensured that `PlaceBuilder` can be resolved before attempting to extract `Place` in any of the pattern matching code
Closes rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/27
Closes rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/24
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Right now, rustdoc users have an unpleasant situation: they can either
use the new tool lint names (`rustdoc::non_autolinks`) or they can use
the old names (`non_autolinks`). If they use the tool lints, they get a
hard error on stable compilers, because rustc rejects all tool names it
doesn't recognize. If they use the old name, they get a warning to
rename the lint to the new name. The only way to compile without
warnings is to add `#[allow(renamed_removed_lints)]`, which defeats the
whole point of the change: we *want* people to switch to the new name.
To avoid people silencing the lint and never migrating to the tool lint,
this avoids warning about the old name, while still allowing you to use
the new name. Once the new `rustdoc` tool name makes it to the stable
channel, we can change these lints to warn again.
This adds the new lint functions `register_alias` and `register_ignored`
- I didn't see an existing way to do this.
Use delay_span_bug instead of panic in layout_scalar_valid_range
#83054 introduced validation of scalar range attributes, but panicking
code that uses the attribute remained reachable. Use `delay_span_bug`
instead to avoid the ICE.
Fixes#83180.
Allow rustdoc to handle asm! of foreign architectures
This allows rustdoc to process code containing `asm!` for architectures other than the current one. Since this never reaches codegen, we just replace target-specific registers and register classes with a dummy one.
Fixes#82869
Add a `min_type_alias_impl_trait` feature gate
This new feature gate only permits type alias impl trait to be constrained by function and trait method return types. All other possible constraining sites like const/static types, closure return types and binding types are now forbidden and gated under the `type_alias_impl_trait` and `impl_trait_in_bindings` feature gates (which are both marked as incomplete, as they have various ways to ICE the compiler or cause query cycles where they shouldn't).
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This is best reviewed commit-by-commit
83054 introduced validation of scalar range attributes, but panicking
code that uses the attribute remained reachable. Use `delay_span_bug`
instead to avoid the ICE.
We now lint on *any* use of `procedural-masquerade` crate. While this
crate still exists, its main reverse dependency (`cssparser`) no longer
depends on it. Any crates still depending off should stop doing so, as
it only exists to support very old Rust versions.
If a crate actually needs to support old versions of rustc via
`procedural-masquerade`, then they'll just need to accept the warning
until we remove it entirely (at the same time as the back-compat hack).
The latest version of `procedural-masquerade` does not work with the
latest rustc, but trying to check for the version seems like more
trouble than it's worth.
While working on this, I realized that the `proc-macro-hack` check was
never actually doing anything. The corresponding enum variant in
`proc-macro-hack` is named `Value` or `Nested` - it has never been
called `Input`. Due to a strange Crater issue, the Crater run that
tested adding this did *not* end up testing it - some of the crates that
would have failed did not actually have their tests checked, making it
seem as though the `proc-macro-hack` check was working.
The Crater issue is being discussed at
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/Nearly.20identical.20Crater.20runs.20processed.20a.20crate.20differently/near/230406661
Despite the `proc-macro-hack` check not actually doing anything, we
haven't gotten any reports from users about their build being broken.
I went ahead and removed it entirely, since it's clear that no one is
being affected by the `proc-macro-hack` regression in practice.
Denis Drakhnia
Mark Rousskov
Deadbeef
Felix S. Klock II
bors
Dylan DPC
Oli Scherer
Jennifer Wills
SparrowLii
Aaron Hill
Vadim Petrochenkov
Yuki Okushi
Ivan Tham
Joshua Nelson
Tomasz Miąsko
Roxane