We used to make the upvar types in the closure `==` but that was
stronger than we needed. Subtyping suffices, since we are copying the
upvar value into the closure field. This in turn allows us to infer
smaller lifetimes in captured values in some cases (like the example
here), avoiding errors.
Add filtering options to `rustc_on_unimplemented`
- Add filtering options to `rustc_on_unimplemented` for local traits, filtering on `Self` and type arguments.
- Add a way to provide custom notes.
- Tweak binops text.
- Add filter to detect wether `Self` is local or belongs to another crate.
- Add filter to `Iterator` diagnostic for `&str`.
Partly addresses #44755 with a different syntax, as a first approach. Fixes#46216, fixes#37522, CC #34297, #46806.
Tweak presentation on lifetime trait mismatch
- On trait/impl method discrepancy, add label pointing at trait signature.
- Point only at method definition when referring to named lifetimes on lifetime mismatch.
- When the sub and sup expectations are the same, tweak the output to avoid repeated spans.
Fix#30790, CC #18759.
- filter error on the evaluated value of `Self`
- filter error on the evaluated value of the type arguments
- add argument to include custom note in diagnostic
- allow the parser to parse `Self` when processing attributes
- add custom message to binops
- On mismatch between impl and trait method, point at the trait
signature.
- Point only at the method signature instead of the whole body on
trait/impl mismatch errors.
When encountering a method call for an ADT that doesn't have any
implementation of it, we search for traits that could be implemented
that do have that method. Filter out private non-local traits that would
not be able to be implemented.
This doesn't account for public traits that are in a private scope, but
works as a first approximation and is a more correct behavior than the
current one.
Use the proper term when using non-existing variant
When using a non-existing variant, function or associated item, refer to
the proper term, instead of defaulting to "associated item" in
diagnostics.
Fix#28972.
```
error[E0599]: no variant named `Quux` found for type `Foo` in the current scope
--> file.rs:7:9
|
7 | Foo::Quux(..) =>(),
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Prior to this PR, when we aborted because a "critical pass" failed, we
displayed the number of errors from that critical pass. While that's the
number of errors that caused compilation to abort in *that place*,
that's not what people really want to know. Instead, always report the
total number of errors, and don't bother to track the number of errors
from the last pass that failed.
This changes the compiler driver API to handle errors more smoothly,
and therefore is a compiler-api-[breaking-change].
Fixes#42793.
When the trait's span is available, it is already being used, add a
`note` for the cases where the span isn't available:
```
error[E0053]: method `fmt` has an incompatible type for trait
--> $DIR/trait_type.rs:17:4
|
17 | fn fmt(&self, x: &str) -> () { }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ types differ in mutability
|
= note: expected type `fn(&MyType, &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::result::Result<(), std::fmt::Error>`
found type `fn(&MyType, &str)`
error[E0050]: method `fmt` has 1 parameter but the declaration in trait `std::fmt::Display::fmt` has 2
--> $DIR/trait_type.rs:21:11
|
21 | fn fmt(&self) -> () { }
| ^^^^^ expected 2 parameters, found 1
|
= note: `fmt` from trait: `fn(&Self, &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::result::Result<(), std::fmt::Error>`
error[E0186]: method `fmt` has a `&self` declaration in the trait, but not in the impl
--> $DIR/trait_type.rs:25:4
|
25 | fn fmt() -> () { }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `&self` in impl
|
= note: `fmt` from trait: `fn(&Self, &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::result::Result<(), std::fmt::Error>`
error[E0046]: not all trait items implemented, missing: `fmt`
--> $DIR/trait_type.rs:28:1
|
28 | impl std::fmt::Display for MyType4 {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `fmt` in implementation
|
= note: `fmt` from trait: `fn(&Self, &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::result::Result<(), std::fmt::Error>`
```
When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for
example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message:
```
note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>`
```
Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
tinaun
Taylor Cramer
kennytm
Niko Matsakis
John Kåre Alsaker
Guillaume Gomez
Vadim Petrochenkov
Manish Goregaokar
bors
Esteban Küber
Oliver Schneider
Christopher Vittal
Ariel Ben-Yehuda
Eduard-Mihai Burtescu
Mark Simulacrum
Michael Kohl