Object-lifetime-default elision is distinct from other forms of
elision; it always refers to some enclosing lifetime *present in the
surrounding type* (e.g., `&dyn Bar` expands to `&'a (dyn Bar + 'a)`.
If there is no enclosing lifetime, then it expands to `'static`.
Therefore, in an `impl Trait<Item = dyn Bar>` setting, we don't expand
to create a lifetime parameter for the `dyn Bar + 'X` bound. It will
just be resolved to `'static`.
Annoyingly, the responsibility for this resolution is spread across
multiple bits of code right now (`middle::resolve_lifetimes`,
`lowering`). The lowering code knows that the default is for an object
lifetime, but it doesn't know what the correct result would be.
Probably this should be fixed, but what we do now is a surgical fix:
we have it generate a different result for elided lifetimes in a
object context, and then we can ignore those results when figuring out
the lifetimes that are captured in the opaque type.
Fix#58270, fix off-by-one error in error diagnostics.
This fixes#58270 by checking if two diagnostics overlap completely when we're calculating the line offset for each message.
This commit updates the test output for the updated NLL compare mode
that uses `-Z borrowck=migrate` rather than `-Z borrowck=mir`. The
previous commit changes `compiletest` and this commit only updates
`.nll.stderr` files.
* `ui/lifetimes/lifetime-errors/ex3-both-anon-regions-both-are-structs-4`
and `ex3-both-anon-regions-both-are-structs-3`
* `ui/lint/lint-group-style` and `lint-group-nonstandard-style`
use structured suggestion for "missing mut" label
Fixes#54133 for both NLL and non-NLL.
r? @estebank
I'm not super happy with the existing wording here, since it's now a suggestion. I wonder if the message would work better as something like "help: make binding mutable: `mut foo`"?
Also, are the `HELP` and `SUGGESTION` comments necessary?
[NLL] Suggest let binding
Closes#49821
Also adds an alternative to `explain_why_borrow_contains_point` that allows changing error messages based on the reason that will be given. This will also be useful for #51026, #51169 and maybe further changes to does not live long enough messages.
NOTE: I was careful to make each change in a manner that preserves the
existing diagnostic output (usually by ensuring that no lines were
added or removed). This means that the resulting source files are not
as nice to read as they were at the start. But we will have to review
these cases by hand anyway as follow-up work, so cleanup could
reasonably happen then (or not at all).
fix broken assertion in type_param
Nested generics (aka method generics) in trait methods don't have an
*additional* Self parameter in their own type parameter list (they have
a Self parameter in the parent generics), so don't try to check we're
correctly adjusting for it.
Fixes#46568.
r? @eddyb
Nested generics (aka method generics) in trait methods don't have an
*additional* Self parameter in their own type parameter list (they have
a Self parameter in the parent generics), so don't try to check we're
correctly adjusting for it.
Fixes#46568.
On "the parameter type `T` may not live long enough" error, point to the
parameter type suggesting lifetime bindings:
```
error[E0310]: the parameter type `T` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/lifetime-doesnt-live-long-enough.rs:28:5
|
27 | struct Foo<T> {
| - help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound `T: 'static`...
28 | foo: &'static T
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: ...so that the reference type `&'static T` does not outlive the data it points at
--> $DIR/lifetime-doesnt-live-long-enough.rs:28:5
|
28 | foo: &'static T
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
These give so many incorrect suggestions that having them is
detrimental to the user experience. The compiler should not be
suggesting changes to the code that are wrong - it is infuriating: not
only is the compiler telling you that _you don't understand_ borrowing,
_the compiler itself_ appears to not understand borrowing. It does not
inspire confidence.
When dealing with multiline spans that span few lines, show the complete
span instead of restricting to the first character of the first line.
For example, instead of:
```
% ./rustc foo.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> foo.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ^ trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
show
```
% ./rustc foo.rs
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` is not satisfied
--> foo.rs:13:9
|
13 | foo(1 + bar(x,
| ________^ starting here...
14 | | y),
| |_____________^ ...ending here: trait `{integer}: std::ops::Add<()>` not satisfied
|
```
Don't provide hint to add lifetime on impl items that implement a trait.
```rust
use std::str::FromStr;
pub struct Foo<'a> {
field: &'a str,
}
impl<'a> FromStr for Foo<'a> {
type Err = ();
fn from_str(path: &str) -> Result<Self, ()> {
Ok(Foo { field: path })
}
}
```
would give the following hint:
```nocode
help: consider using an explicit lifetime parameter as shown: fn from_str(path: &'a str) -> Result<Self, ()>
--> <anon>:9:5
|
9 | fn from_str(path: &str) -> Result<Self, ()> {
| ^
```
which is never correct, since then there will be a lifetime mismatch
between the impl and the trait.
Remove this hint for impl items that implement a trait.
Niko Matsakis
Matthew Jasper
memoryruins
Christopher Vittal
Mazdak Farrokhzad
Xavier Denis
varkor
Andy Russell
Vadim Petrochenkov
Mark Rousskov
Oliver Scherer
Felix S. Klock II
Esteban Küber
David Wood
Shotaro Yamada
Mikhail Modin
bors
toidiu
Basile Desloges
Matthias Krüger
Federico Poli
Guillaume Gomez
Ariel Ben-Yehuda
Alex Burka
Oliver Schneider
Eduard-Mihai Burtescu
Michael Kohl
Brian Anderson
Jonathan Turner