make MaybeUninit::as_(mut_)ptr const
I think it was just an oversight that they are not const yet.
I also changed their implementation as the old one created references to uninitialized memory.^^
Display elided lifetime for non-reference type in doc
In edition 2018 we encourage writing `<'_>` explicitly, so rustdoc should display like such as well.
Fixes#75225
~~Somehow when I run the compiled rustdoc using `cargo +stage2 doc` on other crates, it correctly produces `<'_>`, but I couldn't get the std doc to do the same with `./x.py doc --stage 2`. Might this be related to the recent change to x.py about how the doc is built?~~
Don't call a function in function-arguments-naked.rs
Fixes#75096
It's U.B. to use anything other than inline assmebling in a naked
function. Fortunately, the `#break` directive works fine without
anything in the function body.
Prevent `__rust_begin_short_backtrace` frames from being tail-call optimised away
I've stumbled across some situations where there (unexpectedly) was no `__rust_begin_short_backtrace` frame on the stack during unwinding.
On closer examination, it appeared that the calls to that function had been tail-call optimised away.
This PR follows [@bjorn3's suggestion on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Disabling.20tail.20call.20optimisation.3F/near/205699133), by adding calls to `black_box` that hint to rustc not to perform TCO.
Fixes#47429
instance: polymorphize upvar closures/generators
This PR modifies how instances are polymorphized so that closures and generators have any closures or generators captured within their upvars also polymorphized.
With the new symbol mangling, a fully polymorphised closure will produce the same symbol regardless of what it was instantiated with. However, when that polymorphised closure captures another closure as an upvar, then the type of that other closure in the upvar substitution wouldn't have been polymorphised. The other closure will still refer to the initial substitutions. Therefore, the polymorphised closure will end up hashing differently but producing the same symbol - triggering `assert_symbols_are_distinct` in MIR partitioning. The old mangling scheme had a hash at the end that meant this didn't happen (this would still have been an issue, we just didn't have a way to notice).
See [this Zulip discussion for further elaboration](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/216091-t-compiler.2Fwg-polymorphization/topic/symbol.20mangling.20v0.20.E2.9C.95.20polymorphisation/near/206152008).
r? @eddyb
cc @lcnr
This commit avoids unnecessary calls to `mk_closure` and `mk_generator`
by checking if the polymorphized substs match the original substs.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
This commit adds a `MAY_POLYMORPHIZE` which checks for closures and
generators so that polymorphization of substs does not need to traverse
every substs.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
By always polymorphizing substitutions, functions which take closures as
arguments (e.g. `impl Fn()`) can have fewer mono items when some of the
argument closures can be polymorphized.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
This commit modifies how instances are polymorphized so that closures
and generators have any closures or generators captured within their
upvars also polymorphized - this avoids symbol clashes with the new
symbol mangling scheme.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Check whether locals are too large instead of whether accesses into them are too large
Essentially this stops const prop from attempting to optimize
```rust
let mut x = [0_u8; 5000];
x[42] = 3;
```
I don't expect this to be a perf improvement without #73656 (which is also where the lack of this PR will be a perf regression).
r? @wesleywiser
rustc_ast: Stop using "string typing" for doc comment tokens
Explicitly store their kind and style retrieved during lexing in the `token::DocComment`.
Also don't "beautify" doc comments before converting them to `#[doc]` attributes when passing them to macros (both declarative and procedural).
The trimming of empty lines, lines containing only `*`s, etc is purely a rustdoc's job as a part of its presentation of doc strings to users, rustc must not do this and must pass tokens as precisely as possible internally.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #74774 (adds [*mut|*const] ptr::set_ptr_value)
- #75079 (Disallow linking to items with a mismatched disambiguator)
- #75203 (Make `IntoIterator` lifetime bounds of `&BTreeMap` match with `&HashMap` )
- #75227 (Fix ICE when using asm! on an unsupported architecture)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Make `IntoIterator` lifetime bounds of `&BTreeMap` match with `&HashMap`
This is a pretty small change on the lifetime bounds of `IntoIterator` implementations of both `&BTreeMap` and `&mut BTreeMap`. This is loosening the lifetime bounds, so more code should be accepted with this PR. This is lifetime bounds will still be implicit since we have `type Item = (&'a K, &'a V);` in the implementation. This change will make the HashMap and BTreeMap share the same signature, so we can share the same function/trait with both HashMap and BTreeMap in the code.
Fixes#74034.
r? @dtolnay hey, I was touching this file on my previous PR and wanted to fix this on the way. Would you mind taking a look at this, or redirecting it if you are busy?
adds [*mut|*const] ptr::set_ptr_value
I propose the addition of these two functions to `*mut T` and `*const T`, respectively. The motivation for this is primarily byte-wise pointer arithmetic on (potentially) fat pointers, i.e. for types with a `T: ?Sized` bound. A concrete use-case has been discussed in [this](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/byte-wise-fat-pointer-arithmetic/12739) thread.
TL;DR: Currently, byte-wise pointer arithmetic with potentially fat pointers in not possible in either stable or nightly Rust without making assumptions about the layout of fat pointers, which is currently still an implementation detail and not formally stabilized. This PR adds one function to `*mut T` and `*const T` each, allowing to circumvent this restriction without exposing any internal implementation details.
One possible alternative would be to add specific byte-wise pointer arithmetic functions to the two pointer types in addition to the already existing count-wise functions. However, I feel this fairly niche use case does not warrant adding a whole set of new functions like `add_bytes`, `offset_bytes`, `wrapping_offset_bytes`, etc. (times two, one for each pointer type) to `libcore`.
Change the type of `AssertModuleSource::available_cgus`.
It's currently a `BTreeSet<Symbol>`, which is a strange type. The
`BTreeSet` suggests that element order is important, but `Symbol` is a
type whose ordering isn't useful to humans. The ordering of the
collection only manifests in an obscure error message ("no module named
`...`") that doesn't appear in any tests.
This commit changes the `Symbol` to a `String`, which is more
typical.
