This does the bare minimum to make registration of error codes work again. After this patch, every call to `span_err!` with an error code gets that error code validated against a list in that crate and a new tidy script `errorck.py` validates that no error codes are duplicated globally.
There are further improvements to be made yet, detailed in #19624.
r? @nikomatsakis
The script is intended as a tool for doing every sort of verifications
amenable to Rustdoc's HTML output. For example, link checkers would go
to this script. It already parses HTML into a document tree form (with
a slight caveat), so future tests can make use of it.
As an example, relevant `rustdoc-*` run-make tests have been updated
to use `htmldocck.py` and got their `verify.sh` removed. In the future
they may go to a dedicated directory with htmldocck running by default.
The detailed explanation of test scripts is provided as a docstring of
htmldocck.
cc #19723
This pulls all of our long-form documentation into a single document,
nicknamed "the book" and formally titled "The Rust Programming
Language."
A few things motivated this change:
* People knew of The Guide, but not the individual Guides. This merges
them together, helping discoverability.
* You can get all of Rust's longform documentation in one place, which
is nice.
* We now have rustbook in-tree, which can generate this kind of
documentation. While its style is basic, the general idea is much
better: a table of contents on the left-hand side.
* Rather than a almost 10,000-line guide.md, there are now smaller files
per section.
This removes a large array of deprecated functionality, regardless of how
recently it was deprecated. The purpose of this commit is to clean out the
standard libraries and compiler for the upcoming alpha release.
Some notable compiler changes were to enable warnings for all now-deprecated
command line arguments (previously the deprecated versions were silently
accepted) as well as removing deriving(Zero) entirely (the trait was removed).
The distribution no longer contains the libtime or libregex_macros crates. Both
of these have been deprecated for some time and are available externally.
Enable parallel codegen (2 units) by default when --opt-level is 0 or 1. This
gives a minor speedup on large crates (~10%), with only a tiny slowdown (~2%)
for small ones (which usually build in under a second regardless). The current
default (no parallelization) is used when the user requests optimization
(--opt-level 2 or 3), and when the user has enabled LTO (which is incompatible
with parallel codegen).
This commit also changes the rust build system to use parallel codegen
when appropriate. This means codegen-units=4 for stage0 always, and
also for stage1 and stage2 when configured with --disable-optimize.
(Other settings use codegen-units=1 for stage1 and stage2, to get
maximum performance for release binaries.) The build system also sets
codegen-units=1 for compiletest tests (compiletest does its own
parallelization) and uses the same setting as stage2 for crate tests.
----
To reproduce issue on commit ba246100ca
it does not suffice to add just `check-build-compiletest` to
`check-secondary`; one must also ensure that `check-build-compiletest`
precedes the satisification of the `check` rule.
Otherwise hidden dependencies of `compiletest` would end up getting
satisfied when make builds `rustc` at each stage in order to
eventually run `check-stage2`.
So to handle that I moved `check-secondary` before `check` in the
`check-all` rule that bors uses, and for good measure, I also put
`check-build-compiltest` at the front of the `check-secondary` rule's
dependencies.
My understanding is that running `check-secondary` should be
relatively cheap, and thus such a reordering will not hurt bors.
----
Fix#17883.
We'll use this to run a subset of the test suite onto a dedicated
bot.
This puts the grammar tests and the pretty-printer tests under
check-secondary. It leanves the pretty tests under plain `check`
for now, until the new bot is added to take over.
Because check-secondary is not run as part of `make check` there
will be a set of tests that most users never run and are only
checked by bors. I think this will be ok because grammar tests
should rarely regress, and the people regressing such tests
should have the fortitude to deal with it.
Brian Anderson