LLVM is unable to determine this for most cases.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2034 needs to land upstream before
this is going to have an effect. It's harmless to start generating the
expect hint now.
When invoked with the --rust-path-hack flag, rustpkg was correctly building
the package into the default workspace (and not into the build/ subdirectory of the
parent directory of the source directory), but not correctly putting the output
for any dependencies into the default workspace as well.
Spotted by Jack.
I'm not entirely sure why this is happening, but the server task is never seeing
the second send of the client task, and this test will very reliably fail to
complete on windows.
It was pretty much a miracle that these tests were ever passing. They would
never have passed in the single threaded case because only one sigint in the
tests is ever generated, but when run in parallel two sigints will be generated.
The patch replaces mkdir -p dir with (umask 022 && mkdir -p dir). Sadly mkdir -m 755 -p dir does not work if it creates parent directories as those parents will have umask permissions, not the one passed with -m option.
Closes#10046
This drops more of the old C++ runtime to rather be written in rust. A few
features were lost along the way, but hopefully not too many. The main loss is
that there are no longer backtraces associated with allocations (rust doesn't
have a way of acquiring those just yet). Other than that though, I believe that
the rest of the debugging utilities made their way over into rust.
Closes#8704
This optimizes the `home_for_io` code path by requiring fewer scheduler
operations in some situtations.
When moving to your home scheduler, this no longer forces a context switch if
you're already on the home scheduler. Instead, the homing code now simply pins
you to your current scheduler (making it so you can't be stolen away). If you're
not on your home scheduler, then we context switch away, sending you to your
home scheduler.
When the I/O operation is done, then we also no longer forcibly trigger a
context switch. Instead, the action is cased on whether the task is homed or
not. If a task does not have a home, then the task is re-flagged as not having a
home and no context switch is performed. If a task is homed to the current
scheduler, then we don't do anything, and if the task is homed to a foreign
scheduler, then it's sent along its merry way.
I verified that there are about a third as many `write` syscalls done in print
operations now. Libuv uses write to implement async handles, and the homing
before and after each I/O operation was triggering a write on these async
handles. Additionally, using the terrible benchmark of printing 10k times in a
loop, this drives the runtime from 0.6s down to 0.3s (yay!).
This optimizes the `home_for_io` code path by requiring fewer scheduler
operations in some situtations.
When moving to your home scheduler, this no longer forces a context switch if
you're already on the home scheduler. Instead, the homing code now simply pins
you to your current scheduler (making it so you can't be stolen away). If you're
not on your home scheduler, then we context switch away, sending you to your
home scheduler.
When the I/O operation is done, then we also no longer forcibly trigger a
context switch. Instead, the action is cased on whether the task is homed or
not. If a task does not have a home, then the task is re-flagged as not having a
home and no context switch is performed. If a task is homed to the current
scheduler, then we don't do anything, and if the task is homed to a foreign
scheduler, then it's sent along its merry way.
I verified that there are about a third as many `write` syscalls done in print
operations now. Libuv uses write to implement async handles, and the homing
before and after each I/O operation was triggering a write on these async
handles. Additionally, using the terrible benchmark of printing 10k times in a
loop, this drives the runtime from 0.6s down to 0.3s (yay!).
Almost all languages provide some form of buffering of the stdout stream, and
this commit adds this feature for rust. A handle to stdout is lazily initialized
in the Task structure as a buffered owned Writer trait object. The buffer
behavior depends on where stdout is directed to. Like C, this line-buffers the
stream when the output goes to a terminal (flushes on newlines), and also like C
this uses a fixed-size buffer when output is not directed at a terminal.
We may decide the fixed-size buffering is overkill, but it certainly does reduce
write syscall counts when piping output elsewhere. This is a *huge* benefit to
any code using logging macros or the printing macros. Formatting emits calls to
`write` very frequently, and to have each of them backed by a write syscall was
very expensive.
In a local benchmark of printing 10000 lines of "what" to stdout, I got the
following timings:
when | terminal | redirected
----------|---------------|--------
before | 0.575s | 0.525s
after | 0.197s | 0.013s
C | 0.019s | 0.004s
I can also confirm that we're buffering the output appropriately in both
situtations. We're still far slower than C, but I believe much of that has to do
with the "homing" that all tasks due, we're still performing an order of
magnitude more write syscalls than C does.
Almost all languages provide some form of buffering of the stdout stream, and
this commit adds this feature for rust. A handle to stdout is lazily initialized
in the Task structure as a buffered owned Writer trait object. The buffer
behavior depends on where stdout is directed to. Like C, this line-buffers the
stream when the output goes to a terminal (flushes on newlines), and also like C
this uses a fixed-size buffer when output is not directed at a terminal.
We may decide the fixed-size buffering is overkill, but it certainly does reduce
write syscall counts when piping output elsewhere. This is a *huge* benefit to
any code using logging macros or the printing macros. Formatting emits calls to
`write` very frequently, and to have each of them backed by a write syscall was
very expensive.
In a local benchmark of printing 10000 lines of "what" to stdout, I got the
following timings:
when | terminal | redirected
----------------------------------
before | 0.575s | 0.525s
after | 0.197s | 0.013s
C | 0.019s | 0.004s
I can also confirm that we're buffering the output appropriately in both
situtations. We're still far slower than C, but I believe much of that has to do
with the "homing" that all tasks due, we're still performing an order of
magnitude more write syscalls than C does.
This is more progress towards #9128 and all its related tree of issues. This implements a new `BasicLoop` on top of pthreads synchronization primitives (wrapped in `LittleLock`). This also removes the wonky `callback_ms` function from the interface of the event loop.
After #9901 is taking forever to land, I'm going to try to do all this runtime work in much smaller chunks than before. Right now this will not work unless #9901 lands first, but I'm close to landing it (hopefully), and I wanted to go ahead and get this reviewed before throwing it at bors later on down the road.
This "pausible idle callback" is also a bit of a weird idea, but it wasn't as difficult to implement as callback_ms so I'm more semi-ok with it.
It's not guaranteed that there will always be an event loop to run, and this
implementation will serve as an incredibly basic one which does not provide any
I/O, but allows the scheduler to still run.
cc #9128
Palmer Cox
Daniel Micay
Tim Chevalier
Alex Crichton
bors
Huon Wilson
Joshua Yanovski
Brian Anderson
Jason Toffaletti
Seo Sanghyeon
Luqman Aden