Add regression test for TAIT lifetime inference (issue #55099)
Fixes#55099
The minimized reproducer in issue #55099 now compiles successfully.
This commit adds a regression test for it.
codegen/mir: support polymorphic `InstanceDef`s
cc #69925
This PR modifies the use of `subst_and_normalize_erasing_regions` on parts of the MIR bodies returned from `instance_mir`, so that `InstanceDef::CloneShim` and `InstanceDef::DropGlue` (where there is a type) do not perform substitutions. This avoids double substitutions and enables polymorphic `InstanceDef`s.
r? @eddyb
cc @nikomatsakis
Clarify the relationship between `forget()` and `ManuallyDrop`.
As discussed on reddit, this commit addresses two issues with the
documentation of `mem::forget()`:
* The documentation of `mem::forget()` can confuse the reader because of the
discrepancy between usage examples that show correct usage and the
accompanying text which speaks of the possibility of double-free. The
text that says "if the panic occurs before `mem::forget` was called"
refers to a variant of the second example that was never shown, modified
to use `mem::forget` instead of `ManuallyDrop`. Ideally the documentation
should show both variants, so it's clear what it's talking about.
Also, the double free could be fixed just by placing `mem::forget(v)`
before the construction of `s`. Since the lifetimes of `s` and `v`
wouldn't overlap, there would be no point where panic could cause a double
free. This could be mentioned, and contrasted against the more robust fix
of using `ManuallyDrop`.
* This sentence seems unjustified: "For some types, operations such as
passing ownership (to a funcion like `mem::forget`) requires them to
actually be fully owned right now [...]". Unlike C++, Rust has no move
constructors, its moves are (possibly elided) bitwise copies. Even if you
pass an invalid object to `mem::forget`, no harm should come to pass
because `mem::forget` consumes the object and exists solely to prevent
drop, so there no one left to observe the invalid state state.
The memory fences used previously in Arc implementation are not properly
understood by ThreadSanitizer as synchronization primitives. This had
unfortunate effect where running any non-trivial program compiled with
`-Z sanitizer=thread` would result in numerous false positives.
Replace acquire fences with acquire loads when using ThreadSanitizer to
address the issue.
The manual implementation of PartialEq, Eq and Hash for RangeInclusive was functionally equivalent to a derived implementation.
This change removes the manual implementation and adds the respective derives.
A side effect of this change is that the derives also add implementations for StructuralPartialEq and StructuralEq, which enables RangeInclusive to be used in const generics.
Extend search
I realized that when looking for "struct:String" in the rustdoc search for example, the "in arguments" and "returned" tabs were always empty. After some investigation, I realized it was because we only provided the name, and not the type, making it impossible to pass the "type filtering" check.
To resolve this, I added the type alongside the name. Note for the future: we could improve this by instead only registering the path id and use the path dictionary directly. The only problem with that solution (which I already tested) is that it becomes complicated for types in other crates. It'd force us to handle both case with an id and a case with `(name, type)`. I found the current PR big enough to not want to provide it directly. However, I think this is definitely worth it to make it work this way in the future.
About the two tests I added: they don't have much interest except checking that we actually have something returned in the search in the cases of a type filtering with and without literal search.
I also had to update a bit the test script to add the new locally global (haha) variable I created (`NO_TYPE_FILTER`). I added this variable to make the code easier to read than just "-1".
r? @kinnison
cc @ollie27
As discussed on reddit, this commit addresses two issues with the
documentation of `mem::forget()`:
* The documentation of `mem::forget()` can confuse the reader because of the
discrepancy between usage examples that show correct usage and the
accompanying text which speaks of the possibility of double-free. The
text that says "if the panic occurs before `mem::forget` was called"
refers to a variant of the second example that was never shown, modified
to use `mem::forget` instead of `ManuallyDrop`. Ideally the documentation
should show both variants, so it's clear what it's talking about.
Also, the double free could be fixed just by placing `mem::forget(v)`
before the construction of `s`. Since the lifetimes of `s` and `v`
wouldn't overlap, there would be no point where panic could cause a double
free. This could be mentioned, and contrasted against the more robust fix
of using `ManuallyDrop`.
* This sentence seems unjustified: "For some types, operations such as
passing ownership (to a funcion like `mem::forget`) requires them to
actually be fully owned right now [...]". Unlike C++, Rust has no move
constructors, its moves are (possibly elided) bitwise copies. Even if you
pass an invalid object to `mem::forget`, no harm should come to pass
because `mem::forget` consumes the object and exists solely to prevent
drop, so there no one left to observe the invalid state state.
rustc: use LocalDefId instead of DefIndex where possible.
That is, wherever `DefIndex` always referred to a "def" in the local crate, I replaced it with `LocalDefId`.
While `LocalDefId` already existed, it wasn't used a lot, but I hope I'm on the right track.
Unresolved questions:
* [x] ~~should `LocalDefId` implement `rustc_index::Idx`?~~
* ~~this would get rid of a couple more `DefIndex` uses~~
* [x] ~~should `LocalDefId` be encoded/decoded as just a `DefIndex`?~~
* ~~right now it's a bit messy, `LocalDefId` encodes/decodes like `DefId`~~
* [x] ~~should `DefId::assert_local` be named something else, like `expect_local`?~~
A future PR should change `tcx.hir().local_def_id(...)` to return `LocalDefId` instead of `DefId`, as changing it in this PR would be too noisy.
r? @michaelwoerister cc @nikomatsakis @petrochenkov @Zoxc
