Improve unresolved use error message
"use of undeclared type or module `foo`" doesn't mention that it could be a crate.
This error can happen when users forget to add a dependency to `Cargo.toml`, so I think it's important to mention that it could be a missing crate.
I've used a heuristic based on Rust's naming conventions. It complains about an unknown type if the ident starts with an upper-case letter, and crate or module otherwise. It seems to work very well. The expanded error help covers both an unknown type and a missing crate case.
Add `-Z combine_cgu` flag
Introduce a compiler option to let rustc combines all regular CGUs into a single one at the end of compilation.
Part of Issue #64191
make `ConstEvaluatable` more strict
relevant zulip discussion: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/146212-t-compiler.2Fconst-eval/topic/.60ConstEvaluatable.60.20generic.20functions/near/204125452
Let's see how much this impacts. Depending on how this goes this should probably be a future compat warning.
Short explanation: we currently forbid anonymous constants which depend on generic types, e.g. `[0; std::mem::size_of::<T>]` currently errors.
We previously checked this by evaluating the constant and returned an error if that failed. This however allows things like
```rust
const fn foo<T>() -> usize {
if std::mem::size_of::<*mut T>() < 8 { // size of *mut T does not depend on T
std::mem::size_of::<T>()
} else {
8
}
}
fn test<T>() {
let _ = [0; foo::<T>()];
}
```
which is a backwards compatibility hazard. This also has worrying interactions with mir optimizations (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74491#issuecomment-661890421) and intrinsics (#74538).
r? `@oli-obk` `@eddyb`
Add help note to unconstrained const parameter
Resolves#68366, since it is currently intended behaviour.
If demonstrating `T -> U` is injective, there should be an additional word that it is not **yet** supported.
r? @lcnr
remove public visibility previously needed for rustfmt
`submod_path_from_attr` in rustc_expand::module was previously public because it was also consumed by rustfmt. However, we've done a bit of refactoring in rustfmt and no longer need to use this function.
This changes the visibility to the parent mod as was originally going to be done before the rustfmt dependency was realized (c189565edc (diff-cd1b379893bae95f7991d5a3f3c6d337R201))
Do not promote &mut of a non-ZST ever
Since ~pre-1.0~ 1.36, we have accepted code like this:
```rust
static mut TEST: &'static mut [i32] = {
let x = &mut [1,2,3];
x
};
```
I tracked it back to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/21744, but unfortunately could not find any discussion or RFC that would explain why we thought this was a good idea. And it's not, it breaks all sorts of things -- see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75556.
To fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75556, we have to stop promoting non-ZST mutable references no matter the context, which is what this PR does. It's a breaking change.
Notice that this still works, since it does not rely on promotion:
```rust
static mut TEST: &'static mut [i32] = &mut [0,1,2];
```
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
Add derive macro for specifying diagnostics using attributes.
Introduces `#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]`, a derive macro for specifying structs that can be converted to Diagnostics using directions given by attributes on the struct and its fields. Currently, the following attributes have been implemented:
- `#[code = "..."]` -- this sets the Diagnostic's error code, and must be provided on the struct iself (ie, not on a field). Equivalent to calling `code`.
- `#[message = "..."]` -- this sets the Diagnostic's primary error message.
- `#[label = "..."]` -- this must be applied to fields of type `Span`, and is equivalent to `span_label`
- `#[suggestion(..)]` -- this allows a suggestion message to be supplied. This attribute must be applied to a field of type `Span` or `(Span, Applicability)`, and is equivalent to calling `span_suggestion`. Valid arguments are:
- `message = "..."` -- this sets the suggestion message.
- (Optional) `code = "..."` -- this suggests code for the suggestion. Defaults to empty.
`suggestion`also comes with other variants: `#[suggestion_short(..)]`, `#[suggestion_hidden(..)]` and `#[suggestion_verbose(..)]` which all take the same keys.
Within the strings passed to each attribute, fields can be referenced without needing to be passed explicitly into the format string -- eg, `#[error = "{ident} already declared"] ` will set the error message to `format!("{} already declared", &self.ident)`. Any fields on the struct can be referenced in this way.
Additionally, for any of these attributes, Option fields can be used to only optionally apply the decoration -- for example:
```rust
#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]
#[code = "E0123"]
struct SomeKindOfError {
...
#[suggestion(message = "informative error message")]
opt_sugg: Option<(Span, Applicability)>
...
}
```
will not emit a suggestion if `opt_sugg` is `None`.
We plan on iterating on this macro further; this PR is a start.
Closes#61132.
r? `@oli-obk`
Support dataflow problems on arbitrary lattices
This PR implements last of the proposed extensions I mentioned in the design meeting for the original dataflow refactor. It extends the current dataflow framework to work with arbitrary lattices, not just `BitSet`s. This is a prerequisite for dataflow-enabled MIR const-propagation. Personally, I am skeptical of the usefulness of doing const-propagation pre-monomorphization, since many useful constants only become known after monomorphization (e.g. `size_of::<T>()`) and users have a natural tendency to hand-optimize the rest. It's probably worth exprimenting with, however, and others have shown interest cc `@rust-lang/wg-mir-opt.`
The `Idx` associated type is moved from `AnalysisDomain` to `GenKillAnalysis` and replaced with an associated `Domain` type that must implement `JoinSemiLattice`. Like before, each `Analysis` defines the "bottom value" for its domain, but can no longer override the dataflow join operator. Analyses that want to use set intersection must now use the `lattice::Dual` newtype. `GenKillAnalysis` impls have an additional requirement that `Self::Domain: BorrowMut<BitSet<Self::Idx>>`, which effectively means that they must use `BitSet<Self::Idx>` or `lattice::Dual<BitSet<Self::Idx>>` as their domain.
Most of these changes were mechanical. However, because a `Domain` is no longer always a powerset of some index type, we can no longer use an `IndexVec<BasicBlock, GenKillSet<A::Idx>>>` to store cached block transfer functions. Instead, we use a boxed `dyn Fn` trait object. I discuss a few alternatives to the current approach in a commit message.
The majority of new lines of code are to preserve existing Graphviz diagrams for those unlucky enough to have to debug dataflow analyses. I find these diagrams incredibly useful when things are going wrong and considered regressing them unacceptable, especially the pretty-printing of `MovePathIndex`s, which are used in many dataflow analyses. This required a parallel `fmt` trait used only for printing dataflow domains, as well as a refactoring of the `graphviz` module now that we cannot expect the domain to be a `BitSet`. Some features did have to be removed, such as the gen/kill display mode (which I didn't use but existed to mirror the output of the old dataflow framework) and line wrapping. Since I had to rewrite much of it anyway, I took the opportunity to switch to a `Visitor` for printing dataflow state diffs instead of using cursors, which are error prone for code that must be generic over both forward and backward analyses. As a side-effect of this change, we no longer have quadratic behavior when writing graphviz diagrams for backward dataflow analyses.
r? `@pnkfelix`
* Adds missing "tail" spans (spans that continue beyond the end of
overlapping spans)
* Adds a caret to highlight empty spans associated with MIR elements
that have a position, but otherwise would not be visible.
* Adds visual pointing brackets at the beginning and end of each span
Use ops::ControlFlow in rustc_data_structures::graph::iterate
Since I only know about this because you mentioned it,
r? @ecstatic-morse
If we're not supposed to use new `core` things in compiler for a while then feel free to close, but it felt reasonable to merge the two types since they're the same, and it might be convenient for people to use `?` in their traversal code.
(This doesn't do the type parameter swap; NoraCodes has signed up to do that one.)
Implementation of incompatible features error
Proposal of a new error: Incompatible features
This error should happen if two features which are not compatible are used together.
For now the only incompatible features are `const_generics` and `min_const_generics`
fixes#76280
Allow try blocks as the argument to return expressions
Fixes#76271
I don't think this needs to be edition-aware (phew) since `return try` in 2015 is also the start of an expression, just with a struct literal instead of a block (`return try { x: 4, y: 5 }`).
Account for version number in NtIdent hack
Issue #74616 tracks a backwards-compatibility hack for certain macros.
This has is implemented by hard-coding the filenames and macro names of
certain code that we want to continue to compile.
However, the initial implementation of the hack was based on the
directory structure when building the crate from its repository (e.g.
`js-sys/src/lib.rs`). When the crate is build as a dependency, it will
include a version number from the clone from the cargo registry (e.g.
`js-sys-0.3.17/src/lib.rs`), which would fail the check.
This commit modifies the backwards-compatibility hack to check that
desired crate name (`js-sys` or `time-macros-impl`) is a prefix of the
proper part of the path.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76070#issuecomment-687215646
for more details.
Disable use of `--eh-frame-hdr` on wasm32.
Set wasm32's `TargetOptions::eh_frame_header` to false so that we don't pass `--eh-frame-hdr` to `wasm-ld`, which doesn't support that flag.
r? @alexcrichton
Move jointness censoring to proc_macro
Proc-macro API currently exposes jointness in `Punct` tokens. That is,
`+` in `+one` is **non** joint.
Our lexer produces jointness info for all tokens, so we need to censor
it *somewhere*
Previously we did this in a lexer, but it makes more sense to do this
in a proc-macro server.
r? @petrochenkov
inliner: Check for codegen fn attributes compatibility
* Check for target features compatibility
* Check for no_sanitize attribute compatibility
Fixes#76259.
Refactor byteorder to std in rustc_middle
Use std::io::{Read, Write} and {to, from}_{le, be}_bytes methods in
order to remove byteorder from librustc_middle's dependency graph.
do not apply DerefMut on union field
This implements the part of [RFC 2514](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2514-union-initialization-and-drop.md) about `DerefMut`. Unlike described in the RFC, we only apply this warning specifically when doing `DerefMut` of a `ManuallyDrop` field; that is really the case we are worried about here.
@matthewjasper suggested I patch `convert_place_derefs_to_mutable` and `convert_place_op_to_mutable` for this, but I could not find anything to do in `convert_place_op_to_mutable` and this is sufficient to make the test pass. However, maybe there are some other cases this misses? I have no familiarity with this code.
This is a breaking change *in theory*, if someone used `ManuallyDrop<T>` in a union field and relied on automatic `DerefMut`. But on stable this means `T: Copy`, so the `ManuallyDrop` is rather pointless.
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55149
