As there’s no C++ runtime any more there’s really no point in having
anything but Rust tags being made.
I’ve also taken the liberty of excluding the compiler parts of this in
the `librust%,,` pattern substitution. Whether or not this is “correct”
will depend on whether you want tags for the compiler or for general
use. For myself, I want it for general use.
I’m not sure how much people use the tags files anyway. I definitely do,
but with Racer existing the tags files aren’t quite so necessary.
Remove superfluous parentheses from the CTAGS_LOCATIONS expression.
Fixes the following error when executing `make TAGS.vi`:
/bin/sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near unexpected token `)'
This commit removes the libuv and gyp submodules, as well as all build
infrastructure related to them.
For more context, see the [runtime removal
RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/230)
[breaking-change]
Largely, this is just being more specific about where tags get searched
for to remove external dependencies like src/llvm, which reduces the
number of tags *enormously* and significantly increases the usefulness
of the tags file as it is then focusing on 240K lines of Rust code
and 4.5K of C++ rather than just shy of 1M lines of C++ code (mostly
from LLVM) and another 100K lines of Rust tests and a diverse collection
of other languages.
src/rustllvm/RustWrapper.cpp and src/rustllvm/PassWrapper.cpp are
getting tags made, but I'm not sure if that's desirable or not. At
worst, it's not a significant wrong.
A future, desirable step is producing tags for just libstd and libextra
for the use of people using Rust-the-language rather than working on
Rust itself.
Chris Morgan
Felix S. Klock II
Steve Klabnik
Ben Noordhuis
Aaron Turon
Birunthan Mohanathas
Graydon Hoare
Niko Matsakis