Improve wording of "cannot multiply" type error
For example, if you had this code:
fn foo(x: i32, y: f32) -> f32 {
x * y
}
You would get this error:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
However, that's not usually how people describe multiplication. People
usually describe multiplication like how the division error words it:
error[E0277]: cannot divide `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x / y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 / f32`
|
= help: the trait `Div<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
So that's what this change does. It changes this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
To this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
Add Pin::static_ref, static_mut.
This adds `Pin::static_ref` and `Pin::static_mut`, which convert a static reference to a pinned static reference.
Static references are effectively already pinned, as what they refer to has to live forever and can never be moved.
---
Context: I want to update the `sys` and `sys_common` mutexes/rwlocks/condvars to use `Pin<&self>` in their functions, instead of only warning in the unsafety comments that they may not be moved. That should make them a little bit less dangerous to use. Putting such an object in a `static` (e.g. through `sys_common::StaticMutex`) fulfills the requirements about never moving it, but right now there's no safe way to get a `Pin<&T>` to a `static`. This solves that.
Move `slice::check_range` to `RangeBounds`
Since this method doesn't take a slice anymore (#76662), it makes more sense to define it on `RangeBounds`.
Questions:
- Should the new method be `assert_len` or `assert_length`?
For example, if you had this code:
fn foo(x: i32, y: f32) -> f32 {
x * y
}
You would get this error:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
However, that's not usually how people describe multiplication. People
usually describe multiplication like how the division error words it:
error[E0277]: cannot divide `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x / y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 / f32`
|
= help: the trait `Div<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
So that's what this change does. It changes this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
To this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
Deny broken intra-doc links in linkchecker
Since rustdoc isn't warning about these links, check for them manually.
This also fixes the broken links that popped up from the lint.
Add `str::{Split,RSplit,SplitN,RSplitN,SplitTerminator,RSplitTerminator,SplitInclusive}::as_str` methods
tl;dr this allows viewing unyelded part of str-split-iterators, like so:
```rust
let mut split = "Mary had a little lamb".split(' ');
assert_eq!(split.as_str(), "Mary had a little lamb");
split.next();
assert_eq!(split.as_str(), "had a little lamb");
split.by_ref().for_each(drop);
assert_eq!(split.as_str(), "");
```
--------------
This PR adds semi-identical `as_str` methods to most str-split-iterators with signatures like `&'_ Split<'a, P: Pattern<'a>> -> &'a str` (Note: output `&str` lifetime is bound to the `'a`, not the `'_`). The methods are similar to [`Chars::as_str`]
`SplitInclusive::as_str` is under `"str_split_inclusive_as_str"` feature gate, all other methods are under `"str_split_as_str"` feature gate.
Before this PR you had to sum `len`s of all yielded parts or collect into `String` to emulate `as_str`.
[`Chars::as_str`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/core/str/struct.Chars.html#method.as_str
Replace absolute paths with relative ones
Modern compilers allow reaching external crates
like std or core via relative paths in modules
outside of lib.rs and main.rs.
Stabilize slice_partition_at_index
This stabilizes slice_partition_at_index, including renaming `partition_at_index*` -> `select_nth_unstable*`.
Closes#55300
r? `@Amanieu`
This stabilizes the functionality in slice_partition_at_index,
but under the names `select_nth_unstable*`. The functions
`partition_at_index*` are left as deprecated, to be removed in
a later release.
Closes#55300
Allow generic parameters in intra-doc links
Fixes#62834.
---
The contents of the generics will be mostly ignored (except for warning
if fully-qualified syntax is used, which is currently unsupported in
intra-doc links - see issue #74563).
* Allow links like `Vec<T>`, `Result<T, E>`, and `Option<Box<T>>`
* Allow links like `Vec::<T>::new()`
* Warn on
* Unbalanced angle brackets (e.g. `Vec<T` or `Vec<T>>`)
* Missing type to apply generics to (`<T>` or `<Box<T>>`)
* Use of fully-qualified syntax (`<Vec as IntoIterator>::into_iter`)
* Invalid path separator (`Vec:<T>:new`)
* Too many angle brackets (`Vec<<T>>`)
* Empty angle brackets (`Vec<>`)
Note that this implementation *does* allow some constructs that aren't
valid in the actual Rust syntax, for example `Box::<T>new()`. That may
not be supported in rustdoc in the future; it is an implementation
detail.
Give `impl Trait` in a `const fn` its own feature gate
...previously it was gated under `#![feature(const_fn)]`.
I think we actually want to do this in all const-contexts? If so, this should be `#![feature(const_impl_trait)]` instead. I don't think there's any way to make use of `impl Trait` within a `const` initializer.
cc #77463
r? `@oli-obk`
Eliminate bounds checking in slice::Windows
This is how `<core::slice::Windows as Iterator>::next` looks right now:
```rust
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<&'a [T]> {
if self.size > self.v.len() {
None
} else {
let ret = Some(&self.v[..self.size]);
self.v = &self.v[1..];
ret
}
}
```
The line with `self.v = &self.v[1..];` relies on assumption that `self.v` is definitely not empty at this point. Else branch is taken when `self.size <= self.v.len()`, so `self.v` can be empty if `self.size` is zero. In practice, since `Windows` is never created directly but rather trough `[T]::windows` which panics when `size` is zero, `self.size` is never zero. However, the compiler doesn't know about this check, so it keeps the code which checks bounds and panics.
Using `NonZeroUsize` lets the compiler know about this invariant and reliably eliminate bounds checking without `unsafe` on `-O2`. Here is assembly of `Windows<'a, u32>::next` before and after this change ([goldbolt](https://godbolt.org/z/xrefzx)):
<details>
<summary>Before</summary>
```
example::next:
push rax
mov rcx, qword ptr [rdi + 8]
mov rdx, qword ptr [rdi + 16]
cmp rdx, rcx
jbe .LBB0_2
xor eax, eax
pop rcx
ret
.LBB0_2:
test rcx, rcx
je .LBB0_5
mov rax, qword ptr [rdi]
mov rsi, rax
add rsi, 4
add rcx, -1
mov qword ptr [rdi], rsi
mov qword ptr [rdi + 8], rcx
pop rcx
ret
.LBB0_5:
lea rdx, [rip + .L__unnamed_1]
mov edi, 1
xor esi, esi
call qword ptr [rip + core::slice::slice_index_order_fail@GOTPCREL]
ud2
.L__unnamed_2:
.ascii "./example.rs"
.L__unnamed_1:
.quad .L__unnamed_2
.asciz "\f\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\016\000\000\000\027\000\000"
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>After</summary>
```
example::next:
mov rcx, qword ptr [rdi + 8]
mov rdx, qword ptr [rdi + 16]
cmp rdx, rcx
jbe .LBB0_2
xor eax, eax
ret
.LBB0_2:
mov rax, qword ptr [rdi]
lea rsi, [rax + 4]
add rcx, -1
mov qword ptr [rdi], rsi
mov qword ptr [rdi + 8], rcx
ret
```
</details>
Note the lack of call to `core::slice::slice_index_order_fail` in second snippet.
#### Possible reasons _not_ to merge this PR:
* this changes the error message on panic in `[T]::windows`. However, AFAIK this messages are not covered by backwards compatibility policy.
Implement advance_by, advance_back_by for iter::Chain
Part of #77404.
This PR does two things:
- implement `Chain::advance[_back]_by` in terms of `advance[_back]_by` on `self.a` and `advance[_back]_by` on `self.b`
- change `Chain::nth[_back]` to use `advance[_back]_by` on `self.a` and `nth[_back]` on `self.b`
This ensures that `Chain::nth` can take advantage of an efficient `nth` implementation on the second iterator, in case it doesn't implement `advance_by`.
cc `@scottmcm` in case you want to review this
