Duration::zero() -> Duration::ZERO
In review for #72790, whether or not a constant or a function should be favored for `#![feature(duration_zero)]` was seen as an open question. In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73544#issuecomment-691701670 an invitation was opened to either stabilize the methods or propose a switch to the constant value, supplemented with reasoning. Followup comments suggested community preference leans towards the const ZERO, which would be reason enough.
ZERO also "makes sense" beside existing associated consts for Duration. It is ever so slightly awkward to have a series of constants specifying 1 of various units but leave 0 as a method, especially when they are side-by-side in code. It seems unintuitive for the one non-dynamic value (that isn't from Default) to be not-a-const, which could hurt discoverability of the associated constants overall. Elsewhere in `std`, methods for obtaining a constant value were even deprecated, as seen with [std::u32::min_value](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.u32.html#method.min_value).
Most importantly, ZERO costs less to use. A match supports a const pattern, but const fn can only be used if evaluated through a const context such as an inline `const { const_fn() }` or a `const NAME: T = const_fn()` declaration elsewhere. Likewise, while https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73544#issuecomment-691949373 notes `Duration::zero()` can optimize to a constant value, "can" is not "will". Only const contexts have a strong promise of such. Even without that in mind, the comment in question still leans in favor of the constant for simplicity. As it costs less for a developer to use, may cost less to optimize, and seems to have more of a community consensus for it, the associated const seems best.
r? ```@LukasKalbertodt```
The discussion seems to have resolved that this lint is a bit "noisy" in
that applying it in all places would result in a reduction in
readability.
A few of the trivial functions (like `Path::new`) are fine to leave
outside of closures.
The general rule seems to be that anything that is obviously an
allocation (`Box`, `Vec`, `vec![]`) should be in a closure, even if it
is a 0-sized allocation.
Add missing newline to error message of the default OOM hook
Currently the default OOM hook in libstd does not end the error message with a newline:
```
memory allocation of 4 bytes failedtimeout: the monitored command dumped core
/playground/tools/entrypoint.sh: line 11: 7 Aborted timeout --signal=KILL ${timeout} "$`@"`
```
https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=030d8223eb57dfe47ef157709aa26542
This is because the `fmt::Arguments` passed to `dumb_print()` does not end with a newline. All other calls to `dumb_print()` in libstd pass a `\n`-ended `fmt::Arguments` to `dumb_print()`. For example:
25f6938da4/library/std/src/sys_common/util.rs (L18)
I think the `\n` was forgotten in #51264.
This PR appends `\n` to the error string.
~~Note that I didn't add a test, because I didn't find tests for functions in ` library/std/src/alloc.rs` or a test that is similar to the test of this change would be.~~ *Edit: CI told me there is an existing test. Sorry.*
Workaround for "could not fully normalize" ICE
Workaround for "could not fully normalize" ICE (#78139) by removing the `needs_drop::<T>()` calls triggering it.
Corresponding beta PR: #78845Fixes#78139 -- the underlying bug is likely not fixed but we don't have another test case isolated for now, so closing.
fix some incorrect aliasing in the BTree
This line is wrong:
```
ptr::copy(slice.as_ptr().add(idx), slice.as_mut_ptr().add(idx + 1), slice.len() - idx);
```
When `slice.as_mut_ptr()` is called, that creates a mutable reference to the entire slice, which invalidates the raw pointer previously returned by `slice.as_ptr()`. (Miri currently misses this because raw pointers are not tracked properly.)
Cc ````````@ssomers````````
BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place
A second mistake in #77612 was to ignore the node module's rightful comment "this module doesn't care whether the entries are sorted". And there's a much simpler way to visit the keys in order, if you check this separately from a single pass checking everything.
r? ````````@Mark-Simulacrum````````
Define `fs::hard_link` to not follow symlinks.
POSIX leaves it [implementation-defined] whether `link` follows symlinks.
In practice, for example, on Linux it does not and on FreeBSD it does.
So, switch to `linkat`, so that we can pick a behavior rather than
depending on OS defaults.
Pick the option to not follow symlinks. This is somewhat arbitrary, but
seems the less surprising choice because hard linking is a very
low-level feature which requires the source and destination to be on
the same mounted filesystem, and following a symbolic link could end
up in a different mounted filesystem.
[implementation-defined]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/link.html
Refactor IntErrorKind to avoid "underflow" terminology
This PR is a continuation of #76455
# Changes
- `Overflow` renamed to `PosOverflow` and `Underflow` renamed to `NegOverflow` after discussion in #76455
- Changed some of the parsing code to return `InvalidDigit` rather than `Empty` for strings "+" and "-". https://users.rust-lang.org/t/misleading-error-in-str-parse-for-int-types/49178
- Carry the problem `char` with the `InvalidDigit` variant.
- Necessary changes were made to the compiler as it depends on `int_error_matching`.
- Redid tests to match on specific errors.
r? ```@KodrAus```
Stabilize `Poll::is_ready` and `is_pending` as const
Insta-stabilize the methods `is_ready` and `is_pending` of `std::task::Poll` as const, in the same way as [PR#76198](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76198).
Possible because of the recent stabilization of const control flow.
Part of #76225.
Use Intra-doc links for std::io::buffered
Helps with #75080. I used the implicit link style for intrinsics, as that was what `minnumf32` and others already had.
``@rustbot`` modify labels: T-doc, A-intra-doc-links
r? ``@jyn514``
`#![deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]` in sys/hermit
Partial fix of #73904.
This encloses ``unsafe`` operations in ``unsafe fn`` in ``sys/hermit``.
Some unsafe blocks are not well documented because some system-based functions lack documents.
Partially fix#55002, deprecate in another release
Co-authored-by: Ashley Mannix <kodraus@hey.com>
Update stable version for stabilize_spin_loop
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
Use better example for spinlock
As suggested by KodrAus
Remove renamed_spin_loop already available in master
Fix spin loop example
Change as_str → to_string in proc_macro::Ident::span() docs
There is no `as_str` function on Ident any more.
Also change it to an intra doc link while we're at it.
Move Vec UI tests to unit tests when possible
Helps with #76268.
I'm moving the tests using `Vec` or `VecDeque`.
````@rustbot```` modify labels: A-testsuite C-cleanup T-libs
