change the order of type arguments on ControlFlow
This allows ControlFlow<BreakType> which is much more ergonomic for common iterator combinator use cases.
Addresses one component of #75744
Check for exhaustion in RangeInclusive::contains and slicing
When a range has finished iteration, `is_empty` returns true, so it
should also be the case that `contains` returns false.
Fixes#77941.
add `insert` to `Option`
This removes a cause of `unwrap` and code complexity.
This allows replacing
```
option_value = Some(build());
option_value.as_mut().unwrap()
```
with
```
option_value.insert(build())
```
It's also useful in contexts not requiring the mutability of the reference.
Here's a typical cache example:
```
let checked_cache = cache.as_ref().filter(|e| e.is_valid());
let content = match checked_cache {
Some(e) => &e.content,
None => {
cache = Some(compute_cache_entry());
// unwrap is OK because we just filled the option
&cache.as_ref().unwrap().content
}
};
```
It can be changed into
```
let checked_cache = cache.as_ref().filter(|e| e.is_valid());
let content = match checked_cache {
Some(e) => &e.content,
None => &cache.insert(compute_cache_entry()).content,
};
```
*(edited: I removed `insert_with`)*
This removes a cause of `unwrap` and code complexity.
This allows replacing
```
option_value = Some(build());
option_value.as_mut().unwrap()
```
with
```
option_value.insert(build())
```
or
```
option_value.insert_with(build)
```
It's also useful in contexts not requiring the mutability of the reference.
Here's a typical cache example:
```
let checked_cache = cache.as_ref().filter(|e| e.is_valid());
let content = match checked_cache {
Some(e) => &e.content,
None => {
cache = Some(compute_cache_entry());
// unwrap is OK because we just filled the option
&cache.as_ref().unwrap().content
}
};
```
It can be changed into
```
let checked_cache = cache.as_ref().filter(|e| e.is_valid());
let content = match checked_cache {
Some(e) => &e.content,
None => &cache.insert_with(compute_cache_entry).content,
};
```
Doc formating consistency between slice sort and sort_unstable, and big O notation consistency
Updated documentation for slice sorting methods to be consistent between stable and unstable versions, which just ended up being minor formatting differences.
I also went through and updated any doc comments with big O notation to be consistent with #74010 by italicizing them rather than having them in a code block.
Fixing escaping to ensure generation of welformed json.
doc tests' json name have a filename in them. When json test output is asked for on windows currently produces invalid json.
Tracking issue for json test output: #49359
Implement TryFrom between NonZero types.
This will instantly be stable, as trait implementations for stable types and traits can not be `#[unstable]`.
Closes#77258.
@rustbot modify labels: +T-libs
Improve wording of "cannot multiply" type error
For example, if you had this code:
fn foo(x: i32, y: f32) -> f32 {
x * y
}
You would get this error:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
However, that's not usually how people describe multiplication. People
usually describe multiplication like how the division error words it:
error[E0277]: cannot divide `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x / y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 / f32`
|
= help: the trait `Div<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
So that's what this change does. It changes this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `f32` to `i32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
To this:
error[E0277]: cannot multiply `i32` by `f32`
--> src/lib.rs:2:7
|
2 | x * y
| ^ no implementation for `i32 * f32`
|
= help: the trait `Mul<f32>` is not implemented for `i32`
Add Pin::static_ref, static_mut.
This adds `Pin::static_ref` and `Pin::static_mut`, which convert a static reference to a pinned static reference.
Static references are effectively already pinned, as what they refer to has to live forever and can never be moved.
---
Context: I want to update the `sys` and `sys_common` mutexes/rwlocks/condvars to use `Pin<&self>` in their functions, instead of only warning in the unsafety comments that they may not be moved. That should make them a little bit less dangerous to use. Putting such an object in a `static` (e.g. through `sys_common::StaticMutex`) fulfills the requirements about never moving it, but right now there's no safe way to get a `Pin<&T>` to a `static`. This solves that.
Wrapping intrinsics doc links update.
The links in the wrapping intrinsics docs now refer to the `wrapping_*` functions, not the `checked_*` functions.
const keyword: brief paragraph on 'const fn'
`const fn` were mentioned in the title, but called "deterministic functions" which is not their main property (though at least currently it is a consequence of being const-evaluable). This adds a brief paragraph discussing them, also in the hopes of clarifying that they do *not* have any effect on run-time uses.
Assert that pthread mutex initialization succeeded
If pthread mutex initialization fails, the failure will go unnoticed unless
debug assertions are enabled. Any subsequent use of mutex will also silently
fail, since return values from lock & unlock operations are similarly checked
only through debug assertions.
In some implementations the mutex initialization requires a memory
allocation and so it does fail in practice.
Assert that initialization succeeds to ensure that mutex guarantees
mutual exclusion.
Fixes#34966.
If pthread mutex initialization fails, the failure will go unnoticed unless
debug assertions are enabled. Any subsequent use of mutex will also silently
fail, since return values from lock & unlock operations are similarly checked
only through debug assertions.
In some implementations the mutex initialization requires a memory
allocation and so it does fail in practice.
Check that initialization succeeds to ensure that mutex guarantees
mutual exclusion.
