Suggest deref when coercing `ty::Ref` to `ty::RawPtr` with arbitrary mutability
Fixes#71676
1. Implement dereference suggestion when coercing `ty::Ref` to `ty::RawPtr` with arbitrary mutability.
2. Extract the dereference steps into `deref_steps()`, which removes all the `use` and `pub` noise introduced by last PR #71540, and makes the code more readable.
3. Use the `remove_prefix()` closure which makes the prefix removal more readable.
4. Introduce `Applicability` as a return value of `check_ref` to suggest `Applicability::Unspecified` suggestion.
**Special**: I found it is not possible to genereate `Applicability::MachineApplicable` suggestion for situation like this:
```rust
use std::ops::Deref;
use std::ops::DerefMut;
struct Bar(u8);
struct Foo(Bar);
struct Emm(Foo);
impl Deref for Bar{
type Target = u8;
fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
&self.0
}
}
impl Deref for Foo {
type Target = Bar;
fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
&self.0
}
}
impl Deref for Emm {
type Target = Foo;
fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
&self.0
}
}
impl DerefMut for Bar{
fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Self::Target {
&mut self.0
}
}
impl DerefMut for Foo {
fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Self::Target {
&mut self.0
}
}
impl DerefMut for Emm {
fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut Self::Target {
&mut self.0
}
}
fn main() {
let a = Emm(Foo(Bar(0)));
let _: *mut u8 = &a; //~ ERROR mismatched types
}
```
We may suggest `&mut ***a` here, but the `a` is not declared as mutable variable. And also when processing HIR, it's not possible to check if `a` is declared as a mutable variable (currently we do borrow checking with MIR). So we cannot ensure that suggestion when coercing immutable reference to mutable pointer is always machine applicable. Therefore I added a `Applicability` return value in `check_ref()`. And move the `immutable reference -> mutable pointer` situation into a sperate test file without `run-rustfix`. (It seems that `run-rustfix` will also adopt `Applicability::Unspecified` suggestion, which is strange)
Fix exceeding bitshifts not emitting for assoc. consts (properly this time, I swear!)
Fixes#69021 and fixes#71353.
As described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71353#issuecomment-617901923, this PR:
- adds a variant of `try_validation!` called `try_validation_pat!` that allows specific failures to be turned into validation failures (but returns the rest, unchanged), and
- allows `InvalidProgram` to be returned out of validation
r? @RalfJung
Add `RefCell::take`
Add `RefCell::take` to match `Cell` and `Option`.
I also changed a couple of calls to `.replace` to `.take`.
Tracking issue is #71395.
This is my first contribution, please tell me if there's anything I could improve, thanks!
typeck: always expose explicit enum discriminant `AnonConst`s' parent in `generics_of`.
This is similar to #70452 but for explicit `enum` discriminant constant expressions.
However, unlike #70452, this PR should have no effect on stable code, as while it alleviates #43408 errors, there is no way to actually compile an `enum` with generic parameters *and* explicit discriminants, without `#![feature(arbitrary_enum_discriminant)]`, as explicit discriminant expression don't count as uses of parameters (if they did, they would count as invariant uses).
<hr/>
There's also 2 other commits here, both related to #70453:
* "ty: use `delay_span_bug` in `ty::AdtDef::eval_explicit_discr`." - hides the ICEs demonstrated on #70453, when there are other errors (which the next commit adds)
* "typeck/wfcheck: require that explicit enum discriminants const-evaluate succesfully." - closes#70453 by picking alternative "2", i.e. erroring when a discriminant doesn't fully const-evaluate from the perspective of the `enum` definition
In the future, it might be possible to allow `enum` discriminants to actually depend on parameters, but that will likely require #68436 + some way to restrict the values so no two variants can end up with overlapping discriminants.
As this PR would close#70453, it shouldn't be merged until a decision is reached there.
r? @nikomatsakis
Decode qualifs for associated const defaults
Fixes#71734.
We encode qualifs for associated constants, but never expected to decode the qualifs for defaulted associated consts. Fix this, and test that associated const defaults have the correct qualifs cross-crate.
r? @tmandry
Implement `confusable_idents` lint.
This collects all identifier symbols into `ParseSession` and examines them within the non-ascii-idents lint.
The skeleton generation part needs to be added to `unicode-security` crate. Will update this PR when the crate is updated.
r? @petrochenkov
EDIT: also included the `concat_idents` part.
Implement RFC 2523, `#[cfg(version(..))]`
Hi! This is my first contribution to rust, I hope I didn't miss anything. I tried to implement this feature so that `#[cfg(version(1.44.0))]` works but the parser was printing an error that I wasn't sure how to fix so I just opted for implementing `#[cfg(version("1.44.0"))]` (note the quotes).
Tracking issue: #64796
Associated types with a default type in a trait can't be relied upon to
remain of that default type when in use, so literals of that type can't
be used in the trait's items. Point at the associated type and state
that information.
Reduce verbosity for associated consts of the wrong type.
When an associated type is found when a specific type was expected, if
possible provide a structured suggestion constraining the associated
type in a bound.
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<T as Foo>::Y == i32`
--> $DIR/associated-types-multiple-types-one-trait.rs:13:5
|
LL | want_y(t);
| ^^^^^^ expected `i32`, found associated type
...
LL | fn want_y<T:Foo<Y=i32>>(t: &T) { }
| ----- required by this bound in `want_y`
|
= note: expected type `i32`
found associated type `<T as Foo>::Y`
help: consider constraining the associated type `<T as Foo>::Y` to `i32`
|
LL | fn have_x_want_y<T:Foo<X=u32, Y = i32>>(t: &T)
| ^^^^^^^^^
```
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/trait-with-missing-associated-type-restriction.rs:12:9
|
LL | qux(x.func())
| ^^^^^^^^ expected `usize`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type `usize`
found associated type `<impl Trait as Trait>::A`
help: consider constraining the associated type `<impl Trait as Trait>::A` to `usize`
|
LL | fn foo(x: impl Trait<A = usize>) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^
```
The extracted function can be used by the rest of bootstrap to detect if we've
already built an up-to-date LLVM (and so it's safe for us to either request it
or pretend it exists).
