std/sys/unix/time: make it easier for LLVM to optimize `Instant` subtraction.
This PR is the minimal change necessary to get LLVM to optimize `if self.t.tv_nsec >= other.t.tv_nsec` to branchless instructions (at least on x86_64), inspired by @m-ou-se's own attempts at optimizing `Instant` subtraction.
I stumbled over this by looking at the total number of instructions executed by `rustc -Z self-profile`, and found that after disabling ASLR, the largest source of non-determinism remaining was from this `if` taking one branch or the other, depending on the values involved.
The reason this code is even called so many times to make a difference, is that `measureme` (the `-Z self-profile` implementation) currently uses `Instant::elapsed` for its event timestamps (of which there can be millions).
I doubt it's critical to land this, although perhaps it could slightly improve some forms of benchmarking.
Change Debug impl of SocketAddr and IpAddr to match their Display output
This has already been done for `SocketAddrV4`, `SocketAddrV6`, `IpAddrV4` and `IpAddrV6`. I don't see a point to keep the rather bad to read derived impl, especially so when pretty printing:
V4(
127.0.0.1
)
From the `Display`, one can easily and unambiguously see if it's V4 or V6. Two examples:
```
127.0.0.1:443
[2001:db8:85a3::8a2e:370:7334]:443
```
Luckily the docs explicitly state that `Debug` output is not stable and that it may be changed at any time.
Using `Display` as `Debug` is very convenient for configuration structs (e.g. for webservers) that often just have a `derive(Debug)` and are printed that way to the one starting the server.
Improve documentation on process::Child.std* fields
As a relative beginner, it took a while for me to figure out I could just steal the references to avoid partially moving the child and thus retain ability to call functions on it (and store it in structs etc).
As a relative beginner, it took a while for me to figure out I could just steal the references to avoid partially moving the child and thus retain ability to call functions on it (and store it in structs etc).
Expand function pointer docs
Be more explicit in the ABI section, and add a section on how to obtain a function pointer, which can be somewhat confusing.
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75239
Move to intra doc links whenever possible within std/src/lib.rs
Helps with #75080.
@rustbot modify labels: T-doc, A-intra-doc-links, T-rustdoc
There are some things like
```rust
`//! [`Option<T>`]: option::Option`
```
that will either be fixed in the future or have open issues about them.
Fix minor things in the `f32` primitive docs
All of these were review comments in #74621 that I first fixed in that PR, but later accidentally overwrote by a force push.
Thanks @the8472 for noticing.
r? @KodrAus
Fix wasi::fs::OpenOptions to imply write when append is on
This PR fixes a bug in `OpenOptions` of `wasi` platform that it currently doesn't imply write mode when only `append` is enabled.
As explained in the [doc of OpenOptions#append](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fs/struct.OpenOptions.html#method.append), calling `.append(true)` should imply `.write(true)` as well.
## Reproduce
Given below simple Rust program:
```rust
use std::fs::OpenOptions;
use std::io::Write;
fn main() {
let mut file = OpenOptions::new()
.write(true)
.create(true)
.open("foo.txt")
.unwrap();
writeln!(file, "abc").unwrap();
}
```
it can successfully compiled into wasm and execute by `wasmtime` runtime:
```sh
$ rustc --target wasm32-wasi write.rs
$ ~/wasmtime/target/debug/wasmtime run --dir=. write.wasm
$ cat foo.txt
abc
```
However when I change `.write(true)` to `.append(true)`, it fails to execute by the error "Capabilities insufficient":
```sh
$ ~/wasmtime/target/debug/wasmtime run --dir=. append.wasm
thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os { code: 76, kind: Other, message: "Capabilities insufficient" }', append.rs:10:5
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
Error: failed to run main module `append.wasm`
...
```
This is because of lacking "rights" on the opened file:
```sh
$ RUST_LOG=trace ~/wasmtime/target/debug/wasmtime run --dir=. append.wasm 2>&1 | grep validate_rights
TRACE wasi_common::entry > | validate_rights failed: required rights = HandleRights { base: fd_write (0x40), inheriting: empty (0x0) }; actual rights = HandleRights { base: fd_seek|fd_fdstat_set_flags|fd_sync|fd_tell|fd_advise|fd_filestat_set_times|poll_fd_readwrite (0x88000bc), inheriting: empty (0x0) }
```
Add Ipv6Addr::to_ipv4_mapped
* add Ipv6Addr::to_ipv4_mapped
* ~~deprecate Ipv4Addr::to_ipv6_compatible & Ipv6Addr::to_ipv4~~ reference: #75150
According to [IETF RFC 4291](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#page-10), the "IPv4-Compatible IPv6 address" is deprecated.
> 2.5.5.1. IPv4-Compatible IPv6 Address
>
> The "IPv4-Compatible IPv6 address" was defined to assist in the IPv6
> transition. The format of the "IPv4-Compatible IPv6 address" is as
> follows:
>
> | 80 bits | 16 | 32 bits |
> +--------------------------------------+--------------------------+
> |0000..............................0000|0000| IPv4 address |
> +--------------------------------------+----+---------------------+
>
> Note: The IPv4 address used in the "IPv4-Compatible IPv6 address"
> must be a globally-unique IPv4 unicast address.
>
> The "IPv4-Compatible IPv6 address" is now deprecated because the
> current IPv6 transition mechanisms no longer use these addresses.
> New or updated implementations are not required to support this
> address type.
And the current implementation of `Ipv4Addr::to_ipv6_compatible`is incorrect: it does not check whether the IPv4 address is a globally-unique IPv4 unicast address.
Please let me know if there are any issues with this pull request.
Improve `f32` and `f64` primitive documentation
I noticed that the docs for the primitive floats were fairly short. I first only wanted to add the IEEE specification information (compare [the reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/types/numeric.html)), but then also added some more beginner-friendly docs. Let me know what you think!
Random doc team assign:
r? @rylev
