rustbuild: Print out all build steps when --verbose
These helped me debug some problems with the asmjs target. It's just vomiting debug representations, so not the prettiest stuff.
r? @alexcrichton
rustdoc: implement --sysroot
with the same semantics as rustc. This let us build documentation for a
crate that depends on a custom sysroot.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @cbiffle
rustc: implement -C link-arg
this flag lets you pass a _single_ argument to the linker but can be
used _repeatedly_. For example, instead of using:
```
rustc -C link-args='-l bar' (..)
```
you could write
```
rustc -C link-arg='-l' -C link-arg='bar' (..)
```
This new flag can be used with RUSTFLAGS where `-C link-args` has
problems with "nested" spaces:
```
RUSTFLAGS='-C link-args="-Tlayout.ld -nostartfiles"'
```
This passes three arguments to rustc: `-C` `link-args="-Tlayout.ld` and
`-nostartfiles"` to `rustc`. That's not what we meant. But this does
what we want:
```
RUSTFLAGS='-C link-arg=-Tlayout.ld -C link-arg=-nostartfiles`
```
cc rust-lang/rfcs#1509
r? @alexcrichton
cc @Zoxc
This needs a test. Any suggestion?
Docs: Update to "Getting Started" section
I came across #34523 and wanted to suggest a solution. See commit for details.
It seemed like a good place to start contributing, let me know if I did anything wrong 😇
Change error message for intrinsic signature.
Makes it so the signature of the intrinsic in the user's code is
"found," while the signature that rustc knows about is "expected."
Before this patch, the code
```
extern "platform-intrinsic" {
fn x86_mm_movemask_ps() -> i32;
}
```
would give the error
```
error[E0444]: platform-specific intrinsic has invalid number of arguments: found 1, expected 0
--> test.rs:4:5
|
4 | fn x86_mm_movemask_ps() -> i32;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
After this patch, it says "found 0, expected 1".
The test relies on the undefined behavior, and so may fail in some
circumstances. This can be worked around by stubbing a memory allocator
in the test, but it is a bit of work, and LLVM could still theoretically
eliminate the write of the zero byte in release mode (which is
intended).
So let's just remove the test and mark the function as inline. It
shouldn't be optimized away when inlined into the debug build of user's
code.
Don't allocate during default HashSet creation.
The following `HashMap` creation functions don't allocate heap storage for elements.
```
HashMap::new()
HashMap::default()
HashMap::with_hasher()
```
This is good, because it's surprisingly common to create a HashMap and never
use it. So that case should be cheap.
However, `HashSet` does not have the same behaviour. The corresponding creation
functions *do* allocate heap storage for the default number of non-zero
elements (which is 32 slots for 29 elements).
```
HashMap::new()
HashMap::default()
HashMap::with_hasher()
```
This commit gives `HashSet` the same behaviour as `HashMap`, by simply calling
the corresponding `HashMap` functions (something `HashSet` already does for
`with_capacity` and `with_capacity_and_hasher`). It also reformats one existing
`HashSet` construction to use a consistent single-line format.
This speeds up rustc itself by 1.01--1.04x on most of the non-tiny
rustc-benchmarks.
Jonathan Turner