Initial support for `..=` syntax
#28237
This PR adds `..=` as a synonym for `...` in patterns and expressions.
Since `...` in expressions was never stable, we now issue a warning.
cc @durka
r? @aturon
Allow unused extern crate again
This is a partial revert of #42588. There is a usability concern reported in #44294 that was not considered in the discussion of the PR, so I would like to back this out of 1.21. As is, I think users would have a worse and more confusing experience with this lint enabled by default. We can re-enabled once there are better diagnostics or the case in #44294 does not trigger the lint.
Fix capacity comparison in reserve
You can otherwise end up in a situation where you don't actually resize
but still call into handle_cap_increase which then corrupts head/tail.
Closes#44800
Not totally sure the right way to write a test for this - there are some debug asserts the old bad behavior will hit but we don't build the stdlib with debug assertions by default.
r? @Gankro
use param_env on the trait_cache key
We bailed from making trans_fulfill_obligation return `Option` or `Result`, just made it less prone to crashing outside trans
r? @nikomatsakis
Add a flag to hir and ty TypeParameterDef and raise an error when using
explicit type parameters when calling a function using impl Trait in
argument position.
This commit changes the default of rustc to use 32 codegen units when compiling
in debug mode, typically an opt-level=0 compilation. Since their inception
codegen units have matured quite a bit, gaining features such as:
* Parallel translation and codegen enabling codegen units to get worked on even
more quickly.
* Deterministic and reliable partitioning through the same infrastructure as
incremental compilation.
* Global rate limiting through the `jobserver` crate to avoid overloading the
system.
The largest benefit of codegen units has forever been faster compilation through
parallel processing of modules on the LLVM side of things, using all the cores
available on build machines that typically have many available. Some downsides
have been fixed through the features above, but the major downside remaining is
that using codegen units reduces opportunities for inlining and optimization.
This, however, doesn't matter much during debug builds!
In this commit the default number of codegen units for debug builds has been
raised from 1 to 32. This should enable most `cargo build` compiles that are
bottlenecked on translation and/or code generation to immediately see speedups
through parallelization on available cores.
Work is being done to *always* enable multiple codegen units (and therefore
parallel codegen) but it requires #44841 at least to be landed and stabilized,
but stay tuned if you're interested in that aspect!
Some fixes to mir-borrowck
Make the code more closely match the NLL RFC (updated description).
(The biggest visible fix the addition of the Shallow/Deep distinction, which means mir-borrowck stops falsely thinking that StorageDeads need deep access to their input L-value.)
Many of the iterator adaptors will perform faster folds if they forward
to their inner iterator's folds, especially for inner types like `Chain`
which are optimized too. The following types are newly specialized:
| Type | `fold` | `rfold` |
| ----------- | ------ | ------- |
| `Enumerate` | ✓ | ✓ |
| `Filter` | ✓ | ✓ |
| `FilterMap` | ✓ | ✓ |
| `FlatMap` | exists | ✓ |
| `Fuse` | ✓ | ✓ |
| `Inspect` | ✓ | ✓ |
| `Peekable` | ✓ | N/A¹ |
| `Skip` | ✓ | N/A² |
| `SkipWhile` | ✓ | N/A¹ |
¹ not a `DoubleEndedIterator`
² `Skip::next_back` doesn't pull skipped items at all, but this couldn't
be avoided if `Skip::rfold` were to call its inner iterator's `rfold`.
Benchmarks
----------
In the following results, plain `_sum` computes the sum of a million
integers -- note that `sum()` is implemented with `fold()`. The
`_ref_sum` variants do the same on a `by_ref()` iterator, which is
limited to calling `next()` one by one, without specialized `fold`.
The `chain` variants perform the same tests on two iterators chained
together, to show a greater benefit of forwarding `fold` internally.
test iter::bench_enumerate_chain_ref_sum ... bench: 2,216,264 ns/iter (+/- 29,228)
test iter::bench_enumerate_chain_sum ... bench: 922,380 ns/iter (+/- 2,676)
test iter::bench_enumerate_ref_sum ... bench: 476,094 ns/iter (+/- 7,110)
test iter::bench_enumerate_sum ... bench: 476,438 ns/iter (+/- 3,334)
test iter::bench_filter_chain_ref_sum ... bench: 2,266,095 ns/iter (+/- 6,051)
test iter::bench_filter_chain_sum ... bench: 745,594 ns/iter (+/- 2,013)
test iter::bench_filter_ref_sum ... bench: 889,696 ns/iter (+/- 1,188)
test iter::bench_filter_sum ... bench: 667,325 ns/iter (+/- 1,894)
test iter::bench_filter_map_chain_ref_sum ... bench: 2,259,195 ns/iter (+/- 353,440)
test iter::bench_filter_map_chain_sum ... bench: 1,223,280 ns/iter (+/- 1,972)
test iter::bench_filter_map_ref_sum ... bench: 611,607 ns/iter (+/- 2,507)
test iter::bench_filter_map_sum ... bench: 611,610 ns/iter (+/- 472)
test iter::bench_fuse_chain_ref_sum ... bench: 2,246,106 ns/iter (+/- 22,395)
test iter::bench_fuse_chain_sum ... bench: 634,887 ns/iter (+/- 1,341)
test iter::bench_fuse_ref_sum ... bench: 444,816 ns/iter (+/- 1,748)
test iter::bench_fuse_sum ... bench: 316,954 ns/iter (+/- 2,616)
test iter::bench_inspect_chain_ref_sum ... bench: 2,245,431 ns/iter (+/- 21,371)
test iter::bench_inspect_chain_sum ... bench: 631,645 ns/iter (+/- 4,928)
test iter::bench_inspect_ref_sum ... bench: 317,437 ns/iter (+/- 702)
test iter::bench_inspect_sum ... bench: 315,942 ns/iter (+/- 4,320)
test iter::bench_peekable_chain_ref_sum ... bench: 2,243,585 ns/iter (+/- 12,186)
test iter::bench_peekable_chain_sum ... bench: 634,848 ns/iter (+/- 1,712)
test iter::bench_peekable_ref_sum ... bench: 444,808 ns/iter (+/- 480)
test iter::bench_peekable_sum ... bench: 317,133 ns/iter (+/- 3,309)
test iter::bench_skip_chain_ref_sum ... bench: 1,778,734 ns/iter (+/- 2,198)
test iter::bench_skip_chain_sum ... bench: 761,850 ns/iter (+/- 1,645)
test iter::bench_skip_ref_sum ... bench: 478,207 ns/iter (+/- 119,252)
test iter::bench_skip_sum ... bench: 315,614 ns/iter (+/- 3,054)
test iter::bench_skip_while_chain_ref_sum ... bench: 2,486,370 ns/iter (+/- 4,845)
test iter::bench_skip_while_chain_sum ... bench: 633,915 ns/iter (+/- 5,892)
test iter::bench_skip_while_ref_sum ... bench: 666,926 ns/iter (+/- 804)
test iter::bench_skip_while_sum ... bench: 444,405 ns/iter (+/- 571)
