Allow more non-inline modules in blocks
Currently, non-inline modules without a `#[path]` attribute are not allowed in blocks.
This PR allows non-inline modules that have an ancestor module with a `#[path]` attribute, provided there is not a nearer ancestor block.
For example,
```rust
fn main() {
#[path = "..."] mod foo {
mod bar; //< allowed by this PR
fn f() {
mod bar; //< still an error
}
}
}
```
Fixes#36772.
r? @nikomatsakis
Allow supplying an error destination via the compiler driver
Allows replacing stderr with a buffer from the client.
Also, some refactoring around run_compiler.
Remove CString drop test.
The test relies on the undefined behavior, and so may fail in some
circumstances. This can be worked around by stubbing a memory allocator
in the test, but it is a bit of work, and LLVM could still theoretically
eliminate the write of the zero byte in release mode (which is
intended).
So let's just remove the test and mark the function as inline. It
shouldn't be optimized away when inlined into the debug build of user's
code.
Supersedes #36607
r? @alexcrichton
Move ty_align and ty_size out of most C ABI code
s390x's C ABI ty_align and ty_size are not moved because the
implementation of ty_align varies in an atypical pattern: it calls
ty_size for the llvm::Vector type kind. ty_size then cannot be moved
since it indirectly calls ty_align through align.
Fixes#5116 (probably, not sure).
remove ExactSizeIterator from RangeInclusive<{u,i}{32,size}>
Fixes#36386.
This is a [breaking-change] for nightly users of `#![feature(inclusive_range_syntax)]` and/or `#![feature(inclusive_range)]`.
This applies the HIR changes from the previous commits to the AST, and
is thus a syntax-[breaking-change]
Renames `PatKind::Vec` to `PatKind::Slice`, since these are called slice
patterns, not vec patterns. Renames `TyKind::Vec`, which represents the
type `[T]`, to `TyKind::Slice`. Renames `TyKind::FixedLengthVec` to
`TyKind::Array`.
update mips64* data-layout
I tried to compile some (`#![no_core]`) code for the `mips64` targets on the latest nightly and got ICE's about mismatched data layouts. I updated the data layouts to match the listed llvm defaults.
cc @japaric
Funnily enough, this seems to be the exact reverse of what @japaric did in 2222d437a7 as part of #36024.
Remove requirement to use 10.7 (fixes macOS)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36650 by removing the requirement to use 10.7. @alexcrichton pointed out that the buildbots won't be affected, since they set the requirement with an environment variable.
This should now allow rustbuild to build Rust on macOS (nee OS X)
r? @alexcrichton
rustc: Tweak expansion order of custom derive
This commit alters the expansion order of custom macros-1.1 style `#[derive]`
modes. Instead of left-to-right the expansion now happens in three categories,
each of which is internally left-to-right:
* Old-style custom derive (`#[derive_Foo]`) is expanded
* New-style custom derive (macros 1.1) is expanded
* Built in derive modes are expanded
This gives built in derive modes maximal knowledge about the struct that's being
expanded and also avoids pesky issues like exposing `#[structural_match]` or
`#[rustc_copy_clone_marker]`.
cc #35900
libtest: add a --skip flag to the test runner
This flag takes a FILTER argument and instructs the test runner to skip
the tests whose names contain the word FILTER. --skip can be used
several times.
---
My motivation for submitting this is that while using [smoke] to run `std` unit tests for cross
targets I found that a few of the tests always fail due to limitations in QEMU (it can't handle too
many threads) and I'd like to skip these problematic tests from the command line to be able to run
the rest of the unit tests.
[smoke]: https://github.com/japaric/smoke
I know there is another mechanism to skip tests: `#[ignore]` but this doesn't work in my use case
because I can't (easily) modify the source of the standard libraries to `#[ignore]` some tests. And
even if I could, the change would involve conditionally ignoring some tests for some targets but
that's not a perfect solution because those tests should pass if executed on real hardware so they
should not be `#[ignored]` in that scenario.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @brson
