MIR Inline is incompatible with coverage
Fixes: #80060
Fixed by disabling inlining if `-Zinstrument-coverage` is set.
The PR also adds additional use cases to the coverage test for doctests.
r? `@wesleywiser`
cc: `@tmandry`
Stabilize slice::strip_prefix and slice::strip_suffix
These two methods are useful. The corresponding methods on `str` are already stable.
I believe that stablising these now would not get in the way of, in the future, extending these to take a richer pattern API a la `str`'s patterns.
Tracking PR: #73413. I also have an outstanding PR to improve the docs for these two functions and the corresponding ones on `str`: #75078
I have tried to follow the [instructions in the dev guide](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/stabilization_guide.html#stabilization-pr). The part to do with `compiler/rustc_feature` did not seem applicable. I assume that's because these are just library features, so there is no corresponding machinery in rustc.
Make `ExpnData` fields `krate` and `orig_id` private
These fields are only used by hygiene serialized, and should not be
accessed by anything outside of `rustc_span`.
Change:
```
`parse` can parse any type that...
```
to:
```
`parse` can parse into any type that...
```
Word `into` added to be more precise and in coherence with other parts of the doc.
Optimize DST field access
For
struct X<T: ?Sized>(T)
struct Y<T: ?Sized>(u8, T)
the offset of the unsized field is
0
mem::align_of_val(&self.1)
respectively. This patch changes the expression used to compute these
offsets so that the optimizer can perform this optimization.
Consider
```rust
fn f(x: &X<dyn Any>) -> &dyn Any {
&x.0
}
```
Before:
```asm
test:
movq %rsi, %rdx
movq 16(%rsi), %rax
leaq -1(%rax), %rcx
negq %rax
andq %rcx, %rax
addq %rdi, %rax
retq
```
After:
```asm
test:
movq %rsi, %rdx
movq %rdi, %rax
retq
```
Optimize away a `fs::metadata` call.
This also eliminates a use of a `Path` convenience function, in support
of #80741, refactoring `std::path` to focus on pure data structures and
algorithms.
* Rename `ModuleData.normal_ancestor_id` to `nearest_parent_mod`
`normal_ancestor_id` is a very confusing name if you don't already
understand what it means. Adding docs helps, but using a clearer and
more obvious name is also important.
* Rename `Resolver::nearest_mod_parent` to `nearest_parent_mod`
* Add more docs
This also eliminates a use of a `Path` convenience function, in support
of #80741, refactoring `std::path` to focus on pure data structures and
algorithms.
This also eliminates a use of a `Path` convenience function, in support
of #80741, refactoring `std::path` to focus on pure data structures and
algorithms.
This also eliminates a use of a `Path` convenience function, in support
of #80741, refactoring `std::path` to focus on pure data structures and
algorithms.
Remove useless doc_alias feature gate
As `@jyn514` rightfully noted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80686 , this feature is no more. Therefore, cleanup time!
r? `@jyn514`
Add more code spans to docs in intrinsics.rs
I have added some more code spans in core/src/intrinsics.rs, changing some `=` to `==`, etc. I also changed the wording in some sections.
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #80442 (Mention Arc::make_mut and Rc::make_mut in the documentation of Cow)
- #80533 (bootstrap: clippy fixes)
- #80538 (Add check for `[T;N]`/`usize` mismatch in astconv)
- #80612 (Remove reverted change from relnotes)
- #80627 (Builder: Warn if test file does not exist)
- #80637 (Use Option::filter instead of open-coding it)
- #80643 (Move variable into the only branch where it is relevant)
- #80656 (Fixed documentation error for `std::hint::spin_loop`)
- #80666 (Fix missing link for "fully qualified syntax")
- #80672 (./x.py clippy: allow the most noisy lints)
- #80677 (doc -- list edit for consistency)
- #80696 (make sure that promoteds which fail to evaluate in dead const code behave correctly)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
make sure that promoteds which fail to evaluate in dead const code behave correctly
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80243 showed that we'll have to live with these kinds of failing promoteds for a while, so let's make sure we have a test that covers them.
