static_assert is documented as working on static with type `bool`, but
we currently accept it on any const static and crash when the const has
an non-integral type.
This is a breaking-change for anyone who used static_assert on types
likes i32, which happened to work but seems like an unintended
consequence of the missing error checking.
[breaking-change]
Fixes#22056
some commits in OpenBSD OS have corrected a problem of stack position.
Now, we can adjust more accurately the page guard in rust.
@dhuseby I am not sure that bitrig have already integrated these changes (the `$OpenBSD$` header in sys/kern/kern_exec.c is too old). But when they do, you may want this patch too.
Fixing #21475. Right now this code can not be parsed:
```rust
use m::{START, END};
fn main() {
match 42u32 {
m::START...m::END => {}, // error: expected one of `::`, `=>`, or `|`, found `...`
_ => {},
}
}
mod m {
pub const START: u32 = 4;
pub const END: u32 = 14;
}
```
I fixed the parser and added test for this case, but now there are still problems with mixing literals and paths in interval:
```rust
match 42u32 {
0u32...m::END => {}, // mismatched types in range [E0031]
m::START...59u32 => {}, // mismatched types in range [E0031]
_ => {},
}
}
```
I'll try fix this problem and need review.
static_assert is documented as working on static with type `bool`, but
we currently accept it on any const static and crash when the const has
an non-integral type.
This is a breaking-change for anyone who used static_assert on types
likes i32, which happened to work but seems like an unintended
consequence of the missing error checking.
[breaking-change]
Fixes#22056
MacEager is a MacResult implementation for the common case where you've already built each form of AST that you might return.
Fixes#17637. Based on #18814.
This is a [breaking-change] for syntax extensions:
* MacExpr::new becomes MacEager::expr.
* MacPat::new becomes MacEager::pat.
* MacItems::new becomes MacEager::items. It takes a SmallVector directly,
not an iterator.
r? @sfackler
Now that the `std::env` module has had some time to bake this commit marks most
of its APIs as `#[stable]`. Some notable APIs that are **not** stable (and still
use the same `env` feature gate) are:
* `{set,get}_exit_status` - there are still questions about whether this is the
right interface for setting/getting the exit status of a process.
* `page_size` - this may change location in the future or perhaps name as well.
This also effectively closes#22122 as the variants of `VarError` are
`#[stable]` now. (this is done intentionally)
Fixes#20978 for supported platforms (i.e. non-Android POSIX).
This uses `backtrace_pcinfo` to inspect the DWARF debug info and list the file and line pairs for given stack frame. Such pair is not unique due to the presence of inlined functions and the updated routine correctly handles this case. The code is modelled after libbacktrace's `backtrace_full` routine.
There is one known issue with this approach. Macros, when invoked, take over the current frame and shadows the file and line pair which has invoked a macro. In particular, this makes many panicking
macros a bit harder to inspect. This really is a debuginfo problem, and the backtrace routine should print them correctly with a correct debuginfo.
Some example trace:
```
thread '<main>' panicked at 'explicit panic', /home/arachneng/Works/git/rust/src/test/run-pass/backtrace-debuginfo.rs:74
stack backtrace:
1: 0xd964702f - sys::backtrace::write::h32d93fffb64131b2yxC
2: 0xd9670202 - panicking::on_panic::h3a4fcb37b873aefeooM
3: 0xd95b396a - rt::unwind::begin_unwind_inner::h576b3df5f626902dJ2L
4: 0xd9eb88df - rt::unwind::begin_unwind::h16852273847167740350
5: 0xd9eb8afb - aux::callback::h15056955655605709172
at /home/arachneng/Works/git/rust/<std macros>:3
at src/test/run-pass/backtrace-debuginfo-aux.rs:15
6: 0xd9eb8caa - outer::h2cf96412459fceb6ema
at src/test/run-pass/backtrace-debuginfo.rs:73
at src/test/run-pass/backtrace-debuginfo.rs:88
7: 0xd9ebab24 - main::h3f701287441442edasa
at src/test/run-pass/backtrace-debuginfo.rs:134
8: 0xd96daba8 - rust_try_inner
9: 0xd96dab95 - rust_try
10: 0xd9671af4 - rt::lang_start::h7da0de9529b4c394liM
11: 0xd8f3aec4 - __libc_start_main
12: 0xd9eb8148 - <unknown>
13: 0xffffffff - <unknown>
```
This pulls out the implementations of most built-in lints into a
separate crate, to reduce edit-compile-test iteration times with
librustc_lint and increase parallelism. This should enable lints to be
refactored, added and deleted much more easily as it slashes the
edit-compile cycle to get a minimal working compiler to test with (`make
rustc-stage1`) from
librustc -> librustc_typeck -> ... -> librustc_driver ->
libcore -> ... -> libstd
to
librustc_lint -> librustc_driver -> libcore -> ... libstd
which is significantly faster, mainly due to avoiding the librustc build
itself.
The intention would be to move as much as possible of the infrastructure
into the crate too, but the plumbing is deeply intertwined with librustc
itself at the moment. Also, there are lints for which diagnostics are
registered directly in the compiler code, not in their own crate
traversal, and their definitions have to remain in librustc.
This is a [breaking-change] for direct users of the compiler APIs:
callers of `rustc::session::build_session` or
`rustc::session::build_session_` need to manually call
`rustc_lint::register_builtins` on their return value.
This should make #22206 easier.
This pulls out the implementations of most built-in lints into a
separate crate, to reduce edit-compile-test iteration times with
librustc_lint and increase parallelism. This should enable lints to be
refactored, added and deleted much more easily as it slashes the
edit-compile cycle to get a minimal working compiler to test with (`make
rustc-stage1`) from
librustc -> librustc_typeck -> ... -> librustc_driver ->
libcore -> ... -> libstd
to
librustc_lint -> librustc_driver -> libcore -> ... libstd
which is significantly faster, mainly due to avoiding the librustc build
itself.
The intention would be to move as much as possible of the infrastructure
into the crate too, but the plumbing is deeply intertwined with librustc
itself at the moment. Also, there are lints for which diagnostics are
registered directly in the compiler code, not in their own crate
traversal, and their definitions have to remain in librustc.
This is a [breaking-change] for direct users of the compiler APIs:
callers of `rustc::session::build_session` or
`rustc::session::build_session_` need to manually call
`rustc_lint::register_builtins` on their return value.
This should make #22206 easier.
