Do not allow moving out of thread local under ast borrowck
AST borrowck failed to prevent moving out of a thread-local static.
This was broken. And it also (sometimes?) caused an ICE during drop elaboration.
Fix#47215Fix#54797
This commit extends existing special-casing of closures to highlight the
use of variables within generators that are causing the generator to
borrow them.
(and of course they are not quite statics either).
Namely, they *do* have a restricted region (like rvalues), but they
also cannot be moved out of (like statics).
This commit adds an `ImplicitSelfKind` to the HIR and the MIR that keeps
track of whether a implicit self argument is immutable by-value, mutable
by-value, immutable reference or mutable reference so that the addition
of the `mut` keyword can be suggested for the immutable by-value case.
Remove usages of span_suggestion without Applicability
Use `Applicability::Unspecified` for all of them instead.
Shall deprecations for the non-`_with_applicability` functions be added?
Shall clippy be addressed somehow?
r? @estebank
Make rustc::middle::region::Scope's fields public
This PR makes the following changes to `rustc::middle::region::Scope`:
- [x] Makes `region::Scope`'s fields public
- [x] Removes the `impl Scope` block with constructors (as per [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/54032#discussion_r216618208))
- [x] Updates call sites throughout the compiler
Closes#54122.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #53418 (Mark some suggestions as MachineApplicable)
- #53431 (Moved some feature gate ui tests to correct location)
- #53442 (Update version of rls-data used with save-analysis)
- #53504 (Set applicability for more suggestions.)
- #53541 (Fix missing impl trait display as ret type)
- #53544 (Point at the trait argument when using unboxed closure)
- #53558 (Normalize source line and column numbers.)
- #53562 (Lament the invincibility of the Turbofish)
- #53574 (Suggest direct raw-pointer dereference)
- #53585 (Remove super old comment on function that parses items)
Failed merges:
- #53472 (Use FxHash{Map,Set} instead of the default Hash{Map,Set} everywhere in rustc.)
- #53563 (use String::new() instead of String::from(""), "".to_string(), "".to_owned() or "".into())
r? @ghost
Set applicability for more suggestions.
Converts a couple more calls to `span_suggestion_with_applicability` (#50723). To be on the safe side, I marked suggestions that depend on the intent of the user or that are potentially lossy conversions as MaybeIncorrect.
r? @estebank
(old) borrowck cleanup
Primarily moves dataflow code based on CFG to borrowck; this is mostly so we don't forget to delete it once it becomes unused after we fully move to MIR borrowck.
Add help message for missing `IndexMut` impl
Code:
```rust
let mut map = HashMap::new();
map.insert("peter", 23);
map["peter"] = 27;
```
Before:
```
error[E0594]: cannot assign to immutable indexed content
--> src/main.rs:7:5
|
7 | map["peter"] = 27;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot borrow as mutable
```
With this change (just the `help` was added):
```
error[E0594]: cannot assign to immutable indexed content
--> index-error.rs:7:5
|
7 | map["peter"] = 27;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot borrow as mutable
|
= help: trait `IndexMut` is required to modify indexed content, but it is not implemented for std::collections::HashMap<&str, i32>
```
---
Yesterday I did some pair programming with a Rust-beginner. We created a type and implemented `Index` for it. Trying to modify the value returned by the index operation returns in a rather vague error that was not very clear for the Rust beginner. So I tried to improve the situation.
## Notes/questions for reviewers:
- Is the formulation OK like that? I'm fine with changing it.
- Can we be absolutely sure that `IndexMut` is actually not implemented in the case my `help` message is added? I'm fairly sure myself, but there could be some cases I didn't think of. Also, I don't know the compiler very well, so I don't know what exactly certain enum variants are used for.
- It would be nice to test if `IndexMut` is in fact not implemented for the type, but I couldn't figure out how to check that. If you think that additional check would be beneficial, could you tell me how to check if a trait is implemented?
- Do you think I should change the error message instead of only adding an additional help message?
Previously it was only emitted for assigments, which was an
unnecessary restriction. Now it doesn't care where the mutability
comes from.
This commit also adds `` quotes around the printed type.
Blitzerr
scalexm
bors
Shotaro Yamada
Oliver Scherer
David Wood
Felix S. Klock II
ljedrz
Pietro Albini
Niko Matsakis
varkor
Josh Stone
Vitaly _Vi Shukela
Marshall Bowers
Andy Russell
toidiu
Matthias Krüger
Guillaume Gomez
Sébastien Duquette
Donato Sciarra
Eduard-Mihai Burtescu
ashtneoi
memoryruins
Lukas Kalbertodt