* eval.c (evaluate_subexp_with_coercion): Add call to
check_typedef, to handle typedeffed vars correctly.
* gdb.base/printcmds.c: Add typedeffed arrays.
* gdb.base/printcmds.exp (test_print_typedef_arrays): New
procedure to test arrays that are typedef'd.
only \r\n, not .*. The test can pass .* as the last thing in
$pattern if that is what it wants. In addition to providing this
flexibility, this change should speed up pattern matching in cases
where the pattern already ended with .* (there were a number of
them). This change also helps catch bad patterns--in the old
scheme the typo "char \*" instead of "char \\*" would pass. Now
it is caught.
* Many .exp files: Update callers.
"p '\'", which is the same as "p ''" once tcl gets done with
quoting, to "p '\\'", which I suspect is what is intended (one
backslash gets sent to GDB).
* gdb.base/printcmds.exp (test_artificial_arrays): New tests.
gdb.c++/inherit.exp, gdb.c++/templates.exp, gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp,
gdb.fortran/exprs.exp, gdb.fortran/types.exp, gdb.chill/chexp.exp,
gdb.base/printcmds.exp: Remove passcount, failcount, etc., stuff;
it makes the tests harder to understand and confuses test-o-matic.
The preferred style is that each test provides a PASS or a FAIL,
and has a unique message (e.g. "continue #54" not just "continue")
which is the same for the pass and the fail.
* gdb.fortran/exprs.exp, gdb.fortran/types.exp,
gdb.chill/chexp.exp: Move test_print_accept and test_print_reject
to lib/gdb.exp.
* gdb.base/printcmds.exp: Use test_print_accept. Remove
prt_accept which was basically the same thing. Likewise for
test_print_reject and prt_reject.
* lib/gdb.exp (test_print_reject): Add some more error message
patterns to match from the former printcmds.exp (prt_reject).
* gdb.c++/classes.exp, gdb.base/scope.exp: Remove spurious xfails.
One defect of the passcount stuff is that some of it failed to
report XPASS where appropriate.
* gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp (print_addr_of): No longer accept extra
stuff before and after arg in expected pattern.
(test_paddr_operator_functions): Re-do test without print_addr_of;
this is the only test which seems to want extra stuff there.
Elena Zannoni