PR c++/77775 - misoptimization of PMF comparison

* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference): Use name matching
	for PMFs.

From-SVN: r240757
This commit is contained in:
Jason Merrill 2016-10-04 17:14:18 -04:00 committed by Jason Merrill
parent 76b294d48d
commit 2db613e5d3
3 changed files with 30 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2016-09-30 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
PR c++/77775
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_component_reference): Use name matching
for PMFs.
2016-10-04 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Implement P0091R2, Template argument deduction for class templates.

View File

@ -2315,9 +2315,13 @@ cxx_eval_component_reference (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
}
if (*non_constant_p)
return t;
bool pmf = TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_P (TREE_TYPE (whole));
FOR_EACH_CONSTRUCTOR_ELT (CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (whole), i, field, value)
{
if (field == part)
/* Use name match for PMF fields, as a variant will have a
different FIELD_DECL with a different type. */
if (pmf ? DECL_NAME (field) == DECL_NAME (part)
: field == part)
{
if (value)
return value;
@ -2342,6 +2346,8 @@ cxx_eval_component_reference (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
if (is_really_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (t)))
return build_constructor (TREE_TYPE (t), NULL);
gcc_assert (DECL_CONTEXT (part) == TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (whole)));
if (CONSTRUCTOR_NO_IMPLICIT_ZERO (whole))
{
/* 'whole' is part of the aggregate initializer we're currently

View File

@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
// PR c++/77775
// { dg-options -fdump-tree-gimple }
// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "== viewAdded" "gimple" { target c++11 } } }
namespace Sublime {
struct View;
struct AreaIndex;
struct Area {
void qt_static_metacall();
void viewAdded(AreaIndex *, View *);
};
}
void Sublime::Area::qt_static_metacall() {
typedef void (Area::*_t)(AreaIndex *, View *);
if (*reinterpret_cast<_t *>(1) == _t(&Area::viewAdded))
__builtin_abort();
}