OpenE2K
/
gcc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

re PR tree-optimization/93210 (Sub-optimal code optimization on struct/combound constexpr (gcc vs. clang)) 

Regarding test gcc.dg/pr93210.c, on different targets GIMPLE code may
slightly differ which is why the scan-tree-dump-times directive may
fail.  For example, for a RETURN_EXPR on x86_64 we have

  return 0x11100f0e0d0c0a090807060504030201;

whereas on IBM Z the first operand is a RESULT_DECL like

  <retval> = 0x102030405060708090a0c0d0e0f1011;
  return <retval>;

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/pr93210.c: Adapt regex in order to also support a
	RESULT_DECL as an operand for a RETURN_EXPR.
This commit is contained in:
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus 2021-04-15 08:03:47 +02:00
parent df3b128952
commit 417c36cfd6
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr93210.c
View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/93210 */
/* { dg-do run } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "return \[0-9]\[0-9a-fA-FxX]*;" 31 "optimized" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "(?:return|<retval> =) \[0-9]\[0-9a-fA-FxX]*;" 31 "optimized" } } */
#ifdef __SIZEOF_INT128__
typedef unsigned __int128 L;