PR other/69006
PR testsuite/88920
* lib/gcc-dg.exp: If llvm_binutils effective target, set
allow_blank_lines to 2 during initialization.
(dg-allow-blank-lines-in-output): Set allow_blank_lines to 1 only if
it was previously zero.
(gcc-dg-prune): Don't check for llvm_binutils effective target here.
Clear allow_blank_lines afterwards whenever it was 1.
* gdc.test/gdc-test.exp (dmd2dg): Don't call
dg-allow-blank-lines-in-output here.
(gdc-do-test): Set allow_blank_lines to 3 if it is 0 before running
the tests and restore it back at the end.
From-SVN: r268930
* c-c++-common/ubsan/opts-1.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/ubsan/opts-2.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/ubsan/opts-3.c: New test.
* c-c++-common/ubsan/opts-4.c: New test.
From-SVN: r268929
PR tree-optimization/89278
* tree-loop-distribution.c: Include tree-eh.h.
(generate_memset_builtin, generate_memcpy_builtin): Call
rewrite_to_non_trapping_overflow on builtin->size before passing it
to force_gimple_operand_gsi.
* gcc.dg/pr89278.c: New test.
Co-Authored-By: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
From-SVN: r268927
PR c/89340
* c-decl.c (start_function): Clear TREE_PUBLIC on nested functions
before c_decl_attributes rather than after it.
* gcc.dg/pr89340.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr57036-2.c (jpgDecode_convert): Expect a warning
that leaf attribute on nested function is useless.
From-SVN: r268926
Compiling with LTO revealed a number of cases in the runtime and
standard library where C and Go disagreed about the type of an object or
function (or where Go and code generated by the compiler disagreed). In
all cases the underlying representation was the same (e.g., uintptr vs.
void*), so this wasn't causing actual problems, but it did result in a
number of annoying warnings when compiling with LTO.
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/160700
From-SVN: r268923
PR go/89168
libgo: change gotest to run examples with output
Change the gotest script to act like "go test" and run examples that
have "output" comments. This is not done with full generality, but
just enough to run the libgo tests. Other packages should be tested
with "go test" as usual.
While we're here clean up some old bits of gotest, and only run
TestXXX functions that are actually in *_test.go files. The latter
change should fix https://gcc.gnu.org/PR89168.
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/162139
From-SVN: r268922
* config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_SUBTARGET64_ISA_DEFAULT):
Enable MMX, SSE and SSE2 by default.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Do not
explicitly set MMX, SSE and SSE2 flags for TARGET_64BIT here.
From-SVN: r268917
PR rtl-optimization/89354
* combine.c (make_extraction): Punt if extraction_mode is narrower
than len bits.
* gcc.dg/pr89354.c: New test.
From-SVN: r268913
Make the option handling code parse the -flag-init-integer value as a
C long type, allowing a larger range on systems where long is a larger
type than int. Document the behavior.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed as obvious.
2019-02-14 Janne Blomqvist <jb@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/81552
* gfortran.h (gfc_option_t): Make flag_init_integer_value a long.
* options.c (gfc_handle_option): Use strtol instead of atoi.
* invoke.texi: Document -finit-integer behavior in more detail
From-SVN: r268906
2018-02-14 Steve Ellcey <sellcey@marvell.com>
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_attribute_table): Change
affects_type_identity to true for aarch64_vector_pcs.
(aarch64_comp_type_attributes): New function.
(TARGET_COMP_TYPE_ATTRIBUTES): New macro.
From-SVN: r268902
2019-02-14 Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
PR fortran/88248
* symbol.c: Move check for labeled DO statement from
gfc_define_st_label to gfc_reference_st_label.
PR fortran/88248
* gfortran.dg/pr88248.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/f2018_obs.f90: Updated test.
From-SVN: r268895
The iterator ANY64 are used in various general split patterns and is supposed
to contain all 64 bit modes.
For some reason the pattern has HI but not HF. This adds HF so that general
64 bit splits are generated for these modes as well. These are required
by various split patterns that expect them to be there.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/88850
* config/arm/iterators.md (ANY64): Add V4HF.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/88850
* gcc.target/arm/pr88850-2.c: New test.
* lib/target-supports.exp
(check_effective_target_arm_neon_softfp_fp16_ok_nocache,
check_effective_target_arm_neon_softfp_fp16_ok,
add_options_for_arm_neon_softfp_fp16): New.
From-SVN: r268884
Because uses-allocator construction is invariably done with a const
lvalue the __uses_alloc helper should use a const lvalue for the
is_constructible checks. Otherwise, it can detect that the type can be
constructed from an rvalue, and then an error happens when a const
lvalue is passed to the constructor instead.
Prior to LWG DR 2586 scoped_allocator_adaptor incorrectly used an rvalue
type in the is_constructible check and then used a non-const lvalue for
the actual construction. The other components using uses-allocator
construction (tuple and polymorphic_allocator) have always done so with
a const lvalue allocator, although the use of __use_alloc in our
implementation meant they behaved the same as scoped_allocator_adaptor
and incorrectly used rvalues for the is_constructible checks.
In C++20 the P0591R4 changes mean that all uses-allocator construction
is defined in terms of the new uses_allocator_construction_args
functions, which always use a const lvalue allocator.
The changes in this patch ensure that the __use_alloc helper correctly
matches the requirements in the standard, consistently using a const
lvalue allocator for the is_constructible checks and the actual
constructor arguments.
* doc/xml/manual/intro.xml: Document LWG 2586 status.
* include/bits/uses_allocator.h (__uses_alloc): Use const lvalue
allocator type in is_constructible checks.
* testsuite/20_util/scoped_allocator/69293_neg.cc: Adjust dg-error.
* testsuite/20_util/scoped_allocator/dr2586.cc: New test.
* testsuite/20_util/tuple/cons/allocators.cc: Add test using
problematic type from LWG 2586 discussion.
* testsuite/20_util/uses_allocator/69293_neg.cc: Adjust dg-error.
* testsuite/20_util/uses_allocator/cons_neg.cc: Likewise.
From-SVN: r268882
When this testcase was introduced it failed to account for the possibility of
targets that do not support arm mode or that do not support the ldrd/strd
instructions.
This patch accounts for both of these by adding some
dg-require-effective-target lines to the testcase.
This patch also adds a new effective-target procedure to check a target
supports ldrd/strd.
This patch also adds a new effective-target procedure to check a target
supports arm ldrd/strd.
The check uses the 'r' constraint to ensure SP is not used so that it will work
for thumb mode code generation as well as arm mode.
Tested by running this testcase with cross compilers using "-march=armv5t",
"-mcpu=cortex-m3", "-mcpu-arm7tdmi", "-mcpu=cortex-a9 -march=armv5t" for both
arm-none-eabi and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
Also ran this testcase with `make check` natively.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-02-14 Matthew Malcomson <matthew.malcomson@arm.com>
* gcc.dg/rtl/arm/ldrd-peepholes.c: Restrict testcase.
* lib/target-supports.exp: Add procedure to check for ldrd.
From-SVN: r268881
This change is safe to make now (in stage 4), because the constructors
are currently incorrect and unusable (unless the supplied container
already contains a heap, in which case the new make_heap calls are
redundant but harmless).
* doc/xml/manual/intro.xml: Document LWG 2537 status.
* include/bits/stl_queue.h
(priority_queue(const Compare&, const Container&, const Alloc&))
(priority_queue(const Compare&, Container&&, const Alloc&)): Call
make_heap.
* testsuite/23_containers/priority_queue/dr2537.cc: New test.
From-SVN: r268878
Although there is no good use for stack<int, deque<double>> or similar
types with a mismatched value_type, it's possible somebody is doing that
and getting away with it currently. This patch only enforces the new
requirement for C++17 and later. During stage 1 we should consider
enforcing it for C++11 and C++14.
* doc/xml/manual/intro.xml: Document LWG 2566 status.
* include/bits/stl_queue.h (queue, priority_queue): Add static
assertions to enforce LWG 2566 requirement on value_type.
* include/bits/stl_stack.h (stack): Likewise.
From-SVN: r268877
The OpenACC 'resolve_oacc_nested_loops' function duplicates most code of the
OpenMP 'resolve_omp_do', but didn't include the PR60127 "ICE with OpenMP and DO
CONCURRENT" (trunk r210331) changes. (Probably the two functions should be
unified?)
The Fortran DO CONCURRENT construct is a way to tell the compiler that loop
iterations don't have any interdependencies -- which is information that would
very well be suitable for OpenACC/OpenMP loops. There are some "details"
however, see the discussion/references in PR60127, so for the time being, make
this a compile-time error instead of an ICE.
gcc/fortran/
* openmp.c (resolve_oacc_nested_loops): Error on do concurrent
loops.
gcc/testsuite/
* gfortran.dg/goacc/loop-3-2.f95: Error on do concurrent loops.
* gfortran.dg/goacc/loop-3.f95: Likewise.
* gfortran.dg/goacc/pr72715.f90: New test.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
From-SVN: r268875
2019-02-14 Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
PR rtl-optimization/89242
* dce.c (delete_unmarked_insns): Call free_dominance_info we
process a transformation.
2019-02-14 Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
PR rtl-optimization/89242
* g++.dg/pr89242.C: New test.
From-SVN: r268873
This DR was already resolved for GCC 7.1 by the implementation of DR
2192, but we didn't have an explicit test for the behaviour that 2735
guarantees.
* doc/xml/manual/intro.xml: Document LWG 2735 status.
* include/bits/std_abs.h: Add comment about LWG 2735.
* testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cstdlib/dr2735.cc: New test.
From-SVN: r268867
gcc/:
* optc-save-gen.awk: Set var_opt_hash for initial optimizations
and set current index for other optimizations.
gcc/testsuite/:
* gcc.dg/func-attr-1.c: New test.
From-SVN: r268860
Clang defines the __cpp_impl_destroying_delete macro unconditionally, so
that the feature is supported whenever the library type is defined. This
is incompatible with the current definition in libstdc++ because we use
constexpr and inline variables, which will give an error for older -std
modes.
This patch defines the destroying_delete_t type and destroying_delete
variable independently of the __cpp_impl_destroying_delete macro, but
only for C++2a (because the names aren't reserved for previous
standards). The __cpp_lib_destroying_delete macro is only defined when
both the library type and compiler macro are defined (i.e. when the type
can actually be used as intended).
PR libstdc++/89345
* include/std/version [__cpp_impl_destroying_delete]
(__cpp_lib_destroying_delete): Only define for C++2a and later.
* libsupc++/new [__cpp_impl_destroying_delete]
(__cpp_lib_destroying_delete): Likewise.
(destroying_delete_t, destroying_delete): Likewise, but define even
when __cpp_impl_destroying_delete is not defined.
* testsuite/18_support/destroying_delete.cc: New test.
From-SVN: r268856
It's too risky to reuse the type field for USING_DECL_SCOPE.
Language-independent parts of the compiler, such as location and
non-lvalue wrappers, happily take the TREE_TYPE of a USING_DECL as if
it was a type rather than an unrelated scope.
For better or worse, USING_DECLs use the non-common struct so we can
use the otherwise unused result field. Adjust fallout, from uses of
TREE_TYPE that were supposed to be USING_DECL_SCOPE, to other
accidental uses of TREE_TYPE of a USING_DECL.
for gcc/cp/ChangeLog
PR c++/86379
* cp-tree.h (USING_DECL_SCOPE): Use result rather than type.
* name-lookup.c (strip_using_decl): Use USING_DECL_SCOPE.
* search.c (protected_accessible_p): Follow USING_DECL_DECLS.
(shared_member_p): Likewise.
(lookup_member): Likewise.
* decl.c (grok_special_member_properties): Skip USING_DECLs.
* semantics.c (finish_omp_declare_simd_methods): Likewise.
(finish_qualified_id_expr): Do not call shared_member_p with
a dependent expr.
for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR c++/86379
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr86379.C: New.
From-SVN: r268851
A lambda capture variable initialized with a lambda expr taking more
than one parameter got us confused.
The first problem was that the parameter list was cut short during
tsubsting because we tsubsted it with cp_unevaluated_operand. We
reset it right after, to tsubst the function body, so I've moved the
reset up so that it's in effect while processing the parameters as
well.
The second problem was that the lambda expr appeared twice, once in a
decltype that gave the capture variable its type, and once in its
initializer. This caused us to instantiate two separate lambda exprs
and closure types, and then to flag that the lambda expr in the
initializer could not be converted to the unrelated closure type
determined for the capture variable. Recording the tsubsted expr in
the local specialization map, and retrieving it for reuse fixed it.
However, that required some care to avoid reusing the lambda expr
across different indices in pack expansions.
for gcc/cp/ChangeLog
PR c++/87322
* pt.c (tsubst_lambda_expr): Avoid duplicate tsubsting.
Move cp_evaluated resetting before signature tsubsting.
(gen_elem_of_pack_expansion_instantiation): Separate local
specializations per index.
for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR c++/87322
* g++.dg/cpp1y/pr87322.C: New.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-variadic5.C: Test that we
instantiate the expected number of lambda functions.
From-SVN: r268850
This patch fixes an ICE in the Thumb-1 LDM peepholer. Thumb-1 LDMs
always update the base register except if the base is loaded.
The current implementation rejects LDMs where the base is not dead,
however this doesn't exclude the case where the base is loaded as
well as dead. Fix this by explicitly checking whether the base is
loaded. Also enable LDMs which load the first register.
gcc/
PR target/89190
* config/arm/arm.c (ldm_stm_operation_p) Set
addr_reg_in_reglist correctly for first register.
(load_multiple_sequence): Remove dead base check.
(gen_ldm_seq): Correctly set write_back for Thumb-1.
testsuite/
PR target/89190
* gcc.target/arm/pr89190.c: New test.
From-SVN: r268848
PR c++/89036 reports an ICE due to this assertion failing
1136 /* A class should never have more than one destructor. */
1137 gcc_assert (!current_fns || via_using || !DECL_DESTRUCTOR_P (method));
on this template with a pair of dtors, with
mutually exclusive "requires" clauses:
template<typename T>
struct Y {
~Y() requires(true) = default;
~Y() requires(false) {}
};
Nathan introduced this assertion as part of:
ca9219bf18c68a001d62ecb981bc9176b0feaf12 (aka r251340):
2017-08-24 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
Conversion operators kept on single overload set
which, amongst other changes to add_method had this:
/* A class should never have more than one destructor. */
- if (current_fns && DECL_MAYBE_IN_CHARGE_DESTRUCTOR_P (method))
- return false;
+ gcc_assert (!current_fns || !DECL_DESTRUCTOR_P (method));
The following patch drops the assertion (I already had to generalize
the assertion in r268041 to fix PR c++/88699).
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/89036
* class.c (add_method): Drop destructor assertion.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/89036
* g++.dg/concepts/pr89036.C: New test.
From-SVN: r268847
On AArch64 aarch64_classify_address has a case for when it's non-strict
that will allow it to accept any byte offset from a reg when validating
an address in a given addressing mode.
This because reload would later make the address valid. SVE however requires
the address always be valid, but currently allows any address when a MEM +
offset is used. This causes an ICE as nothing later forces the address to be
legitimate.
The patch forces aarch64_emit_sve_pred_move via expand_insn to ensure that
the addressing mode is valid for any loads/stores it creates, which follows
the SVE way of handling address classifications.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/88847
* config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md (*pred_mov<mode>, pred_mov<mode>):
Expose as @aarch64_pred_mov.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_classify_address):
Use expand_insn which legitimizes operands.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/88847
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr88847.c: New test.
From-SVN: r268845