Fixed toc.
This commit is contained in:
parent
db90e6f167
commit
6abca68dbf
8
FAQ.in
8
FAQ.in
@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ versions of some string functions. These can only be used with GCC. See
|
||||
libc anymore?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Removed. Does not apply anymore.
|
||||
{} Removed. Does not apply anymore.
|
||||
|
||||
?? When I use GNU libc on my Linux system by linking against
|
||||
the libc.so which comes with glibc all I get is a core dump.
|
||||
@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ completely.
|
||||
the Perl db modules the testsuite is not passed. This did not
|
||||
happen with db-1, gdbm, or ndbm.
|
||||
|
||||
Removed. Does not apply anymore.
|
||||
{} Removed. Does not apply anymore.
|
||||
|
||||
?? The pow() inline function I get when including <math.h> is broken.
|
||||
I get segmentation faults when I run the program.
|
||||
@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ benchmark program for measuring disk access).
|
||||
?? Programs compiled with glibc 2.1 can't read db files made with glibc
|
||||
2.0. What has changed that programs like rpm break?
|
||||
|
||||
Removed. Does not apply anymore.
|
||||
{} Removed. Does not apply anymore.
|
||||
|
||||
?? Autoconf's AC_CHECK_FUNC macro reports that a function exists, but
|
||||
when I try to use it, it always returns -1 and sets errno to ENOSYS.
|
||||
@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ and regulations of the country this effects. glibc behaves correctly.
|
||||
??make I've build make 3.77 against glibc 2.1 and now make gets
|
||||
segmentation faults.
|
||||
|
||||
Removed. Does not apply anymore, use make 3.79 or newer.
|
||||
{} Removed. Does not apply anymore, use make 3.79 or newer.
|
||||
|
||||
?? Why do so many programs using math functions fail on my AlphaStation?
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user