When attempting to repair a read error, don't read from
devices with a known bad block.
As we are only reading PAGE_SIZE blocks, we don't try to
narrow down to smaller regions in the hope that only part of this
page is bad - it isn't worth the effort.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When redirecting a read error to a different device, we must
again avoid bad blocks and possibly split the request.
Spin_lock typo fixed thanks to Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This patch just covers the basic read path:
1/ read_balance needs to check for badblocks, and return not only
the chosen slot, but also how many good blocks are available
there.
2/ read submission must be ready to issue multiple reads to
different devices as different bad blocks on different devices
could mean that a single large read cannot be served by any one
device, but can still be served by the array.
This requires keeping count of the number of outstanding requests
per bio. This count is stored in 'bi_phys_segments'
On read error we currently just fail the request if another target
cannot handle the whole request. Next patch refines that a bit.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When a loop ends with a large if, it can be neater to change the
if to invert the condition and just 'continue'.
Then the body of the if can be indented to a lower level.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
On a successful write to a known bad block, flag the sh
so that raid5d can remove the known bad block from the list.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When a write error is detected, don't mark the device as failed
immediately but rather record the fact for handle_stripe to deal with.
Handle_stripe then attempts to record a bad block. Only if that fails
does the device get marked as faulty.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If we get an uncorrectable read error - record a bad block rather than
failing the device.
And if these errors (which may be due to known bad blocks) cause
recovery to be impossible, record a bad block on the recovering
devices, or abort the recovery.
As we might abort a recovery without failing a device we need to teach
RAID5 about recovery_disabled handling.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
There are two times that we might read in raid5:
1/ when a read request fits within a chunk on a single
working device.
In this case, if there is any bad block in the range of
the read, we simply fail the cache-bypass read and
perform the read though the stripe cache.
2/ when reading into the stripe cache. In this case we
mark as failed any device which has a bad block in that
strip (1 page wide).
Note that we will both avoid reading and avoid writing.
This is correct (as we will never read from the block, there
is no point writing), but not optimal (as writing could 'fix'
the error) - that will be addressed later.
If we have not seen any write errors on the device yet, we treat a bad
block like a recent read error. This will encourage an attempt to fix
the read error which will either generate a write error, or will
ensure good data is stored there. We don't yet forget the bad block
in that case. That comes later.
Now that we honour bad blocks when reading we can allow devices with
bad blocks into the array.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
raid1d is too big with several deep branches.
So separate them out into their own functions.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
If we cannot read a block from anywhere during recovery, there is
now a better approach than just giving up.
We can record a bad block on each device and keep going - being
careful not to clear the bad block when a write succeeds as it might -
it will be a write of incorrect data.
We have now reached the state where - for raid1 - we only call
md_error if md_set_badblocks has failed.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
If we find a bad block while writing as part of resync/recovery we
need to report that back to raid1d which must record the bad block,
or fail the device.
Similarly when fixing a read error, a further error should just
record a bad block if possible rather than failing the device.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
When we get a write error (in the data area, not in metadata),
update the badblock log rather than failing the whole device.
As the write may well be many blocks, we trying writing each
block individually and only log the ones which fail.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
When performing write-behind we allocate pages to store the data
during write.
Previously we just keep a list of pages. Now we keep a list of
bi_vec which includes offset and size.
This means that the r1bio has complete information to create a new
bio which will be needed for retrying after write errors.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
If we succeed in writing to a block that was recorded as
being bad, we clear the bad-block record.
This requires some delayed handling as the bad-block-list update has
to happen in process-context.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
If we have seen any write error on a drive, then don't write to
any known-bad blocks on that drive.
If necessary, we divide the write request up into pieces just
like we do for reads, so each piece is either all written or
all not written to any given drive.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Previous patches in the bad block series extended behavior of
rdev's 'state' interface but lacked documentation update.
Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
It is only safe to choose not to write to a bad block if that bad
block is safely recorded in metadata - i.e. if it has been
'acknowledged'.
If it hasn't we need to wait for the acknowledgement.
We support that using rdev->blocked wait and
md_wait_for_blocked_rdev by introducing a new device flag
'BlockedBadBlock'.
This flag is only advisory.
It is cleared whenever we acknowledge a bad block, so that a waiter
can re-check the particular bad blocks that it is interested it.
It should be set by a caller when they find they need to wait.
This (set after test) is inherently racy, but as
md_wait_for_blocked_rdev already has a timeout, losing the race will
have minimal impact.
When we clear "Blocked" was also clear "BlockedBadBlocks" incase it
was set incorrectly (see above race).
We also modify the way we manage 'Blocked' to fit better with the new
handling of 'BlockedBadBlocks' and to make it consistent between
externally managed and internally managed metadata. This requires
that each raidXd loop checks if the metadata needs to be written and
triggers a write (md_check_recovery) if needed. Otherwise a queued
write request might cause raidXd to wait for the metadata to write,
and only that thread can write it.
Before writing metadata, we set FaultRecorded for all devices that
are Faulty, then after writing the metadata we clear Blocked for any
device for which the Fault was certainly Recorded.
The 'faulty' device flag now appears in sysfs if the device is faulty
*or* it has unacknowledged bad blocks. So user-space which does not
understand bad blocks can continue to function correctly.
User space which does, should not assume a device is faulty until it
sees the 'faulty' flag, and then sees the list of unacknowledged bad
blocks is empty.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If a device has ever seen a write error, we will want to handle
known-bad-blocks differently.
So create an appropriate state flag and export it via sysfs.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
When performing resync/etc, keep the size of the request
small enough that it doesn't overlap any known bad blocks.
Devices with badblocks at the start of the request are completely
excluded.
If there is nowhere to read from due to bad blocks, record
a bad block on each target device.
Now that we never read from known-bad-blocks we can allow devices with
known-bad-blocks into a RAID1.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Now that we have a bad block list, we should not read from those
blocks.
There are several main parts to this:
1/ read_balance needs to check for bad blocks, and return not only
the chosen device, but also how many good blocks are available
there.
2/ fix_read_error needs to avoid trying to read from bad blocks.
3/ read submission must be ready to issue multiple reads to
different devices as different bad blocks on different devices
could mean that a single large read cannot be served by any one
device, but can still be served by the array.
This requires keeping count of the number of outstanding requests
per bio. This count is stored in 'bi_phys_segments'
4/ retrying a read needs to also be ready to submit a smaller read
and queue another request for the rest.
This does not yet handle bad blocks when reading to perform resync,
recovery, or check.
'md_trim_bio' will also be used for RAID10, so put it in md.c and
export it.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Space must have been allocated when array was created.
A feature flag is set when the badblock list is non-empty, to
ensure old kernels don't load and trust the whole device.
We only update the on-disk badblocklist when it has changed.
If the badblocklist (or other metadata) is stored on a bad block, we
don't cope very well.
If metadata has no room for bad block, flag bad-blocks as disabled,
and do the same for 0.90 metadata.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
As no personality understand bad block lists yet, we must
reject any device that is known to contain bad blocks.
As the personalities get taught, these tests can be removed.
This only applies to raid1/raid5/raid10.
For linear/raid0/multipath/faulty the whole concept of bad blocks
doesn't mean anything so there is no point adding the checks.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Previous patch in the bad block series added new sysfs interfaces
([unacknowledged_]bad_blocks) for each rdev without documentation.
Add it.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This can show the log (providing it fits in one page) and
allows bad blocks to be 'acknowledged' meaning that they
have safely been recorded in metadata.
Clearing bad blocks is not allowed via sysfs (except for
code testing). A bad block can only be cleared when
a write to the block succeeds.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
This the first step in allowing md to track bad-blocks per-device so
that we can fail individual blocks rather than the whole device.
This patch just adds a data structure for recording bad blocks, with
routines to add, remove, search the list.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
When calling bioset_create we pass the size of the front_pad as
sizeof(mddev)
which looks suspicious as mddev is a pointer and so it looks like a
common mistake where
sizeof(*mddev)
was intended.
The size is actually correct as we want to store a pointer in the
front padding of the bios created by the bioset, so make the intent
more explicit by using
sizeof(mddev_t *)
Reported-by: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This patch causes MD to generate an event (for device-mapper) when the
synchronization thread is reaped. This is expected behavior for device-mapper.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Revert most of commit e384e58549
md/bitmap: prepare for storing write-intent-bitmap via dm-dirty-log.
MD should not need to use DM's dirty log - we decided to use md's
bitmaps instead.
Keeping the DIV_ROUND_UP clean-ups that were part of commit
e384e58549, however.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If device-mapper creates a RAID1 array that includes devices to
be rebuilt, it will deref a NULL pointer when finished because
sysfs is not used by device-mapper instantiated RAID devices.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
While preparing to write a stripe we keep the parity block or blocks
locked (R5_LOCKED) - towards the end of schedule_reconstruction.
If the array is discovered to have failed before this write completes
we can leave those blocks LOCKED, and init_stripe will notice that a
free stripe still has a locked block and will complain.
So clear the R5_LOCKED flag in handle_failed_stripe, and demote the
'BUG' to a 'WARN_ON'.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read
cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev->
corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable
IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read
cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev->
corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable
IMHO.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Read errors are considered to corrected if write-back and re-read
cycle is finished without further problems. Thus moving the rdev->
corrected_errors counting after the re-reading looks more reasonable
IMHO. Also included a couple of whitespace fixes on sync_page_io().
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
page_address() returns void pointer, so the casts can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Normally we would fail a device with a READ error. However if doing
so causes the array to fail, it is better to leave the device
in place and just return the read error to the caller.
The current test for decide if the array will fail is overly
simplistic.
We have a function 'enough' which can tell if the array is failed or
not, so use it to guide the decision.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
When we get a read error during recovery, RAID10 previously
arranged for the recovering device to appear to fail so that
the recovery stops and doesn't restart. This is misleading and wrong.
Instead, make use of the new recovery_disabled handling and mark
the target device and having recovery disabled.
Add appropriate checks in add_disk and remove_disk so that devices
are removed and not re-added when recovery is disabled.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
If we hit a read error while recovering a mirror, we want to abort the
recovery without necessarily failing the disk - as having a disk this
a read error is better than not having an array at all.
Currently this is managed with a per-array flag "recovery_disabled"
and is only implemented for RAID1. For RAID10 we will need finer
grained control as we might want to disable recovery for individual
devices separately.
So push more of the decision making into the personality.
'recovery_disabled' is now a 'cookie' which is copied when the
personality want to disable recovery and is changed when a device is
added to the array as this is used as a trigger to 'try recovery
again'.
This will allow RAID10 to get the control that it needs.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Commit c89a8eee61 ("Allow faulty devices to be removed from a
readonly array.") added some work on ro array in the function,
but it couldn't be done since we didn't allow the ro array to be
handled from the beginning. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
There are places where sysfs links to rdev are handled
in a same way. Add the helper functions to consolidate
them.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
As per printk_ratelimit comment, it should not be used.
Signed-off-by: Christian Dietrich <christian.dietrich@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Using __test_and_{set,clear}_bit_le() with ignoring its return value
can be replaced with __{set,clear}_bit_le().
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
handle_stripe5() and handle_stripe6() are now virtually identical.
So discard one and rename the other to 'analyse_stripe()'.
It always returns 0, so change it to 'void' and remove the 'done'
variable in handle_stripe().
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
The RAID6 version of this code is usable for RAID5 providing:
- we test "conf->max_degraded" rather than "2" as appropriate
- we make sure s->failed_num[1] is meaningful (and not '-1')
when s->failed > 1
The 'return 1' must become 'goto finish' in the new location.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Apart from 'prexor' which can only be set for RAID5, and
'qd_idx' which can only be meaningful for RAID6, these two
chunks of code are nearly the same.
So combine them into one adding a test to call either
handle_parity_checks5 or handle_parity_checks6 as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
RAID6 is only allowed to choose 'reconstruct-write' while RAID5 is
also allow 'read-modify-write'
Apart from this difference, handle_stripe_dirtying[56] are nearly
identical. So resolve these differences and create just one function.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Provided that ->failed_num[1] is not a valid device number (which is
easily achieved) fetch_block6 provides all the functionality of
fetch_block5.
So remove the latter and rename the former to simply "fetch_block".
Then handle_stripe_fill5 and handle_stripe_fill6 become the same and
can similarly be united.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Next patch will unite fetch_block5 and fetch_block6.
First I want to make the differences a little more clear.
For RAID6 if we are writing at all and there is a failed device, then
we need to load or compute every block so we can do a
reconstruct-write.
This case isn't needed for RAID5 - we will do a read-modify-write in
that case.
So make that test a separate test in fetch_block6 rather than merged
with two other tests.
Make a similar change in fetch_block5 so the one bit that is not
needed for RAID6 is clearly separate.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
