Commit Graph

414715 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hidetoshi Seto f88ba6a2a4 Btrfs: skip submitting barrier for missing device
I got an error on v3.13:
 BTRFS error (device sdf1) in write_all_supers:3378: errno=-5 IO failure (errors while submitting device barriers.)

how to reproduce:
  > mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdf2
  > wipefs -a /dev/sdf2
  > mount -o degraded /dev/sdf1 /mnt
  > btrfs balance start -f -sconvert=single -mconvert=single -dconvert=single /mnt

The reason of the error is that barrier_all_devices() failed to submit
barrier to the missing device.  However it is clear that we cannot do
anything on missing device, and also it is not necessary to care chunks
on the missing device.

This patch stops sending/waiting barrier if device is missing.

Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:53 -04:00
Josef Bacik 29bce2f399 Btrfs: unlock extent and pages on error in cow_file_range
When I converted the BUG_ON() for the free_space_cache_inode in cow_file_range I
made it so we just return an error instead of unlocking all of our various
stuff.  This is a mistake and causes us to hang when we run into this.  This
patch fixes this problem.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:53 -04:00
Josef Bacik c581afc8db Btrfs: balance delayed inode updates
While trying to reproduce a delayed ref problem I noticed the box kept falling
over using all 80gb of my ram with btrfs_inode's and btrfs_delayed_node's.
Turns out this is because we only throttle delayed inode updates in
btrfs_dirty_inode, which doesn't actually get called that often, especially when
all you are doing is creating a bunch of files.  So balance delayed inode
updates everytime we create a new inode.  With this patch we no longer use up
all of our ram with delayed inode updates.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:52 -04:00
David Sterba 1bae30982b btrfs: add simple debugfs interface
Help during debugging to export various interesting infromation and
tunables without the need of extra mount options or ioctls.

Usage:
* declare your variable in sysfs.h, and include where you need it
* define the variable in sysfs.c and make it visible via
  debugfs_create_TYPE

Depends on CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:51 -04:00
David Sterba ace0105076 btrfs: send: lower memory requirements in common case
The fs_path structure uses an inline buffer and falls back to a chain of
allocations, but vmalloc is not necessary because PATH_MAX fits into
PAGE_SIZE.

The size of fs_path has been reduced to 256 bytes from PAGE_SIZE,
usually 4k. Experimental measurements show that most paths on a single
filesystem do not exceed 200 bytes, and these get stored into the inline
buffer directly, which is now 230 bytes. Longer paths are kmalloced when
needed.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:50 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana dff6d0adbe Btrfs: make some tree searches in send.c more efficient
We have this pattern where we do search for a contiguous group of
items in a tree and everytime we find an item, we process it, then
we release our path, increment the offset of the search key, do
another full tree search and repeat these steps until a tree search
can't find more items we're interested in.

Instead of doing these full tree searches after processing each item,
just process the next item/slot in our leaf and don't release the path.
Since all these trees are read only and we always use the commit root
for a search and skip node/leaf locks, we're not affecting concurrency
on the trees.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:49 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana a0859c0998 Btrfs: use right extent item position in send when finding extent clones
This was a leftover from the commit:

   74dd17fbe3
   (Btrfs: fix btrfs send for inline items and compression)

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:48 -04:00
David Sterba 57fb8910c2 btrfs: send: remove BUG_ON from name_cache_delete
If cleaning the name cache fails, we could try to proceed at the cost of
some memory leak. This is not expected to happen often.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:48 -04:00
David Sterba 4d1a63b21b btrfs: send: remove BUG from process_all_refs
There are only 2 static callers, the BUG would normally be never
reached, but let's be nice.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:47 -04:00
David Sterba 1f5a7ff999 btrfs: send: squeeze bitfilelds in fs_path
We know that buf_len is at most PATH_MAX, 4k, and can merge it with the
reversed member. This saves 3 bytes in favor of inline_buf.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:46 -04:00
David Sterba e25a812206 btrfs: send: remove virtual_mem member from fs_path
We don't need to keep track of that, it's available via is_vmalloc_addr.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:45 -04:00
David Sterba b23ab57d48 btrfs: send: remove prepared member from fs_path
The member is used only to return value back from
fs_path_prepare_for_add, we can do it locally and save 8 bytes for the
inline_buf path.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:44 -04:00
David Sterba 64792f2535 btrfs: send: replace check with an assert in gen_unique_name
The buffer passed to snprintf can hold the fully expanded format string,
64 = 3x largest ULL + 3x char + trailing null.  I don't think that removing the
check entirely is a good idea, hence the ASSERT.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:44 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 5ed7f9ff15 Btrfs: more send support for parent/child dir relationship inversion
The commit titled "Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send"
didn't cover a particular case where the parent-child relationship inversion
of directories doesn't imply a rename of the new parent directory. This was
due to a simple logic mistake, a logical and instead of a logical or.

Steps to reproduce:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
  $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3/bar2/k11
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers
this case, will be submitted soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:43 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 03cb4fb9d8 Btrfs: fix send dealing with file renames and directory moves
This fixes a case that the commit titled:

   Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send

didn't cover. If the parent-child relationship between 2 directories
is inverted, both get renamed, and the former parent has a file that
got renamed too (but remains a child of that directory), the incremental
send operation would use the file's old path after sending an unlink
operation for that old path, causing receive to fail on future operations
like changing owner, permissions or utimes of the corresponding inode.

This is not a regression from the commit mentioned before, as without
that commit we would fall into the issues that commit fixed, so it's
just one case that wasn't covered before.

Simple steps to reproduce this issue are:

      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
      $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
      $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d
      $ touch /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/file
      $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x
      $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
      $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2
      $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2
      $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file2
      $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers
this case, will be submitted soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:42 -04:00
Wang Shilong 98cfee2143 Btrfs: only add roots if necessary in find_parent_nodes()
find_all_leafs() dosen't need add all roots actually, add roots only
if we need, this can avoid unnecessary ulist dance.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:41 -04:00
Hugo Mills abccd00f8a btrfs: Fix 32/64-bit problem with BTRFS_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL ioctl
The structure for BTRFS_SET_RECEIVED_IOCTL packs differently on 32-bit
and 64-bit systems. This means that it is impossible to use btrfs
receive on a system with a 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userspace, because
the structure size (and hence the ioctl number) is different.

This patch adds a compatibility structure and ioctl to deal with the
above case.

Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:40 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana d86477b303 Btrfs: add missing error check in incremental send
Function wait_for_parent_move() returns negative value if an error
happened, 0 if we don't need to wait for the parent's move, and
1 if the wait is needed.
Before this change an error return value was being treated like the
return value 1, which was not correct.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:40 -04:00
Miao Xie c404e0dc2c Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing procedure of the device replace
During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very easy
to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on the devices with the virtio
scsi driver). There were two bugs that caused this problem:
- We might allocate new chunks on the replaced device after we updated
  the mapping tree. And we forgot to replace the source device in those
  mapping of the new chunks.
- We might get the mapping information which including the source device
  before the mapping information update. And then submit the bio which was
  based on that mapping information after we freed the source device.

For the first bug, we can fix it by doing mapping tree update and source
device remove in the same context of the chunk mutex. The chunk mutex is
used to protect the allocable device list, the above method can avoid
the new chunk allocation, and after we remove the source device, all
the new chunks will be allocated on the new device. So it can fix
the first bug.

For the second bug, we need make sure all flighting bios are finished and
no new bios are produced during we are removing the source device. To fix
this problem, we introduced a global @bio_counter, we not only inc/dec
@bio_counter outsize of map_blocks, but also inc it before submitting bio
and dec @bio_counter when ending bios.

Since Raid56 is a little different and device replace dosen't support raid56
yet, it is not addressed in the patch and I add comments to make sure we will
fix it in the future.

Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:39 -04:00
Miao Xie 391cd9df81 Btrfs: fix unprotected alloc list insertion during the finishing procedure of replace
the alloc list of the filesystem is protected by ->chunk_mutex, we need
get that mutex when we insert the new device into the list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:38 -04:00
Kusanagi Kouichi 23ad5b17dc btrfs: Return EXDEV for cross file system snapshot
EXDEV seems an appropriate error if an operation fails bacause it
crosses file system boundaries.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@ac.auone-net.jp>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:37 -04:00
Miao Xie 827463c49f Btrfs: don't mix the ordered extents of all files together during logging the inodes
There was a problem in the old code:
If we failed to log the csum, we would free all the ordered extents in the log list
including those ordered extents that were logged successfully, it would make the
log committer not to wait for the completion of the ordered extents.

This patch doesn't insert the ordered extents that is about to be logged into
a global list, instead, we insert them into a local list. If we log the ordered
extents successfully, we splice them with the global list, or we will throw them
away, then do full sync. It can also reduce the lock contention and the traverse
time of list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:15:36 -04:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 93de4ba864 Btrfs: use right clone root offset for compressed extents
For non compressed extents, iterate_extent_inodes() gives us offsets
that take into account the data offset from the file extent items, while
for compressed extents it doesn't. Therefore we have to adjust them before
placing them in a send clone instruction. Not doing this adjustment leads to
the receiving end requesting for a wrong a file range to the clone ioctl,
which results in different file content from the one in the original send
root.

Issue reproducible with the following excerpt from the test I made for
xfstests:

  _scratch_mkfs
  _scratch_mount "-o compress-force=lzo"

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 118811" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x0d -b 39987 92267 39987" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1

  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x3e -b 80000 200000 80000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xdc -b 10000 250000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10000 300000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  # will be used for incremental send to be able to issue clone operations
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2

  $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
  $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/2.fssum -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/mysnap1 \
      -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
  $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap \
      -x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap1 -x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap2

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $tmp/1.snap
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap -f $tmp/clones.snap
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \
      -c $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 -f $tmp/2.snap

  _scratch_unmount
  _scratch_mkfs
  _scratch_mount

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap
  $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 2>> $seqres.full

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/clones.snap
  $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap 2>> $seqres.full

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap
  $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 2>> $seqres.full

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-15 08:04:27 -08:00
Anand Jain f085381e6d btrfs: fix null pointer deference at btrfs_sysfs_add_one+0x105
bdev is null when disk has disappeared and mounted with
the degrade option

stack trace
---------
btrfs_sysfs_add_one+0x105/0x1c0 [btrfs]
open_ctree+0x15f3/0x1fe0 [btrfs]
btrfs_mount+0x5db/0x790 [btrfs]
? alloc_pages_current+0xa4/0x160
mount_fs+0x34/0x1b0
vfs_kern_mount+0x62/0xf0
do_mount+0x22e/0xa80
? __get_free_pages+0x9/0x40
? copy_mount_options+0x31/0x170
SyS_mount+0x7e/0xc0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
---------

reproducer:
-------
mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
(detach a disk)
devmgt detach /dev/sdc [1]
mount -o degrade /dev/sdd /btrfs
-------

[1] github.com/anajain/devmgt.git

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-15 08:03:09 -08:00
Josef Bacik 3a0dfa6a12 Btrfs: unset DCACHE_DISCONNECTED when mounting default subvol
A user was running into errors from an NFS export of a subvolume that had a
default subvol set.  When we mount a default subvol we will use d_obtain_alias()
to find an existing dentry for the subvolume in the case that the root subvol
has already been mounted, or a dummy one is allocated in the case that the root
subvol has not already been mounted.  This allows us to connect the dentry later
on if we wander into the path.  However if we don't ever wander into the path we
will keep DCACHE_DISCONNECTED set for a long time, which angers NFS.  It doesn't
appear to cause any problems but it is annoying nonetheless, so simply unset
DCACHE_DISCONNECTED in the get_default_root case and switch btrfs_lookup() to
use d_materialise_unique() instead which will make everything play nicely
together and reconnect stuff if we wander into the defaul subvol path from a
different way.  With this patch I'm no longer getting the NFS errors when
exporting a volume that has been mounted with a default subvol set.  Thanks,

cc: bfields@fieldses.org
cc: ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-14 13:44:32 -08:00
Mitch Harder feb5f96589 Btrfs: fix max_inline mount option
Currently, the only mount option for max_inline that has any effect is
max_inline=0.  Any other value that is supplied to max_inline will be
adjusted to a minimum of 4k.  Since max_inline has an effective maximum
of ~3900 bytes due to page size limitations, the current behaviour
only has meaning for max_inline=0.

This patch will allow the the max_inline mount option to accept non-zero
values as indicated in the documentation.

Signed-off-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-14 13:44:32 -08:00
Liu Bo a9d2d4adb6 Btrfs: fix a lockdep warning when cleaning up aborted transaction
Given now we have 2 spinlock for management of delayed refs,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y helped me find this,

[ 4723.413809] BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#1, btrfs-transacti/2258
[ 4723.414882]  lock: 0xffff880048377670, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: btrfs-transacti/2258, .owner_cpu: 2
[ 4723.417146] CPU: 1 PID: 2258 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0+ #4
[ 4723.421321] Call Trace:
[ 4723.421872]  [<ffffffff81680fe7>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74
[ 4723.422753]  [<ffffffff81681093>] spin_dump+0x8c/0x91
[ 4723.424979]  [<ffffffff816810b9>] spin_bug+0x21/0x26
[ 4723.425846]  [<ffffffff81323956>] do_raw_spin_unlock+0x66/0x90
[ 4723.434424]  [<ffffffff81689bf7>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
[ 4723.438747]  [<ffffffffa015da9e>] btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction+0x35e/0x710 [btrfs]
[ 4723.443321]  [<ffffffffa015df54>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x104/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 4723.444692]  [<ffffffff810c1b5d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0
[ 4723.450336]  [<ffffffff810c1c2d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 4723.451332]  [<ffffffffa015e5ee>] transaction_kthread+0x22e/0x270 [btrfs]
[ 4723.452543]  [<ffffffffa015e3c0>] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x570/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 4723.457833]  [<ffffffff81079efa>] kthread+0xea/0xf0
[ 4723.458990]  [<ffffffff81079e10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
[ 4723.460133]  [<ffffffff81692aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 4723.460865]  [<ffffffff81079e10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
[ 4723.496521] ------------[ cut here ]------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The reason is that we get to call cond_resched_lock(&head_ref->lock) while
still holding @delayed_refs->lock.

So it's different with __btrfs_run_delayed_refs(), where we do drop-acquire
dance before and after actually processing delayed refs.

Here we don't drop the lock, others are not able to add new delayed refs to
head_ref, so cond_resched_lock(&head_ref->lock) is not necessary here.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-14 13:44:32 -08:00
Chris Mason 11bcac89c0 Revert "btrfs: add ioctl to export size of global metadata reservation"
This reverts commit 01e219e806.

David Sterba found a different way to provide these features without adding a new
ioctl.  We haven't released any progs with this ioctl yet, so I'm taking this out
for now until we finalize things.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
CC: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
2014-02-14 13:42:13 -08:00
Filipe David Borba Manana a2aa75e18a Btrfs: fix data corruption when reading/updating compressed extents
When using a mix of compressed file extents and prealloc extents, it
is possible to fill a page of a file with random, garbage data from
some unrelated previous use of the page, instead of a sequence of zeroes.

A simple sequence of steps to get into such case, taken from the test
case I made for xfstests, is:

   _scratch_mkfs
   _scratch_mount "-o compress-force=lzo"
   $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x06 -b 18670 266978 18670" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc 26450 665194" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 542872" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar

This results in the following file items in the fs tree:

   item 4 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 15879 itemsize 160
       inode generation 6 transid 6 size 542872 block group 0 mode 100600
   item 5 key (257 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 15863 itemsize 16
       inode ref index 2 namelen 6 name: foobar
   item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15810 itemsize 53
       extent data disk byte 0 nr 0 gen 6
       extent data offset 0 nr 24576 ram 266240
       extent compression 0
   item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 24576) itemoff 15757 itemsize 53
       prealloc data disk byte 12849152 nr 241664 gen 6
       prealloc data offset 0 nr 241664
   item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 266240) itemoff 15704 itemsize 53
       extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 4096 gen 6
       extent data offset 0 nr 20480 ram 20480
       extent compression 2
   item 9 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 286720) itemoff 15651 itemsize 53
       prealloc data disk byte 13090816 nr 405504 gen 6
       prealloc data offset 0 nr 258048

The on disk extent at offset 266240 (which corresponds to 1 single disk block),
contains 5 compressed chunks of file data. Each of the first 4 compress 4096
bytes of file data, while the last one only compresses 3024 bytes of file data.
Therefore a read into the file region [285648 ; 286720[ (length = 4096 - 3024 =
1072 bytes) should always return zeroes (our next extent is a prealloc one).

The solution here is the compression code path to zero the remaining (untouched)
bytes of the last page it uncompressed data into, as the information about how
much space the file data consumes in the last page is not known in the upper layer
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:__do_readpage(). In __do_readpage we were correctly zeroing
the remainder of the page but only if it corresponds to the last page of the inode
and if the inode's size is not a multiple of the page size.

This would cause not only returning random data on reads, but also permanently
storing random data when updating parts of the region that should be zeroed.
For the example above, it means updating a single byte in the region [285648 ; 286720[
would store that byte correctly but also store random data on disk.

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-08 17:57:15 -08:00
Josef Bacik 27a377db74 Btrfs: don't loop forever if we can't run because of the tree mod log
A user reported a 100% cpu hang with my new delayed ref code.  Turns out I
forgot to increase the count check when we can't run a delayed ref because of
the tree mod log.  If we can't run any delayed refs during this there is no
point in continuing to look, and we need to break out.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-08 17:57:15 -08:00
David Sterba 8051aa1a3d btrfs: reserve no transaction units in btrfs_ioctl_set_features
Added in patch "btrfs: add ioctls to query/change feature bits online"
modifications to superblock don't need to reserve metadata blocks when
starting a transaction.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-08 17:57:15 -08:00
Jeff Mahoney d0270aca88 btrfs: commit transaction after setting label and features
The set_fslabel ioctl uses btrfs_end_transaction, which means it's
possible that the change will be lost if the system crashes, same for
the newly set features. Let's use btrfs_commit_transaction instead.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-08 17:57:15 -08:00
Josef Bacik 6cc98d90f8 Btrfs: fix assert screwup for the pending move stuff
Wang noticed that he was failing btrfs/030 even though me and Filipe couldn't
reproduce.  Turns out this is because Wang didn't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT set,
which meant that a key part of Filipe's original patch was not being built in.
This appears to be a mess up with merging Filipe's patch as it does not exist in
his original patch.  Fix this by changing how we make sure del_waiting_dir_move
asserts that it did not error and take the function out of the ifdef check.
This makes btrfs/030 pass with the assert on or off.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-08 17:57:15 -08:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 60efa5eb2e Btrfs: use late_initcall instead of module_init
It seems that when init_btrfs_fs() is called, crc32c/crc32c-intel might
not always be already initialized, which results in the call to crypto_alloc_shash()
returning -ENOENT, as experienced by Ahmet who reported this.

Therefore make sure init_btrfs_fs() is called after crc32c is initialized (which
is at initialization level 6, module_init), by using late_initcall (which is at
initialization level 7) instead of module_init for btrfs.

Reported-and-Tested-by: Ahmet Inan <ainan@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-03 09:01:28 -08:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 0b947aff15 Btrfs: use btrfs_crc32c everywhere instead of libcrc32c
After the commit titled "Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in",
LIBCRC32C requirement was removed from btrfs' Kconfig. This made it not
possible to build a kernel with btrfs enabled (either as module or built-in)
if libcrc32c is not enabled as well. So just replace all uses of libcrc32c
with the equivalent function in btrfs hash.h - btrfs_crc32c.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-03 09:01:27 -08:00
Josef Bacik 8101c8dbf6 Btrfs: disable snapshot aware defrag for now
It's just broken and it's taking a lot of effort to fix it, so for now just
disable it so people can defrag in peace.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-02-03 09:01:27 -08:00
Chris Mason cf93da7bcf Btrfs: fix spin_unlock in check_ref_cleanup
Our goto out should have gone a little farther.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:31 -08:00
Chris Mason 90d3e592e9 Btrfs: setup inode location during btrfs_init_inode_locked
We have a race during inode init because the BTRFS_I(inode)->location is setup
after the inode hash table lock is dropped.  btrfs_find_actor uses the location
field, so our search might not find an existing inode in the hash table if we
race with the inode init code.

This commit changes things to setup the location field sooner.  Also the find actor now
uses only the location objectid to match inodes.  For inode hashing, we just
need a unique and stable test, it doesn't have to reflect the inode numbers we
show to userland.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
2014-01-29 07:06:30 -08:00
Chris Mason 514ac8ad87 Btrfs: don't use ram_bytes for uncompressed inline items
If we truncate an uncompressed inline item, ram_bytes isn't updated to reflect
the new size.  The fixe uses the size directly from the item header when
reading uncompressed inlines, and also fixes truncate to update the
size as it goes.

Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
2014-01-29 07:06:29 -08:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 23c6bf6a91 Btrfs: fix btrfs_search_slot_for_read backwards iteration
If the current path's leaf slot is 0, we do search for the previous
leaf (via btrfs_prev_leaf) and set the new path's leaf slot to a
value corresponding to the number of items - 1 of the former leaf.
Fix this by using the slot set by btrfs_prev_leaf, decrementing it
by 1 if it's equal to the leaf's number of items.

Use of btrfs_search_slot_for_read() for backward iteration is used in
particular by the send feature, which could miss items when the input
leaf has less items than its previous leaf.

This could be reproduced by running btrfs/007 from xfstests in a loop.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:28 -08:00
Wang Shilong 49fc647a2c Btrfs: do not export ulist functions
There are not any users that use ulist except Btrfs,don't
export them.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:27 -08:00
Wang Shilong 4c7a6f74ce Btrfs: rework ulist with list+rb_tree
We are really suffering from now ulist's implementation, some developers
gave their try, and i just gave some of my ideas for things:

 1. use list+rb_tree instead of arrary+rb_tree

 2. add cur_list to iterator rather than ulist structure.

 3. add seqnum into every node when they are added, this is
 used to do selfcheck when iterating node.

I noticed Zach Brown's comments before, long term is to kick off
ulist implementation, however, for now, we need at least avoid
arrary from ulist.

Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:27 -08:00
Wang Shilong f05c474688 Btrfs: fix memory leaks on walking backrefs failure
When walking backrefs, we may iterate every inode's extent
and add/merge them into ulist, and the caller will free memory
from ulist.

However, if we fail to allocate inode's extents element
memory or ulist_add() fail to allocate memory, we won't
add allocated memory into ulist, and the caller won't
free some allocated memory thus memory leaks happen.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:26 -08:00
Filipe David Borba Manana bf54f412f0 Btrfs: fix send file hole detection leading to data corruption
There was a case where file hole detection was incorrect and it would
cause an incremental send to override a section of a file with zeroes.

This happened in the case where between the last leaf we processed which
contained a file extent item for our current inode and the leaf we're
currently are at (and has a file extent item for our current inode) there
are only leafs containing exclusively file extent items for our current
inode, and none of them was updated since the previous send operation.
The file hole detection code would incorrectly consider the file range
covered by these leafs as a hole.

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:25 -08:00
Wang Shilong bca1a29003 Btrfs: add a reschedule point in btrfs_find_all_roots()
I can easily trigger the following warnings when enabling quota
in my virtual machine(running Opensuse), Steps are firstly creating
a subvolume full of fragment extents, and then create many snapshots
(500 in my test case).

[ 2362.808459] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [btrfs-qgroup-re:1970]

[ 2362.809023] task: e4af8450 ti: e371c000 task.ti: e371c000
[ 2362.809026] EIP: 0060:[<fa38f4ae>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0
[ 2362.809049] EIP is at __merge_refs+0x5e/0x100 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809051] EAX: 00000000 EBX: cfadbcf0 ECX: 00000000 EDX: cfadbcb0
[ 2362.809052] ESI: dd8d3370 EDI: e371dde0 EBP: e371dd6c ESP: e371dd5c
[ 2362.809054]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
[ 2362.809055] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ac454d50 CR3: 009a9000 CR4: 001407d0
[ 2362.809099] Stack:
[ 2362.809100]  00000001 e371dde0 dfcc6890 f29f8000 e371de28 fa39016d 00000011 00000001
[ 2362.809105]  99bfc000 00000000 93928000 00000000 00000001 00000050 e371dda8 00000001
[ 2362.809109]  f3a31000 f3413000 00000001 e371ddb8 000040a8 00000202 00000000 00000023
[ 2362.809113] Call Trace:
[ 2362.809136]  [<fa39016d>] find_parent_nodes+0x34d/0x1280 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809156]  [<fa391172>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0xb2/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809174]  [<fa3934a8>] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x358/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809180]  [<c024d0ce>] ? lock_timer_base.isra.39+0x1e/0x40
[ 2362.809199]  [<fa3648df>] worker_loop+0xff/0x470 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809204]  [<c027a88a>] ? __wake_up_locked+0x1a/0x20
[ 2362.809221]  [<fa3647e0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x2b0/0x2b0 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809225]  [<c025ebbc>] kthread+0x9c/0xb0
[ 2362.809229]  [<c06b487b>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x30
[ 2362.809233]  [<c025eb20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110

By adding a reschedule point at the end of btrfs_find_all_roots(), i no longer
hit these warnings.

Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:25 -08:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 7fdd29d02e Btrfs: make send's file extent item search more efficient
Instead of looking for a file extent item, process it, release the path
and do a btree search for the next file extent item, just process all
file extent items in a leaf without intermediate btree searches. This way
we save cpu and we're not blocking other tasks or affecting concurrency on
the btree, because send's paths use the commit root and skip btree node/leaf
locking.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:24 -08:00
Wang Shilong 95def2ede1 Btrfs: fix to catch all errors when resolving indirect ref
We can only tolerate ENOENT here, for other errors, we should
return directly.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:23 -08:00
Wang Shilong 538f72cdf0 Btrfs: fix protection between walking backrefs and root deletion
There is a race condition between resolving indirect ref and root deletion,
and we should gurantee that root can not be destroyed to avoid accessing
broken tree here.

Here we fix it by holding @subvol_srcu, and we will release it as soon
as we have held root node lock.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:23 -08:00
Gui Hecheng 3c9665df0c btrfs: fix warning while merging two adjacent extents
When we have two adjacent extents in relink_extent_backref,
we try to merge them. When we use btrfs_search_slot to locate the
slot for the current extent, we shouldn't set "ins_len = 1",
because we will merge it into the previous extent rather than
insert a new item. Otherwise, we may happen to create a new leaf
in btrfs_search_slot and path->slot[0] will be 0. Then we try to
fetch the previous item using "path->slots[0]--", and it will cause
a warning as follows:

	[  145.713385] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1796 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:5043 map_private_extent_buffer+0xd4/0xe0
	[  145.713387] btrfs bad mapping eb start 5337088 len 4096, wanted 167772306 8
	...
	[  145.713462]  [<ffffffffa034b1f4>] map_private_extent_buffer+0xd4/0xe0
	[  145.713476]  [<ffffffffa030097a>] ? btrfs_free_path+0x2a/0x40
	[  145.713485]  [<ffffffffa0340864>] btrfs_get_token_64+0x64/0xf0
	[  145.713498]  [<ffffffffa033472c>] relink_extent_backref+0x41c/0x820
	[  145.713508]  [<ffffffffa0334d69>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x239/0xa80

I encounter this warning when running defrag having mkfs.btrfs
with option -M. At the same time there are read/writes & snapshots
running at background.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:22 -08:00
Filipe David Borba Manana 9f03740a95 Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send
The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes
that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the
caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the
one we're currently processing) were processed.

This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change
between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory
inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became
parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop,
which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc
warning being displayed in dmesg:

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0()
  Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid
  CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G           O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3
  Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
  [ 5381.660441]  00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007
  [ 5381.660447]  0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0
  [ 5381.660452]  0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0
  [ 5381.660457] Call Trace:
  [ 5381.660464]  [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68
  [ 5381.660471]  [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
  [ 5381.660476]  [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
  [ 5381.660480]  [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0
  [ 5381.660487]  [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
  [ 5381.660491]  [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440
  [ 5381.660495]  [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
  [ 5381.660502]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660508]  [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
  [ 5381.660515]  [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0
  [ 5381.660520]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660524]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660530]  [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100
  [ 5381.660536]  [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230
  [ 5381.660560]  [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660564]  [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
  [ 5381.660569]  [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0
  [ 5381.660586]  [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660601]  [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660615]  [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660628]  [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs]

Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt
to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was
renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
  $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d
  $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is:

	 .                       (ino 256)
	 |-- a                   (ino 257)
	     |-- b               (ino 258)
	         |-- c           (ino 259)
	         |   |-- d       (ino 260)
                 |
	         |-- c2          (ino 261)

And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is:

	 .                       (ino 256)
	 |-- a                   (ino 257)
	     |-- b               (ino 258)
	         |-- c2          (ino 261)
	             |-- d2      (ino 260)
	                 |-- cc  (ino 259)

Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the
move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child
of 260.

A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:22 -08:00