qemu-e2k/migration/colo.c

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

958 lines
26 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* COarse-grain LOck-stepping Virtual Machines for Non-stop Service (COLO)
* (a.k.a. Fault Tolerance or Continuous Replication)
*
* Copyright (c) 2016 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
* Copyright (c) 2016 FUJITSU LIMITED
* Copyright (c) 2016 Intel Corporation
*
* This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
* later. See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
*/
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
#include "qapi/error.h"
#include "qapi/qapi-commands-migration.h"
#include "migration.h"
#include "qemu-file.h"
#include "savevm.h"
#include "migration/colo.h"
#include "block.h"
#include "io/channel-buffer.h"
#include "trace.h"
#include "qemu/error-report.h"
#include "qemu/main-loop.h"
#include "qemu/rcu.h"
#include "migration/failover.h"
#include "migration/ram.h"
#include "block/replication.h"
#include "net/colo-compare.h"
#include "net/colo.h"
#include "block/block.h"
#include "qapi/qapi-events-migration.h"
#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
#include "sysemu/runstate.h"
#include "net/filter.h"
#include "options.h"
static bool vmstate_loading;
static Notifier packets_compare_notifier;
/* User need to know colo mode after COLO failover */
static COLOMode last_colo_mode;
#define COLO_BUFFER_BASE_SIZE (4 * 1024 * 1024)
bool migration_in_colo_state(void)
{
MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
return (s->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO);
}
bool migration_incoming_in_colo_state(void)
{
MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
return mis && (mis->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO);
}
static bool colo_runstate_is_stopped(void)
{
return runstate_check(RUN_STATE_COLO) || !runstate_is_running();
}
static void colo_checkpoint_notify(void)
{
MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
int64_t next_notify_time;
qemu_event_set(&s->colo_checkpoint_event);
s->colo_checkpoint_time = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_HOST);
next_notify_time = s->colo_checkpoint_time + migrate_checkpoint_delay();
timer_mod(s->colo_delay_timer, next_notify_time);
}
static void colo_checkpoint_notify_timer(void *opaque)
{
colo_checkpoint_notify();
}
void colo_checkpoint_delay_set(void)
{
if (migration_in_colo_state()) {
colo_checkpoint_notify();
}
}
static void secondary_vm_do_failover(void)
{
/* COLO needs enable block-replication */
int old_state;
MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
Error *local_err = NULL;
/* Can not do failover during the process of VM's loading VMstate, Or
* it will break the secondary VM.
*/
if (vmstate_loading) {
old_state = failover_set_state(FAILOVER_STATUS_ACTIVE,
FAILOVER_STATUS_RELAUNCH);
if (old_state != FAILOVER_STATUS_ACTIVE) {
error_report("Unknown error while do failover for secondary VM,"
"old_state: %s", FailoverStatus_str(old_state));
}
return;
}
migrate_set_state(&mis->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO,
MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED);
replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_report_err(local_err);
local_err = NULL;
}
/* Notify all filters of all NIC to do checkpoint */
colo_notify_filters_event(COLO_EVENT_FAILOVER, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_report_err(local_err);
}
if (!autostart) {
error_report("\"-S\" qemu option will be ignored in secondary side");
/* recover runstate to normal migration finish state */
autostart = true;
}
/*
* Make sure COLO incoming thread not block in recv or send,
* If mis->from_src_file and mis->to_src_file use the same fd,
* The second shutdown() will return -1, we ignore this value,
* It is harmless.
*/
if (mis->from_src_file) {
qemu_file_shutdown(mis->from_src_file);
}
if (mis->to_src_file) {
qemu_file_shutdown(mis->to_src_file);
}
old_state = failover_set_state(FAILOVER_STATUS_ACTIVE,
FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED);
if (old_state != FAILOVER_STATUS_ACTIVE) {
error_report("Incorrect state (%s) while doing failover for "
"secondary VM", FailoverStatus_str(old_state));
return;
}
/* Notify COLO incoming thread that failover work is finished */
qemu_sem_post(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
/* For Secondary VM, jump to incoming co */
migration: split migration_incoming_co Originally, migration_incoming_co was introduced by 25d0c16f625feb3b6 "migration: Switch to COLO process after finishing loadvm" to be able to enter from COLO code to one specific yield point, added by 25d0c16f625feb3b6. Later in 923709896b1b0 "migration: poll the cm event for destination qemu" we reused this variable to wake the migration incoming coroutine from RDMA code. That was doubtful idea. Entering coroutines is a very fragile thing: you should be absolutely sure which yield point you are going to enter. I don't know how much is it safe to enter during qemu_loadvm_state() which I think what RDMA want to do. But for sure RDMA shouldn't enter the special COLO-related yield-point. As well, COLO code doesn't want to enter during qemu_loadvm_state(), it want to enter it's own specific yield-point. As well, when in 8e48ac95865ac97d "COLO: Add block replication into colo process" we added bdrv_invalidate_cache_all() call (now it's called activate_all()) it became possible to enter the migration incoming coroutine during that call which is wrong too. So, let't make these things separate and disjoint: loadvm_co for RDMA, non-NULL during qemu_loadvm_state(), and colo_incoming_co for COLO, non-NULL only around specific yield. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20230515130640.46035-3-vsementsov@yandex-team.ru> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
2023-05-15 15:06:39 +02:00
if (mis->colo_incoming_co) {
qemu_coroutine_enter(mis->colo_incoming_co);
}
}
static void primary_vm_do_failover(void)
{
MigrationState *s = migrate_get_current();
int old_state;
Error *local_err = NULL;
migrate_set_state(&s->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO,
MIGRATION_STATUS_COMPLETED);
/*
* kick COLO thread which might wait at
* qemu_sem_wait(&s->colo_checkpoint_sem).
*/
colo_checkpoint_notify();
/*
* Wake up COLO thread which may blocked in recv() or send(),
* The s->rp_state.from_dst_file and s->to_dst_file may use the
* same fd, but we still shutdown the fd for twice, it is harmless.
*/
if (s->to_dst_file) {
qemu_file_shutdown(s->to_dst_file);
}
if (s->rp_state.from_dst_file) {
qemu_file_shutdown(s->rp_state.from_dst_file);
}
old_state = failover_set_state(FAILOVER_STATUS_ACTIVE,
FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED);
if (old_state != FAILOVER_STATUS_ACTIVE) {
error_report("Incorrect state (%s) while doing failover for Primary VM",
FailoverStatus_str(old_state));
return;
}
replication_stop_all(true, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_report_err(local_err);
local_err = NULL;
}
/* Notify COLO thread that failover work is finished */
qemu_sem_post(&s->colo_exit_sem);
}
COLOMode get_colo_mode(void)
{
if (migration_in_colo_state()) {
return COLO_MODE_PRIMARY;
} else if (migration_incoming_in_colo_state()) {
return COLO_MODE_SECONDARY;
} else {
return COLO_MODE_NONE;
}
}
void colo_do_failover(void)
{
/* Make sure VM stopped while failover happened. */
if (!colo_runstate_is_stopped()) {
vm_stop_force_state(RUN_STATE_COLO);
}
switch (last_colo_mode = get_colo_mode()) {
case COLO_MODE_PRIMARY:
primary_vm_do_failover();
break;
case COLO_MODE_SECONDARY:
secondary_vm_do_failover();
break;
default:
error_report("colo_do_failover failed because the colo mode"
" could not be obtained");
}
}
void qmp_xen_set_replication(bool enable, bool primary,
bool has_failover, bool failover,
Error **errp)
{
ReplicationMode mode = primary ?
REPLICATION_MODE_PRIMARY :
REPLICATION_MODE_SECONDARY;
if (has_failover && enable) {
error_setg(errp, "Parameter 'failover' is only for"
" stopping replication");
return;
}
if (enable) {
replication_start_all(mode, errp);
} else {
if (!has_failover) {
failover = NULL;
}
replication_stop_all(failover, failover ? NULL : errp);
}
}
ReplicationStatus *qmp_query_xen_replication_status(Error **errp)
{
Error *err = NULL;
ReplicationStatus *s = g_new0(ReplicationStatus, 1);
replication_get_error_all(&err);
if (err) {
s->error = true;
s->desc = g_strdup(error_get_pretty(err));
} else {
s->error = false;
}
error_free(err);
return s;
}
void qmp_xen_colo_do_checkpoint(Error **errp)
{
Error *err = NULL;
replication_do_checkpoint_all(&err);
if (err) {
error_propagate(errp, err);
return;
}
/* Notify all filters of all NIC to do checkpoint */
colo_notify_filters_event(COLO_EVENT_CHECKPOINT, errp);
}
COLOStatus *qmp_query_colo_status(Error **errp)
{
COLOStatus *s = g_new0(COLOStatus, 1);
s->mode = get_colo_mode();
s->last_mode = last_colo_mode;
switch (failover_get_state()) {
case FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE:
s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_NONE;
break;
case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST;
break;
default:
if (migration_in_colo_state()) {
s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_PROCESSING;
} else {
s->reason = COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR;
}
}
return s;
}
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
static void colo_send_message(QEMUFile *f, COLOMessage msg,
Error **errp)
{
int ret;
if (msg >= COLO_MESSAGE__MAX) {
error_setg(errp, "%s: Invalid message", __func__);
return;
}
qemu_put_be32(f, msg);
ret = qemu_fflush(f);
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
if (ret < 0) {
error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Can't send COLO message");
}
trace_colo_send_message(COLOMessage_str(msg));
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
}
static void colo_send_message_value(QEMUFile *f, COLOMessage msg,
uint64_t value, Error **errp)
{
Error *local_err = NULL;
int ret;
colo_send_message(f, msg, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
qemu_put_be64(f, value);
ret = qemu_fflush(f);
if (ret < 0) {
error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Failed to send value for message:%s",
COLOMessage_str(msg));
}
}
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
static COLOMessage colo_receive_message(QEMUFile *f, Error **errp)
{
COLOMessage msg;
int ret;
msg = qemu_get_be32(f);
ret = qemu_file_get_error(f);
if (ret < 0) {
error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Can't receive COLO message");
return msg;
}
if (msg >= COLO_MESSAGE__MAX) {
error_setg(errp, "%s: Invalid message", __func__);
return msg;
}
trace_colo_receive_message(COLOMessage_str(msg));
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
return msg;
}
static void colo_receive_check_message(QEMUFile *f, COLOMessage expect_msg,
Error **errp)
{
COLOMessage msg;
Error *local_err = NULL;
msg = colo_receive_message(f, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
if (msg != expect_msg) {
error_setg(errp, "Unexpected COLO message %d, expected %d",
msg, expect_msg);
}
}
static uint64_t colo_receive_message_value(QEMUFile *f, uint32_t expect_msg,
Error **errp)
{
Error *local_err = NULL;
uint64_t value;
int ret;
colo_receive_check_message(f, expect_msg, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return 0;
}
value = qemu_get_be64(f);
ret = qemu_file_get_error(f);
if (ret < 0) {
error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Failed to get value for COLO message: %s",
COLOMessage_str(expect_msg));
}
return value;
}
static int colo_do_checkpoint_transaction(MigrationState *s,
QIOChannelBuffer *bioc,
QEMUFile *fb)
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
{
Error *local_err = NULL;
int ret = -1;
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
colo_send_message(s->to_dst_file, COLO_MESSAGE_CHECKPOINT_REQUEST,
&local_err);
if (local_err) {
goto out;
}
colo_receive_check_message(s->rp_state.from_dst_file,
COLO_MESSAGE_CHECKPOINT_REPLY, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
goto out;
}
/* Reset channel-buffer directly */
qio_channel_io_seek(QIO_CHANNEL(bioc), 0, 0, NULL);
bioc->usage = 0;
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
if (failover_get_state() != FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE) {
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
goto out;
}
vm_stop_force_state(RUN_STATE_COLO);
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
trace_colo_vm_state_change("run", "stop");
/*
* Failover request bh could be called after vm_stop_force_state(),
* So we need check failover_request_is_active() again.
*/
if (failover_get_state() != FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE) {
goto out;
}
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
replication_do_checkpoint_all(&local_err);
if (local_err) {
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
goto out;
}
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
colo_send_message(s->to_dst_file, COLO_MESSAGE_VMSTATE_SEND, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
goto out;
}
/* Note: device state is saved into buffer */
ret = qemu_save_device_state(fb);
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
if (ret < 0) {
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
goto out;
}
if (migrate_auto_converge()) {
mig_throttle_counter_reset();
}
/*
* Only save VM's live state, which not including device state.
* TODO: We may need a timeout mechanism to prevent COLO process
* to be blocked here.
*/
qemu_savevm_live_state(s->to_dst_file);
qemu_fflush(fb);
/*
* We need the size of the VMstate data in Secondary side,
* With which we can decide how much data should be read.
*/
colo_send_message_value(s->to_dst_file, COLO_MESSAGE_VMSTATE_SIZE,
bioc->usage, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
goto out;
}
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
qemu_put_buffer(s->to_dst_file, bioc->data, bioc->usage);
ret = qemu_fflush(s->to_dst_file);
if (ret < 0) {
goto out;
}
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
colo_receive_check_message(s->rp_state.from_dst_file,
COLO_MESSAGE_VMSTATE_RECEIVED, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
goto out;
}
qemu_event_reset(&s->colo_checkpoint_event);
colo_notify_compares_event(NULL, COLO_EVENT_CHECKPOINT, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
goto out;
}
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
colo_receive_check_message(s->rp_state.from_dst_file,
COLO_MESSAGE_VMSTATE_LOADED, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
goto out;
}
ret = 0;
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
vm_start();
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
trace_colo_vm_state_change("stop", "run");
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
out:
if (local_err) {
error_report_err(local_err);
}
return ret;
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
}
static void colo_compare_notify_checkpoint(Notifier *notifier, void *data)
{
colo_checkpoint_notify();
}
static void colo_process_checkpoint(MigrationState *s)
{
QIOChannelBuffer *bioc;
QEMUFile *fb = NULL;
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
Error *local_err = NULL;
int ret;
if (get_colo_mode() != COLO_MODE_PRIMARY) {
error_report("COLO mode must be COLO_MODE_PRIMARY");
return;
}
failover_init_state();
s->rp_state.from_dst_file = qemu_file_get_return_path(s->to_dst_file);
if (!s->rp_state.from_dst_file) {
error_report("Open QEMUFile from_dst_file failed");
goto out;
}
packets_compare_notifier.notify = colo_compare_notify_checkpoint;
colo_compare_register_notifier(&packets_compare_notifier);
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
/*
* Wait for Secondary finish loading VM states and enter COLO
* restore.
*/
colo_receive_check_message(s->rp_state.from_dst_file,
COLO_MESSAGE_CHECKPOINT_READY, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
goto out;
}
bioc = qio_channel_buffer_new(COLO_BUFFER_BASE_SIZE);
fb = qemu_file_new_output(QIO_CHANNEL(bioc));
object_unref(OBJECT(bioc));
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_PRIMARY, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
goto out;
}
vm_start();
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
trace_colo_vm_state_change("stop", "run");
timer_mod(s->colo_delay_timer, qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_HOST) +
migrate_checkpoint_delay());
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
while (s->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO) {
if (failover_get_state() != FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE) {
error_report("failover request");
goto out;
}
qemu_event_wait(&s->colo_checkpoint_event);
if (s->state != MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO) {
goto out;
}
ret = colo_do_checkpoint_transaction(s, bioc, fb);
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
if (ret < 0) {
goto out;
}
}
out:
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
/* Throw the unreported error message after exited from loop */
if (local_err) {
error_report_err(local_err);
}
if (fb) {
qemu_fclose(fb);
}
/*
* There are only two reasons we can get here, some error happened
* or the user triggered failover.
*/
switch (failover_get_state()) {
case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
break;
default:
qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_PRIMARY,
COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
}
/* Hope this not to be too long to wait here */
qemu_sem_wait(&s->colo_exit_sem);
qemu_sem_destroy(&s->colo_exit_sem);
/*
* It is safe to unregister notifier after failover finished.
* Besides, colo_delay_timer and colo_checkpoint_sem can't be
* released before unregister notifier, or there will be use-after-free
* error.
*/
colo_compare_unregister_notifier(&packets_compare_notifier);
timer_free(s->colo_delay_timer);
qemu_event_destroy(&s->colo_checkpoint_event);
/*
* Must be called after failover BH is completed,
* Or the failover BH may shutdown the wrong fd that
* re-used by other threads after we release here.
*/
if (s->rp_state.from_dst_file) {
qemu_fclose(s->rp_state.from_dst_file);
colo: fixed 'Segmentation fault' when the simplex mode PVM poweroff The GDB statck is as follows: Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0 object_class_dynamic_cast (class=0x55c8f5d2bf50, typename=0x55c8f2f7379e "qio-channel") at qom/object.c:832 if (type->class->interfaces && [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f756e97eb00 (LWP 1811577))] (gdb) bt 0 object_class_dynamic_cast (class=0x55c8f5d2bf50, typename=0x55c8f2f7379e "qio-channel") at qom/object.c:832 1 0x000055c8f2c3dd14 in object_dynamic_cast (obj=0x55c8f543ac00, typename=0x55c8f2f7379e "qio-channel") at qom/object.c:763 2 0x000055c8f2c3ddce in object_dynamic_cast_assert (obj=0x55c8f543ac00, typename=0x55c8f2f7379e "qio-channel", file=0x55c8f2f73780 "migration/qemu-file-channel.c", line=117, func=0x55c8f2f73800 <__func__.18724> "channel_shutdown") at qom/object.c:786 3 0x000055c8f2bbc6ac in channel_shutdown (opaque=0x55c8f543ac00, rd=true, wr=true, errp=0x0) at migration/qemu-file-channel.c:117 4 0x000055c8f2bba56e in qemu_file_shutdown (f=0x7f7558070f50) at migration/qemu-file.c:67 5 0x000055c8f2ba5373 in migrate_fd_cancel (s=0x55c8f4ccf3f0) at migration/migration.c:1699 6 0x000055c8f2ba1992 in migration_shutdown () at migration/migration.c:187 7 0x000055c8f29a5b77 in main (argc=69, argv=0x7fff3e9e8c08, envp=0x7fff3e9e8e38) at vl.c:4512 The root cause is that we still want to shutdown the from_dst_file in migrate_fd_cancel() after qemu_close in colo_process_checkpoint(). So, we should set the s->rp_state.from_dst_file = NULL after qemu_close(). Signed-off-by: Lei Rao <lei.rao@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
2021-11-01 08:57:02 +01:00
s->rp_state.from_dst_file = NULL;
}
}
void migrate_start_colo_process(MigrationState *s)
{
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
qemu_event_init(&s->colo_checkpoint_event, false);
s->colo_delay_timer = timer_new_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_HOST,
colo_checkpoint_notify_timer, NULL);
qemu_sem_init(&s->colo_exit_sem, 0);
colo_process_checkpoint(s);
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
}
static void colo_incoming_process_checkpoint(MigrationIncomingState *mis,
QEMUFile *fb, QIOChannelBuffer *bioc, Error **errp)
{
uint64_t total_size;
uint64_t value;
Error *local_err = NULL;
int ret;
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
vm_stop_force_state(RUN_STATE_COLO);
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
trace_colo_vm_state_change("run", "stop");
/* FIXME: This is unnecessary for periodic checkpoint mode */
colo_send_message(mis->to_src_file, COLO_MESSAGE_CHECKPOINT_REPLY,
&local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
colo_receive_check_message(mis->from_src_file,
COLO_MESSAGE_VMSTATE_SEND, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
cpu_synchronize_all_states();
ret = qemu_loadvm_state_main(mis->from_src_file, mis);
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
if (ret < 0) {
error_setg(errp, "Load VM's live state (ram) error");
return;
}
value = colo_receive_message_value(mis->from_src_file,
COLO_MESSAGE_VMSTATE_SIZE, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
/*
* Read VM device state data into channel buffer,
* It's better to re-use the memory allocated.
* Here we need to handle the channel buffer directly.
*/
if (value > bioc->capacity) {
bioc->capacity = value;
bioc->data = g_realloc(bioc->data, bioc->capacity);
}
total_size = qemu_get_buffer(mis->from_src_file, bioc->data, value);
if (total_size != value) {
error_setg(errp, "Got %" PRIu64 " VMState data, less than expected"
" %" PRIu64, total_size, value);
return;
}
bioc->usage = total_size;
qio_channel_io_seek(QIO_CHANNEL(bioc), 0, 0, NULL);
colo_send_message(mis->to_src_file, COLO_MESSAGE_VMSTATE_RECEIVED,
&local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
vmstate_loading = true;
colo_flush_ram_cache();
ret = qemu_load_device_state(fb);
if (ret < 0) {
error_setg(errp, "COLO: load device state failed");
vmstate_loading = false;
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
return;
}
replication_get_error_all(&local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
vmstate_loading = false;
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
return;
}
/* discard colo disk buffer */
replication_do_checkpoint_all(&local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
vmstate_loading = false;
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
return;
}
/* Notify all filters of all NIC to do checkpoint */
colo_notify_filters_event(COLO_EVENT_CHECKPOINT, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
vmstate_loading = false;
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
return;
}
vmstate_loading = false;
vm_start();
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
trace_colo_vm_state_change("stop", "run");
if (failover_get_state() == FAILOVER_STATUS_RELAUNCH) {
return;
}
colo_send_message(mis->to_src_file, COLO_MESSAGE_VMSTATE_LOADED,
&local_err);
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
}
static void colo_wait_handle_message(MigrationIncomingState *mis,
QEMUFile *fb, QIOChannelBuffer *bioc, Error **errp)
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
{
COLOMessage msg;
Error *local_err = NULL;
msg = colo_receive_message(mis->from_src_file, &local_err);
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
if (local_err) {
error_propagate(errp, local_err);
return;
}
switch (msg) {
case COLO_MESSAGE_CHECKPOINT_REQUEST:
colo_incoming_process_checkpoint(mis, fb, bioc, errp);
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
break;
default:
error_setg(errp, "Got unknown COLO message: %d", msg);
break;
}
}
void colo_shutdown(void)
{
MigrationIncomingState *mis = NULL;
MigrationState *s = NULL;
switch (get_colo_mode()) {
case COLO_MODE_PRIMARY:
s = migrate_get_current();
qemu_event_set(&s->colo_checkpoint_event);
qemu_sem_post(&s->colo_exit_sem);
break;
case COLO_MODE_SECONDARY:
mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
qemu_sem_post(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
break;
default:
break;
}
}
static void *colo_process_incoming_thread(void *opaque)
{
MigrationIncomingState *mis = opaque;
QEMUFile *fb = NULL;
QIOChannelBuffer *bioc = NULL; /* Cache incoming device state */
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
Error *local_err = NULL;
rcu_register_thread();
qemu_sem_init(&mis->colo_incoming_sem, 0);
migrate_set_state(&mis->state, MIGRATION_STATUS_ACTIVE,
MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO);
if (get_colo_mode() != COLO_MODE_SECONDARY) {
error_report("COLO mode must be COLO_MODE_SECONDARY");
return NULL;
}
failover_init_state();
mis->to_src_file = qemu_file_get_return_path(mis->from_src_file);
if (!mis->to_src_file) {
error_report("COLO incoming thread: Open QEMUFile to_src_file failed");
goto out;
}
/*
* Note: the communication between Primary side and Secondary side
* should be sequential, we set the fd to unblocked in migration incoming
* coroutine, and here we are in the COLO incoming thread, so it is ok to
* set the fd back to blocked.
*/
qemu_file_set_blocking(mis->from_src_file, true);
colo_incoming_start_dirty_log();
bioc = qio_channel_buffer_new(COLO_BUFFER_BASE_SIZE);
fb = qemu_file_new_input(QIO_CHANNEL(bioc));
object_unref(OBJECT(bioc));
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
replication_start_all(REPLICATION_MODE_SECONDARY, &local_err);
if (local_err) {
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
goto out;
}
vm_start();
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
trace_colo_vm_state_change("stop", "run");
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
colo_send_message(mis->to_src_file, COLO_MESSAGE_CHECKPOINT_READY,
&local_err);
if (local_err) {
goto out;
}
while (mis->state == MIGRATION_STATUS_COLO) {
colo_wait_handle_message(mis, fb, bioc, &local_err);
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
if (local_err) {
error_report_err(local_err);
break;
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
}
if (failover_get_state() == FAILOVER_STATUS_RELAUNCH) {
failover_set_state(FAILOVER_STATUS_RELAUNCH,
FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE);
failover_request_active(NULL);
break;
}
if (failover_get_state() != FAILOVER_STATUS_NONE) {
error_report("failover request");
break;
COLO: Introduce checkpointing protocol We need communications protocol of user-defined to control the checkpointing process. The new checkpointing request is started by Primary VM, and the interactive process like below: Checkpoint synchronizing points: Primary Secondary initial work 'checkpoint-ready' <-------------------- @ 'checkpoint-request' @ --------------------> Suspend (Only in hybrid mode) 'checkpoint-reply' <-------------------- @ Suspend&Save state 'vmstate-send' @ --------------------> Send state Receive state 'vmstate-received' <-------------------- @ Release packets Load state 'vmstate-load' <-------------------- @ Resume Resume (Only in hybrid mode) Start Comparing (Only in hybrid mode) NOTE: 1) '@' who sends the message 2) Every sync-point is synchronized by two sides with only one handshake(single direction) for low-latency. If more strict synchronization is required, a opposite direction sync-point should be added. 3) Since sync-points are single direction, the remote side may go forward a lot when this side just receives the sync-point. 4) For now, we only support 'periodic' checkpoint, for which the Secondary VM is not running, later we will support 'hybrid' mode. Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Cc: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit@amitshah.net>
2016-10-27 08:42:57 +02:00
}
}
out:
/*
* There are only two reasons we can get here, some error happened
* or the user triggered failover.
*/
switch (failover_get_state()) {
case FAILOVER_STATUS_COMPLETED:
qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
COLO_EXIT_REASON_REQUEST);
break;
default:
qapi_event_send_colo_exit(COLO_MODE_SECONDARY,
COLO_EXIT_REASON_ERROR);
}
if (fb) {
qemu_fclose(fb);
}
/* Hope this not to be too long to loop here */
qemu_sem_wait(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
qemu_sem_destroy(&mis->colo_incoming_sem);
rcu_unregister_thread();
return NULL;
}
int coroutine_fn colo_incoming_co(void)
{
MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
Error *local_err = NULL;
QemuThread th;
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
assert(bql_locked());
if (!migration_incoming_colo_enabled()) {
return 0;
}
/* Make sure all file formats throw away their mutable metadata */
bdrv_activate_all(&local_err);
if (local_err) {
error_report_err(local_err);
return -EINVAL;
}
qemu_thread_create(&th, "COLO incoming", colo_process_incoming_thread,
mis, QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE);
mis->colo_incoming_co = qemu_coroutine_self();
qemu_coroutine_yield();
mis->colo_incoming_co = NULL;
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_unlock();
/* Wait checkpoint incoming thread exit before free resource */
qemu_thread_join(&th);
system/cpus: rename qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() to bql_lock() The Big QEMU Lock (BQL) has many names and they are confusing. The actual QemuMutex variable is called qemu_global_mutex but it's commonly referred to as the BQL in discussions and some code comments. The locking APIs, however, are called qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() and qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread(). The "iothread" name is historic and comes from when the main thread was split into into KVM vcpu threads and the "iothread" (now called the main loop thread). I have contributed to the confusion myself by introducing a separate --object iothread, a separate concept unrelated to the BQL. The "iothread" name is no longer appropriate for the BQL. Rename the locking APIs to: - void bql_lock(void) - void bql_unlock(void) - bool bql_locked(void) There are more APIs with "iothread" in their names. Subsequent patches will rename them. There are also comments and documentation that will be updated in later patches. Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org> Acked-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Hyman Huang <yong.huang@smartx.com> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com> Message-id: 20240102153529.486531-2-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
2024-01-02 16:35:25 +01:00
bql_lock();
/* We hold the global BQL, so it is safe here */
colo_release_ram_cache();
return 0;
}