Commit f3ed93d545 "qapi: Allow documentation for features" neglected
to check documentation against the schema. Fix that: check them the
same way we check arguments.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-20-armbru@redhat.com>
Improve error messages from
the following documented members are not in the declaration: a
the following documented members are not in the declaration: aa, bb
to the more concise
documented member 'a' does not exist
documented members 'aa', 'bb' do not exist
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-19-armbru@redhat.com>
When a command's 'data' is an object, its doc comment describes the
arguments defined there. When 'data' names a type, the doc comment
does not describe arguments. Instead, the doc generator inserts a
pointer to the named type.
An event's doc comment works the same.
We don't actually check doc comments for commands and events.
Instead, QAPISchema._def_command() forwards the doc comment to the
implicit argument type, where it gets checked. Works because the
check only cares for the implicit argument type's members.
Not only is this needlessly hard to understand, it actually falls
apart in two cases:
* When 'data' is empty, there is nothing to forward to, and the doc
comment remains unchecked. Demonstrated by test doc-bad-event-arg.
* When 'data' names a type, we can't forward, as the type has its own
doc comment. The command or event's doc comment remains unchecked.
Demonstrated by test doc-bad-boxed-command-arg.
The forwarding goes back to commit 069fb5b250 "qapi: Prepare for
requiring more complete documentation", put to use in commit
816a57cd6e "qapi: Fix detection of bogus member documentation". That
fix was incomplete.
To fix this, make QAPISchemaCommand and QAPISchemaEvent check doc
comments, and drop the forwarding of doc comments to implicit argument
types.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-12-armbru@redhat.com>
Enumeration type documentation comments are not checked, as
demonstrated by test doc-bad-enum-member. This is because we neglect
to call self.doc.check() for enumeration types. Messed up in
816a57cd6e "qapi: Fix detection of bogus member documentation". Fix
it.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-10-armbru@redhat.com>
Generate a reference "Arguments: the members of ...", just like we do
for commands since commit c2dd311cb7 "qapi2texi: Implement boxed
argument documentation".
No change to generated QMP documentation; we don't yet use boxed
events outside tests/.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-7-armbru@redhat.com>
Commit 8aa3a33e44 "tests/qapi-schema: Test for good feature lists in
structs" made test-qapi.py show features, but neglected to show their
documentation. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Add negative tests doc-bad-boxed-command-arg and doc-bad-event-arg to
cover boxed and no arguments. They demonstrate insufficient doc
comment checking.
Update positive test doc-good to cover boxed event arguments. It
demonstrates the generated doc comment misses arguments.
These bugs will be fixed later in this series.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Add negative tests doc-bad-enum-member and doc-bad-feature to cover
documentation for nonexistent enum members and features, and test
doc-undoc-feature to cover features lacking documentation. None of
them works. To be fixed later in this series.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191024110237.30963-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Commit 8aa3a33e44 "tests/qapi-schema: Test for good feature lists in
structs" neglected to cover documentation comments, and the previous
commit followed its example. Make up for them.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191018081454.21369-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191018081454.21369-4-armbru@redhat.com>
Similarly to features for struct types introduce the feature flags also
for commands. This will allow notifying management layers of fixes and
compatible changes in the behaviour of a command which may not be
detectable any other way.
The changes were heavily inspired by commit 6a8c0b5102.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191018081454.21369-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Command and event details are indented three spaces, everything else
four. Messed up in commit 156402e504. Use four spaces consistently.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191018081454.21369-2-armbru@redhat.com>
The QAPI code generator clocks in at some 3100 SLOC in 8 source files.
Almost 60% of the code is in qapi/common.py. Split it into more
focused modules:
* Move QAPISchemaPragma and QAPISourceInfo to qapi/source.py.
* Move QAPIError and its sub-classes to qapi/error.py.
* Move QAPISchemaParser and QAPIDoc to parser.py. Use the opportunity
to put QAPISchemaParser first.
* Move check_expr() & friends to qapi/expr.py. Use the opportunity to
put the code into a more sensible order.
* Move QAPISchema & friends to qapi/schema.py
* Move QAPIGen and its sub-classes, ifcontext,
QAPISchemaModularCVisitor, and QAPISchemaModularCVisitor to qapi/gen.py
* Delete camel_case(), it's unused since commit e98859a9b9 "qapi:
Clean up after recent conversions to QAPISchemaVisitor"
A number of helper functions remain in qapi/common.py. I considered
moving the code generator helpers to qapi/gen.py, but decided not to.
Perhaps we should rewrite them as methods of QAPIGen some day.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191018074345.24034-7-armbru@redhat.com>
[Add "# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-" lines]
"make check-qapi-schema" takes around 10s user + system time for me.
With -j, it takes a bit over 3s real time. We have worse tests. It's
still annoying when you work on the QAPI generator.
Some 1.4s user + system time is consumed by make figuring out what to
do, measured by making a target that does nothing. There's nothing I
can do about that right now. But let's see what we can do about the
other 8s.
Almost 7s are spent running test-qapi.py for every test case, the rest
normalizing and diffing test-qapi.py output. We have 190 test cases.
If I downgrade to python2, it's 4.5s, but python2 is a goner.
Hacking up test-qapi.py to exit(0) without doing anything makes it
only marginally faster. The problem is Python startup overhead.
Our configure puts -B into $(PYTHON). Running without -B is faster:
4.4s.
We could improve the Makefile to run test cases only when the test
case or the generator changed. But I'm after improvement in the case
where the generator changed.
test-qapi.py is designed to be the simplest possible building block
for a shell script to do the complete job (it's actually a Makefile,
not a shell script; no real difference). Python is just not meant for
that. It's for bigger blocks.
Move the post-processing and diffing into test-qapi.py, and make it
capable of testing multiple schema files. Set executable bits while
there.
Running it once per test case now takes slightly longer than 8s. But
running it once for all of them takes under 0.2s.
Messing with the Makefile to run it only on the tests that need
retesting is clearly not worth the bother.
Expected error output changes because the new normalization strips off
$(SRCDIR)/tests/qapi-schema/ instead of just $(SRCDIR)/.
The .exit files go away, because there is no exit status to test
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20191018074345.24034-5-armbru@redhat.com>
qapi-gen.py crashes when it can't open the main schema file, and when
it can't read from any schema file. Lazy.
Change QAPISchema.__init__() to take a file name instead of a file
object. Move the open code from _include() to __init__(), so it's
used for the main schema file, too.
Move the read into the try for good measure, and rephrase the error
message.
Reporting open or read failure for the main schema file needs a
QAPISourceInfo representing "no source". Make QAPISourceInfo cope
with fname=None.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-27-armbru@redhat.com>
Point to the previous definition, unless it's a built-in.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-26-armbru@redhat.com>
Have check_exprs() check this later, so the error message gains an "in
definition line". Tweak the error message.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-25-armbru@redhat.com>
check_if()'s errors don't point to the offending part of the
expression. For instance:
tests/qapi-schema/alternate-branch-if-invalid.json:2: 'if' condition ' ' makes no sense
Other check_FOO() do, with the help of a @source argument. Make
check_if() do that, too. The example above improves to:
tests/qapi-schema/alternate-branch-if-invalid.json:2: 'if' condition ' ' of 'data' member 'branch' makes no sense
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-23-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Many error messages refer to the offending definition even though
they're preceded by an "in definition" line. Rephrase them.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-22-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Have check_exprs() call check_keys() later, so its error messages gain
an "in definition" line.
Both check_keys() and check_name_is_str() check the definition's name
is a string. Since check_keys() now runs after check_name_is_str()
rather than before, its check is dead. Bury it. Checking values in
check_keys() is unclean anyway.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-21-armbru@redhat.com>
Split check_flags() off check_keys() and have check_exprs() call it
later, so its error messages gain an "in definition" line. Tweak the
error messages.
Checking values in a function named check_keys() is unclean anyway.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-20-armbru@redhat.com>
Move check_if() from check_keys() to check_exprs() and call it later,
so its error messages gain an "in definition" line.
Checking values in a function named check_keys() is unclean anyway.
The original sin was commit 0545f6b887 "qapi: Better error messages
for bad expressions", which checks the value of key 'name'. More
sinning in commit 2cbf09925a "qapi: More rigorous checking for type
safety bypass", commit c818408e44 "qapi: Implement boxed types for
commands/events", and commit 967c885108 "qapi: add 'if' to top-level
expressions". This commit does penance for the latter. The next
commits will do penance for the others.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-19-armbru@redhat.com>
QAPISchemaCommand.check() and QAPISchemaEvent().check() check 'data'
is present when 'boxed': true. That's context-free. Move to
check_command() and check_event().
Tweak the error message while there.
check_exprs() & friends now check exactly what qapi-code-gen.txt calls
the second layer of syntax.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-18-armbru@redhat.com>
When we introduced the QAPISchema intermediate representation (commit
ac88219a6c), we took a shortcut: we left check_exprs() & friends
alone instead of moving semantic checks into the
QAPISchemaFOO.check(). The .check() assert check_exprs() did its job.
Time to finish the conversion job. Move exactly the context-sensitive
checks to the .check(). They replace assertions there. Context-free
checks stay put.
Fixes the misleading optional tag error demonstrated by test
flat-union-optional-discriminator.
A few other error message improve.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-17-armbru@redhat.com>
The checks for reserved names are spread far and wide. Move one from
add_name() to new check_defn_name_str(). This is a first step towards
collecting them all in dedicated name checking functions next to
check_name().
While there, drop the quotes around the meta-type in
check_name_str()'s error messages: "'command' uses ... name 'NAME'"
becomes "command uses ... name 'NAME'".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-13-armbru@redhat.com>
The special "does not allow optional name" error is well meant, but
confusing in practice. Drop it.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-12-armbru@redhat.com>
Split check_name() into check_name_is_str() and check_name_str(), keep
check_name() as a wrapper.
Move add_name()'s call into its caller check_exprs(), and inline.
This permits delaying check_name_str() there, so its error message
gains an "in definition" line.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-10-armbru@redhat.com>
We report name clashes like this:
struct-base-clash.json: In struct 'Sub':
struct-base-clash.json:5: 'name' (member of Sub) collides with 'name' (member of Base)
The "(member of Sub)" is redundant with "In struct 'Sub'". Comes from
QAPISchemaMember.describe(). Pass info to it, so it can detect the
redundancy and avoid it. Result:
struct-base-clash.json: In struct 'Sub':
struct-base-clash.json:5: member 'name' collides with member 'name' of type 'Base'
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-8-armbru@redhat.com>
Starting error messages with a capital letter complicates things when
text can get interpolated both at the beginning and in the middle of
an error message. The next patch will do that. Switch to lower case
to keep it simpler.
For what it's worth, the GNU Coding Standards advise the message
"should not begin with a capital letter when it follows a program name
and/or file name, because that isn’t the beginning of a sentence. (The
sentence conceptually starts at the beginning of the line.)"
While there, avoid breaking lines containing multiple arguments in the
middle of an argument.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-7-armbru@redhat.com>
QAPISchemaMember.check_clash() checks for member names that map to the
same c_name(). Takes care of rejecting duplicate names.
It also checks a naming rule: no uppercase in member names. That's a
rather odd place to do it. Enforcing naming rules is
check_name_str()'s job.
qapi-code-gen.txt specifies the name case rule applies to the name as
it appears in the schema. check_clash() checks c_name(name) instead.
No difference, as c_name() leaves alone case, but unclean.
Move the name case check into check_name_str(), less the c_name().
New argument @permit_upper suppresses it. Pass permit_upper=True for
definitions (which are not members), and when the member's owner is
whitelisted with pragma name-case-whitelist.
Bonus: name-case-whitelist now applies to a union's inline base, too.
Update qapi/qapi-schema.json pragma to whitelist union CpuInfo instead
of CpuInfo's implicit base type's name q_obj_CpuInfo-base.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-6-armbru@redhat.com>
We take pains to include the offending expression in error messages,
e.g.
tests/qapi-schema/alternate-any.json:2: alternate 'Alt' member 'one' cannot use type 'any'
But not always:
tests/qapi-schema/enum-if-invalid.json:2: 'if' condition must be a string or a list of strings
Instead of improving them one by one, report the offending expression
whenever it is known, like this:
tests/qapi-schema/enum-if-invalid.json: In enum 'TestIfEnum':
tests/qapi-schema/enum-if-invalid.json:2: 'if' condition must be a string or a list of strings
Error messages that mention the offending expression become a bit
redundant, e.g.
tests/qapi-schema/alternate-any.json: In alternate 'Alt':
tests/qapi-schema/alternate-any.json:2: alternate 'Alt' member 'one' cannot use type 'any'
I'll take care of that later in this series.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190927134639.4284-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Commit 87adbbffd4..3e270dcacc "qapi: Add 'if' to (implicit
struct|union|alternate) members" (v4.0.0) neglected test coverage, and
promptly failed to check the conditions. Review fail.
Recent commit "tests/qapi-schema: Demonstrate insufficient 'if'
checking" added test coverage, demonstrating the bug. Fix it by add
the missing check_if().
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-13-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
"'if': 'COND'" generates "#if COND". We reject empty COND because it
won't compile. Blank COND won't compile any better, so reject that,
too.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-12-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
check_union() checks the discriminator exists in base and makes sense.
Two error messages mention the base. These are broken for anonymous
bases, as demonstrated by tests flat-union-invalid-discriminator and
flat-union-invalid-if-discriminator.err. The third one doesn't
bother.
First broken when commit ac4338f8eb "qapi: Allow anonymous base for
flat union" (v2.6.0) neglected to adjust the "not a member of base"
error message. Commit ccadd6bcba "qapi: Add 'if' to implicit struct
members" (v4.0.0) then cloned the flawed error message.
Dumb them down not to mention the base.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-11-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
We represent the parse tree as OrderedDict. We fetch optional dict
members with .get(). So far, so good.
We represent null literals as None. .get() returns None both for
"absent" and for "present, value is the null literal". Uh-oh.
Test features-if-invalid exposes this bug: "'if': null" is
misinterpreted as absent "if".
We added null to the schema language to "allow [...] an explicit
default value" (commit e53188ada5 "qapi: Allow true, false and null in
schema json", v2.4.0). Hasn't happened; null is still unused except
as generic invalid value in tests/.
To fix, we'd have to replace .get() by something more careful, or
represent null differently. Feasible, but we got more and bigger fish
to fry right now. Remove the null literal from the schema language.
Replace null in tests by another invalid value.
Test features-if-invalid now behaves as it should.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-10-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Show text up to next structural character, whitespace, or quote
character instead of just the first character.
Forgotten quotes now get reported like "Stray 'command'" instead of
"Stray 'c'".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-9-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Consistently enclose error messages in double quotes. Use single
quotes within, except for one case of "'".
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-8-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
The error message for forgotten quotes around a name shows just the
name's first character, which isn't as nice as it could be. Same for
attempting to use a number.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-7-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cover invalid 'if' in struct members, features, union and alternate
branches. Four out of four are broken. Mark FIXME.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-6-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
[Comment typo fixed]
When the union definition's base is an object, some error messages
show it as an OrderedDict. Oops. Mark FIXME.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-5-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Test flat-union-optional-discriminator declares its union tag as
'*switch': 'Enum', and points to it with 'discriminator': '*switch'.
This gets rejected as "discriminator of flat union 'MyUnion' uses
invalid name '*switch'". Correct; member 'discriminator' doesn't
accept a '*' prefix.
However, this merely tests name validity checking, which we already
cover elsewhere. More interesting is testing the valid name 'switch'.
This reports "discriminator 'switch' is not a member of base struct
'Base'", which is misleading.
Copy the existing 'discriminator': '*switch' test to
flat-union-discriminator-bad-name, and rewrite its comment. Change
flat-union-optional-discriminator to test 'discriminator': 'switch',
and mark it FIXME.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-4-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Tests duplicate-key and double-data test the same thing. The former
predates the latter, and it has a better name. Delete the latter, and
tweak the former's comment.
Tests include-format-err and include-extra-junk test the same thing.
The former predates the latter, but the latter has a better name and a
comment. Delete the former.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190914153506.2151-3-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
The previous commit made qapi-code-gen.txt define "(top-level)
expression" as either "directive" or "definition". The code still
uses "expression" when it really means "definition". Tidy up.
The previous commit made qapi-code-gen.txt use "object" rather than
"dictionary". The code still uses "dictionary". Tidy up.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190913201349.24332-17-armbru@redhat.com>
For consistency with docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190913201349.24332-12-armbru@redhat.com>
Absent flat union branches default to the empty struct (since commit
800877bb16 "qapi: allow empty branches in flat unions"). But an
attempt to omit all of them is rejected with "Union 'FOO' has no
branches". Harmless oddity, but it's easy to avoid, so do that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190913201349.24332-11-armbru@redhat.com>
[Commit message typo fixed]
A union or alternate without branches makes no sense and doesn't work:
it can't be instantiated. A union or alternate with just one branch
works, but is degenerate. We accept the former, but reject the
latter. Weird. docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.txt doesn't mention the
difference. It claims an alternate definition is "is similar to a
simple union type".
Permit degenerate alternates to make them consistent with unions.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190913201349.24332-10-armbru@redhat.com>
We reject empty types with 'boxed': true. We don't really need that
to work, but making it work is actually simpler than rejecting it, so
do that.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190913201349.24332-9-armbru@redhat.com>
Since the previous commit restricted strings to printable ASCII,
\uXXXX's only use is obfuscation. Drop it.
This leaves \\, \/, \', and \". Since QAPI schema strings are all
names, and names are restricted to ASCII letters, digits, hyphen, and
underscore, none of them is useful.
The latter three have no test coverage. Drop them.
Keep \\ to avoid (more) gratuitous incompatibility with JSON.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190913201349.24332-8-armbru@redhat.com>
