When hotplugging a PCI bridge right now to the root port, we resolve
pci_get_bus(pdev)->parent_dev, which results in a SEGFAULT. Hotplugging
really only works right now when hotplugging to another bridge.
Instead, we have to properly check if we are already at the root.
Let's cleanup the code while at it a bit and factor out updating the
subordinate bus number into a separate function. The check for
"old_nr < nr" is right now not strictly necessary, but makes it more
obvious what is actually going on.
Most probably fixing up the topology is not our responsibility when
hotplugging. The guest has to sort this out. But let's keep it for now
and only fix current code to not crash.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190130155733.32742-3-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
The primary bus number corresponds always to the bus number of the
bus the bridge is attached to.
Right now, if we have two bridges attached to the same bus (e.g. root
bus) this is however not the case. The first bridge will have primary
bus 0, the second bridge primary bus 1, which is wrong. Fix the assignment.
While at it, drop setting the PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS temporarily to 0xff.
Setting it temporarily to that value (as discussed e.g. in [1]), is
only relevant for a running system that probes the buses. The value is
effectively unused for us just doing a DFS.
Also add a comment why we have to reassign during every reset (which I
found to be surprising.
Please note that hotplugging of bridges is in general still broken, will
be fixed next.
[1] http://www.science.unitn.it/~fiorella/guidelinux/tlk/node76.html
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190130155733.32742-2-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
We currently don't migrate any state for zpci devices, which are
coupled with standard pci devices. This means funny things happen
when we e.g. try to migrate with a virtio-pci device but the s390x-
specific zpci state is not migrated (vfio-pci is not affected, as
it is not migratable anyway.)
Until this is fixed, mark zpci devices as unmigratable.
Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Let's handle it similar to x86 ACPI PCI code and don't use a timer.
Instead, remember if an unplug request is pending and keep it pending
for eternity. (a follow up patch will process the request on
reboot).
We expect that a guest that is up and running, will process the unplug
request and trigger the unplug. This is normal operation, no timer needed.
If the guest does not react, this usually means something in the guest
is going wrong. Simply removing the device after 30 seconds does not
really sound like a good idea. It might sometimes be wanted, but I
consider this rather an "opt-in" decision as it might harm a guest not
prepared for it.
If we ever actually want a "forced/surprise removal", we will have to
implement something on top of the existing "device_del" framework. E.g.
also x86 might want to do a forced/surprise removal of PCI devices under
some conditions. "device_del X, forced=true" could be an option and will
require changes to the hotplug handler infrastructure.
This will then move the responsibility on when to do a forced removal
to a higher level. Doing a forced removal right now over-complicates
things and doesn't really seem to be required.
Let's allow to send multiple requests.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190130155733.32742-6-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
PCI on s390x is really weird and how it was modeled in QEMU might not have
been the right choice. Anyhow, right now it is the case that:
- Hotplugging a PCI device will silently create a zPCI device
(if none is provided)
- Hotunplugging a zPCI device will unplug the PCI device (if any)
- Hotunplugging a PCI device will unplug also the zPCI device
As far as I can see, we can no longer change this behavior. But we
should fix it.
Both device types are handled via a single hotplug handler call. This
is problematic for various reasons:
1. Unplugging via the zPCI device allows to unplug devices that are not
hot removable. (check performed in qdev_unplug()) - bad.
2. Hotplug handler chains are not possible for the unplug case. In the
future, the machine might want to override hotplug handlers, to
process device specific stuff and to then branch off to the actual
hotplug handler. We need separate hotplug handler calls for both the
PCI and zPCI device to make this work reliably. All other PCI
implementations are already prepared to handle this correctly, only
s390x is missing.
Therefore, introduce the unplug_request handler and properly perform
unplug checks by redirecting to the separate unplug_request handlers.
When finally unplugging, perform two separate hotplug_handler_unplug()
calls, first for the PCI device, followed by the zPCI device. This now
nicely splits unplugging paths for both devices.
The redirect part is a little hairy, as the user is allowed to trigger
unplug either via the PCI or the zPCI device. So redirect always to the
PCI unplug request handler first and remember if that check has been
performed in the zPCI device. Redirect then to the zPCI device unplug
request handler to perform the magic. Remembering that we already
checked the PCI device breaks the redirect loop.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190130155733.32742-5-david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
These files don't use anything from m48t59.h, so no need to include
this header here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
reg->phys_hi and assigned->phys_hi are big endian but we do an extra
byteswap anyway when copying reg->phys_hi to assigned->phys_hi.
To make things slightly more messy, we also add a relocatable bit (b_n())
although in the right endianness.
This fixes endianness of assigned->phys_hi.
This is unlikely to produce any visible difference though as we should end up
there only in the case of PCI hotplug and even then I am not sure if
(d->io_regions[i].addr == PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED) == true.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The cirrus VGA card has been enabled in the PPC builds with
commit 29f9cef39e ("ppc: Include vga cirrus card into
the compiling process") last year. It also works on the pseries
machine, even SLOF contains support for this card, so we can
also support this for the "-vga" parameter here.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
spapr_load_rtas() handles now RTAS address and size information in the FDT
so drop them from spapr_build_fdt().
While we are here, fix a small typo.
Fixes: 3f5dabceba "pseries: Consolidate construction of /rtas device tree node"
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Currently, it is not possible to build a QEMU binary without the
ppc405_uc.c file, even if you do not want to have the embedded machines
in the binary. This is bad since it's quite a bit of code and this code
pulls in some more dependencies (e.g. via the usage of serial_mm_init())
which would not be needed otherwise - especially with the upcoming
Kconfig-style configuration system for QEMU.
The only functions from this file which are really always required for
linking are the ppc40x_*reset() functions, so move these functions to
ppc.c, close to the ppc40x_set_irq() function that calls them. Now we
can flag ppc405_uc.c and ppc4xx_devs.c with the CONFIG_PPC4XX config
switch, too.
And while we're at it, replace the printf()s in these ppc40x_*reset()
functions with proper calls to qemu_log_mask().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Next step is to remove them from under the PowerPCCPU
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Include the interrupt presenter under the machine_data as we plan to
remove it from under PowerPCCPU
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
It provides a mean to retrieve the XiveTCTX of a CPU. This will become
necessary with future changes which move the interrupt presenter
object pointers under the PowerPCCPU machine_data.
The PowerNV machine has an extra requirement on TIMA accesses that
this new method addresses. The machine can perform indirect loads and
stores on the TIMA on behalf of another CPU. The PIR being defined in
the controller registers, we need a way to peek in the controller
model to find the PIR value.
The XiveTCTX is moved above the XiveRouter definition to avoid forward
typedef declarations.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
While looking at the s390x implementation, looks like spapr has a
similar BUG when building the topology.
The primary bus number corresponds always to the bus number of the
bus the bridge is attached to.
Right now, if we have two bridges attached to the same bus (e.g. root
bus) this is however not the case. The first bridge will have primary
bus 0, the second bridge primary bus 1, which is wrong. Fix the assignment.
While at it, drop setting the PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS temporarily to 0xff.
Setting it temporarily to that value (as discussed e.g. in [1]), is
only relevant for a running system that probes the buses. The value is
effectively unused for us just doing a DFS.
[1] http://www.science.unitn.it/~fiorella/guidelinux/tlk/node76.html
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Machine types 3.0 and older only know about the legacy XICS backend.
Make it clear by erroring out if the user tries to set ic-mode on
such machines.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
In hw/scsi/spapr_vio.c we declare that the controller supports multiple
buses by specifying "max_channel = 7" there. So in the code that fixes
up the device tree nodes, we must encode the channel number (a.k.a. bus
number in the "Logical unit addressing format" table of SAM5) into the
64-bit LUN, too.
Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663160
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
commit efe2add7cb ("spapr/vio: deprecate the "irq" property") was
merged in QEMU version 3.0. The "irq" property" can be removed for
QEMU version 4.0.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
When reading base register of RAM slot with no RAM we should not try
to calculate register value because that will result printing an error
due to invalid RAM size. Just return 0 without the error in this case.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Fix the encoding of larger memory modules in the SoC registers which
allows specifying more than 1GB memory for sam460ex. Well, only 2GB
due to SoC and firmware restrictions which was the only missing value
compared to what the real hardware supports. The SoC should support up
to 4GB but when setting that the firmware hangs during memory test.
This may be an overflow bug in the firmware which I did not try to
debug but this may affect real hardware as well.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The sdram_set_bcr() function in ppc440_uc.c takes a pointer into an
array then calculates its index from that. It's simpler and easier to
just pass the index which simplifies both the function and its callers.
Do similar cleanup in ppc4xx_devs.c to similar function.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
There's already a struct with the same name in ppc4xx_devs.c. They are
not used outside their files so don't clash but they are also not
identical so rename the ppc440 specific one to distinguish them.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To avoid overflow if larger values are added later use ram_addr_t for
the sdram_bank_sizes parameter to match ram_size to which it is compared.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Get rid of code from MIPS Malta board used to create SPD EEPROM data
(parts of which was not even needed for sam460ex) and use the generic
spd_data_generate() function to simplify this.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
There are several boards with SPD EEPROMs that are now using
duplicated or slightly different hard coded data. Add a helper to
generate SPD data for a memory module of given type and size that
could be used by these boards (either as is or with further changes if
needed) which should help cleaning this up and avoid further duplication.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
- vmdk: Support for blockdev-create
- block: Apply auto-read-only for ro-whitelist drivers
- virtio-scsi: Fixes related to attaching/detaching iothreads
- scsi-disk: Fixed erroneously detected multipath setup with multiple
disks created with node-names. Added device_id property.
- block: Fix hangs in synchronous APIs with iothreads
- block: Fix invalidate_cache error path for parent activation
- block-backend, mirror, qcow2, vpc, vdi, qemu-iotests:
Minor fixes and code improvements
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=oaAn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/kevin/tags/for-upstream' into staging
Block layer patches:
- vmdk: Support for blockdev-create
- block: Apply auto-read-only for ro-whitelist drivers
- virtio-scsi: Fixes related to attaching/detaching iothreads
- scsi-disk: Fixed erroneously detected multipath setup with multiple
disks created with node-names. Added device_id property.
- block: Fix hangs in synchronous APIs with iothreads
- block: Fix invalidate_cache error path for parent activation
- block-backend, mirror, qcow2, vpc, vdi, qemu-iotests:
Minor fixes and code improvements
# gpg: Signature made Fri 01 Feb 2019 15:23:10 GMT
# gpg: using RSA key 7F09B272C88F2FD6
# gpg: Good signature from "Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>" [full]
# Primary key fingerprint: DC3D EB15 9A9A F95D 3D74 56FE 7F09 B272 C88F 2FD6
* remotes/kevin/tags/for-upstream: (27 commits)
scsi-disk: Add device_id property
scsi-disk: Don't use empty string as device id
qtest.py: Wait for the result of qtest commands
block: Fix invalidate_cache error path for parent activation
iotests/236: fix transaction kwarg order
iotests: Filter second BLOCK_JOB_ERROR from 229
virtio-scsi: Forbid devices with different iothreads sharing a blockdev
scsi-disk: Acquire the AioContext in scsi_*_realize()
virtio-scsi: Move BlockBackend back to the main AioContext on unplug
block: Eliminate the S_1KiB, S_2KiB, ... macros
block: Remove blk_attach_dev_legacy() / legacy_dev code
block: Apply auto-read-only for ro-whitelist drivers
uuid: Make qemu_uuid_bswap() take and return a QemuUUID
block/vdi: Don't take address of fields in packed structs
block/vpc: Don't take address of fields in packed structs
vmdk: Reject excess extents in blockdev-create
iotests: Add VMDK tests for blockdev-create
iotests: Filter cid numbers in VMDK extent info
vmdk: Implement .bdrv_co_create callback
vmdk: Refactor vmdk_create_extent
...
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The nRF51 contains three regions of non-volatile memory (NVM):
- CODE (R/W): contains code
- FICR (R): Factory information like code size, chip id etc.
- UICR (R/W): Changeable configuration data. Lock bits, Code
protection configuration, Bootloader address, Nordic SoftRadio
configuration, Firmware configuration.
Read and write access to the memories is managed by the
Non-volatile memory controller.
Memory schema:
[ CPU ] -+- [ NVM, either FICR, UICR or CODE ]
| |
\- [ NVMC ]
Signed-off-by: Steffen Görtz <contrib@steffen-goertz.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190201023357.22596-2-stefanha@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Until now, the set_pc logic was unclear, which raised questions about
whether it should be used directly, applying a value to PC or adding
additional checks, for example, set the Thumb bit in Arm cpu. Let's set
the set_pc logic for “Configure the PC, as was done in the ELF file”
and implement synchronize_with_tb hook for preserving PC to cpu_tb_exec.
Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20190129121817.7109-1-jusual@mail.ru
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add a model of the MPS2 FPGA image described in Application Note
AN521. This is identical to the AN505 image, except that it uses
the SSE-200 rather than the IoTKit and so has two Cortex-M33 CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-24-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In preparation for adding support for the AN521 MPS2 image, we need
to handle wiring up the MPS2 device interrupt lines to both CPUs in
the SSE-200, rather than just the one that the IoTKit has.
Abstract out a "connect to the IoTKit interrupt line" function
and make it connect to a splitter which feeds both sets of inputs
for the SSE-200 case.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-23-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add a model of the SSE-200, now we have put in all
the code that lets us make it different from the IoTKit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-22-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Instantiate a copy of the CPU_IDENTITY register block for each CPU
in an SSE-200.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-21-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has a CPU_IDENTITY register block, which is a set of
read-only registers. As well as the usual PID/CID registers, there
is a single CPUID register which indicates whether the CPU is CPU 0
or CPU 1. Implement a model of this register block.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-20-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has a "CPU local security control" register bank; add an
unimplemented-device stub for it. (The register bank has only one
interesting register, which allows the guest to lock down changes
to various CPU registers so they cannot be modified further. We
don't support that in our Cortex-M33 model anyway.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 gives each CPU a register bank to use to control its
L1 instruction cache. Put in an unimplemented-device stub for this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Add unimplemented-device stubs for the various Power Policy Unit
devices that the SSE-200 has.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has two Message Handling Units (MHUs), which sit behind
the APB PPC0. Wire up some unimplemented-device stubs for these,
since we don't yet implement a real model of this device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SYS_VERSION and SYS_CONFIG register values differ between the
IoTKit and SSE-200. Make them configurable via QOM properties rather
than hard-coded, and set them appropriately in the ARMSSE code that
instantiates the IOTKIT_SYSINFO device.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Create a cluster object to hold each CPU in the SSE. They are
logically distinct and may be configured differently (for instance
one may not have an FPU where the other does).
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Give each CPU its own container memory region. This is necessary
for two reasons:
* some devices are instantiated one per CPU and the CPU sees only
its own device
* since a memory region can only be put into one container, we must
give each armv7m object a different MemoryRegion as its 'memory'
property, or a dual-CPU configuration will assert on realize when
the second armv7m object tries to put the MR into a container when
it is already in the first armv7m object's container
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has two Cortex-M33 CPUs. These see the same view
of memory, with the exception of the "private CPU region" which
has per-CPU devices. Internal device interrupts for SSE-200
devices are mostly wired up to both CPUs, with the exception of
a few per-CPU devices. External GPIO inputs on the SSE-200
device are provided for the second CPU's interrupts above 32,
as is already the case for the first CPU.
Refactor the code to support creation of multiple CPUs.
For the moment we leave all CPUs with the same view of
memory: this will not work in the multiple-CPU case, but
we will fix this in the following commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-12-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For the IoTKit the SRAM bank size is always 32K (15 bits); for the
SSE-200 this is a configurable parameter, which defaults to 32K but
can be changed when it is built into a particular SoC. For instance
the Musca-B1 board sets it to 128K (17 bits).
Make the bank size a QOM property. We follow the SSE-200 hardware in
naming the parameter SRAM_ADDR_WIDTH, which specifies the number of
address bits of a single SRAM bank.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has four banks of SRAM, each with its own
Memory Protection Controller, where the IoTKit has only one.
Make the number of SRAM banks a field in ARMSSEInfo.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-200 has 4 banks of SRAM, each with its own internal
Memory Protection Controller. The interrupt status for these
extra MPCs appears in the same security controller SECMPCINTSTATUS
register as the MPC for the IoTKit's single SRAM bank. Enhance the
iotkit-secctl device to allow 4 MPCs. (If the particular IoTKit/SSE
variant in use does not have all 4 MPCs then the unused inputs will
simply result in the SECMPCINTSTATUS bits being zero as required.)
The hardcoded constant "1"s in armsse.c indicate the actual number
of SRAM MPCs the IoTKit has, and will be replaced in the following
commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Rename the files that used to be iotkit.[ch] to
armsse.[ch] to reflect the fact they new cover
multiple Arm subsystems for embedded.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Rename various internal uses of 'iotkit' in hw/arm/iotkit.c to
'armsse', for consistency. The remaining occurences are:
* related to the devices TYPE_IOTKIT_SYSCTL, TYPE_IOTKIT_SYSINFO,
etc, which this refactor is not touching
* references that apply specifically to the IoTKit (like
the lack of a private CPU region)
* the vmstate, which keeps its old "iotkit" name for
migration compatibility reasons
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Arm SSE-200 Subsystem for Embedded is a revised and
extended version of the older IoTKit SoC. Prepare for
adding a model of it by refactoring the IoTKit code into
an abstract base class which contains the functionality,
driven by a class data block specific to each subclass.
(This is the same approach used by the existing bcm283x
SoC family implementation.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Arm IoTKit was effectively the forerunner of a series of
subsystems for embedded SoCs, named the SSE-050, SSE-100 and SSE-200:
https://developer.arm.com/products/system-design/subsystems
These are generally quite similar, though later iterations have
extra devices that earlier ones do not.
We want to add a model of the SSE-200, which means refactoring the
IoTKit code into an abstract base class and subclasses (using the
same design that the bcm283x SoC and Aspeed SoC family
implementations do). As a first step, rename the IoTKit struct and
QOM macros to ARMSSE, which is what we're going to name the base
class. We temporarily retain TYPE_IOTKIT to avoid changing the
code that instantiates a TYPE_IOTKIT device here and then changing
it back again when it is re-introduced as a subclass.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190121185118.18550-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org