clang's C11 atomic_fetch_*() functions only take a C11 atomic type
pointer argument. QEMU uses direct types (int, etc) and this causes a
compiler error when a QEMU code calls these functions in a source file
that also included <stdatomic.h> via a system header file:
$ CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure ... && make
../util/async.c:79:17: error: address argument to atomic operation must be a pointer to _Atomic type ('unsigned int *' invalid)
Avoid using atomic_*() names in QEMU's atomic.h since that namespace is
used by <stdatomic.h>. Prefix QEMU's APIs with 'q' so that atomic.h
and <stdatomic.h> can co-exist. I checked /usr/include on my machine and
searched GitHub for existing "qatomic_" users but there seem to be none.
This patch was generated using:
$ git grep -h -o '\<atomic\(64\)\?_[a-z0-9_]\+' include/qemu/atomic.h | \
sort -u >/tmp/changed_identifiers
$ for identifier in $(</tmp/changed_identifiers); do
sed -i "s%\<$identifier\>%q$identifier%g" \
$(git grep -I -l "\<$identifier\>")
done
I manually fixed line-wrap issues and misaligned rST tables.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200923105646.47864-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
The seqlock write unlock function was incorrectly calling
seqlock_write_begin() instead of seqlock_write_end(), and was releasing
the lock before incrementing the sequence. This could lead to a race
condition and a corrupted sequence number becoming odd even though the
lock is not held.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200129144948.2161551-1-luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Fixes: 988fcafc73 ("seqlock: add QemuLockable support", 2018-08-23)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
There is a data race if the sequence is written concurrently to the
read. In C11 this has undefined behavior. Use atomic_set; the
read side is already using atomic_read.
Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20160930213106.20186-6-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Tracked down with an ugly, brittle and probably buggy Perl script.
Also move includes converted to <...> up so they get included before
ours where that's obviously okay.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
It is a more appropriate name, now that the mutex embedded
in the seqlock is gone.
Reviewed-by: Sergey Fedorov <sergey.fedorov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org>
Message-Id: <1465412133-3029-4-git-send-email-cota@braap.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
This option is unused; besides, it bloats the struct when not needed.
Let's just let writers define their own locks elsewhere.
Reviewed-by: Sergey Fedorov <sergey.fedorov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org>
Message-Id: <1465412133-3029-3-git-send-email-cota@braap.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
With this change we make sure that the compiler will not
optimise the read of the sequence number in any way.
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org>
Message-Id: <1440375847-17603-8-git-send-email-cota@braap.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <cota@braap.org>
Message-Id: <1440375847-17603-7-git-send-email-cota@braap.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Seqlock implementation for QEMU. Usage idiom
reader:
do {
start = seqlock_read_begin(&sl);
...
} while (seqlock_read_retry(&sl, start));
writer:
seqlock_write_lock(&sl);
...
seqlock_write_unlock(&sl);
initialization:
seqlock_init(QemuSeqLock *sl, QemuMutex *mutex)
mutex could be NULL if the caller will provide its own protection
for concurrent write sides (typically using the BQL).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Stefan Hajnoczi