In the very least, a change like this requires discussion on the list.
The naming convention is goofy and it causes a massive merge problem. Something
like this _must_ be presented on the list first so people can provide input
and cope with it.
This reverts commit 99a0949b72.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
The CPU state parameter is not used, remove it and adjust callers. Now we
can compile ioport.c once for all targets.
Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Using int for cpu_{in, out}[bwl] is inconsistent with other part
because for address or value, uintN_t is used by other qemu part.
At least, softmmu, CPU{Read, Write}MemoryFunc, pci, target_phys_addr_t
and the callers of cpu_{in, out}[bwl]().
This patch removes the inconsistency.
IO port has its own address space so define pio_addr_t as uint32_t
because PCI io space width is 32bit.
And use uint{32, 16, 8}_t for ioport value.
Changing signedness of value might cause subtle issue. However
only a suspicious caller is kvm_handle_io() which is ok. And other callers
pass unsigned value in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: Stuart Brady <sdbrady@ntlworld.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Cc: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>