When instantiating a user-created PHB on P9/P10, we don't really have
a reason any more to go through an indirection in pnv_chip_add_phb()
in pnv.c, we can go straight to the right function in
pnv_phb4_pec.c. That way, default PHBs and user-created PHBs are all
handled in the same file. This patch also renames pnv_phb4_get_pec()
to pnv_pec_add_phb() to better reflect that it "hooks" a PHB to a PEC.
For P8, the PHBs are parented to the chip directly, so it makes sense
to keep calling pnv_chip_add_phb() in pnv.c, to also be consistent
with where default PHBs are handled. The only change here is that,
since that function is now only used for P8, we can refine the return
type.
So overall, the PnvPHB front-end now has a pnv_phb_user_get_parent()
function which handles the parenting of the user-created PHBs by
calling the right function in the right file based on the processor
version. It's also easily extensible if we ever need to support a
different parent object.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20230302163715.129635-5-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Convert the TYPE_CXL_ROOT_PORT and TYPE_PNV_PHB_ROOT_PORT classes to
3-phase reset, so they don't need to use the deprecated
device_class_set_parent_reset() function any more.
We have to do both in the same commit, because they keep the
parent_reset field in their common parent class's class struct.
Note that pnv_phb_root_port_class_init() was pointlessly setting
dc->reset twice, once by calling device_class_set_parent_reset()
and once directly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20221125115240.3005559-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Currently QEMU terminates if you try to hotplug pnv-phb-root-port in
an environment where it is not supported, e.g. if doing this:
echo "device_add pnv-phb-root-port" | \
./qemu-system-ppc64 -monitor stdio -M powernv9
To avoid this problem, the pnv_phb_root_port_realize() function should
not use error_fatal when trying to set the properties which might not
be available.
Fixes: c2f3f78af5 ("ppc/pnv: set root port chassis and slot using Bus properties")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20221109122210.115667-1-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
User creatable root ports are being parented by the 'peripheral' or the
'peripheral-anon' container. This happens because this is the regular
QOM schema for sysbus devices that are added via the command line.
Let's make this QOM hierarchy similar to what we have with default root
ports, i.e. the root port must be parented by the pnv-root-bus. To do
that we change the qom and bus parent of the root port during
root_port_realize(). The realize() is shared by the default root port
code path, so we can remove the code inside pnv_phb_attach_root_port()
that was adding the root port as a child of the bus as well.
After all that, remove pnv_phb_attach_root_port() and create the root
port explictly in the 'default_enabled()' case of pnv_phb_realize().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220819094748.400578-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We have 2 helpers that amends the QOM and parent bus of a given object,
repectively. These 2 helpers are called together, and not by accident.
Due to QOM internals, doing an object_unparent() will result in the
device being removed from its parent bus. This means that changing the
QOM parent requires reassigning the parent bus again.
Create a single helper called pnv_parent_fixup(), documenting some of
the QOM specifics that we're dealing with the unparenting/parenting
mechanics, and handle both the QOM and the parent bus assignment.
Next patch will make use of this function to handle a case where we need
to change the QOM parent while keeping the same parent bus assigned
beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220819094748.400578-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Enable pnv-phb user created devices for powernv9 now that we have
everything in place.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The bulk of the work was already done by previous patches.
Use defaults_enabled() to determine whether we need to create the
default devices or not.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-7-danielhb413@gmail.com>
pnv_parent_qom_fixup() and pnv_parent_bus_fixup() are versions of the
helpers that were reverted by commit 9c10d86fee "ppc/pnv: Remove
user-created PHB{3,4,5} devices". They are needed to amend the QOM and
bus hierarchies of user created pnv-phbs, matching them with default
pnv-phbs.
A new helper pnv_phb_user_device_init() is created to handle
user-created devices setup. We're going to call it inside
pnv_phb_realize() in case we're realizing an user created device. This
will centralize all user device realated in a single spot, leaving the
realize functions of the phb3/phb4 backends untouched.
Another helper called pnv_chip_add_phb() was added to handle the
particularities of each chip version when adding a new PHB.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
For default root ports we have a way of accessing chassis and slot,
before root_port_realize(), via pnv_phb_attach_root_port(). For the
future user created root ports this won't be the case: we can't use
this helper because we don't have access to the PHB phb-id/chip-id
values.
In earlier patches we've added phb-id and chip-id to pnv-phb-root-bus
objects. We're now able to use the bus to retrieve them. The bus is
reachable for both user created and default devices, so we're changing
all the code paths. This also allow us to validate these changes with
the existing default devices.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The helper is only used in this file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-13-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We support only a single root port, PNV_PHB_ROOT_PORT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-10-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The unified pnv-phb-root-port can be used instead. The phb4-root-port
device isn't exposed to the user in any official QEMU release so there's
no ABI breakage in removing it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The unified pnv-phb-root-port can be used in its place. There is no ABI
breakage in doing so because no official QEMU release introduced user
creatable pnv-phb3-root-port devices.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We have two very similar root-port devices, pnv-phb3-root-port and
pnv-phb4-root-port. Both consist of a wrapper around the PCIESlot device
that, until now, has no additional attributes.
The main difference between the PHB3 and PHB4 root ports is that
pnv-phb4-root-port has the pnv_phb4_root_port_reset() callback. All
other differences can be merged in a single device without too much
trouble.
This patch introduces the unified pnv-phb-root-port that, in time, will
be used as the default root port for the pnv-phb device.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-7-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Similar to what we already did for the PnvPHB3 device, let's add a
helper to init the bus when using a PnvPHB4. This helper will be used by
PnvPHb when PnvPHB4 turns into a backend.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The PnvPHB device is going to be the base device for all other powernv
PHBs. It consists of a device that has the same user API as the other
PHB, namely being a PCIHostBridge and having chip-id and index
properties. It also has a 'backend' pointer that will be initialized
with the PHB implementation that the device is going to use.
The initialization of the PHB backend is done by checking the PHB
version via a 'version' attribute that can be set via a global machine
property. The 'version' field will be used to make adjustments based on
the running version, e.g. PHB3 uses a 'chip' reference while PHB4 uses
'pec'. To init the PnvPHB bus we'll rely on helpers for each version.
The version 3 helper is already added (pnv_phb3_bus_init), the PHB4
helper will be added later on.
For now let's add the basic logic of the PnvPHB object, which consists
mostly of pnv_phb_realize() doing all the work of checking the
phb->version set, initializing the proper backend, passing through its
attributes to the chosen backend, finalizing the backend realize and
adding a root port in the end.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
