TARGET_NR_select can have three different implementations:
1- to always return -ENOSYS
microblaze, ppc, ppc64
-> TARGET_WANT_NI_OLD_SELECT
2- to take parameters from a structure pointed by arg1
(kernel sys_old_select)
i386, arm, m68k
-> TARGET_WANT_OLD_SYS_SELECT
3- to take parameters from arg[1-5]
(kernel sys_select)
x86_64, alpha, s390x,
cris, sparc, sparc64
Some (new) architectures don't define NR_select,
4- but only NR__newselect with sys_select:
mips, mips64, sh
5- don't define NR__newselect, and use pselect6 syscall:
aarch64, openrisc, tilegx, unicore32
Reported-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>
Reported-by: Allan Wirth <awirth@akamai.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
x86, m68k, ppc, sh4 and sparc failed to enable timerfd, because they
didn't have timerfd_create system call defined. Instead QEMU
defined timerfd syscall. Checking with kernel sources, it appears
kernel developers reused timerfd syscall number with timerfd_create,
presumably since no userspace called the old syscall number.
Reported-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
As reported by Cédric VINCENT:
The syscall #123 on SH4 should be "TARGET_NR_cacheflush" instead of
"TARGET_NR_modify_ldt" [1]. The only consequence of this misnaming is
that many "Unsupported syscall" warnings are issued when emulating JIT
compilers.
Reported-by: Cédric VINCENT <cedric.vincent@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Add syscall numbers for new syscall numbers; this brings us
into line with Linux 2.6.39.2.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>
Aleksandar Markovic
Markus Armbruster
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Laurent Vivier
Riku Voipio
Peter Maydell
Riku Voipio
ths
bellard