The sysctl PDCM_PD_*_SENSE registers control various power domains in
the system and allow the guest to configure which conditions keep a
power domain awake and what power state to use when the domain is in
a low power state. QEMU doesn't model power domains, so for us these
registers are dummy reads-as-written implementations.
The SSE-300 has a different power domain setup, so the set of
registers is slightly different:
Offset SSE-200 SSE-300
---------------------------------------------------
0x200 PDCM_PD_SYS_SENSE PDCM_PD_SYS_SENSE
0x204 reserved PDCM_PD_CPU0_SENSE
0x208 reserved reserved
0x20c PDCM_PD_SRAM0_SENSE reserved
0x210 PDCM_PD_SRAM1_SENSE reserved
0x214 PDCM_PD_SRAM2_SENSE PDCM_PD_VMR0_SENSE
0x218 PDCM_PD_SRAM3_SENSE PDCM_PD_VMR1_SENSE
Offsets 0x200 and 0x208 are the same for both, so handled in a
previous commit; here we deal with 0x204, 0x20c, 0x210, 0x214, 0x218.
(We can safely add new lines to the SSE300 vmstate because no board
uses this device in an SSE300 yet.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-300 has a new PWRCTRL register at offset 0x1fc (previously
reserved). This register controls accessibility of some registers
in the Power Policy Units (PPUs). Since QEMU doesn't implement
the PPUs, we don't need to implement any real behaviour for this
register, so we just handle the UNLOCK bit which controls whether
writes to the register itself are permitted and otherwise make it
be reads-as-written.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Remove the is_sse200 flag in favour of just directly testing the new
sse_version field.
Since some of these registers exist in the SSE-300 but some do not or
have different behaviour, we expand out the if() statements in the
read and write functions into switch()es, so we have an easy place to
put SSE-300 specific behaviour.
(Until we do add the SSE-300 behaviour, the thing preventing us
reaching the "unreachable" default cases is that armsse.c doesn't
yet pass us an ARMSSE_SSE300 version.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We model Arm "Subsystems for Embedded" SoC subsystems using generic
code which is split into various sub-devices which are configurable
by QOM properties to handle the behaviour differences between the SSE
subsystems we implement. Currently the only sub-device which needs
to change is the IOTKIT_SYSCTL device, and we do this with a mix of
properties that directly specify divergent behaviours (eg
CPUWAIT_RST) and passing it the SYS_VERSION register value as a way
for it to distinguish IoTKit from SSE-200.
The "pass SYS_VERSION" approach is already a bit hacky, since the
IOTKIT_SYSCTL device has to know that the different part of the
register value happens to be bits [31:28]. For SSE-300 this register
is renamed SOC_IDENTITY and has a different format entirely, all of
whose fields can be configured by the SoC integrator when they
integrate the SSE into their SoC, and so "pass SYS_VERSION" breaks
down completely.
Switch to using a simple integer property representing an
internal-to-QEMU enumeration of the SSE flavour. For the moment we
only need this in IOTKIT_SYSCTL, but as we add SSE-300 support a few
of the other devices will also need to know.
We define and permit a value for the SSE-300 so we can start using
it in subsequent commits which add SSE-300 support.
The now-redundant is_sse200 flag in IoTKitSysCtl will be removed
in the following commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update old infocenter.arm.com URLs to the equivalent developer.arm.com
ones (the old URLs should redirect, but we might as well avoid the
redirection notice, and the new URLs are pleasantly shorter).
This commit covers the links to the MPS2 board TRM, the various
Application Notes, the IoTKit and SSE-200 documents.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210215115138.20465-25-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Some typedefs and macros are defined after the type check macros.
This makes it difficult to automatically replace their
definitions with OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE.
Patch generated using:
$ ./scripts/codeconverter/converter.py -i \
--pattern=QOMStructTypedefSplit $(git grep -l '' -- '*.[ch]')
which will split "typdef struct { ... } TypedefName"
declarations.
Followed by:
$ ./scripts/codeconverter/converter.py -i --pattern=MoveSymbols \
$(git grep -l '' -- '*.[ch]')
which will:
- move the typedefs and #defines above the type check macros
- add missing #include "qom/object.h" lines if necessary
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200831210740.126168-9-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200831210740.126168-10-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200831210740.126168-11-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
At the moment the handling of init-svtor and cpuwait initial
values is split between armsse.c and iotkit-sysctl.c:
the code in armsse.c sets the initial state of the CPU
object by setting the init-svtor and start-powered-off
properties, but the iotkit-sysctl.c code has its own
code setting the reset values of its registers (which are
then used when updating the CPU when the guest makes
runtime changes).
Clean this up by making the armsse.c code set properties on the
iotkit-sysctl object to define the initial values of the
registers, so they always match the initial CPU state,
and update the comments in armsse.c accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SYSCTL block in the SSE-200 has some extra registers that
are not present in the IoTKit version. Add these registers
(as reads-as-written stubs), enabled by a new QOM property.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The iotkit-sysctl device has a register it names INITSVRTOR0.
This is actually a typo present in the IoTKit documentation
and also in part of the SSE-200 documentation: it should be
INITSVTOR0 because it is specifying the initial value of the
Secure VTOR register in the CPU. Correct the typo.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Arm IoTKit includes a system control element which
provides a block of read-only ID registers and a block
of read-write control registers. Implement a minimal
version of this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180820141116.9118-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Peter Maydell
Eduardo Habkost