The SSE-200 and SSE-300 have different PID register values from the
IoTKit for the sysctl register block. We incorrectly implemented the
SSE-200 with the same PID values as IoTKit. Fix the SSE-200 bug and
report these register values for SSE-300.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The sysctl PDCM_PD_*_SENSE registers control various power domains in
the system and allow the guest to configure which conditions keep a
power domain awake and what power state to use when the domain is in
a low power state. QEMU doesn't model power domains, so for us these
registers are dummy reads-as-written implementations.
The SSE-300 has a different power domain setup, so the set of
registers is slightly different:
Offset SSE-200 SSE-300
---------------------------------------------------
0x200 PDCM_PD_SYS_SENSE PDCM_PD_SYS_SENSE
0x204 reserved PDCM_PD_CPU0_SENSE
0x208 reserved reserved
0x20c PDCM_PD_SRAM0_SENSE reserved
0x210 PDCM_PD_SRAM1_SENSE reserved
0x214 PDCM_PD_SRAM2_SENSE PDCM_PD_VMR0_SENSE
0x218 PDCM_PD_SRAM3_SENSE PDCM_PD_VMR1_SENSE
Offsets 0x200 and 0x208 are the same for both, so handled in a
previous commit; here we deal with 0x204, 0x20c, 0x210, 0x214, 0x218.
(We can safely add new lines to the SSE300 vmstate because no board
uses this device in an SSE300 yet.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-300 has a new PWRCTRL register at offset 0x1fc (previously
reserved). This register controls accessibility of some registers
in the Power Policy Units (PPUs). Since QEMU doesn't implement
the PPUs, we don't need to implement any real behaviour for this
register, so we just handle the UNLOCK bit which controls whether
writes to the register itself are permitted and otherwise make it
be reads-as-written.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-300 has only one CPU and so no INITSVTOR1. It does
have INITSVTOR0, but unlike the SSE-200 this register now
has a LOCK bit which can be set to 1 to prevent any further
writes to the register. Implement these differences.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the SSE-300 the CPU_WAIT and NMI_ENABLE registers have
moved offsets, so they are now where the SSE-200's WICCTRL
and EWCTRL were. The SSE-300 does not have WICCTLR or EWCTRL
at all, and the old offsets are reserved:
Offset SSE-200 SSE-300
-----------------------------------
0x118 CPUWAIT reserved
0x118 NMI_ENABLE reserved
0x120 WICCTRL CPUWAIT
0x124 EWCTRL NMI_ENABLE
Handle this reshuffle, and the fact that SSE-300 has only
one CPU and so only one active bit in CPUWAIT.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SSE-300's iokit-sysctl device is similar to the SSE-200, but
some registers have moved address or have different behaviours.
In this commit we add case statements for the registers where
the SSE-300 and SSE-200 have the same behaviour. Some registers
are the same on all SSE versions and so need no code change at all.
Putting both of these categories together covers:
0x0 SECDBGSTAT
0x4 SECDBGSET
0x8 SECDBGCLR
0xc SCSECCTRL
0x10 CLK_CFG0 -- this is like SSE-200 FCLK_DIV but with a
different set of clocks being controlled; our implementation
is a dummy reads-as-written anyway
0x14 CLK_CFG1 -- similar to SSE-200 SYSCLK_DIV; our implementation
is a dummy
0x18 CLK_FORCE -- similar to SSE-200 but different bit allocations;
we have a dummy implementation
0x100 RESET_SYNDROME -- bit allocation differs from SSE-200 but our
implementation is a dummy
0x104 RESET_MASK -- bit allocation differs from SSE-200 but our
implementation is a dummy
0x108 SWRESET
0x10c GRETREG
0x200 PDCM_PD_SYS_SENSE -- some bit allocations differ, but our
implementation is a dummy
We also need to migrate the state of these registers which are shared
between the SSE-200 and SSE-300, so update the vmstate 'needed'
function to do this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Remove the is_sse200 flag in favour of just directly testing the new
sse_version field.
Since some of these registers exist in the SSE-300 but some do not or
have different behaviour, we expand out the if() statements in the
read and write functions into switch()es, so we have an easy place to
put SSE-300 specific behaviour.
(Until we do add the SSE-300 behaviour, the thing preventing us
reaching the "unreachable" default cases is that armsse.c doesn't
yet pass us an ARMSSE_SSE300 version.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We model Arm "Subsystems for Embedded" SoC subsystems using generic
code which is split into various sub-devices which are configurable
by QOM properties to handle the behaviour differences between the SSE
subsystems we implement. Currently the only sub-device which needs
to change is the IOTKIT_SYSCTL device, and we do this with a mix of
properties that directly specify divergent behaviours (eg
CPUWAIT_RST) and passing it the SYS_VERSION register value as a way
for it to distinguish IoTKit from SSE-200.
The "pass SYS_VERSION" approach is already a bit hacky, since the
IOTKIT_SYSCTL device has to know that the different part of the
register value happens to be bits [31:28]. For SSE-300 this register
is renamed SOC_IDENTITY and has a different format entirely, all of
whose fields can be configured by the SoC integrator when they
integrate the SSE into their SoC, and so "pass SYS_VERSION" breaks
down completely.
Switch to using a simple integer property representing an
internal-to-QEMU enumeration of the SSE flavour. For the moment we
only need this in IOTKIT_SYSCTL, but as we add SSE-300 support a few
of the other devices will also need to know.
We define and permit a value for the SSE-300 so we can start using
it in subsequent commits which add SSE-300 support.
The now-redundant is_sse200 flag in IoTKitSysCtl will be removed
in the following commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210219144617.4782-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Update old infocenter.arm.com URLs to the equivalent developer.arm.com
ones (the old URLs should redirect, but we might as well avoid the
redirection notice, and the new URLs are pleasantly shorter).
This commit covers the links to the MPS2 board TRM, the various
Application Notes, the IoTKit and SSE-200 documents.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20210215115138.20465-25-peter.maydell@linaro.org
When debugging QEMU it is often useful to put a breakpoint on the
error_setg_internal method impl.
Unfortunately the object_property_add / object_class_property_add
methods call object_property_find / object_class_property_find methods
to check if a property exists already before adding the new property.
As a result there are a huge number of calls to error_setg_internal
on startup of most QEMU commands, making it very painful to set a
breakpoint on this method.
Most callers of object_find_property and object_class_find_property,
however, pass in a NULL for the Error parameter. This simplifies the
methods to remove the Error parameter entirely, and then adds some
new wrapper methods that are able to raise an Error when needed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200914135617.1493072-1-berrange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
The object_property_set_FOO() setters take property name and value in
an unusual order:
void object_property_set_FOO(Object *obj, FOO_TYPE value,
const char *name, Error **errp)
Having to pass value before name feels grating. Swap them.
Same for object_property_set(), object_property_get(), and
object_property_parse().
Convert callers with this Coccinelle script:
@@
identifier fun = {
object_property_get, object_property_parse, object_property_set_str,
object_property_set_link, object_property_set_bool,
object_property_set_int, object_property_set_uint, object_property_set,
object_property_set_qobject
};
expression obj, v, name, errp;
@@
- fun(obj, v, name, errp)
+ fun(obj, name, v, errp)
Chokes on hw/arm/musicpal.c's lcd_refresh() with the unhelpful error
message "no position information". Convert that one manually.
Fails to convert hw/arm/armsse.c, because Coccinelle gets confused by
ARMSSE being used both as typedef and function-like macro there.
Convert manually.
Fails to convert hw/rx/rx-gdbsim.c, because Coccinelle gets confused
by RXCPU being used both as typedef and function-like macro there.
Convert manually. The other files using RXCPU that way don't need
conversion.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20200707160613.848843-27-armbru@redhat.com>
[Straightforwad conflict with commit 2336172d9b "audio: set default
value for pcspk.iobase property" resolved]
sysemu/sysemu.h is a rather unfocused dumping ground for stuff related
to the system-emulator. Evidence:
* It's included widely: in my "build everything" tree, changing
sysemu/sysemu.h still triggers a recompile of some 1100 out of 6600
objects (not counting tests and objects that don't depend on
qemu/osdep.h, down from 5400 due to the previous two commits).
* It pulls in more than a dozen additional headers.
Split stuff related to run state management into its own header
sysemu/runstate.h.
Touching sysemu/sysemu.h now recompiles some 850 objects. qemu/uuid.h
also drops from 1100 to 850, and qapi/qapi-types-run-state.h from 4400
to 4200. Touching new sysemu/runstate.h recompiles some 500 objects.
Since I'm touching MAINTAINERS to add sysemu/runstate.h anyway, also
add qemu/main-loop.h.
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-30-armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
[Unbreak OS-X build]
In my "build everything" tree, changing hw/qdev-properties.h triggers
a recompile of some 2700 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and
objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).
Many places including hw/qdev-properties.h (directly or via hw/qdev.h)
actually need only hw/qdev-core.h. Include hw/qdev-core.h there
instead.
hw/qdev.h is actually pointless: all it does is include hw/qdev-core.h
and hw/qdev-properties.h, which in turn includes hw/qdev-core.h.
Replace the remaining uses of hw/qdev.h by hw/qdev-properties.h.
While there, delete a few superfluous inclusions of hw/qdev-core.h.
Touching hw/qdev-properties.h now recompiles some 1200 objects.
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-22-armbru@redhat.com>
In my "build everything" tree, changing migration/vmstate.h triggers a
recompile of some 2700 out of 6600 objects (not counting tests and
objects that don't depend on qemu/osdep.h).
hw/hw.h supposedly includes it for convenience. Several other headers
include it just to get VMStateDescription. The previous commit made
that unnecessary.
Include migration/vmstate.h only where it's still needed. Touching it
now recompiles only some 1600 objects.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-16-armbru@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
At the moment the handling of init-svtor and cpuwait initial
values is split between armsse.c and iotkit-sysctl.c:
the code in armsse.c sets the initial state of the CPU
object by setting the init-svtor and start-powered-off
properties, but the iotkit-sysctl.c code has its own
code setting the reset values of its registers (which are
then used when updating the CPU when the guest makes
runtime changes).
Clean this up by making the armsse.c code set properties on the
iotkit-sysctl object to define the initial values of the
registers, so they always match the initial CPU state,
and update the comments in armsse.c accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The CPUWAIT register acts as a sort of power-control: if a bit
in it is 1 then the CPU will have been forced into waiting
when the system was reset (which in QEMU we model as the
CPU starting powered off). Writing a 0 to the register will
allow the CPU to boot (for QEMU, we model this as powering
it on). Note that writing 0 to the register does not power
off a CPU.
For this to work correctly we need to also honour the
INITSVTOR* registers, which let the guest control where the
CPU will load its SP and PC from when it comes out of reset.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The SYSCTL block in the SSE-200 has some extra registers that
are not present in the IoTKit version. Add these registers
(as reads-as-written stubs), enabled by a new QOM property.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The iotkit-sysctl device has a register it names INITSVRTOR0.
This is actually a typo present in the IoTKit documentation
and also in part of the SSE-200 documentation: it should be
INITSVTOR0 because it is specifying the initial value of the
Secure VTOR register in the CPU. Correct the typo.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20190219125808.25174-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Arm IoTKit includes a system control element which
provides a block of read-only ID registers and a block
of read-write control registers. Implement a minimal
version of this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180820141116.9118-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
