Commit Graph

90031 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mazdak Farrokhzad
59f1a563d5
Rollup merge of #58607 - gurgalex:fail_E0505_for_2018_edition, r=matthewjasper
Fixes #58586: Make E0505 erronous example fail for the 2018 edition

The original example worked for 2015, but not the 2018 edition of Rust.

Borrowing the moved value after ownership is transferred seems required for 2018.

[this](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/rust-lang:f66e469...gurgalex:b2a02c8#diff-4ca866aea4a6efecd732f1975faaad88R1564) line though is correct for 2018, but not for the 2015 edition.

Fix #58586
2019-02-22 14:58:11 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
b28a32fba7
Rollup merge of #58606 - stjepang:put-future-into-spotlight, r=alexcrichton
Docs: put Future trait into spotlight

If a function returns a type that implements `Future`, there should be a small "i" symbol next to it indicating the return type implements an important trait.
2019-02-22 14:58:09 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
555df2bba1
Rollup merge of #58601 - gnzlbg:json_error, r=oli-obk
Search for target_triple.json only if builtin target not found

Before this commit, if the builtin target was found, but an error
happened when instantiating it (e.g. validating the target
specification file failed, etc.), then we ignored those errors
and proceeded to try to find a `target_triple.json` file, and if
that failed, reported that as an error.

With this commit, if rustc is supposed to provide the builtin target,
and something fails while instantiating it, that error will
get properly propagated.

r? @oli-obk
2019-02-22 14:58:08 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
575a209624
Rollup merge of #58600 - llogiq:documentation-tests-typo, r=frewsxcv
fix small documentation typo

Thanks to @stjepang for catching my mistake.
2019-02-22 14:58:07 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
1d0d94a650
Rollup merge of #58591 - dwijnand:dedup-a-rustdoc-diag-construction, r=GuillaumeGomez
Dedup a rustdoc diagnostic construction

None
2019-02-22 14:58:06 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
aa3779b4e9
Rollup merge of #58589 - matklad:remove-hack, r=petrochenkov
cleanup macro after 2018 transition

We can now use `?`
2019-02-22 14:58:04 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
94817aa87a
Rollup merge of #58588 - matklad:dead-code, r=petrochenkov
remove a bit of dead code

[Six years](5dc5efefd4) seem to be a long enough transition period 🤣
2019-02-22 14:58:03 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
bcb7dce75c
Rollup merge of #58555 - scottmcm:try-2015, r=Centril
Add a note about 2018e if someone uses `try {` in 2015e

Inspired by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/58491, where a `try_blocks` example was accidentally run in 2015, which of course produces a bunch of errors.

What's the philosophy about gating for this?  The keyword is stably a keyword in 2018, so I haven't gated it for now but am not mentioning what the keyword _does_.  Let me know if I should do differently.

Resolves #53672
2019-02-22 14:58:02 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
42b9a046d4
Rollup merge of #58431 - RalfJung:btree, r=Mark-Simulacrum
fix overlapping references in BTree

This fixes two kinds of overlapping references in BTree (both found by running the BTree test suite in Miri).

In `into_slices_mut`, we did `k.into_key_slice_mut()` followed by `self.into_val_slice_mut()` (where `k` is a copy of `self`). Calling `into_val_slice_mut` calls `self.len()`, which creates a shared reference to `NodeHeader`, which unfortunately (due to padding) overlaps with the mutable reference returned by `into_key_slice_mut`.  Hence the key slice got (partially) invalidated.  The fix is to avoid creating an `&NodeHeader` after the first slice got created.

In the iterators, we used to first create the references that will be returned, and then perform the walk on the tree.  Walking the tree creates references (such as `&mut InternalNode`) that overlap with all of the keys and values stored in a pointer; in particular, they overlap with the references the iterator will later return. This is fixed by reordering the operations of walking the tree and obtaining the inner references.

The test suite still passes (and it passes in Miri now!), but there is a lot of code here that I do not understand...
2019-02-22 14:58:00 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
894141b57d
Rollup merge of #58198 - igorsdv:suggest-removing-parentheses-surrounding-lifetimes, r=estebank
Suggest removing parentheses surrounding lifetimes

Fixes #57386.

r? @estebank
2019-02-22 14:57:59 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
70cc6c980c
Rollup merge of #58064 - llogiq:vec-deque-try-rfold, r=scottmcm
override `VecDeque::try_rfold`, also update iterator

This keeps the slice based iteration and updates the iterator state after each slice. It also uses a loop to reduce the amount of code.

This uses unsafe code, so some thorough review would be appreciated. Cc @RalfJung
2019-02-22 14:57:58 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
ec8ef1836a
Rollup merge of #58059 - RalfJung:before_exec, r=alexcrichton
deprecate before_exec in favor of unsafe pre_exec

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39575

As per the [lang team decision](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/39575#issuecomment-442993358):

> The language team agreed that before_exec should be unsafe, and leaves the details of a transition plan to the libs team.

Cc @alexcrichton @rust-lang/libs how would you like to proceed?
2019-02-22 14:57:56 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
0bcb66469c
Rollup merge of #57656 - scottmcm:deprecate-resize_default, r=SimonSapin
Deprecate the unstable Vec::resize_default

As a way to either get additional feedback to stabilize or help move nightly users off it.

Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/41758#issuecomment-449719961

r? @SimonSapin
2019-02-22 14:57:55 +01:00
bors
1005f3bac7 Auto merge of #56113 - spastorino:erroneous-loop-diagnostic-in-nll, r=pnkfelix
Erroneous loop diagnostic in nll

Closes #53773

r? @nikomatsakis
2019-02-22 06:52:39 +00:00
bors
c6fd02772b Auto merge of #58574 - RalfJung:pin, r=Mark-Simulacrum
improve Pin documentation

Incorporates a bunch of the documentation-related comments that came up when discussing `Pin` stabilization.

Cc @alexcrichton @withoutboats @cramertj @jonhoo

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/58130
2019-02-22 04:11:23 +00:00
bors
d1f8970bd1 Auto merge of #58616 - vertexclique:destabilize-fixed-width-atomic-integers, r=dtolnay
Destabilize fixed-width const defined atomic integers

With this PR version 1.34.0 onwards const declarations of atomic integers will be unstable.

* Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/58089
* Reverts partially: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/57425
2019-02-22 01:29:34 +00:00
Ralf Jung
497439c199 take a bit more space for new_unchecked examples 2019-02-21 23:13:49 +01:00
bors
8a1d0defdf Auto merge of #58592 - nikomatsakis:universe-leak-check, r=aturon
Re-implement leak check in terms of universes

This PR temporarily restores the leak-check, but implemented in terms of universes. This is not because the leak check behavior was necessarily **correct**, but because (a) we may want to have a transition period and because (b) we want to have more breathing room to work through the full implications of handling higher-ranked types correctly. Note that this PR builds atop https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/58056.

Fixes #58451
Fixes #46989
Fixes #57639

r? @aturon
cc @arielb1, @lqd

~~Temporary note: I've not finished running `./x.py test` locally -- I'm confident a lot of error messages in tests will need updating. I sort of expect them to revert to the older, (imo) less good error messages, which is mildly unfortunate. There might be a way to preserve the new error messages, not sure.~~
2019-02-21 21:35:21 +00:00
Niko Matsakis
33d3598e3b partially revert 904a0bde93
This preserves the error you currently get on stable for the
old-lub-glb-object.rs test.
2019-02-21 12:50:13 -05:00
bors
633d75ac17 Auto merge of #58584 - ehuss:update-cargo, r=alexcrichton
Update cargo

9 commits in 865cb70106a6b1171a500ff68f93ab52eea56e72..b33ce7fc9092962b0657b4c25354984b5e5c47e4
2019-02-10 15:49:37 +0000 to 2019-02-19 18:42:50 +0000
- Don't retry invalid credentials from git credential helpers (rust-lang/cargo#6681)
- Fix some typos in resolver tests (rust-lang/cargo#6682)
- Add an unstable option to build proc macros for both the host and the target (rust-lang/cargo#6547)
- Test cases proving RUSTC_WRAPPER can be a relative path (rust-lang/cargo#6638)
- Add support for Azure DevOps (rust-lang/cargo#6264)
- Update docs for removed `patch` restriction. (rust-lang/cargo#6663)
- Fix incorrect help message (rust-lang/cargo#6555)
- Stabilize Alternative Registries (rust-lang/cargo#6654)
- Having a [patch] section when publishing is not an error (rust-lang/cargo#6535)
2019-02-21 17:18:53 +00:00
Niko Matsakis
21e9478366 update test files to reflect new output
One surprise: old-lub-glb-object.rs, may indicate a bug
2019-02-21 11:32:17 -05:00
Niko Matsakis
561ce442de restore the actual leak-check 2019-02-21 11:32:17 -05:00
Niko Matsakis
0c94ea0bf1 introduce a dummy leak check and invoke it in all the right places
This set of diffs was produced by combing through
b68fad670b and seeing where the
`leak_check` used to be invoked and how.
2019-02-21 11:32:17 -05:00
Niko Matsakis
2cbe07b5b3 reintroduce commit_if_ok calls to subtype_predicate 2019-02-21 11:32:17 -05:00
Niko Matsakis
6cb4ffbe14 reintroduce commit_if_ok call into higher_ranked_sub 2019-02-21 11:32:17 -05:00
Niko Matsakis
3cd286bac2 s/skol_/placeholder_/ 2019-02-21 11:32:17 -05:00
Ralf Jung
811af4289c fix link 2019-02-21 17:18:18 +01:00
Ralf Jung
32a9614a4e this is for you, tidy 2019-02-21 16:05:49 +01:00
bors
fd42f24b01 Auto merge of #58597 - pietroalbini:appveyor-gce, r=alexcrichton
ci: switch appveyor to gce builders to try debugging the 259 failure

r? @alexcrichton
2019-02-21 14:34:49 +00:00
Ralf Jung
6b88007473 explain unsafe 2019-02-21 15:33:55 +01:00
Ralf Jung
bcc55e5e79 we only list some examples of basic types 2019-02-21 15:31:09 +01:00
Ralf Jung
2db0e0d65c tweaks and fix weird space 2019-02-21 15:30:31 +01:00
Mazdak Farrokhzad
e61a8a94f7
Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: RalfJung <post@ralfj.de>
2019-02-21 15:28:46 +01:00
Mahmut Bulut
99d67ca3b8
Destabilize fixed-width const defined atomic integers
* With this PR 1.34.0 onwards const declarations of atomic integers will be
  unstable.
2019-02-21 13:57:51 +01:00
bors
0e25a6829c Auto merge of #58535 - RalfJung:miri, r=oli-obk
update miri

r? @oli-obk

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/58558
2019-02-21 11:44:16 +00:00
Ralf Jung
59bdb31c89 final pin projections tweaking 2019-02-21 10:21:59 +01:00
Ralf Jung
c9ade6a577 more pin projections tweaking 2019-02-21 09:57:29 +01:00
Alex Gurganus
6a5abea709 Remove braces from most E0505 examples
The solution which uses braces to release the borrow
before it is moved is only required to satisfy the 2015
edition borrow checker.

All other examples give the expected results for both
2015 and 2018 editions.
2019-02-20 16:12:28 -06:00
bors
1349c84a4f Auto merge of #58056 - nikomatsakis:issue-57843-universe-leak, r=pnkfelix
make generalization code create new variables in correct universe

In our type inference system, when we "generalize" a type T to become
a suitable value for a type variable V, we sometimes wind up creating
new inference variables. So, for example, if we are making V be some
subtype of `&'X u32`, then we might instantiate V with `&'Y u32`.
This generalized type is then related `&'Y u32 <: &'X u32`, resulting
in a region constriant `'Y: 'X`. Previously, however, we were making
these fresh variables like `'Y` in the "current universe", but they
should be created in the universe of V. Moreover, we sometimes cheat
in an invariant context and avoid creating fresh variables if we know
the result must be equal -- we can only do that when the universes
work out.

Fixes #57843

r? @pnkfelix
2019-02-20 21:12:18 +00:00
Stjepan Glavina
102436d16a Put Future trait into spotlight 2019-02-20 22:06:30 +01:00
Alex Gurganus
b2a02c8d4a Fixes #58586: Make E0505 explain example fail for 2018 edition 2019-02-20 14:46:42 -06:00
Ralf Jung
1b556f16c9 expand pinning projections 2019-02-20 19:38:28 +01:00
gnzlbg
103ed0c347 Search for target_triple.json only if builtin target not found
Before this commit, if the builtin target was found, but an error
happened when instantiating it (e.g. validating the target
specification file failed, etc.), then we ignored those errors
and proceeded to try to find a `target_triple.json` file, and if
that failed, reported that as an error.

With this commit, if rustc is supposed to provide the builtin target,
and something fails while instantiating it, that error will
get properly propagated.
2019-02-20 19:37:54 +01:00
Ralf Jung
06b2affa78 tweak pinning projections 2019-02-20 18:28:12 +01:00
Andre Bogus
8cf3605c50 fix typo 2019-02-20 17:59:17 +01:00
Pietro Albini
703e2361f0
ci: switch appveyor to gce builders to try debugging the 259 failure 2019-02-20 17:01:29 +01:00
Santiago Pastorino
a12982cdc2
Run rustfmt 2019-02-20 12:15:27 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
801c3f060f
Fix erroneous loop diagnostic in nll
This commit fixes the logic of detecting when a use happen in a later
iteration of where a borrow was defined

Fixes #53773
2019-02-20 12:15:08 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
cbc865defd
Use successor_within_block helper 2019-02-20 11:49:18 -03:00
Dale Wijnand
ad096d1a0e
Dedup a rustdoc diagnostic construction 2019-02-20 14:07:07 +00:00