Document that `/` works as separator on Windows
Hi Whenever I see code like `Path::new("./src/bin/main.rs")` or `path.ends_with("foo/bar")`, I wonder if it will work on Windows as I expect. Unfortunately, reading the current docs does not help to answer this question, because all examples are Unix-specific.
However, I believe that using `/` is fine, because both Windows itself [and Rust stdlib](47faf1d519/src/libstd/sys/windows/path.rs (L26)) do treat it as a file separator, and because it is [actually used](abf01e1edd/tests/git.rs (L579)) in Cargo. So looks like we can just document it?
r? @steveklabnik
cc @retep998 I don't actually program for windows that much, so I might be totally wrong, and perhaps we should advise to always use (allocating) `.join` method to construct paths of more than one component?
[libcore/cmp] Expand Ord/PartialOrd Derivable doc for enum types
Expand Derivable docblock section for `Ord` and `PartialOrd` to cover
`enum` types, in addition to the existing language explaining it for
`struct` types.
std: Fix implementation of `Alloc::alloc_one`
This had an accidental `u8 as *mut T` where it was intended to have just a
normal pointer-to-pointer cast.
Closes#42827
Update docs for fmt::write.
#29355
I reworded it slightly to make it more clear that the function only take
two arguments - the output and the Arguments struct that can be
generated from the format_args! macro.
r? @steveklabnik
add `allow_fail` test attribute
This change allows the user to add an `#[allow_fail]` attribute to
tests that will cause the test to compile & run, but if the test fails
it will not cause the entire test run to fail. The test output will
show the failure, but in yellow instead of red, and also indicate that
it was an allowed failure.
Here is an example of the output: http://imgur.com/a/wt7ga
Detect missing `;` on methods with return type `()`
- Point out the origin of a type requirement when it is the return type
of a method
- Point out possibly missing semicolon when the return type is `()` and
the implicit return makes sense as a statement
- Suggest changing the return type of methods with default return type
- Don't suggest changing the return type on `fn main()`
- Don't suggest changing the return type on impl fn
- Suggest removal of semicolon (instead of being help)
Reuse the mem::swap optimizations to speed up slice::rotate
This is most helpful for compound types where LLVM didn't vectorize the loop. Highlight: bench slice::rotate_medium_by727_strings gets 38% faster.
Exposes the swapping logic from PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/40454 as `pub unsafe fn ptr::swap_nonoverlapping` under library feature `swap_nonoverlapping` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42818.
(The new method seemed plausible, and was the simplest way to share the logic. I'm not attached to it, though, so let me know if a different way would be better.)
re-add the call to `super_statement` in EraseRegions
The move gathering code is sensitive to type-equality - that is rather
un-robust and I plan to fix it eventually, but that's a more invasive
change. And we want to fix the visitor anyway.
Fixes#42903.
r? @eddyb
The move gathering code is sensitive to type-equality - that is rather
un-robust and I plan to fix it eventually, but that's a more invasive
change. And we want to fix the visitor anyway.
Fixes#42903.
Fix NaN handling in is_sign_negative/positive
This would be my proposed fix for the #42425 provided we decide it is indeed a problem.
Note this would technically be a breaking change to a stable API. We might want to consider deprecating these methods and adding new ones.
Don't drag function signatures along function item types.
This PR separates the signature of a function from the "function item type" (`TyFnDef`), leaving only the `DefId` and parameter `Substs`, making them even more like (captureless) closure types.
The motivation for this change is reducing typesystem complexity, and its consequences:
* operating on the signature instead of just the parameters was less efficient
* specifically, signatures can easily add several levels of depth on top of the parameter types
* and the signatured were always substituted and normalized, so typically even more complex
* it was *the only* type that was *both* nominal (identity) and structural (signature)
* harder to model in Chalk than either a purely nominal or structural type
* subtyping worked on the signature but parameters were always invariant
* call type-checking was transforming signatures but keeping the nominal half intact
* the signature could therefore get out of sync during type inference in several ways
That last point comes with a `[breaking-change]`, because functions with `'static` in their return types will now *not* be as usable as if they were using lifetime parameters instead:
```rust
// Will cause lifetime mismatch in main after this PR.
fn bar() -> &'static str { "bar" }
// Will continue to work fine, as every use can choose its own lifetime.
fn bar<'a>() -> &'a str { "bar" }
fn main() {
let s = String::from("foo");
Some(&s[..]).unwrap_or_else(bar);
}
```
r? @nikomatsakis
