Short-circuiting internal iteration with Iterator::try_fold & try_rfold
These are the core methods in terms of which the other methods (`fold`, `all`, `any`, `find`, `position`, `nth`, ...) can be implemented, allowing Iterator implementors to get the full goodness of internal iteration by only overriding one method (per direction).
Based off the `Try` trait, so works with both `Result` and `Option` (🎉https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/42526). The `try_fold` rustdoc examples use `Option` and the `try_rfold` ones use `Result`.
AKA continuing in the vein of PRs https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44682 & https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44856 for more of `Iterator`.
New bench following the pattern from the latter of those:
```
test iter::bench_take_while_chain_ref_sum ... bench: 1,130,843 ns/iter (+/- 25,110)
test iter::bench_take_while_chain_sum ... bench: 362,530 ns/iter (+/- 391)
```
I also ran the benches without the `fold` & `rfold` overrides to test their new default impls, with basically no change. I left them there, though, to take advantage of existing overrides and because `AlwaysOk` has some sub-optimality due to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43278 (which 45225 should fix).
If you're wondering why there are three type parameters, see issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45462
Thanks for @bluss for the [original IRLO thread](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-fold-ok-is-composable-internal-iteration/4434) and the rfold PR and to @cuviper for adding so many folds, [encouraging me](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45379#issuecomment-339424670) to make this PR, and finding a catastrophic bug in a pre-review.
fix linking error on i586
Try to fix this linking error on i586 in cross:
https://travis-ci.org/japaric/cross/builds/302095949#L8670
The problem is that `std` is built in Ubuntu 16.04 and `cross` uses a linker from 12.04.
Currently this fix solves the problem for `i686-musl` making it "supercompatible", this PR applies the fix to `i586` as well.
The cross PR is here: https://github.com/japaric/cross/pull/157
integrate MIR type-checker with NLL inference
This branch refactors NLL type inference so that it uses the MIR type-checker to gather constraints. Along the way, it also refactors how region constraints are gathered in the normal inference context mildly. The new setup is like this:
- What used to be `region_inference` is split into two parts:
- `region_constraints`, which just collects up sets of constraints
- `lexical_region_resolve`, which does the iterative, lexical region resolution
- When `resolve_regions_and_report_errors` is invoked, the inference engine converts the constraints into final values.
- In the MIR type checker, however, we do not invoke this method, but instead periodically take the region constraints and package them up for the NLL solver to use later.
- This allows us to track when and where those constraints were incurred.
- We also remove the central fulfillment context from the MIR type checker, instead instantiating new fulfillment contexts at each point. This allows us to capture the set of obligations that occurred at a particular point, and also to ensure that if the same obligation arises at two points, we will enforce the region constraints at both locations.
- The MIR type checker is also enhanced to instantiate late-bound-regions with fresh variables and handle a few other corner cases that arose.
- I also extracted some of the 'outlives' logic from the regionck, which will be needed later (see future work) to handle the type-outlives relationships.
One concern I have with this branch: since the MIR type checker is used even without the `-Znll` switch, I'm not sure if it will impact performance. One simple fix here would be to only enable the MIR type-checker if debug-assertions are enabled, since it just serves to validate the MIR. Longer term I hope to address this by improving the interface to the trait solver to be more query-based (ongoing work).
There is plenty of future work left. Here are two things that leap to mind:
- **Type-region outlives.** Currently, the NLL solver will ICE if it is required to handle a constraint like `T: 'a`. Fixing this will require a small amount of refactoring to extract the implied bounds code. I plan to follow a file-up bug on this (hopefully with mentoring instructions).
- **Testing.** It's a good idea to enumerate some of the tricky scenarios that need testing, but I think it'd be nice to try and parallelize some of the actual test writing (and resulting bug fixing):
- Same obligation occurring at two points.
- Well-formedness and trait obligations of various kinds (which are not all processed by the current MIR type-checker).
- More tests for how subtyping and region inferencing interact.
- More suggestions welcome!
r? @arielb1
rustc: Add some more compatibility with AVX-512
* Increase the maximum vector size in the ABI calculations to ensure that
AVX-512 operands are immediates.
* Add a few more `target_feature` matchings for AVX-512 features
This restores the behavior of regionck with respect to the
free-region-map: that is, it collects all the relations from the fn
and its closures. This feels a bit fishy but it's the behavior we've
had for some time, and it will go away with NLL, so seems best to just
keep it.
We are heading towards deeper integration with the region inference
system in infcx; in particular, prior to the creation of the
`RegionInferenceContext`, it will be the "owner" of the set of region
variables.
