Provide positional information when visiting ty, substs and closure_substs in MIR
This will enable the region renumbering portion of #43234 (non-lexical lifetimes). @nikomatsakis's current plan [here](https://gist.github.com/nikomatsakis/dfc27b28cd024eb25054b52bb11082f2) shows that we need spans of the original code to create new region variables, e.g. `self.infcx.next_region_var(infer::MiscVariable(span))`. The current visitor impls did not pass positional information (`Location` in some, `Span` and `SourceInfo` for others) for all types. I did not expand this to all visits, just the ones necessary for the above-mentioned plan.
Embed MSVC .natvis files into .pdbs and mangle debuginfo for &str, *T, and [T].
No idea if these changes are reasonable - please feel free to suggest changes/rewrites. And these are some of my first real commits to any rust codebase - *don't* be gentle, and nitpick away, I need to learn! ;)
### Overview
Embedding `.natvis` files into `.pdb`s allows MSVC (and potentially other debuggers) to automatically pick up the visualizers without having to do any additional configuration (other than to perhaps add the relevant .pdb paths to symbol search paths.)
The native debug engine for MSVC parses the type names, making various C++ish assumptions about what they mean and adding various limitations to valid type names. `&str` cannot be matched against a visualizer, but if we emit `str&` instead, it'll be recognized as a reference to a `str`, solving the problem. `[T]` is similarly problematic, but emitting `slice<T>` instead works fine as it looks like a template. I've been unable to get e.g. `slice<u32>&` to match visualizers in VS2015u3, so I've gone with `str*` and `slice<u32>*` instead.
### Possible Issues
* I'm not sure if `slice<T>` is a great mangling for `[T]` or if I should worry about name collisions.
* I'm not sure if `linker.rs` is the right place to be enumerating natvis files.
* I'm not sure if these type name mangling changes should actually be MSVC specific. I recall seeing gdb visualizer tests that might be broken if made more general? I'm hesitant to mess with them without a gdb install. But perhaps I'm just wracking up technical debt.
Should I try `pacman -S mingw-w64-x86_64-gdb` and to make things consistent?
* I haven't touched `const` / `mut` yet, and I'm worried MSVC might trip up on `mut` or their placement.
* I may like terse oneliners too much.
* I don't know if there's broader implications for messing with debug type names here.
* I may have been mistaken about bellow test failures being ignorable / unrelated to this changelist.
### Test Failures on `x86_64-pc-windows-gnu`
```
---- [debuginfo-gdb] debuginfo-gdb\associated-types.rs stdout ----
thread '[debuginfo-gdb] debuginfo-gdb\associated-types.rs' panicked at 'gdb not available but debuginfo gdb debuginfo test requested', src\tools\compiletest\src\runtest.rs:48:16
note: Run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` for a backtrace.
[...identical panic causes omitted...]
---- [debuginfo-gdb] debuginfo-gdb\vec.rs stdout ----
thread '[debuginfo-gdb] debuginfo-gdb\vec.rs' panicked at 'gdb not available but debuginfo gdb debuginfo test requested', src\tools\compiletest\src\runtest.rs:48:16
```
### Relevant Issues
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40460 Metaissue for Visual Studio debugging Rust
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/36503 Investigate natvis for improved msvc debugging
* https://github.com/PistonDevelopers/VisualRust/issues/160 Debug visualization of Rust data structures
### Pretty Pictures
Add precondition to `Layout` that the `align` fit in a u32.
Add precondition to `Layout` that the `align` not exceed 2^31.
This precondition takes the form of a behavorial change in `Layout::from_size_align` (so it returns `None` if the input `align` is too large) and a new requirement for safe usage of `Layout::from_size_align_unchecked`.
Fix#30170.
syntax: Simplify parsing of paths
Discern between `Path` and `Path<>` in AST (but not in HIR).
Give span to angle bracketed generic arguments (`::<'a, T>` in `path::segment::<'a, T>`).
This is a refactoring in preparation for https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/macro-path-uses-novel-syntax/5561/3, but it doesn't add anything to the grammar yet.
r? @jseyfried
Compile rustdoc on-demand
Fixes#43284, fixes#38318, and fixes#39505.
Doesn't directly help with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42686, since we need to rebuild just as much. In fact, this hurts it, since `./x.py doc --stage 0` will now fail. I'm not sure if it did before, but with these changes it runs into the problem where we attempt to use artifacts from bootstrap rustc with a non-bootstrap rustdoc, running into version conflicts. I believe this is solvable, but leaving for a future PR.
This means that rustdoc will no longer be compiled when compiling rustc, by default. However, it is still built from `./x.py build` (for hosts, but not targets, since we don't produce compiler toolchains for them) and will be built for doc tests and crate tests.
After this, the recommended workflow if you want a rustdoc is: `./x.py build --stage 1 src/tools/rustdoc` which will give you a working rustdoc in `build/triple/stage1/bin/rustdoc`. Note that you can add `src/libstd` onto the command to compile libstd as well so that the rustdoc can easily compile crates in the wild. `./x.py doc --stage 1 src/libstd` will document `libstd` with a freshly built rustdoc (if necessary), and will not rebuild rustc on modifications to rustdoc.
r? @alexcrichton
Copyright/license headers
(As discussed with @aturon and @est31. CC @rust-lang/core.)
Currently, rust-lang/rust includes notices that say things like
```
The Rust Project is copyright 2010, The Rust Project
Developers.
```
or
```
Copyright (c) 2010 The Rust Project Developers
```
or
```
// Copyright 2017 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
```
These notices aren't accurate. "Copyright YYYY Some Name" has a specific legal meaning, and "The Rust Project Developers" isn't a legal entity. In practice, the actual legal structure is that all Rust contributors retain their copyrights when contributing to Rust, and just license them under MIT/Apache-2.0. Our legal notices should reflect that.
This came up because of RFC 2044, which proposed fixing this for the RFC repository. That effort started out by copying the rust-lang/rust notices, propagating this issue.
Based on discussion with @aturon, the two of us propose the following:
- Delete the per-file notices entirely, for any files licensed under the standard terms. (Keep notices for anything that's *not* MIT/Apache-2.0.)
- An alternative to that would be to just delete the first paragraph of the standard notice, and keep the second paragraph that points to the MIT and Apache 2.0 licenses.
- Delete the first paragraph of LICENSE-MIT (the inaccurate pseudo-copyright line), leaving only the text of the MIT license.
- Edit the COPYRIGHT file to more accurately describe the situation (changing the pseudo-copyright line immediately under "longer version", and editing the text that starts with "additional copyright may be ...", to just always state that copyrights are retained by the Rust contributors, and licensed under MIT/Apache-2.0 (with the exceptions to that explicitly noted in that file).
If @rust-lang/core is fine with this proposal, I'd be happy to provide a pull request with the proposed fixes.
Extended error message for mut borrow conflicts in loops
RFC issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/2080
The error message for multiple mutable borrows on the same value over loop iterations now makes it clear that the conflict comes from the borrow outlasting the loop. The wording of the error is based on the special case of the moved-value error for a value moved in a loop. Following the example of that error, the code remains the same for the special case.
This is mainly because I felt the current message is confusing in the loop case : https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43437. It's not clear that the two conflicting borrows are in different iterations of the loop, and instead it just looks like the compiler has an issue with a single line.
Avoid implying that any copyrights have been assigned to a separate
entity (such as "The Rust Project Developers") Rust contributors retain
their copyrights, and do not assign them to anyone by contributing.
Remove the inaccurate notice, and provide a clear explanation. Avoid
stating that all files contain copyright notices and/or license notices,
and especially avoid suggesting that the license terms only apply to
files marked as such.
In the process, this also drops a separate notice that implies only some
copyrights are retained by contributors (suggesting that others are
not).
LICENSE-MIT contains the line "Copyright (c) 2015 The Rust Project
Developers", which implies that an entity called "The Rust Project
Developers" holds copyrights in Rust. Rust contributors retain
their copyrights, and do not assign them to anyone by contributing.
Remove the inaccurate notice.
Stabilize more APIs for the 1.20.0 release
In addition to the few stabilizations that have already landed, this cleans up the remaining APIs that are in `final-comment-period` right now to be stable by the 1.20.0 release
Make compiletest set cwd before running js tests
Proposed fix for #38800.
Not all tests pass yet - I will mention failures here once the test suite has finished.
Update RLS
This pulls in 79d659e569 It should fix#43453. It increases the timeout for test runs and forces builds in RLS tests to happen sequentially, this prevents interference between env vars passed to Cargo or rustc.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Constrain the layout of Blake2bCtx for proper SPARC compilation
On SPARC, optimization fuel ends up emitting incorrect load and store
instructions for the transmute() call in blake2b_compress(). If we
force Blake2bCtx to be repr(C), the problem disappears.
Fixes#43346
Fix printing regions with -Z verbose
When dumping MIR with `-Z verbose`, it would print regions on types, but not in the code. It seems the Rvalue printing code tried to be smart and guessed when the `Display` for `Region` would not possibly print anything.
This PR makes it no longer be smart, and just always use the `Display` like all the other code (e.g. printing types) does.
add a note to Vec's Extend<&T> impl about its slice specialization
From the regular documentation view, it's not at all apparent that [this specialization](5669c9988f/src/liballoc/vec.rs (L1879-L1891)) exists for `slice::Iter`. This adds a documentation blurb to the Extend impl itself to note that this optimization exists.
Point at path segment on module not found
Point at the correct path segment on a import statement where a module
doesn't exist.
New output:
```rust
error[E0432]: unresolved import `std::bar`
--> <anon>:1:10
|
1 | use std::bar::{foo1, foo2};
| ^^^ Could not find `bar` in `std`
```
instead of:
```rust
error[E0432]: unresolved import `std::bar::foo1`
--> <anon>:1:16
|
1 | use std::bar::{foo1, foo2};
| ^^^^ Could not find `bar` in `std`
error[E0432]: unresolved import `std::bar::foo2`
--> <anon>:1:22
|
1 | use std::bar::{foo1, foo2};
| ^^^^ Could not find `bar` in `std`
```
Fix#43040.
Make the "main" constructors of NonZero/Shared/Unique return Option
Per discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27730#issuecomment-303939441.
This is a breaking change to unstable APIs.
The old behavior is still available under the name `new_unchecked`. Note that only that one can be `const fn`, since `if` is currently not allowed in constant contexts.
In the case of `NonZero` this requires adding a new `is_zero` method to the `Zeroable` trait. I mildly dislike this, but it’s not much worse than having a `Zeroable` trait in the first place. `Zeroable` and `NonZero` are both unstable, this can be reworked later.
