This patch just avoids code duplication by using a function we
introduced recently (ada_is_access_to_unconstrained_array).
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (ada_is_access_to_unconstrained_array): Remove static
declaration.
* ada-lang.h: add ada_is_access_to_unconstrained_array prototype.
* ada-varobj.c (ada_varobj_get_number_of_children,
ada_varobj_describe_child, ada_value_is_changeable_p): Cleanup code.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
No new testcase provided, as this is just a refactoring.
Using this Ada code:
type String_Access is access String;
type Array_Of_String is array (1 .. 2) of String_Access;
Aos : Array_Of_String := (new String'("ab"), new String'("cd"));
When debugging with GDB, printing each Aos element displays:
(gdb) print Aos(1)
$2 = "ab"
(gdb) print Aos(2)
$3 = "cd"
Whereas it should display:
(gdb) print Aos(1)
$2 = (foo_r118_024.string_access) 0x635018
(gdb) print Aos(2)
$3 = (foo_r118_024.string_access) 0x635038
Notice that printing the entire array works:
(gdb) print Aos
$1 = (0x635018, 0x635038)
The problem was located in ada_value_print function and due to the fact
that the value_type used in this function was based on
value_enclosing_type rather than value_type itself.
In our example, the difference between the value_type and the
value_enclosing_type of the value is that the value_type contains an
additional typedef layer which is not present in the value_enclosing_type.
This typedef layer is GNAT's way to specify that the element is, at the
source level, an access to the unconstrained array, rather than the
unconstrained array.
Moreover, the value_enclosing_type is not really needed in that case and
the value_type can be used instead in this function, and this patch fixes
this.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-valprint.c (ada_value_print): Use type instead of
enclosing type.
testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.ada/access_to_unbounded_array.exp: New testcase.
* gdb.ada/access_to_unbounded_array/foo.adb: New file.
* gdb.ada/access_to_unbounded_array/pack.adb: New file.
* gdb.ada/access_to_unbounded_array/pack.ads: New file.
Tested: x86_64-linux
Using this Ada code:
type String_Access is access String;
type Array_Of_String is array (1 .. 2) of String_Access;
Aos : Array_Of_String := (new String'("ab"), new String'("cd"));
In GDB/MI mode, create a variable which type is Aos, evaluate it:
(gdb) -var-create var1 * Aos
^done,name="var1",numchild="2",value="[2]",type="bar.array_of_string",thread-id="1",has_more="0"
Now print it:
(gdb) -var-list-children 1 var1
^done,numchild="2",children=[child={name="var1.1",exp="1",numchild="1",value="[2] \"ab\"", type="bar.string_access",thread-id="1"},child={name="var1.2",exp="2",numchild="1",value="[2] \"cd\"", type="bar.string_access",thread-id="1"}],has_more="0"
But printed fields "value" are wrong, since it should be:
^done,numchild="2",children=[child={name="var1.1",exp="1",numchild="1",value="0x634018",type="bar.string_access",thread-id="1"},child={name="var1.2",exp="2",numchild="1",value="0x634038",type="bar.string_access",thread-id="1"}],has_more="0"^M
Print each child of var1:
(gdb) -var-evaluate-expression var1.1
^done,value="[2] \"ab\""
(gdb) -var-evaluate-expression var1.2
^done,value="[2] \"cd\""
Whereas it should be
(gdb) -var-evaluate-expression var1.1
^done,value="0x635018"
(gdb) -var-evaluate-expression var1.2
^done,value="0x635038"
This patch fixes this.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (ada_value_subscript): Handle case when parameter is
an array of access to unconstrained array.
testsuite/ChangeLog
* gdb.ada/mi_string_access.exp: New testcase.
* gdb.ada/mi_string_access/bar.adb: New file.
* gdb.ada/mi_string_access/pck.adb: New file.
* gdb.ada/mi_string_access/pck.asd: New file.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Add a new function to check if a given type is an access to an
unconstrained array. This function contains code that is present only
once in the current sources but will be used in a future patch.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (ada_is_access_to_unconstrained_array): New function.
(ada_check_typedef): Use it.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Using this Ada code:
type Union_Type (A : Boolean := False) is record
case A is
when True => B : Integer;
when False => C : Float;
end case;
end record;
pragma Unchecked_Union (Union_Type);
Ut : Union_Type := (A => True, B => 3);
In GDB/MI mode, once creating a varobj from variable "Ut" as follow:
(gdb) -var-create var1 * ut
^done,name="var1",numchild="2",value="{...}",type="foo.union_type",thread-id="1",has_more="0"
Printing the list of its children displays:
(gdb) -var-list-children 1 var1
^error,msg="Duplicate variable object name"
Whereas it should be
(gdb) -var-list-children 1 var1
^done,numchild="2",children=[child={name="var1.b",exp="b",numchild="0",value="3",type="integer",thread-id="1"},child={name="var1.c",exp="c",numchild="0",value="4.20389539e-45",type="float",thread-id="1"}],has_more="0"
The problem occurs because ada_varobj_describe_struct_child wasn't
handling unions. This patch fixes this.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-varobj.c (ada_varobj_describe_struct_child)
(ada_varobj_describe_child): Handle union case like struct one.
testsuite/ChangeLog
* gdb.ada/mi_var_union.exp: New testcase.
* gdb.ada/mi_var_union/bar.adb: New file.
* gdb.ada/mi_var_union/pck.adb: New file.
* gdb.ada/mi_var_union/pck.asd: New file.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
This removes the remaining trailing periods from the Python section
titles. I thought these looked weird and I don't this is generally
done in the gdb documentation.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* python.texi (Frames In Python, Blocks In Python)
(Symbols In Python, Symbol Tables In Python)
(Lazy Strings In Python): Remove periods from section titles.
I thought the start of the Pretty Printing API node read a bit
strangely. This patch swaps the first two sentences, which seems
better.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* python.texi (Pretty Printing API): Swap sentence order.
PR python/16461 asks that the Python dynamic_type documentation
mention virtual tables; this patch implements that request.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/16461:
* python.texi (Values From Inferior): Mention use of virtual
table.
I noticed that the decode_line documentation did not have parens
around the argument:
-- Function: gdb.decode_line [expression]
This patch fixes this oversight.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* python.texi (Basic Python): Parenthesize argument to
decode_line.
This updates python.texi to note that gdb can be compiled against
either major version of Python. It also removes the "execfile"
example, because that is specific to Python 2.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* python.texi (Python): Mention Python versions. Don't mention
execfile.
PR python/19808 points out a few issues in the Python unwinder
documentation. This patch update the documentation for
create_unwind_info and read_register to address the issues noted, and
adds a cautionary note about writing an unwinder.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/19808:
* python.texi (Unwinding Frames in Python): Rewrite
create_unwind_info documentation. Update read_register
documentation and add a note about unwinder caution.
PR python/18909 points out that the gdb.events.inferior_call
documentation was incorrect. This patch brings it in line with the
code.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/18909:
* python.texi (Events In Python): Fix inferior_call
documentation.
This fixes a few frame filter documentation omissions noted in
PR python/17752.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/17752:
* python.texi (Frame Filter API): Remove period from subsection
title. Mention 100 as good default priority.
(Frame Decorator API): Remove period from subsection title.
Mention FrameDecorator module.
PR python/23108 points out that the gdb.GdbError documentation is
somewhat difficult to find. The exception is apparently just
mentioned in passing. This patch introduces a new table and adds a
bit more text to try to make it more obvious.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/23108:
* python.texi (Exception Handling): Rearrange gdb.GdbError text
and add a table.
"make info" gives a number of warnings about the use of a "." in
@ref-like commands. These come from the ".info" suffix. I think this
suffix is redundant, and removing the suffix also removes the warning.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* gdb.texinfo (Compilation): Use "gcc", not "gcc.info", in @xref.
(Machine Code): Use "binutils", not "binutils.info", in @pxref.
(Separate Debug Files): Use "ld", not "ld.info", in @ref.
* python.texi (Objfiles In Python): Use "ld", not "ld.info", in @ref.
PR python/18380 points out that the example in the "help python" text
will only work in Python 2. This changes the example to be valid
syntax for both Python 2 and Python 3.
gdb/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/18380:
* python/python.c (_initialize_python): Make example in "python"
help work in Python 3.
PR python/16484 points out that Frame.block can throw an exception,
but this is not documented.
This patch fixes the documentation. Changing Frame.block to return
None would be nice, but I suspect it's too late for that change.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/16484:
* python.texi (Frames In Python): Document that Frame.block can
throw.
PR python/23487 points out that the "disable pretty-printer" example
has a typo that makes it incorrect. This patch fixes the typo.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/23487:
* gdb.texinfo (Pretty-Printer Commands): Fix typo in example.
PR python/16033 points out that Block.end doesn't describe whether it
is inclusive or exclusive. This patch fixes the documentation.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2018-09-10 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/16033:
* python.texi (Blocks In Python): Document that Block.end is
exclusive.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2018-09-10 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
* Makefile.in (transformed_name): Use INSTALL_SCRIPT instead of
INSTALL_PROGRAM to install gdb-add-index.sh. Don't append
$(EXEEXT) to the script, as it is not a program.
BFD handles ELF relocation sections in an executable differently to
relocation sections in a relocatable object. For a relocatable
object, BFD carries the relocations as data associated with the
section to which they apply; The relocation section doesn't appear as
a separate section. For an executable, dynamic relocation sections do
appear as separate sections. This means that objcopy needs to use
different strategies when dealing with relocations.
When --remove-relocations was added to objcopy with commit
d3e5f6c8f1, objcopy lost the ability to remove dynamic relocation
sections such as .rela.plt from executables using the option
"--remove-section=.rela.plt". This patch reinstates that
functionality.
I thought it best to keep --remove-relocations as is, rather than
extending to handle dynamic relocations as per the patch in the PR,
because executables linked with --emit-relocs may have both dynamic
and non-dynamic relocations. In that case --remove-relocataions=* is
useful to remove all the non-dynamic relocations.
PR binutils/23611
* objcopy.c (handle_remove_section_option): Consider .rela and
.rel sections for stripping directly as well as attached to the
associated section they relocate.
* doc/binutils.texi (remove-relocations): Specify that this
option removes non-dynamic relocation sections.
* testsuite/binutils-all/objcopy.exp
(objcopy_remove_relocations_from_executable): New test.
I noticed that we release a gdbpy_ref in pretty_print_one_value only to
create it again later. This patch fills the gap by returning a
gdbpy_ref all the way.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* python/py-prettyprint.c (pretty_print_one_value): Return
gdbpy_ref<>.
(print_string_repr): Adjust.
(apply_varobj_pretty_printer): Return gdbpy_ref<>.
* python/python-internal.h (apply_varobj_pretty_printer): Return
gdbpy_ref<>.
* varobj.c (varobj_value_get_print_value): Adjust.
I noticed that the py-prettyprint.exp test names were not unique.
This patch fixes the problem via with_test_prefix.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2018-09-08 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* gdb.python/py-prettyprint.exp: Use with_test_prefix.
PR python/16047 points out that, while the documentation says that the
to_string method is optional for a pretty-printer, the code disagrees
and throws an exception. This patch fixes the problem. varobj is
already ok here.
Tested on x86-64 Fedora 26.
gdb/ChangeLog
2018-09-08 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/16047:
* python/py-prettyprint.c (pretty_print_one_value): Check for
to_string method.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2018-09-08 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
PR python/16047:
* gdb.python/py-prettyprint.py (pp_int_typedef3): New class.
(register_pretty_printers): Register new printer.
* gdb.python/py-prettyprint.exp (run_lang_tests): Add int_type3
test.
* gdb.python/py-prettyprint.c (int_type3): New typedef.
(an_int_type3): New global.
Consider the following function, which takes no parameter and returns
an integer:
function Something return Integer;
For the purpose of this discussion, our function has been implemented
to always return 124:
function Something return Integer is
begin
return 124;
end Something;
In Ada, such function can been called without using the parentheses.
For instance, in the statement below, variable My_Value is assigned
the returned value from the call to Something:
My_Value := Something;
The Ada expression interpeter in GDB supports this case, as we can
see below:
(gdb) print something
$1 = 124
However, we get fairly strange results when trying to use this feature
as part of a larger expression. For instance:
(gdb) print something + 1
$2 = 248
The problem occurs while doing the resolution pass of the expression.
After prefixying the expression, we obtain the following expression:
0 BINOP_ADD
1 OP_VAR_VALUE Block @0x2021550, symbol @0x20213a0 (pck.something)
5 OP_LONG Type @0x1e3c170 (int), value 1 (0x1)
The resolution pass is then expected to remove the OP_VAR_VALUE
entry, and replace it with an OP_FUNCALL. This is what the call
to replace_operator_with_call in ada-lang.c::resolve_subexp is
expected to do:
if (deprocedure_p
&& (TYPE_CODE (SYMBOL_TYPE (exp->elts[pc + 2].symbol))
== TYPE_CODE_FUNC))
{
replace_operator_with_call (expp, pc, 0, 0,
exp->elts[pc + 2].symbol,
exp->elts[pc + 1].block);
exp = expp->get ();
}
The problem is that we're passing OPLEN (zero -- 4th parameter in
the call), and so replace_operator_with_call ends up removing zero
element from our expression, and inserting the corresponding OP_FUNCALL
instead. As a result, instead of having the OP_LONG (1) as the second
argument of the BINOP_ADD, it is now the OP_VAR_VALUE that we were
meant to replace. That OP_VAR_VALUE then itself gets transformed into
an OP_FUNCALL, with the same issue, and eventually, the resolved
expression now looks like this:
0 BINOP_ADD
1 OP_FUNCALL Number of args: 0
4 OP_VAR_VALUE Block @0x2021550, symbol @0x20213a0 (pck.something)
8 OP_FUNCALL Number of args: 0
11 OP_VAR_VALUE Block @0x2021550, symbol @0x20213a0 (pck.something)
15 OP_VAR_VALUE Block @0x2021550, symbol @0x20213a0 (pck.something)
19 OP_LONG Type @0x1e3c170 (int), value 1 (0x1)
This explains why we get twice the result of the function call
instead of its value plus one. The extra entries in the expression
at the end are just ignored.
This patch fixes the issue by calling replace_operator_with_call
with the correct OPLEN equal to the size of an OP_VAR_VALUE (4).
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (resolve_subexp): Pass correct OPLEN in call to
replace_operator_with_call.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.ada/expr_with_funcall: New testcase.
Consider the following code:
type Enumerated is (Enum_A, Enum_B, Enum_C, Enum_Last);
type Table is array (Enumerated) of Integer;
-- Declare a variable of type Table to make sure the compiler
-- does emit the debugging information for that type.
V : Table := (others => 1);
Trying to print the type description of type Table, or of variable V
yields:
(gdb) ptype v
type = array (0 .. 3) of integer
(gdb) ptype example.table
type = array (0 .. 3) of integer
The compiler generates an XA type for the bounds...
<1><cf6>: Abbrev Number: 13 (DW_TAG_structure_type)
<cf7> DW_AT_name : example__table___XA
... whose member is described as being as:
<2><cfe>: Abbrev Number: 14 (DW_TAG_member)
<cff> DW_AT_name : example__enumerated
<d05> DW_AT_type : <0xc69>
This leads us to DIE 0xc69, which is our enumeration type:
<2><c69>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_enumeration_type)
<c6a> DW_AT_name : example__enumerated
Normally, for arrays, we expect a range type, rather than an enumerated
type. However, for a situation like this, where the range of the array
index is the full enumeration type, it seems like a waste to require
an extra range layer.
Instead, looking at print_range, we see that we print the bounds
of our range using the target type:
target_type = TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type);
if (target_type == NULL)
target_type = type;
[...]
ada_print_scalar (target_type, lo, stream);
fprintf_filtered (stream, " .. ");
ada_print_scalar (target_type, hi, stream);
In this case, this causes us to use the enumerated type's subtype,
which is a plain integer type, hence the output we get. However,
there is no reason for using the target type, even in the TYPE_CODE_RANGE
situation. So this patch fixes the issue by simply printing the bounds
using the type being given, instead of its target type.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-typeprint.c (print_range): Print the bounds using TYPE
rather than its TYPE_TARGET_TYPE.
A new test for this isn't necessary, as existing tests will demonstrate
this issue once a change in the compiler triggering the generation of
this type of debugging info gets pushed.
The arguments in the call to ada_to_fixed_value_create where
improperly aligned. But I also noticed that all the arguments
do fit on a single-line (up to 79 characters). So this patch
just fixes the code by putting everything on that same line.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (ada_to_fixed_value): Minor reformatting in
call to ada_to_fixed_value_create.
On PPC64, the entry point of the function "FN" is ".FN" when a function
descriptor is used. One of the consequences of this is that GDB then
presents the name of the function to the user (eg: in backtraces) with
the leading dot, which is a low-level internal detail that the user
should not be seeing. The Ada decoding should strip it.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (ada_decode): strip dot prefix in symbol name.
No testcase added, as a number of existing testcases should already
demonstrate that problem.
We noticed while debugging a program compiled without assertions
enabled and using an older compiler that inserting a catchpoint
on failed assertions would cause an internal error:
(gdb) catch assert
../../src/gdb/ada-lang.c:13321: internal-error: ada_exception_sal:
Assertion`sym != NULL' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
This is due to a combination of factors:
1. With older versions of the compiler, the function used as a hook
was provided by a unit that's different from the unit which
provides the hooks for the other exception catchpoints.
2. The program either does not use any assertion, or is compiled
without the assertions enabled.
With newer versions of the compiler, all such functions are provided
by the same unit, so should normally always be available. However,
there can still be reasons why this is not the case. Consider, for
instance, the case of a runtime compiled with -ffunction-sections,
in which case the hook might be eliminated unless assertions are
used and enabled.
So this patch transforms the internal error into a simple error.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (ada_exception_sal): Replace gdb_assert calls
by calls to error.
No testcase added, as the existing testcase gdb.ada/catch_ex.exp
should trigger it when using an older version of GNAT as the Ada
compiler.
When debugging a program compiled with an older version of GNAT,
hitting a catchpoint on unhandled exceptions can caused GDB to
got into an infinite loop. This happens while trying to find
the name of the exception that was raised. For that, it searches
for a frame corresponding to a specific function we know gets
called during the exeption handling.
In our particular case, the compiler was too old, and so GDB never
found that frame, and eventually got past the "main" subprogram,
all the way to system frames, where no symbol was available.
As a result, the code addresses could not be resolved into
a function name, leading to the infinite loop because of
a misplaced update of our loop variable "fi":
while (fi != NULL)
{
char *func_name;
enum language func_lang;
find_frame_funname (fi, &func_name, &func_lang, NULL);
if (func_name != NULL)
{
make_cleanup (xfree, func_name);
if (strcmp (func_name,
data->exception_info->catch_exception_sym) == 0)
break; /* We found the frame we were looking for... */
fi = get_prev_frame (fi);
}
}
If FUNC_NAME is NULL, then FI never gets updated ever after!
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (ada_unhandled_exception_name_addr_from_raise):
Move update of loop variable "fi".
No testcase added, as the existing testcase gdb.ada/catch_ex.exp
should trigger it when using an older version of GNAT as the Ada
compiler.
Consider a variable "PRA" defined as a packed array of packed
records as follow:
subtype Int is Integer range 0 .. 7;
type Packed_Rec is record
X, Y : Int;
W : Integer;
end record;
pragma Pack (Packed_Rec);
type Packed_RecArr is array (Integer range <>) of Packed_Rec;
pragma Pack (Packed_RecArr);
PRA : Packed_RecArr (1 .. 3);
Consider also a variable "PR", which is a Packed_Rec record,
declared as follow:
PR : Packed_Rec := (2, 2, 2);
Trying to assign a new value to PRA using an aggregate expression
where one of the components is our variable PR yields the wrong
result on big-endian machines (e.g. on ppc-linux):
(gdb) p pra := (pr, (2,2,2), (2,2,2))
$6 = ((x => 1, y => 0, w => 8), [...]
On the other hand, replacing "pr" by "(2,2,2)" does work.
I tracked the issue down to the bit offset we use to extract
the value of "PR" and copy it inside PRA. in value_assign_to_component,
we have:
if (gdbarch_bits_big_endian (get_type_arch (value_type (container))))
move_bits ([target buffer], [bit offset in target buffer],
[source buffer where PR is stored],
TYPE_LENGTH (value_type (component)) * TARGET_CHAR_BIT - bits,
bits, 1);
The issue is with the third-to-last argument, which provides the bit
offset where the value of PR is stored relative to its start address,
and therefore the bit offset relative to the start of the source
buffer passed as the previous argument.
In our case, component is a 38bit packed record whose TYPE_LENGTH
is 5 bytes, so the bit-offset that gets calculated is 2 (bits).
However, that formula only really applies to scalars, whereas
in our case, we have a record (struct). The offset in the non-scalar
case should be zero.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-lang.c (value_assign_to_component): In the case of
big-endian targets, extract the bits of the given VAL
using an src_offset of zero if container is not a scalar.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.ada/packed_array_assign: New testcase.
Add int24 and uint24. These are used by the upcoming S12Z target, but will be
needed for any arch which features 24 bit registers.
* gdb/gdbtypes.h (struct builtin_type): New members builtin_int24
and builtin_uint24;
* gdb/gdbtypes.c: Initialize them.
* gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo (Predefined Target Types): Mention types int24 and uint24.
Extend test names and add test name prefixes to make test names
unique.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/watchpoint.exp (test_complex_watchpoint): Extend test
names, and add test prefixes to make test names unique.
gcore generates NT_AUXV and NT_FILE notes for Linux targets. On
FreeBSD auxv is stored in a NT_PROCSTAT_AUXV section, virtual memory
mappings are stored in a NT_PROCSTAT_VMMAP, and both are prefixed with
the struct size. In addition, store a NT_PROCSTAT_PS_STRINGS note
saving the initial location of the argv[] and environment[] arrays.
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR gdb/23105
* fbsd-nat.c (fbsd_nat_target::xfer_partial): Add support for
TARGET_OBJECT_FREEBSD_VMMAP and TARGET_OBJECT_FREEBSD_PS_STRINGS.
* fbsd-tdep.c (fbsd_make_note_desc): New.
(fbsd_make_corefile_notes): Write NT_PROCSTAT_AUXV,
NT_PROCSTAT_VMMAP and NT_PROCSTAT_PS_STRINGS notes.
* target.h (enum target_object) Add FreeBSD-specific
TARGET_OBJECT_FREEBSD_VMMAP and TARGET_OBJECT_FREEBSD_PS_STRINGS.
After looking into why the build failed for Simon but not for me, we
found that the underlying cause was due to how gcc treats
-Wformat-nonliteral. gcc requires -Wformat to be given first; but
warning.m4 was not doing this, so -Wformat-nonliteral was not being
used.
This patch changes warning.m4 to account gcc's requirement.
This then showed that the target-float.c build change in the earlier
Makefile patch was also incorrect. Simon didn't see this in his
build, but gcc now points it out. So, this patch fixes this problem
as well.
2018-09-05 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* warning.m4 (AM_GDB_WARNINGS): Add -Wformat when testing
-Wformat-nonliteral.
* target-float.c (host_float_ops<T>::to_string)
(host_float_ops<T>::from_string): Use
DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_FORMAT_NONLITERAL.
* configure: Rebuild.
gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog
2018-09-05 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* configure: Rebuild.
commit 3322c5d9a1 ("Remove unneeded explicit .o targets") broke the
build with clang, because -Wno-format-nonliteral was in fact needed.
This patch fixes the problem by introducing
DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_FORMAT_NONLITERAL and using it in printcmd.c. This
seems preferable to reverting the patch because now the warning
suppression is more targeted.
gdb/ChangeLog
2018-09-05 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
* printcmd.c (printf_c_string): Use
DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_FORMAT_NONLITERAL.
(printf_wide_c_string, printf_pointer, ui_printf): Likewise.
include/ChangeLog
2018-09-05 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
* diagnostics.h (DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORE_FORMAT_NONLITERAL): New macro.
I noticed a couple of unnecessary casts in cli-cmds.c. This patch
removes them.
Tested by rebuilding. I'm checking this in.
gdb/ChangeLog
2018-09-05 Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
* cli/cli-cmds.c (shell_escape, edit_command): Remove cast.
Consider a vla variable 'a' in function f1:
...
<2><1a7>: Abbrev Number: 11 (DW_TAG_variable)
<1a8> DW_AT_description : a
<1aa> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0x311>
...
with abstract origin 'a':
...
<2><311>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_variable)
<312> DW_AT_name : a
<317> DW_AT_type : <0x325>
...
and inherited abstract vla type:
...
<1><325>: Abbrev Number: 9 (DW_TAG_array_type)
<326> DW_AT_type : <0x33a>
<2><32e>: Abbrev Number: 10 (DW_TAG_subrange_type)
<32f> DW_AT_type : <0x2ea>
<333> DW_AT_upper_bound : 5 byte block: fd 1b 3 0 0
(DW_OP_GNU_variable_value: <0x31b>)
...
where the upper bound refers to this artificial variable D.1922 without location
attribute:
...
<2><31b>: Abbrev Number: 8 (DW_TAG_variable)
<31c> DW_AT_description : (indirect string, offset: 0x39a): D.1922
<320> DW_AT_type : <0x2ea>
<324> DW_AT_artificial : 1
...
Currently, when we execute "p sizeof (a)" in f1, the upper bound is calculated
by evaluating the DW_OP_GNU_variable_value expression referring to D.1922, but
since that die doesn't have a location attribute, we get:
...
value has been optimized out
...
However, there's also artificial variable D.4283 that is sibling of vla
variable 'a', has artificial variable D.1922 as abstract origin, and has a
location attribute:
...
<2><1ae>: Abbrev Number: 12 (DW_TAG_variable)
<1af> DW_AT_description : (indirect string, offset: 0x1f8): D.4283
<1b3> DW_AT_abstract_origin: <0x31b>
<1b7> DW_AT_location : 11 byte block: 75 1 8 20 24 8 20 26 31 1c 9f
(DW_OP_breg5 (rdi):1; DW_OP_const1u: 32;
DW_OP_shl; DW_OP_const1u: 32; DW_OP_shra;
DW_OP_lit1; DW_OP_minus; DW_OP_stack_value)
...
The intended behaviour for DW_OP_GNU_variable_value is to find a die that
refers to D.1922 as abstract origin, has a location attribute and is
'in scope', so the expected behaviour is:
...
$1 = 6
...
The 'in scope' concept can be thought of as variable D.1922 having name
attribute "D.1922", and variable D.4283 inheriting that attribute, resulting
in D.4283 being declared with name "D.1922" alongside vla a in f1, and when we
lookup "DW_OP_GNU_variable_value D.1922", it should work as if we try to find
the value of a variable named "D.1922" on the gdb command line using
"p D.1922", and we should return the value of D.4283.
This patch fixes the case described above, by:
- adding a field abstract_to_concrete to struct dwarf2_per_objfile,
- using that field to keep track of which concrete dies are instances of an
abstract die, and
- using that information when getting the value DW_OP_GNU_variable_value.
Build and reg-tested on x86_64-linux.
2018-09-05 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* dwarf2loc.c (sect_variable_value): Call indirect_synthetic_pointer
with resolve_abstract_p == true.
(indirect_synthetic_pointer): Add resolve_abstract_p parameter,
defaulting to false. Propagate resolve_abstract_p to
dwarf2_fetch_die_loc_sect_off.
* dwarf2loc.h (dwarf2_fetch_die_loc_sect_off): Add resolve_abstract_p
parameter, defaulting to false.
* dwarf2read.c (read_variable): Add variable to abstract_to_concrete.
(dwarf2_fetch_die_loc_sect_off): Add and handle resolve_abstract_p
parameter.
* dwarf2read.h (struct die_info): Forward-declare.
(die_info_ptr): New typedef.
(struct dwarf2_per_objfile): Add abstract_to_concrete field.
* gdb.dwarf2/varval.exp: Add test.
