To indicate wheter the semicolon should be supressed. Useful for
prototype/function emission, etc.
Also move the struct stats to be inside its body, to simplify tag__fprintf,
that now looks at conf.no_semicolon after calling the tag type specific
__fprintf method.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
So that tools can specify if they are interested in printing just the members
that use space in the class layout (DW_TAG_inheritance, DW_TAG_member) and not
things like constructors, private type definitions, etc.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
So far we only handle DW_OP_plus_uconst, the simplest of them all, but now
'public virtual' base classes are appearing in these tools radar, so, to make
it clear that we don't support it spit a warning message to stderr and return
UINT64_MAX so that in the report it is clearly seen. C++ support still needs
more work, simple as that :)
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
So that we traverse just the data members, mostly in the reorganize code, where
we can't care less where is that the compiler put the base classes in the
layout since we can't influence how the compiler does this, it has only to
respect the layout we specify for the data members.
Well, it may well be the case that the order of the ancestor classes in the
class declaration can influence this, but I haven't checked.
Yes, another C++ism :-)
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
In the past it was always cloning and doing the reorganization steps on the
clone, now this is done by the caller, so no need to return self.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
This is simplified by introducing list__find_tag_by_id. I guess in the end the
right thing is to use a hashtable to find the ids. Trying to have specialized
find_foo_by_id functions instead of having just one that traverses _all_ the
tags is becoming less of a performance advantage as struct class now has
namespaces, i.e. functions can be inside structs and to find abstract_origin,
specification, etc references we have to traverse most of the tree anyway...
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Heck, anonymous structs are nothing new, things like:
typedef struct {
int bar;
} baz;
Are ugly, but valid. So if ->name is NULL and ->specification is 0, its an
anonymous struct, don't go looking for dwarf offset 0, that is "void", not
something a DW_AT_specification is supposed to point to 8)
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
tag__type_not_found was incorrectly being used for cases where we were
searching things like abstract_origin and specification, not tag->type, so add
this variant, make tag__type_not_found use id and fix the callers.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Basic support, as according to the DWARF3 standard there are other cases that
we don't support yet, such as "using ::foo" with an alias, i.e. in the
namespace that is importing the imported declaration is aliased to some other
name.
But for the test cases, common case, its enough.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
The "using namespace" line in:
namespace __gnu_debug {
using namespace __gnu_debug_def;
};
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Now we see the "private:\n" etc, everytime the accessibility is changed from
one member to the next.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Helper to check if the tag has accessibility info, returning one of
"protected", "private", "public" or NULL if there is no accessibility info.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Will be used in the following csets, where we'll print the accessibility
info in C++ classes.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
The offsets doesn't make sense, /me lazy right now to look at untangling the
expressions in the DW_AT_data_member_location.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
C++ uses this, and to cache the result of the lookup at type__name time we need
to pass the cu to class__name and type__name. Big fallout because of that :-\
But now the output is mucho embelished by the humongous strings representing
C++ templates.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Using it in the --dwarf_offset/-O new pahole command line option, useful in
debugging. Prints the tag in the dwarf offset supplied.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
So that it prints struct stats and decl info (file/line number were tags were
declared).
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
In class__fprintf, at least this can help till we get proper DW_TAG_inheritance
layout printing, that is right now blocked by lack of knowledge about
DW_AT_data_member_location DWARF expression parsing for non const expressions.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
So that in DW_TAG_inheritance we can should "virtual", "virtual public", etc.
This has yet to be supported for normal class members, constructors, etc.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Use pdwtags, that prints all the tags, pahole has to be changed to traverse
namespaces looking for structs.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Go down the rabbit hole baby, oops, the namespace hole that is. Now we find
types inside namespaces. Off to implement namespace__fprintf so that we can see
more brunnetes and blondes out of the DWARF encoding 8)
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
For now its just the direct ancestor of struct type. But it will exists by
itself, to represent the DW_TAG_namespace DWARF tag, that is how the C++
'namespace' (and other languages too, heck, I'd love to get my hands on a
binary with DWARF info built from, say, ADA source code, objectiveC... COBOL!
:-P).
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
This is in preparation for the introduction of struct namespace, that will be
struct type ancestor.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Such as types within types and class methods. This greatly improves support for
C++. Next improvements will be supporting DW_TAG_namespace and properly
supporting DW_TAG_inheritance.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Will be useful to show that the intent is to traverse just the DW_TAG_member
entries in the type list. Right now there are both DW_TAG_inheritance and
DW_TAG_member entries in the ->members type list. But there will be many more
tags, like enumerations, classes, etc, that are defined inside classes, a C++
feature. This will also help with DW_TAG_namespace support.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo