libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/97167
* src/c++17/fs_path.cc (path::_Parser::root_path()): Check
for empty string before inspecting the first character.
* testsuite/27_io/filesystem/path/append/source.cc: Append
empty string_view to path.
This introduces two new headers:
<bits/ranges_base.h> defines the minimal components needed
for using C++20 ranges (customization point objects such as
std::ranges::begin, concepts such as std::ranges::range, etc.)
<bits/ranges_util.h> includes <bits/ranges_base.h> and additionally
defines subrange, which is needed by <bits/ranges_algo.h>.
Most of the content of <bits/ranges_base.h> was previously defined in
<bits/range_access.h>, but a few pieces were only defined in <ranges>.
This meant the entire <ranges> header was needed in <algorithm> and
<memory>, even though they don't use all the range adaptors.
By moving the ranges components out of <bits/range_access.h> that file
is left defining just the contents of [iterator.range] i.e. std::begin,
std::end, std::size etc. and not C++20 ranges components.
For consistency with other C++20 ranges headers, <bits/range_cmp.h> is
renamed to <bits/ranges_cmp.h>.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/Makefile.am: Add new headers and adjust for renamed
header.
* include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* include/bits/iterator_concepts.h: Adjust for renamed header.
* include/bits/range_access.h (ranges::*): Move to new
<bits/ranges_base.h> header.
* include/bits/ranges_algobase.h: Include new <bits/ranges_base.h>
header instead of <ranges>.
* include/bits/ranges_algo.h: Include new <bits/ranges_util.h>
header.
* include/bits/range_cmp.h: Moved to...
* include/bits/ranges_cmp.h: ...here.
* include/bits/ranges_base.h: New header.
* include/bits/ranges_util.h: New header.
* include/experimental/string_view: Include new
<bits/ranges_base.h> header.
* include/std/functional: Adjust for renamed header.
* include/std/ranges (ranges::view_base, ranges::enable_view)
(ranges::dangling, ranges::borrowed_iterator_t): Move to new
<bits/ranges_base.h> header.
(ranges::view_interface, ranges::subrange)
(ranges::borrowed_subrange_t): Move to new <bits/ranges_util.h>
header.
* include/std/span: Include new <bits/ranges_base.h> header.
* include/std/string_view: Likewise.
* testsuite/24_iterators/back_insert_iterator/pr93884.cc: Add
missing <ranges> header.
* testsuite/24_iterators/front_insert_iterator/pr93884.cc:
Likewise.
While backporting 5494edae83 I noticed
that it's still not correct. I made the allocator-extended constructor
use the right type for the uses-allocator construction detection, but I
used an rvalue when it should be a const lvalue.
This should fix it properly this time.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/96803
* include/std/tuple
(_Tuple_impl(allocator_arg_t, Alloc, const _Tuple_impl<U...>&)):
Use correct value category in __use_alloc call.
* testsuite/20_util/tuple/cons/96803.cc: Check with constructors
that require correct value category to be used.
For a span with statically empty extent, we currently model the
preconditions of front(), back(), and operator[] as if they are
mandates, by using a static_assert to verify that extent != 0. This
causes us to reject valid programs that would instantiate these member
functions and at runtime never call them.
Since they are already followed by more general runtime asserts, this
patch just removes these static_asserts altogether,
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/span (span::front): Remove static_assert.
(span::back): Likewise.
(span::operator[]): Likewise.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/back_neg.cc: Rewrite to verify
that we check the preconditions of back() only when it's called.
* testsuite/23_containers/span/front_neg.cc: Likewise for
front().
* testsuite/23_containers/span/index_op_neg.cc: Likewise for
operator[].
This fixes a division by zero in the selection-sampling std::__sample
overload when the input range is empty (and hence __unsampled_sz is 0).
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/stl_algo.h (__sample): Exit early when the
input range is empty.
* testsuite/25_algorithms/sample/3.cc: New test.
As per P0202.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/stl_algo.h (for_each_n): Mark constexpr for C++20.
(search): Likewise for the overload that takes a searcher.
* testsuite/25_algorithms/for_each/constexpr.cc: Test constexpr
std::for_each_n.
* testsuite/25_algorithms/search/constexpr.cc: Test constexpr
std::search overload that takes a searcher.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/ranges (drop_view::begin()): Adjust constraints
to match the correct condition for O(1) ranges::next (LWG 3482).
* testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/drop.cc: Check that iterator is
cached for non-sized_range.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/ranges (transform_view, elements_view): Relax
constraints on operator- for iterators, as per LWG 3483.
* testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/elements.cc: Check that we
can take the difference of two iterators from a non-random
access range.
* testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/transform.cc: Likewise.
The cast from void* to T* in std::assume_aligned is not valid in a
constexpr function. The optimization hint is redundant during constant
evaluation anyway (the compiler can see the object and knows its
alignment). Simply return the original pointer without applying the
__builtin_assume_aligned hint to it when doing constant evaluation.
This change also removes the preprocessor branch that works around
uintptr_t not being available. We already assume that type is present
elsewhere in the library.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/97132
* include/bits/align.h (align) [!_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT_TR1]:
Remove unused code.
(assume_aligned): Do not use __builtin_assume_aligned during
constant evaluation.
* testsuite/20_util/assume_aligned/1.cc: Improve test.
* testsuite/20_util/assume_aligned/97132.cc: New test.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/97101
* include/std/functional (bind_front): Fix order of parameters
in is_nothrow_constructible_v specialization.
* testsuite/20_util/function_objects/bind_front/97101.cc: New test.
The fix for PR68519 in 83fd5e73b3 only
applied to condition_variable::wait_for. This problem can also apply to
condition_variable::wait_until but only if the custom clock is using a
more recent epoch so that a small enough delta can be calculated. let's
use the newly-added chrono::__detail::ceil to fix this and also make use
of that function to simplify the previous wait_for fixes.
Also, simplify the existing test case for PR68519 a little and make its
variables local so we can add a new test case for the above problem.
Unfortunately, the test would have only started failing if sufficient
time has passed since the chrono::steady_clock epoch had passed anyway,
but it's better than nothing.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/condition_variable (condition_variable::wait_until):
Convert delta to steady_clock duration before adding to current
steady_clock time to avoid rounding errors described in PR68519.
(condition_variable::wait_for): Simplify calculation of absolute
time by using chrono::__detail::ceil in both overloads.
* testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/members/68519.cc:
(test_wait_for): Renamed from test01. Replace unassigned val
variable with constant false. Reduce scope of mx and cv
variables to just test_wait_for function.
(test_wait_until): Add new test case.
Convert the specified duration to the target clock's duration type
before adding it to the current time in
__atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_for and
_M_load_when_equal_until. This removes the risk of the timeout being
rounded down to the current time resulting in there being no wait at all
when the duration type lacks sufficient precision to hold the
steady_clock current time.
Rather than using the style of fix from PR68519, let's expose the C++17
std::chrono::ceil function as std::chrono::__detail::ceil so that it can
be used in code compiled with earlier standards versions and simplify
the fix. This was suggested by John Salmon in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91486#c5 .
This problem has become considerably less likely to trigger since I
switched the __atomic__futex_unsigned::__clock_t reference clock from
system_clock to steady_clock and added the loop, but the consequences of
triggering it have changed too.
By my calculations it takes just over 194 days from the epoch for the
current time not to be representable in a float. This means that
system_clock is always subject to the problem (with the standard 1970
epoch) whereas steady_clock with float duration only runs out of
resolution machine has been running for that long (assuming the Linux
implementation of CLOCK_MONOTONIC.)
The recently-added loop in
__atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_until turns this scenario
into a busy wait.
Unfortunately the combination of both of these things means that it's
not possible to write a test case for this occurring in
_M_load_when_equal_until as it stands.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/91486
* include/bits/atomic_futex.h
(__atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_for)
(__atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_until): Use
__detail::ceil to convert delta to the reference clock
duration type to avoid resolution problems.
* include/std/chrono (__detail::ceil): Move implementation
of std::chrono::ceil into private namespace so that it's
available to pre-C++17 code.
* testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc (test_pr91486):
Test __atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_for.
If std::future::wait_until is passed a time point measured against a
clock that is neither std::chrono::steady_clock nor
std::chrono::system_clock then the generic implementation of
__atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_until is called which
calculates the timeout based on __clock_t and calls the
_M_load_when_equal_until method for that clock to perform the actual
wait.
There's no guarantee that __clock_t is running at the same speed as the
caller's clock, so if the underlying wait times out timeout we need to
check the timeout against the caller's clock again before potentially
looping.
Also add two extra tests to the testsuite's async.cc:
* run test03 with steady_clock_copy, which behaves identically to
chrono::steady_clock, but isn't chrono::steady_clock. This causes
the overload of __atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_until
that takes an arbitrary clock to be called.
* invent test04 which uses a deliberately slow running clock in order
to exercise the looping behaviour of
__atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_until described above.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/atomic_futex.h
(__atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_until): Add
loop on generic _Clock to check the timeout against _Clock
again after _M_load_when_equal_until returns indicating a
timeout.
* testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc: Invent slow_clock
that runs at an eleventh of steady_clock's speed. Use it
to test the user-supplied-clock variant of
__atomic_futex_unsigned::_M_load_when_equal_until works
generally with test03 and loops correctly when the timeout
time hasn't been reached in test04.
Add tests for waiting for the future using both chrono::steady_clock and
chrono::system_clock in preparation for dealing with those clocks
properly in futex.cc.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/30_threads/async/async.cc (test02): Test steady_clock
with std::future::wait_until.
(test03): Add new test templated on clock type waiting for future
associated with async to resolve.
(main): Call test03 to test both system_clock and steady_clock.
When a pool resource is constructed with max_blocks_per_chunk=1 it ends
up creating a pool with blocks_per_chunk=0 which means it never
allocates anything. Instead it returns null pointers, which should be
impossible.
To avoid this problem, round the max_blocks_per_chunk value to a
multiple of four, so it's never smaller than four.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/94160
* src/c++17/memory_resource.cc (munge_options): Round
max_blocks_per_chunk to a multiple of four.
(__pool_resource::_M_alloc_pools()): Simplify slightly.
* testsuite/20_util/unsynchronized_pool_resource/allocate.cc:
Check that valid pointers are returned when small values are
used for max_blocks_per_chunk.
The primary reason for this change is to reduce the size of buffers
allocated by std::pmr::monotonic_buffer_resource. Previously, a new
buffer would always add the size of the linked list node (11 bytes) and
then round up to the next power of two. This results in a huge increase
if the expected size of the next buffer is already a power of two. For
example, if the resource is constructed with a desired initial size of
4096 the first buffer it allocates will be std::bit_ceil(4096+11) which
is 8192. If the user has carefully selected the initial size to match
their expected memory requirements then allocating double that amount
wastes a lot of memory.
After this patch the allocated size will be rounded up to a 64-byte
boundary, instead of to a power of two. This means for an initial size
of 4096 only 4160 bytes get allocated.
Previously only the base-2 logarithm of the size was stored, which could
be stored in a single 8-bit integer. Now that the size isn't always a
power of two we need to use more bits to store it. As the size is always
a multiple of 64 the low six bits are not needed, and so we can use the
same approach that the pool resources already use of storing the base-2
logarithm of the alignment in the low bits that are not used for the
size. To avoid code duplication, a new aligned_size<N> helper class is
introduced by this patch, which is then used by both the pool resources'
big_block type and the monotonic_buffer_resource::_Chunk type.
Originally the big_block type used two bit-fields to store the size and
alignment in the space of a single size_t member. The aligned_size type
uses a single size_t member and uses masks and bitwise operations to
manipulate the size and alignment values. This results in better code
than the old version, because the bit-fields weren't optimally ordered
for little endian architectures, so the alignment was actually stored in
the high bits, not the unused low bits, requiring additional shifts to
calculate the values. Using bitwise operations directly avoids needing
to reorder the bit-fields depending on the endianness.
While adapting the _Chunk and big_block types to use aligned_size<N> I
also added checks for size overflows (technically, unsigned wraparound).
The memory resources now ensure that when they require an allocation
that is too large to represent in size_t they will request SIZE_MAX
bytes from the upstream resource, rather than requesting a small value
that results from wrapround. The testsuite is enhanced to verify this.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/96942
* include/std/memory_resource (monotonic_buffer_resource::do_allocate):
Use __builtin_expect when checking if a new buffer needs to be
allocated from the upstream resource, and for checks for edge
cases like zero sized buffers and allocations.
* src/c++17/memory_resource.cc (aligned_size): New class template.
(aligned_ceil): New helper function to round up to a given
alignment.
(monotonic_buffer_resource::chunk): Replace _M_size and _M_align
with an aligned_size member. Remove _M_canary member. Change _M_next
to pointer instead of unaligned buffer.
(monotonic_buffer_resource::chunk::allocate): Round up to multiple
of 64 instead of to power of two. Check for size overflow. Remove
redundant check for minimum required alignment.
(monotonic_buffer_resource::chunk::release): Adjust for changes
to data members.
(monotonic_buffer_resource::_M_new_buffer): Use aligned_ceil.
(big_block): Replace _M_size and _M_align with aligned_size
member.
(big_block::big_block): Check for size overflow.
(big_block::size, big_block::align): Adjust to use aligned_size.
(big_block::alloc_size): Use aligned_ceil.
(munge_options): Use aligned_ceil.
(__pool_resource::allocate): Use big_block::align for alignment.
* testsuite/20_util/monotonic_buffer_resource/allocate.cc: Check
upstream resource gets expected values for impossible sizes.
* testsuite/20_util/unsynchronized_pool_resource/allocate.cc:
Likewise. Adjust checks for expected alignment in existing test.
This "fix" makes no sense, but it avoids an error from G++ about
std::is_constructible being incomplete. The real problem is elsewhere,
but this "fixes" the regression for now.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/96592
* include/std/tuple (_TupleConstraints<true, T...>): Use
alternative is_constructible instead of std::is_constructible.
* testsuite/20_util/tuple/cons/96592.cc: New test.
The current std::gcd and std::chrono::duration::_S_gcd algorithms are
both recursive. This is potentially expensive to evaluate in constant
expressions, because each level of recursion makes a new copy of the
function to evaluate. The maximum number of steps is bounded
(proportional to the number of decimal digits in the smaller value) and
so unlikely to exceed the limit for constexpr nesting, but the memory
usage is still suboptimal. By using an iterative algorithm we avoid
that compile-time cost. Because looping in constexpr functions is not
allowed until C++14, we need to keep the recursive implementation in
duration::_S_gcd for C++11 mode.
For std::gcd we can also optimise runtime performance by using the
binary GCD algorithm.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/chrono (duration::_S_gcd): Use iterative algorithm
for C++14 and later.
* include/std/numeric (__detail::__gcd): Replace recursive
Euclidean algorithm with iterative version of binary GCD algorithm.
* testsuite/26_numerics/gcd/1.cc: Test additional inputs.
* testsuite/26_numerics/gcd/gcd_neg.cc: Adjust dg-error lines.
* testsuite/26_numerics/lcm/lcm_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/experimental/numeric/gcd.cc: Test additional inputs.
* testsuite/26_numerics/gcd/2.cc: New test.
This was copied from a test for std::lcm but I forgot to change one of
the calls to use the experimental version of the function.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/92978
* testsuite/experimental/numeric/92978.cc: Use experimental::lcm
not std::lcm.
The spaceship operator for std::array uses memcmp when the
__is_byte<value_type> trait is true, but memcmp isn't usable in
constexpr contexts. Also, memcmp should only be used for unsigned byte
types, because it gives the wrong answer for signed chars with negative
values.
We can simply check std::is_constant_evaluated() so that we don't use
memcmp during constant evaluation.
To fix the problem of using memcmp for inappropriate types, this patch
adds new __is_memcmp_ordered and __is_memcmp_ordered_with traits. These
say whether using memcmp will give the right answer for ordering
operations such as lexicographical_compare and three-way comparisons.
The new traits can be used in several places, and can also be used to
implement my suggestion in PR 93059 comment 37 to use memcmp for
unsigned integers larger than one byte on big endian targets.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/96851
* include/bits/cpp_type_traits.h (__is_memcmp_ordered):
New trait that says if memcmp can be used for ordering.
(__is_memcmp_ordered_with): Likewise, for two types.
* include/bits/deque.tcc (__lex_cmp_dit): Use new traits
instead of __is_byte and __numeric_traits.
(__lexicographical_compare_aux1): Likewise.
* include/bits/ranges_algo.h (__lexicographical_compare_fn):
Likewise.
* include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__lexicographical_compare_aux1)
(__is_byte_iter): Likewise.
* include/std/array (operator<=>): Likewise. Only use memcmp
when std::is_constant_evaluated() is false.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/comparison_operators/96851.cc:
New test.
* testsuite/23_containers/array/tuple_interface/get_neg.cc:
Adjust dg-error line numbers.
The <new> and <exception> headers each include each other, which makes
building them as header-units "exciting". The <new> header only needs
the definition of std::exception (in order to derive from it) which is
already in its own header, so just include that.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/stl_iterator.h: Include <bits/exception_defines.h>
for definitions of __try, __catch and __throw_exception_again.
(counted_iterator::operator++(int)): Use __throw_exception_again
instead of throw.
* libsupc++/new: Include <bits/exception.h> not <exception>.
* libsupc++/new_opvnt.cc: Include <bits/exception_defines.h>.
* testsuite/18_support/destroying_delete.cc: Include
<type_traits> for std::is_same_v definition.
* testsuite/20_util/variant/index_type.cc: Qualify size_t.
The chrono::duration constructor that converts from another duration
type is meant to be constrained so that it doesn't participate in
overload resolution if the ratio of the periods cannot be represented as
a std::ratio.
Because our std::ratio_divide is not SFINAE-friendly the evaluation of
__is_harmonic results in an error outside the immediate context when an
overflow occurs. I intend to make ratio_divide (and ratio_multiply)
SFINAE-friendly in a future patch, but for now this patch just
introduces a new SFINAE-friendly alias template for the division.
The standard doesn't require it, but it also seems right to constrain
the constructor with std::is_convertible_v<_Rep2, rep>.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/chrono (duration::_S_gcd(intmax_t, intmax_t)):
New helper function for finding GCD of two positive intmax_t
values.
(duration::__divide): New helper alias for dividing one period
by another.
(duration::__is_harmonic): Use __divide not ratio_divide.
(duration(const duration<R2, P2>&)): Require the duration rep
types to be convertible.
* testsuite/20_util/duration/cons/dr2094.cc: New test.
* testsuite/20_util/duration/requirements/reduced_period.cc:
Fix definition of unused member functions in test type.
* testsuite/20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg2.cc:
Adjust expected errors.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/numeric (__detail::__absu(bool)): Make deleted
function a function template, so it will be chosen for calls
with an explicit template argument list.
* testsuite/26_numerics/gcd/gcd_neg.cc: Add dg-prune-output.
* testsuite/26_numerics/lcm/lcm_neg.cc: Likewise.
My recent change to implement P0548 ("common_type and duration") was not
correct. The result of common_type_t<duration<R,P>, duration<R,P>>
should be duration<common_type_t<R>, P::type>, not duration<R, P::type>.
The common_type specialization for two different duration types was
correct, but the specializations for a single duration type (which only
exist to optimize compilation time) were wrong.
This fixes the partial specializations of common_type for a single
duration type, and also the return types of duration::operator+ and
duration::operator- which are supposed to use common_type_t<duration>.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/chrono (common_type): Fix partial specializations
for a single duration type to use the common_type of the rep.
(duration::operator+, duration::operator-): Fix return types
to also use the common_type of the rep.
* testsuite/20_util/duration/requirements/reduced_period.cc:
Check duration using a rep that has common_type specialized.
This fixes a bug with mixed signed and unsigned types, where converting
a negative value to the unsigned result type alters the value. The
solution is to obtain the absolute values of the arguments immediately
and to perform the actual GCD or LCM algorithm on two arguments of the
same type.
In order to operate on the most negative number without overflow when
taking its absolute, use an unsigned type for the result of the abs
operation. For example, -INT_MIN will overflow, but -(unsigned)INT_MIN
is (unsigned)INT_MAX+1U which is the correct value.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/92978
* include/std/numeric (__abs_integral): Replace with ...
(__detail::__absu): New function template that returns an
unsigned type, guaranteeing it can represent the most
negative signed value.
(__detail::__gcd, __detail::__lcm): Require arguments to
be unsigned and therefore already non-negative.
(gcd, lcm): Convert arguments to absolute value as unsigned
type before calling __detail::__gcd or __detail::__lcm.
* include/experimental/numeric (gcd, lcm): Likewise.
* testsuite/26_numerics/gcd/gcd_neg.cc: Adjust expected
errors.
* testsuite/26_numerics/lcm/lcm_neg.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/26_numerics/gcd/92978.cc: New test.
* testsuite/26_numerics/lcm/92978.cc: New test.
* testsuite/experimental/numeric/92978.cc: New test.
This implements the changes from P0548 "common_type and duration". That
was a change for C++17, but as it corrects some issues introduced by DRs
I'm also treating it as a DR and changing it for all modes from C++11
up.
The main change is that duration<R,P>::period no longer denotes P, but
rather P::type, the reduced ratio. The unary operator+ and operator-
members of duration should now return a duration using that reduced
ratio.
The requirement that common_type<T>::type is the same type as
common_type<T, T>::type (rather than simply T) was already implemented
for PR 89102.
The standard says that duration::operator+() and duration::operator-()
should return common_type_t<duration>, but that seems unnecessarily
expensive to compute. This change just uses duration<rep, period> which
is the same type, so we don't need to instantiate common_type.
As an optimization, this also adds partial specializations of
common_type for two durations of the same type, a single duration, two
time_points of the same type, and a single time_point. These
specializations avoid instantiating other specializations of common_type
and one or both of __duration_common_type or __timepoint_common_type for
the cases where the answer is trivial to obtain.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/chrono (__duration_common_type): Ensure the
reduced ratio is used. Remove unused partial specialization
using __failure_type.
(common_type): Pass reduced ratios to __duration_common_type.
Add partial specializations for simple cases involving a single
duration or time_point type.
(duration::period): Use reduced ratio.
(duration::operator+(), duration::operator-()): Return duration
type using the reduced ratio.
* testsuite/20_util/duration/requirements/typedefs_neg2.cc:
Adjust expected errors.
* testsuite/20_util/duration/requirements/reduced_period.cc: New test.
This fixes the months-based addition for year_month when the
year_month's month component is 0.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/chrono (year_month::operator+): Properly handle a
month value of 0 by casting the month value to int before
subtracting 1 from it so that the difference is sign-extended in
the subsequent addition.
* testsuite/std/time/year_month/1.cc: Test adding months to a
year_month whose month component is below or above the
normalized range of [1,12].
We currently don't enforce a constraint on some of the calendar types'
addition/subtraction operator overloads that take a 'months' arguments:
Constraints: If the argument supplied by the caller for the months
parameter is convertible to years, its implicit conversion sequence to
years is worse than its implicit conversion sequence to months.
This constraint is relevant when adding/subtracting a duration to/from,
say, a year_month where the given duration is convertible to both
'months' and to 'years' (as in the new testcases below). The correct
behavior here in light of this constraint is to perform the operation
through the (more efficient) 'years'-based overload, but we currently
emit an ambiguous overload error.
This patch templatizes the 'months'-based addition/subtraction operator
overloads so that in the event of an implicit-conversion tie, we select
the non-template 'years'-based overload. This is the same approach
that the date library takes for enforcing this constraint.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/chrono
(__detail::__months_years_conversion_disambiguator): Define.
(year_month::operator+=): Templatize the 'months'-based overload
so that the 'years'-based overload is selected in case of
equally-ranked implicit conversion sequences to both 'months'
and 'years' from the supplied argument.
(year_month::operator-=): Likewise.
(year_month::operator+): Likewise.
(year_month::operator-): Likewise.
(year_month_day::operator+=): Likewise.
(year_month_day::operator-=): Likewise.
(year_month_day::operator+): Likewise.
(year_month_day::operator-): Likewise.
(year_month_day_last::operator+=): Likewise.
(year_month_day_last::operator-=): Likewise.
(year_month_day_last::operator+): Likewise
(year_month_day_last::operator-): Likewise.
(year_month_day_weekday::operator+=): Likewise
(year_month_day_weekday::operator-=): Likewise.
(year_month_day_weekday::operator+): Likewise.
(year_month_day_weekday::operator-): Likewise.
(year_month_day_weekday_last::operator+=): Likewise
(year_month_day_weekday_last::operator-=): Likewise.
(year_month_day_weekday_last::operator+): Likewise.
(year_month_day_weekday_last::operator-): Likewise.
(testsuite/std/time/year_month/2.cc): New test.
(testsuite/std/time/year_month_day/2.cc): New test.
(testsuite/std/time/year_month_day_last/2.cc): New test.
(testsuite/std/time/year_month_weekday/2.cc): New test.
(testsuite/std/time/year_month_weekday_last/2.cc): New test.
Almost all of the proposed resolution for LWG 3448 is already
implemented; the only part left is to adjust the return type of
transform_view::sentinel::operator-.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/95322
* include/std/ranges (transform_view::sentinel::__distance_from):
Give this a deduced return type.
(transform_view::sentinel::operator-): Adjust the return type so
that it's based on the constness of the iterator rather than
that of the sentinel.
* testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/95322.cc: Refer to LWG 3488.
This implements the proposed resolution for LWG 3406, and adds a
testcase for the example from P1994R1.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/ranges (elements_view::begin): Adjust constraints.
(elements_view::end): Likewise.
(elements_view::_Sentinel::operator==): Templatize to take both
_Iterator<true> and _Iterator<false>.
(elements_view::_Sentinel::operator-): Likewise.
* testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/elements.cc: Add testcase for
the example from P1994R1.
* testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/lwg3406.cc: New test.
The _Tuple_impl constructor for allocator-extended construction from a
different tuple type uses the _Tuple_impl's own _Head type in the
__use_alloc test. That is incorrect, because the argument tuple could
have a different type. Using the wrong type might select the
leading-allocator convention when it should use the trailing-allocator
convention, or vice versa.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/96803
* include/std/tuple
(_Tuple_impl(allocator_arg_t, Alloc, const _Tuple_impl<U...>&)):
Replace parameter pack with a type parameter and a pack and pass
the first type to __use_alloc.
* testsuite/20_util/tuple/cons/96803.cc: New test.
A recent change altered the layout of EBO-helper base classes, resulting
in an ambiguity when the hash function and equality predicate are the
same type.
This modifies the type of one of the base classes, so that we don't get
two base classes of the same type.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/hashtable_policy.h (_Hash_code_base): Change
index of _Hashtable_ebo_helper base class.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_map/dup_types.cc: New test.
Add a static_assertions to check the result type is destructible, as in
the proposed resolution for LWG 3466 (which supersedes 3458).
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/future (future, shared_future. promise): Add
is_destructible assertion (LWG 3466). Adjust string-literal for
!is_array and !is_function assertions.
* testsuite/30_threads/future/requirements/lwg3458.cc: Check
types with no accessible destructor. Adjust expected errors.
* testsuite/30_threads/promise/requirements/lwg3466.cc:
Likewise.
* testsuite/30_threads/shared_future/requirements/lwg3458.cc:
Likewise.
This patch adds the C++20 calendar types and their methods as defined in
[time.cal] (modulo the parsing/printing support). This patch also
implements [time.hms] and [time.12], and a few more bits of
[time.clock]. The remaining C++20 additions to <chrono> from P0355 and
P1466 depend on [time.zone] and <format>, so they will come later, as
will more optimized versions of some of the algorithms added here.
The non-member operator overloads for the calendar types are defined as
namespace-scope functions in the standard, but here we instead define
these operator overloads as hidden friends. This simplifies the
implementation somewhat and lets us reap the benefits of hidden friends
for these overloads.
The bulk of this work is based on a patch from Ed Smith-Rowland, which can
be found at the Git branch users/redi/heads/calendar.
Co-authored-by: Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd@verizon.net>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/chrono (time_point::operator++)
(time_point::operator--): Define.
(utc_clock, tai_clock, gps_clock): Forward declare.
(utc_time, utc_seconds, tai_time, tai_seconds, gps_time)
(gps_seconds): Define.
(is_clock<utc_clock>, is_clock<tai_clock>, is_clock<gps_clock>)
(is_clock_v<utc_clock>, is_clock_v<tai_clock>)
(is_clock_v<gps_clock>): Define these specializations.
(leap_second_info): Define.
(day, month, year, weekday, weekday_indexed)
(weekday_last, month_day, month_day_last, month_weekday)
(month_weekday_last, year_month, year_month_day)
(year_month_day_last, year_month_weekday, year_month_weekday_last):
Declare and later define.
(last_spec, last, __detail::__days_per_month)
(__detail::__days_per_month, __detail::__last_day): Define.
(January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August)
(September, October, November, December, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday)
(Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday): Define.
(weekday::operator[]): Define out-of-line.
(year_month_day::_S_from_days, year_month_day::M_days_since_epoch):
Likewise.
(year_month_day::year_month_day, year_month_day::ok): Likewise.
(__detail::__pow10, hh_mm_ss): Define.
(literals::chrono_literals::operator""d)
(literals::chrono_literals::operator""y): Define.
(is_am, is_pm, make12, make24): Define.
* testsuite/20_util/time_point/4.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/day/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/hh_mm_ss/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/is_am/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/is_pm/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/make12/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/make24/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/month/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/month_day/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/month_day_last/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/month_weekday/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/month_weekday_last/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/weekday/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/weekday_indexed/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/weekday_last/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/year/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/year_month/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/year_month_day/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/year_month_day_last/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/year_month_weekday/1.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/time/year_month_weekday_last/1.cc: New test.
This implements the proposed resolution of LWG 3446. I'm also adding
another new constrained specialization which isn't proposed by 3446, to
resolve the ambiguity when a type has both value_type and element_type
but denoting different types.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/iterator_concepts.h (indirectly_readable): Add
partial specializations to resolve ambiguities (LWG 3446).
* testsuite/24_iterators/associated_types/readable.traits.cc:
Check types with both value_type and element_type.
This avoids the overflow that occurs when negating the most negative
value of an integral type.
Also prevent returning signed int when the values have lower rank and
promote to int.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/ranges (ranges::iota_view::size()): Perform all
calculations in the right unsigned types.
* testsuite/std/ranges/iota/size.cc: New test.
These tests do not actually require TBB, because they only inspect the
feature test macros present in the headers. However, if TBB is installed
then its headers will be included, and the version will be checked. If
the version is too old, compilation fails due to a #error directive.
This change disables the tests if TBB is not present, so that we skip
them instead of failing.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/96718
* testsuite/25_algorithms/pstl/feature_test-2.cc: Require
tbb-backend effective target.
* testsuite/25_algorithms/pstl/feature_test-3.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/25_algorithms/pstl/feature_test-5.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/25_algorithms/pstl/feature_test.cc: Likewise.
This adds specializations of std::incrementable_traits so that 128-bit
integers are always considered incrementable (and therefore usable with
std::ranges::iota_view) even when they don't satisfy std::integral.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/iterator_concepts.h [__STRICT_ANSI__]
(incrementable_traits<__int128>): Define specialization.
(incrementable_traits<unsigned __int128>): Likewise.
* testsuite/std/ranges/iota/96042.cc: Test iota_view with
__int128.
As well as ensuring that numeric_limits<__int128> is defined, we need to
ensure that make-unsigned-like-t and to-unsigned-like work correctly for
128-bit integers in strict mode. This ensures that a subrange created
from an iota_view's iterator and sentinel can represent its size.
Co-authored-by: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
2020-08-19 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
PR libstdc++/96042
* include/bits/range_access.h (__detail::__to_unsigned_like):
Do not use make_unsigned_t<T> in the return type, as it can
result in an error before the integral<T> constraint is checked.
[__STRICT_ANSI__]: Add overloads for 128-bit integer types.
(__detail::__make_unsigned_like_t): Define as the return type
of __to_unsigned_like.
* testsuite/std/ranges/subrange/96042.cc: New test.
Because __int128 can be used as the difference type for iota_view, we
need to ensure that it meets the requirements of an integer-class type.
The requirements in [iterator.concept.winc] p10 include numeric_limits
being specialized and giving meaningful answers. Currently we only
specialize numeric_limits for non-standard integer types in non-strict
modes. However, nothing prevents us from defining an explicit
specialization for any implementation-defined type, so it doesn't matter
whether std::is_integral<__int128> is true or not.
This patch ensures that the numeric_limits specializations for signed
and unsigned __int128 are defined whenever __int128 is available. It
also makes the __numeric_traits and __int_limits helpers work for
__int128, via a new __gnu_cxx::__is_integer_nonstrict trait.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/96042
* include/ext/numeric_traits.h (__is_integer_nonstrict): New
trait which is true for 128-bit integers even in strict modes.
(__numeric_traits_integer, __numeric_traits): Use
__is_integer_nonstrict instead of __is_integer.
* include/std/limits [__STRICT_ANSI__ && __SIZEOF_INT128__]
(numeric_limits<__int128>, (numeric_limits<unsigned __int128>):
Define.
* testsuite/std/ranges/iota/96042.cc: New test.
This implements signed and unsigned integer-class types, whose width is
one bit larger than the widest supported signed and unsigned integral
type respectively. In our case this is either __int128 and unsigned
__int128, or long long and unsigned long long.
Internally, the two integer-class types are represented as a largest
supported unsigned integral type plus one extra bit. The signed
integer-class type is represented in two's complement form with the
extra bit acting as the sign bit.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/Makefile.am (bits_headers): Add new header
<bits/max_size_type.h>.
* include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* include/bits/iterator_concepts.h
(ranges::__detail::__max_diff_type): Remove definition, replace
with forward declaration of class __max_diff_type.
(__detail::__max_size_type): Remove definition, replace with
forward declaration of class __max_size_type.
(__detail::__is_unsigned_int128, __is_signed_int128)
(__is_int128): New concepts.
(__detail::__is_integer_like): Accept __int128 and unsigned
__int128.
(__detail::__is_signed_integer_like): Accept __int128.
* include/bits/max_size_type.h: New header.
* include/bits/range_access.h: Include <bits/max_size_type.h>.
(__detail::__to_unsigned_like): Two new overloads.
* testsuite/std/ranges/iota/difference_type.cc: New test.
* testsuite/std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc: New test.
Back in 2017 I removed these prehistoric members (which were deprecated
since C++98) for C++17 mode. But I didn't add deprecated attributes to
most of them, so users didn't get any warning they would be going away.
Apparently some poor souls do actually use some of these names, and so
now that GCC 11 defaults to -std=gnu++17 some code has stopped
compiling.
This adds deprecated attributes to them, so that C++98/03/11/14 code
will get a warning if it uses them. I'll also backport this to the
release branches so that users can find out about the deprecation before
they start using C++17.
In order to give deprecated warnings even in C++98 mode this patch makes
_GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED work even for C++98, adds _GLIBCXX11_DEPRECATED for
the old meaning of _GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED, and adds new macros such as
_GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED_SUGGEST for suggesting alternatives to deprecated
features.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/bits/c++config (_GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED): Define for all
standard modes.
(_GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED_SUGGEST): New macro for "use 'foo' instead"
message in deprecated warnings.
(_GLIBCXX11_DEPRECATED, _GLIBCXX11_DEPRECATED_SUGGEST): New
macros for marking features derpecated in C++11.
(_GLIBCXX17_DEPRECATED_SUGGEST, _GLIBCXX20_DEPRECATED_SUGGEST):
New macros.
* include/backward/auto_ptr.h (auto_ptr_ref, auto_ptr<void>):
Use _GLIBCXX11_DEPRECATED instead of _GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED.
(auto_ptr): Use _GLIBCXX11_DEPRECATED_SUGGEST.
* include/backward/binders.h (binder1st, binder2nd): Likewise.
* include/bits/ios_base.h (io_state, open_mode, seek_dir)
(streampos, streamoff): Use _GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED_SUGGEST.
* include/std/streambuf (stossc): Replace C++11 attribute
with _GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED_SUGGEST.
* include/std/type_traits (__is_nullptr_t): Use
_GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED_SUGGEST instead of _GLIBCXX_DEPRECATED.
* testsuite/27_io/types/1.cc: Check for deprecated warnings.
Also check for io_state, open_mode and seek_dir typedefs.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
2020-08-19 Antony Polukhin <antoshkka@gmail.com>
PR libstdc++/71579
* include/std/type_traits (invoke_result, is_nothrow_invocable_r)
Add static_asserts to make sure that the argument of the type
trait is not misused with incomplete types.
(is_swappable_with, is_nothrow_swappable_with): Add static_asserts
to make sure that the first and second arguments of the type trait
are not misused with incomplete types.
* testsuite/20_util/invoke_result/incomplete_neg.cc: New test.
* testsuite/20_util/is_nothrow_invocable/incomplete_neg.cc: New test.
* testsuite/20_util/is_nothrow_swappable/incomplete_neg.cc: New test.
* testsuite/20_util/is_nothrow_swappable_with/incomplete_neg.cc: New
test.
* testsuite/20_util/is_swappable_with/incomplete_neg.cc: New test.
