Suggest removing semicolon in last expression only if it's type is known
Fixes#67971
Is there a syntax for explicitly checking if a note doesn't exist in test output? Something like `//~ !NOTE ...`
I believe r? @estebank deals with diagnostics.
Remove clippy from some leftover lists of "possibly failing" tools
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70655 successfully made clippy get built and tested on CI on every merge, but the lack of emitted toolstate info caused the toolstate to get updated to test-fail. We should remove clippy entirely from toolstate, as it now is always test-pass.
The changes made in this PR reflect what we do for `rustdoc`, which is our preexisting tool that is gated on CI.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Add Option to Force Unwind Tables
When panic != unwind, `nounwind` is added to all functions for a target.
This can cause issues when a panic happens with RUST_BACKTRACE=1, as
there needs to be a way to reconstruct the backtrace. There are three
possible sources of this information: forcing frame pointers (for which
an option exists already), debug info (for which an option exists), or
unwind tables.
Especially for embedded devices, forcing frame pointers can have code
size overheads (RISC-V sees ~10% overheads, ARM sees ~2-3% overheads).
In production code, it can be the case that debug info is not kept, so it is useful
to provide this third option, unwind tables, that users can use to
reconstruct the call stack. Reconstructing this stack is harder than
with frame pointers, but it is still possible.
---
This came up in discussion on #69890, and turned out to be a fairly simple addition.
r? @hanna-kruppe
Update btree_map::VacantEntry::insert docs to actually call insert
It looks like they were copied from the `or_insert` docs. This change
makes the example more like the hash_map::VacantEntry::insert docs.
Correctly handle UEFI targets as Windows-like when emitting sections for LLVM bitcode
This handles UEFI handles when emitting inline assembly for sections containing LLVM bitcode. See details in #71880. I have locally confirmed that this change fixes compilation of projects using the `x86_64-unknown-uefi` target compiling with `cargo-xbuild`, but I am not very familiar with LLVM bitcode so this may not be the correct approach.
r? @alexcrichton as they wrote the initial LLVM bitcode emitting code?
Add remove_current_as_list to LinkedList's CursorMut
The `remove_current` method only returns the inner `T` and deallocates the list node. This is unnecessary for move operations, where the element is going to be linked back into this (or even a different) `LinkedList`. The `remove_current_as_list` method avoids this by returning the unlinked list node as a new single-element `LinkedList` structure.
(per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/58533#issuecomment-623010157)
Add const examples
I only added them to `std::f32` to get feedback on this approach before adding the other constants.
When looking at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68952, I found the docs a little confusing. Unless you're intimately aware of what's going on here, I don't think it's super clear what is deprecated and what you're supposed to do instead. I think short examples really clarify what's meant here, so that's what I did.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #71038 (forbid `dyn Trait` in patterns)
- #71697 (Added MIR constant propagation of Scalars into function call arguments)
- #71773 (doc: misc rustdoc things)
- #71810 (Do not try to find binop method on RHS `TyErr`)
- #71877 (Use f64 in f64 examples)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Added MIR constant propagation of Scalars into function call arguments
Now for the function call arguments!
Caveats:
1. It's only being enabled at `mir-opt-2` or higher, because currently codegen gives performance regressions with this optimization.
2. Only propagates Scalars. Tuples and references (references are `Indirect`, right??) are not being propagated into as of this PR.
3. Maybe more tests would be nice?
4. I need (shamefully) to ask @wesleywiser to write in his words (or explain to me, and then I can write it down) why we want to ignore propagation into `ScalarPairs` and `Indirect` arguments.
r? @wesleywiser
forbid `dyn Trait` in patterns
Do not allow `&dyn Trait` as a generic const parameters.
This also changes dyn trait in pattern from ICE to error.
closes#63322closes#70972
r? @eddyb
Don't copy bytecode files into the incr. comp. cache.
It's no longer necessary now that bitcode is embedded into object files.
This change meant that `WorkProductFileKind::Bytecode` is no longer
necessary, which means that type is no longer necessary, which allowed
several places in the code to become simpler.
This commit was written by @nnethercote in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70458 but that didn't land. In the meantime though we managed to land it in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/71528 and that doesn't seem to be causing too many fires, so I'm re-sending this patch!
The `remove_current` method only returns the inner `T` and deallocates the list node. This is unnecessary for move operations, where the element is going to be linked back into this (or even a different) `LinkedList`. The `remove_current_as_list` method avoids this by returning the unlinked list node as a new single-element `LinkedList` structure .
When panic != unwind, `nounwind` is added to all functions for a target.
This can cause issues when a panic happens with RUST_BACKTRACE=1, as
there needs to be a way to reconstruct the backtrace. There are three
possible sources of this information: forcing frame pointers (for which
an option exists already), debug info (for which an option exists), or
unwind tables.
Especially for embedded devices, forcing frame pointers can have code
size overheads (RISC-V sees ~10% overheads, ARM sees ~2-3% overheads).
In code, it can be the case that debug info is not kept, so it is useful
to provide this third option, unwind tables, that users can use to
reconstruct the call stack. Reconstructing this stack is harder than
with frame pointers, but it is still possible.
This commit adds a compiler option which allows a user to force the
addition of unwind tables. Unwind tables cannot be disabled on targets
that require them for correctness, or when using `-C panic=unwind`.
On type mismatch involving associated type, suggest constraint
When an associated type is found when a specific type was expected, if
possible provide a structured suggestion constraining the associated
type in a bound.
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<T as Foo>::Y == i32`
--> $DIR/associated-types-multiple-types-one-trait.rs:13:5
|
LL | want_y(t);
| ^^^^^^ expected `i32`, found associated type
...
LL | fn want_y<T:Foo<Y=i32>>(t: &T) { }
| ----- required by this bound in `want_y`
|
= note: expected type `i32`
found associated type `<T as Foo>::Y`
help: consider constraining the associated type `<T as Foo>::Y` to `i32`
|
LL | fn have_x_want_y<T:Foo<X=u32, Y = i32>>(t: &T)
| ^^^^^^^^^
```
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/trait-with-missing-associated-type-restriction.rs:12:9
|
LL | qux(x.func())
| ^^^^^^^^ expected `usize`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type `usize`
found associated type `<impl Trait as Trait>::A`
help: consider constraining the associated type `<impl Trait as Trait>::A` to `usize`
|
LL | fn foo(x: impl Trait<A = usize>) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^
```
Fix#71035. Related to #70908.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #71645 (Direct contributors to try stage 0 rustdoc first)
- #71801 (Correctly check comparison operator in MIR typeck)
- #71844 (List Clippy as a subtree, instead of a submodule)
- #71864 (Update link in contributing.md)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
Correctly check comparison operator in MIR typeck
The subtyping for comparisons between pointers was reversed in MIR typeck.
There also wasn't a check that comparisons between numeric types had matching types.
Direct contributors to try stage 0 rustdoc first
After #71458, `./x.py doc --stage 0 src/libstd` is (empirically) able to build the standard library docs using the `rustdoc` packaged with the bootstrap compiler. This means that new contributors don't need to build the compiler to locally inspect small documentation fixes. This was a roadblock for me when I first started contributing to rust and something that still regularly annoys people. We should recommend that contributors give bootstrap `rustdoc` a try before building the whole compiler.
Miri: unleash all feature gates
IMO it is silly to unleash features that do not even have a feature gate yet, but not unleash features that do. The only thing this achieves is making unleashed mode annoying to use as we have to figure out the feature flags to enable (and not always do the error messages say what that flag is).
Given that the point of `-Z unleash-the-miri-inside-of-you` is to debug the Miri internals, I see no good reason for this extra hurdle. I cannot imagine a situation where we'd use that flag, realize the program also requires some feature gate, and then be like "oh I guess if this feature is unstable I will do something else". Instead, we'll always just add that flag to the code as well, so requiring the flag achieves nothing.
r? @oli-obk @ecstatic-morse
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71630
