Implement the GICv4 VMOVI command, which moves the pending state
of a virtual interrupt from one redistributor to another. As with
MOVI, we handle the "parse and validate command arguments and
table lookups" part in the ITS source file, and pass the final
results to a function in the redistributor which will do the
actual operation. As with the "make a VLPI pending" change,
for the moment we leave that redistributor function as a stub,
to be implemented in a later commit.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-21-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the ITS side of the handling of the INV command for
virtual interrupts; as usual this calls into a redistributor
function which we leave as a stub to fill in later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-20-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We were previously implementing INV (like INVALL) to just blow away
cached highest-priority-pending-LPI information on all connected
redistributors. For GICv4.0, this isn't going to be sufficient,
because the LPI we are invalidating cached information for might be
either physical or virtual, and the required action is different for
those two cases. So we need to do the full process of looking up the
ITE from the devid and eventid. This also means we can do the error
checks that the spec lists for this command.
Split out INV handling into a process_inv() function like our other
command-processing functions. For the moment, stick to handling only
physical LPIs; we will add the vLPI parts later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The VSYNC command forces the ITS to synchronize all outstanding ITS
operations for the specified vPEID, so that subsequent writes to
GITS_TRANSLATER honour them. The QEMU implementation is always in
sync, so for us this is a nop, like the existing SYNC command.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the GICv4 VMOVP command, which updates an entry in the vPE
table to change its rdbase field. This command is unique in the ITS
command set because its effects must be propagated to all the other
ITSes connected to the same GIC as the ITS which executes the VMOVP
command.
The GICv4 spec allows two implementation choices for handling the
propagation to other ITSes:
* If GITS_TYPER.VMOVP is 1, the guest only needs to issue the command
on one ITS, and the implementation handles the propagation to
all ITSes
* If GITS_TYPER.VMOVP is 0, the guest must issue the command on
every ITS, and arrange for the ITSes to synchronize the updates
with each other by setting ITSList and Sequence Number fields
in the command packets
We choose the GITS_TYPER.VMOVP = 1 approach, and synchronously
execute the update on every ITS.
For GICv4.1 this command has extra fields in the command packet and
additional behaviour. We define the 4.1-only fields with the FIELD
macro, but only implement the GICv4.0 version of the command.
Note that we don't update the reported GITS_TYPER value here;
we'll do that later in a commit which updates all the reported
feature bit and ID register values for GICv4.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
[PMM: Moved gicv3_foreach_its() to arm_gicv3_its_common.h,
for consistency with gicv3_add_its()]
The GICv4 ITS VMOVP command's semantics require it to perform the
operation on every ITS connected to the same GIC that the ITS that
received the command is attached to. This means that the GIC object
needs to keep a pointer to every ITS that is connected to it
(previously it was sufficient for the ITS to have a pointer to its
GIC).
Add a glib ptrarray to the GICv3 object which holds pointers to every
connected ITS, and make the ITS add itself to the array for the GIC
it is connected to when it is realized.
Note that currently all QEMU machine types with an ITS have exactly
one ITS in the system, so typically the length of this ptrarray will
be 1. Multiple ITSes are typically used to improve performance on
real hardware, so we wouldn't need to have more than one unless we
were modelling a real machine type that had multile ITSes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
[PMM: Moved gicv3_add_its() to arm_gicv3_its_common.h to avoid
compilation error building the KVM ITS]
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
For GICv4, interrupt table entries read by process_its_cmd() may
indicate virtual LPIs which are to be directly injected into a VM.
Implement the ITS side of the code for handling this. This is
similar to the existing handling of physical LPIs, but instead of
looking up a collection ID in a collection table, we look up a vPEID
in a vPE table. As with the physical LPIs, we leave the rest of the
work to code in the redistributor device.
The redistributor half will be implemented in a later commit;
for now we just provide a stub function which does nothing.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Split the part of process_its_cmd() which is specific to physical
interrupts into its own function. This is the part which starts by
taking the ICID and looking it up in the collection table. The
handling of virtual interrupts is significantly different (involving
a lookup in the vPE table) so structuring the code with one
sub-function for the physical interrupt case and one for the virtual
interrupt case will be clearer than putting both cases in one large
function.
The code for handling the "remove mapping from ITE" for the DISCARD
command remains in process_its_cmd() because it is common to both
virtual and physical interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Factor out the sequence of looking up a CTE from an ICID including
the validity and error checks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The operation of finding an interrupt table entry given a (DeviceID,
EventID) pair is necessary in multiple different ITS commands. The
process requires first using the DeviceID as an index into the device
table to find the DTE, and then useng the EventID as an index into
the interrupt table specified by that DTE to find the ITE. We also
need to handle all the possible error cases: indexes out of range,
table memory not readable, table entries not valid.
Factor this out into a separate lookup_ite() function which we
can then call from the places where we were previously open-coding
this sequence. We'll also need this for some of the new GICv4.0
commands.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-12-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the ItsCmdResult enum, we currently distinguish only CMD_STALL
(failure, stall processing of the command queue) and CMD_CONTINUE
(keep processing the queue), and we use the latter both for "there
was a parameter error, go on to the next command" and "the command
succeeded, go on to the next command". Sometimes we would like to
distinguish those two cases, so add CMD_CONTINUE_OK to the enum to
represent the success situation, and use it in the relevant places.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the GICv4 VMAPP command, which writes an entry to the vPE
table.
For GICv4.1 this command has extra fields in the command packet
and additional behaviour. We define the 4.1-only fields with the
FIELD macro, but only implement the GICv4.0 version of the command.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Implement the GICv4 VMAPI and VMAPTI commands. These write
an interrupt translation table entry that maps (DeviceID,EventID)
to (vPEID,vINTID,doorbell). The only difference between VMAPI
and VMAPTI is that VMAPI assumes vINTID == EventID rather than
both being specified in the command packet.
(This code won't be reachable until we allow the GIC version to be
set to 4. Support for reading this new virtual-interrupt DTE and
handling it correctly will be implemented in a later commit.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The GICv4 defines a new in-guest-memory table for the ITS: this is
the vPE table. Implement the new GITS_BASER2 register which the
guest uses to tell the ITS where the vPE table is located, including
the decode of the register fields into the TableDesc structure which
we do for the GITS_BASER<n> when the guest enables the ITS.
We guard provision of the new register with the its_feature_virtual()
function, which does a check of the GITS_TYPER.Virtual bit which
indicates presence of ITS support for virtual LPIs. Since this bit
is currently always zero, GICv4-specific features will not be
accessible to the guest yet.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In process_mapti() we check interrupt IDs to see whether they are
in the valid LPI range. Factor this out into its own utility
function, as we're going to want it elsewhere too for GICv4.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
We use the common function gicv3_idreg() to supply the CoreSight ID
register values for the GICv3 for the copies of these ID registers in
the distributor, redistributor and ITS register frames. This isn't
quite correct, because while most of the register values are the
same, the PIDR0 value should vary to indicate which of these three
frames it is. (You can see this and also the correct values of these
PIDR0 registers by looking at the GIC-600 or GIC-700 TRMs, for
example.)
Make gicv3_idreg() take an extra argument for the PIDR0 value.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Boards using the GICv3 need to configure it with both the total
number of CPUs and also the sizes of all the memory regions which
contain redistributors (one redistributor per CPU). At the moment
the GICv3 checks that the number of CPUs specified is not too many to
fit in the defined redistributor regions, but in fact the code
assumes that the two match exactly. For instance when we set the
GICR_TYPER.Last bit on the final redistributor in each region, we
assume that we don't need to consider the possibility of a region
being only half full of redistributors or even completely empty. We
also assume in gicv3_redist_read() and gicv3_redist_write() that we
can calculate the CPU index from the offset within the MemoryRegion
and that this will always be in range.
Fortunately all the board code sets the redistributor region sizes to
exactly match the CPU count, so this isn't a visible bug. We could
in theory make the GIC code handle non-full redistributor regions, or
have it automatically reduce the provided region sizes to match the
CPU count, but the simplest thing is just to strengthen the error
check and insist that the CPU count and redistributor region size
settings match exactly, since all the board code does that anyway.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In the GICv3 code we implicitly rely on there being at least one CPU
and thus at least one redistributor and CPU interface. Sanity-check
that the property the board code sets is not zero.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In commit b6f96009ac we split do_process_its_cmd() from
process_its_cmd(), but forgot the usual blank line between function
definitions. Add it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220408141550.1271295-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Linux kernel required alined address of DTB.
But missing align in dtb load function.
Fixed to load to the correct address.
Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Message-Id: <20220207132758.84403-1-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
* hw/arm/virt: Check for attempt to use TrustZone with KVM or HVF
* versal: Add the Cortex-R5s in the Real-Time Processing Unit (RPU) subsystem
* versal: model enough of the Clock/Reset Low-power domain (CRL) to allow control of the Cortex-R5s
* xlnx-zynqmp: Connect 4 TTC timers
* exynos4210: Refactor GIC/combiner code to stop using qemu_split_irq
* realview: replace 'qemu_split_irq' with 'TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ'
* stellaris: replace 'qemu_split_irq' with 'TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ'
* hw/core/irq: remove unused 'qemu_irq_split' function
* npcm7xx: use symbolic constants for PWRON STRAP bit fields
* virt: document impact of gic-version on max CPUs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Rke9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'pull-target-arm-20220421' of https://git.linaro.org/people/pmaydell/qemu-arm into staging
target-arm queue:
* hw/arm/virt: Check for attempt to use TrustZone with KVM or HVF
* versal: Add the Cortex-R5s in the Real-Time Processing Unit (RPU) subsystem
* versal: model enough of the Clock/Reset Low-power domain (CRL) to allow control of the Cortex-R5s
* xlnx-zynqmp: Connect 4 TTC timers
* exynos4210: Refactor GIC/combiner code to stop using qemu_split_irq
* realview: replace 'qemu_split_irq' with 'TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ'
* stellaris: replace 'qemu_split_irq' with 'TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ'
* hw/core/irq: remove unused 'qemu_irq_split' function
* npcm7xx: use symbolic constants for PWRON STRAP bit fields
* virt: document impact of gic-version on max CPUs
# -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
#
# iQJNBAABCAA3FiEE4aXFk81BneKOgxXPPCUl7RQ2DN4FAmJhPSUZHHBldGVyLm1h
# eWRlbGxAbGluYXJvLm9yZwAKCRA8JSXtFDYM3hAsD/4qzZK6LFL4kFH6E4z3tWIn
# ErHrfPGUt/SEfHLP+stQP/loFgkR1SNzcrIZ/HiDCB/W+IqQKuP+tHin2lMhO1tR
# KM6suUO1In2hoxfzimVta4F4GVN8ifY69qUYhaRxcBYSUpRXDNFJGsRIeT5JeUMd
# SArZUifRs7JUo25rIkg5Y+YZE37dmiA5gcuswtoLPa/UlDVqRxihLnItySmeutsc
# /Y8d/iym/ydlhvtL1OUt1KKYeg4ykrPzJCfvopsT2xgkwwB0PYci8//fa5IrRVlp
# Uw6yDssZrDIcXfVz88rdriILaszicCv8lOhTH6I74oXCatiyvi4BEzW8uGqVS8wt
# ff+AaKvGqb5t4GKKhCdpL2NzDwKBGWZHuruACs9IfvMkz62HE12Vr99qAKdQ3s93
# QnFIyUKg90mGkvKy8336zX3hnWjPH8wTASOXbNrgnt6GVLkqwy9ibug5kS+n77eJ
# BnkE5p3OfMVJ5a4o+iZbbDJKfzhNUHDSMIBbG1jRNzax1RgxOBtHFSqP5jmbpm+S
# agyr8h+Md0Tx1dwZKxdCGyvcbSZiG2WxRnci3dyT4MqYY1t1GEpOfcs1EN+CYKwG
# iuezZzJopjOFGaXQaB3OvbvCKxuroHKG61SmDmx+5OkfAxhrqe4ulwYij4jhsyhH
# t8zGzDOKLakv3li90xCX/w==
# =Rke9
# -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
# gpg: Signature made Thu 21 Apr 2022 04:16:53 AM PDT
# gpg: using RSA key E1A5C593CD419DE28E8315CF3C2525ED14360CDE
# gpg: issuer "peter.maydell@linaro.org"
# gpg: Good signature from "Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>" [full]
# gpg: aka "Peter Maydell <pmaydell@gmail.com>" [full]
# gpg: aka "Peter Maydell <pmaydell@chiark.greenend.org.uk>" [full]
* tag 'pull-target-arm-20220421' of https://git.linaro.org/people/pmaydell/qemu-arm: (31 commits)
hw/arm: Use bit fields for NPCM7XX PWRON STRAPs
hw/misc: Add PWRON STRAP bit fields in GCR module
hw/arm/virt: impact of gic-version on max CPUs
hw/core/irq: remove unused 'qemu_irq_split' function
hw/arm/stellaris: replace 'qemu_split_irq' with 'TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ'
hw/arm/realview: replace 'qemu_split_irq' with 'TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ'
hw/arm/exynos4210: Drop Exynos4210Irq struct
hw/arm/exynos4210: Put combiners into state struct
hw/arm/exynos4210: Fold combiner splits into exynos4210_init_board_irqs()
hw/arm/exynos4210: Don't connect multiple lines to external GIC inputs
hw/arm/exynos4210: Connect MCT_G0 and MCT_G1 to both combiners
hw/arm/exynos4210: Fill in irq_table[] for internal-combiner-only IRQ lines
hw/arm/exynos4210: Use TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ in exynos4210_init_board_irqs()
hw/arm/exynos4210: Delete unused macro definitions
hw/arm/exynos4210: Move exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() into exynos4210.c
hw/arm/exynos4210: Drop ext_gic_irq[] from Exynos4210Irq struct
hw/arm/exynos4210: Put external GIC into state struct
hw/arm/exynos4210: Move exynos4210_init_board_irqs() into exynos4210.c
hw/arm/exynos4210: Fix code style nit in combiner_grp_to_gic_id[]
hw/arm/exynos4210: Coalesce board_irqs and irq_table
...
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
G_NORETURN was introduced in glib 2.68, fallback to G_GNUC_NORETURN in
glib-compat.
Note that this attribute must be placed before the function declaration
(bringing a bit of consistency in qemu codebase usage).
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-20-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
While at it, replace '%x' with '%u' as suggested by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé.
Also fixes a GCC 12.0.1 -Wformat-overflow false-positive.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-16-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Also fixes a GCC 12.0.1 false-positive:
../hw/arm/allwinner-a10.c: In function ‘aw_a10_realize’:
../hw/arm/allwinner-a10.c:135:35: error: ‘%d’ directive writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 8 [-Werror=format-overflow=]
135 | sprintf(bus, "usb-bus.%d", i);
| ^~
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-15-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Also fixes a GCC 12.0.1 false-positive:
../hw/arm/digic.c: In function ‘digic_init’:
../hw/arm/digic.c:45:54: error: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 5 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
45 | snprintf(name, DIGIC_TIMER_NAME_MLEN, "timer[%d]", i);
| ^~
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-14-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
This patch uses the defined fields to describe PWRON STRAPs for
better readability.
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>
Message-id: 20220411165842.3912945-3-wuhaotsh@google.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220324181557.203805-3-zongyuan.li@smartx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220324181557.203805-2-zongyuan.li@smartx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The only time we use the int_combiner_irq[] and ext_combiner_irq[]
arrays in the Exynos4210Irq struct is during realize of the SoC -- we
initialize them with the input IRQs of the combiner devices, and then
connect those to outputs of other devices in
exynos4210_init_board_irqs(). Now that the combiner objects are
easily accessible as s->int_combiner and s->ext_combiner we can make
the connections directly from one device to the other without going
via these arrays.
Since these are the only two remaining elements of Exynos4210Irq,
we can remove that struct entirely.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Switch the creation of the combiner devices to the new-style
"embedded in state struct" approach, so we can easily refer
to the object elsewhere during realize.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
At this point, the function exynos4210_init_board_irqs() splits input
IRQ lines to connect them to the input combiner, output combiner and
external GIC. The function exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() splits
some of the combiner input lines further to connect them to multiple
different inputs on the combiner.
Because (unlike qemu_irq_split()) the TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ device has a
configurable number of outputs, we can do all this in one place, by
making exynos4210_init_board_irqs() add extra outputs to the splitter
device when it must be connected to more than one input on each
combiner.
We do this with a new data structure, the combinermap, which is an
array each of whose elements is a list of the interrupt IDs on the
combiner which must be tied together. As we loop through each
interrupt ID, if we find that it is the first one in one of these
lists, we configure the splitter device with eonugh extra outputs and
wire them up to the other interrupt IDs in the list.
Conveniently, for all the cases where this is necessary, the
lowest-numbered interrupt ID in each group is in the range of the
external combiner, so we only need to code for this in the first of
the two loops in exynos4210_init_board_irqs().
The old code in exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() which is being
deleted here had several problems which don't exist in the new code
in its handling of the multi-core timer interrupts:
(1) the case labels specified bits 4 ... 8, but bit '8' doesn't
exist; these should have been 4 ... 7
(2) it used the input irq[EXYNOS4210_COMBINER_GET_IRQ_NUM(1, bit + 4)]
multiple times as the input of several different splitters,
which isn't allowed
(3) in an apparent cut-and-paste error, the cases for all the
multi-core timer inputs used "bit + 4" even though the
bit range for the case was (intended to be) 4 ... 7, which
meant it was looking at non-existent bits 8 ... 11.
None of these exist in the new code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The combiner_grp_to_gic_id[] array includes the EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G0
and EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G1 multiple times. This means that we will
connect multiple IRQs up to the same external GIC input, which
is not permitted. We do the same thing in the code in
exynos4210_init_board_irqs() because the conditionals selecting
an irq_id in the first loop match multiple interrupt IDs.
Overall we do this for interrupt IDs
(1, 4), (12, 4), (35, 4), (51, 4), (53, 4) for EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G0
and
(1, 5), (12, 5), (35, 5), (51, 5), (53, 5) for EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G1
These correspond to the cases for the multi-core timer that we are
wiring up to multiple inputs on the combiner in
exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin(). That code already deals with all
these interrupt IDs being the same input source, so we don't need to
connect the external GIC interrupt for any of them except the first
(1, 4) and (1, 5). Remove the array entries and conditionals which
were incorrectly causing us to wire up extra lines.
This bug didn't cause any visible effects, because we only connect
up a device to the "primary" ID values (1, 4) and (1, 5), so the
extra lines would never be set to a level.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Currently for the interrupts MCT_G0 and MCT_G1 which are
the only ones in the input range of the external combiner
and which are also wired to the external GIC, we connect
them only to the internal combiner and the external GIC.
This seems likely to be a bug, as all other interrupts
which are in the input range of both combiners are
connected to both combiners. (The fact that the code in
exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() is also trying to wire
up these inputs on both combiners also suggests this.)
Wire these interrupts up to both combiners, like the rest.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In exynos4210_init_board_irqs(), the loop that handles IRQ lines that
are in a range that applies to the internal combiner only creates a
splitter for those interrupts which go to both the internal combiner
and to the external GIC, but it does nothing at all for the
interrupts which don't go to the external GIC, leaving the
irq_table[] array element empty for those. (This will result in
those interrupts simply being lost, not in a QEMU crash.)
I don't have a reliable datasheet for this SoC, but since we do wire
up one interrupt line in this category (the HDMI I2C device on
interrupt 16,1), this seems like it must be a bug in the existing
QEMU code. Fill in the irq_table[] entries where we're not splitting
the IRQ to both the internal combiner and the external GIC with the
IRQ line of the internal combiner. (That is, these IRQ lines go to
just one device, not multiple.)
This bug didn't have any visible guest effects because the only
implemented device that was affected was the HDMI I2C controller,
and we never connect any I2C devices to that bus.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In exynos4210_init_board_irqs(), use the TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ device
instead of qemu_irq_split().
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The function exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() currently lives in
exynos4210_combiner.c, but it isn't really part of the combiner
device itself -- it is a function that implements the wiring up of
some interrupt sources to multiple combiner inputs. Move it to live
with the other SoC-level code in exynos4210.c, along with a few
macros previously defined in exynos4210.h which are now used only
in exynos4210.c.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The only time we use the ext_gic_irq[] array in the Exynos4210Irq
struct is during realize of the SoC -- we initialize it with the
input IRQs of the external GIC device, and then connect those to
outputs of other devices further on in realize (including in the
exynos4210_init_board_irqs() function). Now that the ext_gic object
is easily accessible as s->ext_gic we can make the connections
directly from one device to the other without going via this array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Switch the creation of the external GIC to the new-style "embedded in
state struct" approach, so we can easily refer to the object
elsewhere during realize.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The function exynos4210_init_board_irqs() currently lives in
exynos4210_gic.c, but it isn't really part of the exynos4210.gic
device -- it is a function that implements (some of) the wiring up of
interrupts between the SoC's GIC and combiner components. This means
it fits better in exynos4210.c, which is the SoC-level code. Move it
there. Similarly, exynos4210_git_irq() is used almost only in the
SoC-level code, so move it too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Fix a missing set of spaces around '-' in the definition of
combiner_grp_to_gic_id[]. We're about to move this code, so
fix the style issue first to keep checkpatch happy with the
code-motion patch.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The exynos4210 code currently has two very similar arrays of IRQs:
* board_irqs is a field of the Exynos4210Irq struct which is filled
in by exynos4210_init_board_irqs() with the appropriate qemu_irqs
for each IRQ the board/SoC can assert
* irq_table is a set of qemu_irqs pointed to from the
Exynos4210State struct. It's allocated in exynos4210_init_irq,
and the only behaviour these irqs have is that they pass on the
level to the equivalent board_irqs[] irq
The extra indirection through irq_table is unnecessary, so coalesce
these into a single irq_table[] array as a direct field in
Exynos4210State which exynos4210_init_board_irqs() fills in.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The only time we use the int_gic_irq[] array in the Exynos4210Irq
struct is in the exynos4210_realize() function: we initialize it with
the GPIO inputs of the a9mpcore device, and then a bit later on we
connect those to the outputs of the internal combiner. Now that the
a9mpcore object is easily accessible as s->a9mpcore we can make the
connection directly from one device to the other without going via
this array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The exynos4210 SoC mostly creates its child devices as if it were
board code. This includes the a9mpcore object. Switch that to a
new-style "embedded in the state struct" creation, because in the
next commit we're going to want to refer to the object again further
down in the exynos4210_realize() function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Now we have removed the only use of TYPE_EXYNOS4210_IRQ_GATE we can
delete the device entirely.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <frasse.iglesias@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Exynos4210 SoC device currently uses a custom device
"exynos4210.irq_gate" to model the OR gate that feeds each CPU's IRQ
line. We have a standard TYPE_OR_IRQ device for this now, so use
that instead.
(This is a migration compatibility break, but that is OK for this
machine type.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Connect the CRL (Clock Reset LPD) to the Versal SoC.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Konrad <fkonrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-id: 20220406174303.2022038-5-edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Peter Maydell
Richard Henderson
Yoshinori Sato
Marc-André Lureau
Hao Wu
Zongyuan Li
Edgar E. Iglesias