This allows to make sure the test is still built, and gives more
accurate report details.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-30-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Simplify a bit pre-compiler conditions.
For TSAN, QEMU already has CONFIG_TSAN, but it is only set when the
fiber API is present. (I wonder whether supporting TSAN without the
fiber API is really relevant)
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-27-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
The functions are already covered in check-block-qdict.c.
This will help moving QAPI-related tests in a common subproject.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-26-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Move them where they belong, since the functions are implemented in block-qdict.c.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-25-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Do not require the whole option machinery to handle keyval, as it is
used by QAPI alone, without the option API. And match the associated
unit name.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-24-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Move QEMU-specific code to util/osdep.c, so cutils can become a common
subproject.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-22-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
The implementation depends on the OS. (and longer-term goal is to move
cutils to a common subproject)
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-21-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
G_NORETURN was introduced in glib 2.68, fallback to G_GNUC_NORETURN in
glib-compat.
Note that this attribute must be placed before the function declaration
(bringing a bit of consistency in qemu codebase usage).
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-20-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Move the macro and declaration so it can use glib in the following
patch (it already depends on glib anyway for !optimize)
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-19-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
It's not the way it is usually written (see https://clang.llvm.org/).
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Hedde <damien.hedde@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-17-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
While at it, replace '%x' with '%u' as suggested by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé.
Also fixes a GCC 12.0.1 -Wformat-overflow false-positive.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-16-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Also fixes a GCC 12.0.1 false-positive:
../hw/arm/allwinner-a10.c: In function ‘aw_a10_realize’:
../hw/arm/allwinner-a10.c:135:35: error: ‘%d’ directive writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 8 [-Werror=format-overflow=]
135 | sprintf(bus, "usb-bus.%d", i);
| ^~
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-15-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Also fixes a GCC 12.0.1 false-positive:
../hw/arm/digic.c: In function ‘digic_init’:
../hw/arm/digic.c:45:54: error: ‘%d’ directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 5 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
45 | snprintf(name, DIGIC_TIMER_NAME_MLEN, "timer[%d]", i);
| ^~
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-14-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
The latter simply requires glib.h, while the former is not in the
Windows API (but provided by mingw header & CRT)
Also simplify the expression for 1/10s.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-12-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Move qemu_main() declaration to a new header.
Simplify main.c since both cocoa & sdl cannot be enabled together.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-5-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
The header is no longer commonly included.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220420132624.2439741-4-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
This patch uses the defined fields to describe PWRON STRAPs for
better readability.
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>
Message-id: 20220411165842.3912945-3-wuhaotsh@google.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Similar to the Aspeed code in include/misc/aspeed_scu.h, we define
the PWRON STRAP fields in their corresponding module for NPCM7XX.
Signed-off-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>
Message-id: 20220411165842.3912945-2-wuhaotsh@google.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Describe that the gic-version influences the maximum number of CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Message-id: 20220413231456.35811-1-heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com
[PMM: minor punctuation tweaks]
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220324181557.203805-3-zongyuan.li@smartx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Zongyuan Li <zongyuan.li@smartx.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220324181557.203805-2-zongyuan.li@smartx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
The only time we use the int_combiner_irq[] and ext_combiner_irq[]
arrays in the Exynos4210Irq struct is during realize of the SoC -- we
initialize them with the input IRQs of the combiner devices, and then
connect those to outputs of other devices in
exynos4210_init_board_irqs(). Now that the combiner objects are
easily accessible as s->int_combiner and s->ext_combiner we can make
the connections directly from one device to the other without going
via these arrays.
Since these are the only two remaining elements of Exynos4210Irq,
we can remove that struct entirely.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-19-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Switch the creation of the combiner devices to the new-style
"embedded in state struct" approach, so we can easily refer
to the object elsewhere during realize.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
At this point, the function exynos4210_init_board_irqs() splits input
IRQ lines to connect them to the input combiner, output combiner and
external GIC. The function exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() splits
some of the combiner input lines further to connect them to multiple
different inputs on the combiner.
Because (unlike qemu_irq_split()) the TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ device has a
configurable number of outputs, we can do all this in one place, by
making exynos4210_init_board_irqs() add extra outputs to the splitter
device when it must be connected to more than one input on each
combiner.
We do this with a new data structure, the combinermap, which is an
array each of whose elements is a list of the interrupt IDs on the
combiner which must be tied together. As we loop through each
interrupt ID, if we find that it is the first one in one of these
lists, we configure the splitter device with eonugh extra outputs and
wire them up to the other interrupt IDs in the list.
Conveniently, for all the cases where this is necessary, the
lowest-numbered interrupt ID in each group is in the range of the
external combiner, so we only need to code for this in the first of
the two loops in exynos4210_init_board_irqs().
The old code in exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() which is being
deleted here had several problems which don't exist in the new code
in its handling of the multi-core timer interrupts:
(1) the case labels specified bits 4 ... 8, but bit '8' doesn't
exist; these should have been 4 ... 7
(2) it used the input irq[EXYNOS4210_COMBINER_GET_IRQ_NUM(1, bit + 4)]
multiple times as the input of several different splitters,
which isn't allowed
(3) in an apparent cut-and-paste error, the cases for all the
multi-core timer inputs used "bit + 4" even though the
bit range for the case was (intended to be) 4 ... 7, which
meant it was looking at non-existent bits 8 ... 11.
None of these exist in the new code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The combiner_grp_to_gic_id[] array includes the EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G0
and EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G1 multiple times. This means that we will
connect multiple IRQs up to the same external GIC input, which
is not permitted. We do the same thing in the code in
exynos4210_init_board_irqs() because the conditionals selecting
an irq_id in the first loop match multiple interrupt IDs.
Overall we do this for interrupt IDs
(1, 4), (12, 4), (35, 4), (51, 4), (53, 4) for EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G0
and
(1, 5), (12, 5), (35, 5), (51, 5), (53, 5) for EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G1
These correspond to the cases for the multi-core timer that we are
wiring up to multiple inputs on the combiner in
exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin(). That code already deals with all
these interrupt IDs being the same input source, so we don't need to
connect the external GIC interrupt for any of them except the first
(1, 4) and (1, 5). Remove the array entries and conditionals which
were incorrectly causing us to wire up extra lines.
This bug didn't cause any visible effects, because we only connect
up a device to the "primary" ID values (1, 4) and (1, 5), so the
extra lines would never be set to a level.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Currently for the interrupts MCT_G0 and MCT_G1 which are
the only ones in the input range of the external combiner
and which are also wired to the external GIC, we connect
them only to the internal combiner and the external GIC.
This seems likely to be a bug, as all other interrupts
which are in the input range of both combiners are
connected to both combiners. (The fact that the code in
exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() is also trying to wire
up these inputs on both combiners also suggests this.)
Wire these interrupts up to both combiners, like the rest.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-15-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In exynos4210_init_board_irqs(), the loop that handles IRQ lines that
are in a range that applies to the internal combiner only creates a
splitter for those interrupts which go to both the internal combiner
and to the external GIC, but it does nothing at all for the
interrupts which don't go to the external GIC, leaving the
irq_table[] array element empty for those. (This will result in
those interrupts simply being lost, not in a QEMU crash.)
I don't have a reliable datasheet for this SoC, but since we do wire
up one interrupt line in this category (the HDMI I2C device on
interrupt 16,1), this seems like it must be a bug in the existing
QEMU code. Fill in the irq_table[] entries where we're not splitting
the IRQ to both the internal combiner and the external GIC with the
IRQ line of the internal combiner. (That is, these IRQ lines go to
just one device, not multiple.)
This bug didn't have any visible guest effects because the only
implemented device that was affected was the HDMI I2C controller,
and we never connect any I2C devices to that bus.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-14-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In exynos4210_init_board_irqs(), use the TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ device
instead of qemu_irq_split().
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Delete a couple of #defines which are never used.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-12-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The function exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() currently lives in
exynos4210_combiner.c, but it isn't really part of the combiner
device itself -- it is a function that implements the wiring up of
some interrupt sources to multiple combiner inputs. Move it to live
with the other SoC-level code in exynos4210.c, along with a few
macros previously defined in exynos4210.h which are now used only
in exynos4210.c.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The only time we use the ext_gic_irq[] array in the Exynos4210Irq
struct is during realize of the SoC -- we initialize it with the
input IRQs of the external GIC device, and then connect those to
outputs of other devices further on in realize (including in the
exynos4210_init_board_irqs() function). Now that the ext_gic object
is easily accessible as s->ext_gic we can make the connections
directly from one device to the other without going via this array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Switch the creation of the external GIC to the new-style "embedded in
state struct" approach, so we can easily refer to the object
elsewhere during realize.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The function exynos4210_init_board_irqs() currently lives in
exynos4210_gic.c, but it isn't really part of the exynos4210.gic
device -- it is a function that implements (some of) the wiring up of
interrupts between the SoC's GIC and combiner components. This means
it fits better in exynos4210.c, which is the SoC-level code. Move it
there. Similarly, exynos4210_git_irq() is used almost only in the
SoC-level code, so move it too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Fix a missing set of spaces around '-' in the definition of
combiner_grp_to_gic_id[]. We're about to move this code, so
fix the style issue first to keep checkpatch happy with the
code-motion patch.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-7-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The exynos4210 code currently has two very similar arrays of IRQs:
* board_irqs is a field of the Exynos4210Irq struct which is filled
in by exynos4210_init_board_irqs() with the appropriate qemu_irqs
for each IRQ the board/SoC can assert
* irq_table is a set of qemu_irqs pointed to from the
Exynos4210State struct. It's allocated in exynos4210_init_irq,
and the only behaviour these irqs have is that they pass on the
level to the equivalent board_irqs[] irq
The extra indirection through irq_table is unnecessary, so coalesce
these into a single irq_table[] array as a direct field in
Exynos4210State which exynos4210_init_board_irqs() fills in.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The only time we use the int_gic_irq[] array in the Exynos4210Irq
struct is in the exynos4210_realize() function: we initialize it with
the GPIO inputs of the a9mpcore device, and then a bit later on we
connect those to the outputs of the internal combiner. Now that the
a9mpcore object is easily accessible as s->a9mpcore we can make the
connection directly from one device to the other without going via
this array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The exynos4210 SoC mostly creates its child devices as if it were
board code. This includes the a9mpcore object. Switch that to a
new-style "embedded in the state struct" creation, because in the
next commit we're going to want to refer to the object again further
down in the exynos4210_realize() function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Now we have removed the only use of TYPE_EXYNOS4210_IRQ_GATE we can
delete the device entirely.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <frasse.iglesias@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-3-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Exynos4210 SoC device currently uses a custom device
"exynos4210.irq_gate" to model the OR gate that feeds each CPU's IRQ
line. We have a standard TYPE_OR_IRQ device for this now, so use
that instead.
(This is a migration compatibility break, but that is OK for this
machine type.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Connect the CRL (Clock Reset LPD) to the Versal SoC.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Konrad <fkonrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-id: 20220406174303.2022038-5-edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add a model of the Xilinx Versal CRL.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Konrad <fkonrad@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-id: 20220406174303.2022038-4-edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Add the Cortex-R5Fs of the Versal RPU (Real-time Processing Unit)
subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-id: 20220406174303.2022038-3-edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Create an APU CPU Cluster. This is in preparation to add the RPU.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <francisco.iglesias@amd.com>
Message-id: 20220406174303.2022038-2-edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Connect the 4 TTC timers on the ZynqMP.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc@lmichel.fr>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <frasse.iglesias@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20220331222017.2914409-3-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Break out header file to allow embedding of the the TTC.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Luc Michel <luc@lmichel.fr>
Reviewed-by: Francisco Iglesias <frasse.iglesias@gmail.com>
Message-id: 20220331222017.2914409-2-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Marc-André Lureau
Hao Wu
Heinrich Schuchardt
Zongyuan Li
Peter Maydell
Edgar E. Iglesias