Switch the creation of the combiner devices to the new-style
"embedded in state struct" approach, so we can easily refer
to the object elsewhere during realize.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-18-peter.maydell@linaro.org
At this point, the function exynos4210_init_board_irqs() splits input
IRQ lines to connect them to the input combiner, output combiner and
external GIC. The function exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() splits
some of the combiner input lines further to connect them to multiple
different inputs on the combiner.
Because (unlike qemu_irq_split()) the TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ device has a
configurable number of outputs, we can do all this in one place, by
making exynos4210_init_board_irqs() add extra outputs to the splitter
device when it must be connected to more than one input on each
combiner.
We do this with a new data structure, the combinermap, which is an
array each of whose elements is a list of the interrupt IDs on the
combiner which must be tied together. As we loop through each
interrupt ID, if we find that it is the first one in one of these
lists, we configure the splitter device with eonugh extra outputs and
wire them up to the other interrupt IDs in the list.
Conveniently, for all the cases where this is necessary, the
lowest-numbered interrupt ID in each group is in the range of the
external combiner, so we only need to code for this in the first of
the two loops in exynos4210_init_board_irqs().
The old code in exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() which is being
deleted here had several problems which don't exist in the new code
in its handling of the multi-core timer interrupts:
(1) the case labels specified bits 4 ... 8, but bit '8' doesn't
exist; these should have been 4 ... 7
(2) it used the input irq[EXYNOS4210_COMBINER_GET_IRQ_NUM(1, bit + 4)]
multiple times as the input of several different splitters,
which isn't allowed
(3) in an apparent cut-and-paste error, the cases for all the
multi-core timer inputs used "bit + 4" even though the
bit range for the case was (intended to be) 4 ... 7, which
meant it was looking at non-existent bits 8 ... 11.
None of these exist in the new code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-17-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The combiner_grp_to_gic_id[] array includes the EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G0
and EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G1 multiple times. This means that we will
connect multiple IRQs up to the same external GIC input, which
is not permitted. We do the same thing in the code in
exynos4210_init_board_irqs() because the conditionals selecting
an irq_id in the first loop match multiple interrupt IDs.
Overall we do this for interrupt IDs
(1, 4), (12, 4), (35, 4), (51, 4), (53, 4) for EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G0
and
(1, 5), (12, 5), (35, 5), (51, 5), (53, 5) for EXT_GIC_ID_MCT_G1
These correspond to the cases for the multi-core timer that we are
wiring up to multiple inputs on the combiner in
exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin(). That code already deals with all
these interrupt IDs being the same input source, so we don't need to
connect the external GIC interrupt for any of them except the first
(1, 4) and (1, 5). Remove the array entries and conditionals which
were incorrectly causing us to wire up extra lines.
This bug didn't cause any visible effects, because we only connect
up a device to the "primary" ID values (1, 4) and (1, 5), so the
extra lines would never be set to a level.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-16-peter.maydell@linaro.org
In exynos4210_init_board_irqs(), use the TYPE_SPLIT_IRQ device
instead of qemu_irq_split().
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-13-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Delete a couple of #defines which are never used.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-12-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The function exynos4210_combiner_get_gpioin() currently lives in
exynos4210_combiner.c, but it isn't really part of the combiner
device itself -- it is a function that implements the wiring up of
some interrupt sources to multiple combiner inputs. Move it to live
with the other SoC-level code in exynos4210.c, along with a few
macros previously defined in exynos4210.h which are now used only
in exynos4210.c.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-11-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The only time we use the ext_gic_irq[] array in the Exynos4210Irq
struct is during realize of the SoC -- we initialize it with the
input IRQs of the external GIC device, and then connect those to
outputs of other devices further on in realize (including in the
exynos4210_init_board_irqs() function). Now that the ext_gic object
is easily accessible as s->ext_gic we can make the connections
directly from one device to the other without going via this array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-10-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Switch the creation of the external GIC to the new-style "embedded in
state struct" approach, so we can easily refer to the object
elsewhere during realize.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-9-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The function exynos4210_init_board_irqs() currently lives in
exynos4210_gic.c, but it isn't really part of the exynos4210.gic
device -- it is a function that implements (some of) the wiring up of
interrupts between the SoC's GIC and combiner components. This means
it fits better in exynos4210.c, which is the SoC-level code. Move it
there. Similarly, exynos4210_git_irq() is used almost only in the
SoC-level code, so move it too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The exynos4210 code currently has two very similar arrays of IRQs:
* board_irqs is a field of the Exynos4210Irq struct which is filled
in by exynos4210_init_board_irqs() with the appropriate qemu_irqs
for each IRQ the board/SoC can assert
* irq_table is a set of qemu_irqs pointed to from the
Exynos4210State struct. It's allocated in exynos4210_init_irq,
and the only behaviour these irqs have is that they pass on the
level to the equivalent board_irqs[] irq
The extra indirection through irq_table is unnecessary, so coalesce
these into a single irq_table[] array as a direct field in
Exynos4210State which exynos4210_init_board_irqs() fills in.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-6-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The only time we use the int_gic_irq[] array in the Exynos4210Irq
struct is in the exynos4210_realize() function: we initialize it with
the GPIO inputs of the a9mpcore device, and then a bit later on we
connect those to the outputs of the internal combiner. Now that the
a9mpcore object is easily accessible as s->a9mpcore we can make the
connection directly from one device to the other without going via
this array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-5-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The exynos4210 SoC mostly creates its child devices as if it were
board code. This includes the a9mpcore object. Switch that to a
new-style "embedded in the state struct" creation, because in the
next commit we're going to want to refer to the object again further
down in the exynos4210_realize() function.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-4-peter.maydell@linaro.org
The Exynos4210 SoC device currently uses a custom device
"exynos4210.irq_gate" to model the OR gate that feeds each CPU's IRQ
line. We have a standard TYPE_OR_IRQ device for this now, so use
that instead.
(This is a migration compatibility break, but that is OK for this
machine type.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20220404154658.565020-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
Some typedefs and macros are defined after the type check macros.
This makes it difficult to automatically replace their
definitions with OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE.
Patch generated using:
$ ./scripts/codeconverter/converter.py -i \
--pattern=QOMStructTypedefSplit $(git grep -l '' -- '*.[ch]')
which will split "typdef struct { ... } TypedefName"
declarations.
Followed by:
$ ./scripts/codeconverter/converter.py -i --pattern=MoveSymbols \
$(git grep -l '' -- '*.[ch]')
which will:
- move the typedefs and #defines above the type check macros
- add missing #include "qom/object.h" lines if necessary
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200831210740.126168-9-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200831210740.126168-10-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200831210740.126168-11-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
First parameter to exynos4210_get_irq() is not the SPI port number,
but the interrupt group number. Interrupt groups are 20 for mdma
and 21 for pdma. Interrupts are not inverted. Controllers support 32
events (pdma) or 31 events (mdma). Events must all be routed to a single
interrupt line. Set other parameters as documented in Exynos4210 datasheet,
section 8 (DMA controller).
Fixes: 59520dc65e ("hw/arm/exynos4210: Add DMA support for the Exynos4210")
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-id: 20200123052540.6132-4-linux@roeck-us.net
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Back in 2016, we discussed[1] rules for headers, and these were
generally liked:
1. Have a carefully curated header that's included everywhere first. We
got that already thanks to Peter: osdep.h.
2. Headers should normally include everything they need beyond osdep.h.
If exceptions are needed for some reason, they must be documented in
the header. If all that's needed from a header is typedefs, put
those into qemu/typedefs.h instead of including the header.
3. Cyclic inclusion is forbidden.
This patch gets include/ closer to obeying 2.
It's actually extracted from my "[RFC] Baby steps towards saner
headers" series[2], which demonstrates a possible path towards
checking 2 automatically. It passes the RFC test there.
[1] Message-ID: <87h9g8j57d.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-03/msg03345.html
[2] Message-Id: <20190711122827.18970-1-armbru@redhat.com>
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-07/msg02715.html
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20190812052359.30071-2-armbru@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
No header includes qemu-common.h after this commit, as prescribed by
qemu-common.h's file comment.
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190523143508.25387-5-armbru@redhat.com>
[Rebased with conflicts resolved automatically, except for
include/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.h hw/arm/nrf51_soc.c hw/arm/msf2-soc.c
block/qcow2-refcount.c block/qcow2-cluster.c block/qcow2-cache.c
target/arm/cpu.h target/lm32/cpu.h target/m68k/cpu.h target/mips/cpu.h
target/moxie/cpu.h target/nios2/cpu.h target/openrisc/cpu.h
target/riscv/cpu.h target/tilegx/cpu.h target/tricore/cpu.h
target/unicore32/cpu.h target/xtensa/cpu.h; bsd-user/main.c and
net/tap-bsd.c fixed up]
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-id: 20190520214342.13709-5-philmd@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Before QOM-ifying the Exynos4 SoC model, move the DRAM initialization
from exynos4210.c to exynos4_boards.c because DRAM is board specific,
not SoC.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Pick a uniform chardev type name.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We've currently got 18 architectures in QEMU, and thus 18 target-xxx
folders in the root folder of the QEMU source tree. More architectures
(e.g. RISC-V, AVR) are likely to be included soon, too, so the main
folder of the QEMU sources slowly gets quite overcrowded with the
target-xxx folders.
To disburden the main folder a little bit, let's move the target-xxx
folders into a dedicated target/ folder, so that target-xxx/ simply
becomes target/xxx/ instead.
Acked-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> [m68k part]
Acked-by: Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de> [tricore part]
Acked-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> [lm32 part]
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> [s390x part]
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> [s390x part]
Acked-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> [i386 part]
Acked-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com> [sparc part]
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> [alpha part]
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> [xtensa part]
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> [ppc part]
Acked-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com> [crisµblaze part]
Acked-by: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> [unicore32 part]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
This will keep things working when cpu.h will not be included
indirectly almost everywhere (either directly or through
qemu-common.h).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Many of these should be cleaned up with proper qdev-/QOM-ification.
Right now there are many catch-all headers in include/hw/ARCH depending
on cpu.h, and this makes it necessary to compile these files per-target.
However, fixing this does not belong in these patches.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Peter Maydell
Eduardo Habkost
Guenter Roeck
Markus Armbruster
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Krzysztof Kozlowski
Marc-André Lureau
Thomas Huth
Paolo Bonzini
Andreas Färber