tcg_cpu_instance_init() will be the 'cpu_instance_init' impl for the TCG
accelerator. It'll be called from within riscv_cpu_post_init(), via
accel_cpu_instance_init(), similar to what happens with KVM. In fact, to
preserve behavior, the implementation will be similar to what
riscv_cpu_post_init() already does.
In this patch we'll move riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() and
riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions() and all their dependencies to tcg-cpu.c.
All multi-extension properties code was moved. The 'multi_ext_user_opts'
hash table was also moved to tcg-cpu.c since it's a TCG only structure,
meaning that we won't have to worry about initializing a TCG hash table
when running a KVM CPU anymore.
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() will remain in cpu.c for now due to how
much code it requires to be moved at the same time. We'll do that in the
next patch.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-16-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We'll move riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions() to tcg-cpu.c in the next
patch and set_misa() needs to be usable from there.
Rename it to riscv_cpu_set_misa() and make it public.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-15-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties() is being used to fill the missing KVM
MISA properties but it is a TCG helper that was adapted to do so. We'll
move it to tcg-cpu.c in the next patches, meaning that KVM needs to fill
the remaining MISA properties on its own.
Do not use riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties(). Let's create a new array
with all available MISA bits we support that can be read by KVM. The
array is zero terminate to allow us to iterate through it without
knowing its size.
Then, inside kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties(), we'll create all KVM
MISA properties as usual and then use this array to add any missing MISA
properties with the riscv_cpu_add_kvm_unavail_prop() helper.
Note that we're creating misa_bits[], and not using the existing
'riscv_single_letter_exts[]', because the latter is tuned for riscv,isa
related functions and it doesn't have all MISA bits we support. Commit
0e2c377023 ("target/riscv: misa to ISA string conversion fix") has the
full context.
While we're at it, move both satp and the multi-letter extension
properties to kvm_riscv_add_cpu_user_properties() as well.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-14-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Move the files to a 'kvm' dir to promote more code separation between
accelerators and making our lives easier supporting build options such
as --disable-tcg.
Rename kvm.c to kvm-cpu.c to keep it in line with its TCG counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-13-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Add a KVM accelerator class like we did with TCG. The difference is
that, at least for now, we won't be using a realize() implementation for
this accelerator.
We'll start by assiging kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(), renamed to
kvm_cpu_instance_init(), as a 'cpu_instance_init' implementation. Change
riscv_cpu_post_init() to invoke accel_cpu_instance_init(), which will go
through the 'cpu_instance_init' impl of the current acceleration (if
available) and execute it. The end result is that the KVM initial setup,
i.e. starting registers and adding its specific properties, will be done
via this hook.
Add a 'tcg_enabled()' condition in riscv_cpu_post_init() to avoid
calling riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() when running KVM. We'll remove
this condition when the TCG accel class get its own 'cpu_instance_init'
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-12-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
This file is not needed for some time now. Both kvm_riscv_reset_vcpu()
and kvm_riscv_set_irq() have public declarations in kvm_riscv.h and are
wrapped in 'if kvm_enabled()' blocks that the compiler will rip it out
in non-KVM builds.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-11-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
This function is used for both accelerators. Make it public, and call it
from kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties(). This will make it easier to
split KVM specific code for the KVM accelerator class in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-10-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We'll introduce the KVM accelerator class with a 'cpu_instance_init'
implementation that is going to be invoked during the common
riscv_cpu_post_init() (via accel_cpu_instance_init()). This
instance_init will execute KVM exclusive code that TCG doesn't care
about, such as adding KVM specific properties, initing registers using a
KVM scratch CPU and so on.
The core of the forementioned cpu_instance_init impl is the current
riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() that is being used by the common code via
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() in cpu.c. Move it to kvm.c, together
will all the relevant artifacts, exporting and renaming it to
kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() so cpu.c can keep using it for now.
To make this work we'll need to export riscv_cpu_extensions,
riscv_cpu_vendor_exts and riscv_cpu_experimental_exts from cpu.c as
well. The TCG accelerator will also need to access those in the near
future so this export will benefit us in the long run.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-9-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We'll need to export these arrays to the accelerator classes in the next
patches. Mark them as 'const' now because they should not be modified at
runtime.
Note that 'riscv_cpu_options' will also be exported, but can't be marked
as 'const', because the properties are changed via
qdev_property_add_static().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-8-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
This CPU only exists if we're compiling with KVM so move it to the kvm
specific file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-7-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
All generic CPUs call riscv_cpu_add_user_properties(). The 'max' CPU
calls riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions(). Both can be moved to a common
instance_post_init() callback, implemented in riscv_cpu_post_init(),
called by all CPUs. The call order then becomes:
riscv_cpu_init() -> cpu_init() of each CPU -> .instance_post_init()
In the near future riscv_cpu_post_init() will call the init() function
of the current accelerator, providing a hook for KVM and TCG accel
classes to change the init() process of the CPU.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-6-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Move the remaining of riscv_tcg_ops now that we have a working realize()
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-5-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
This function is the core of the RISC-V validations for TCG CPUs, and it
has a lot going on.
Functions in cpu.c were made public to allow them to be used by the KVM
accelerator class later on. 'cpu_cfg_ext_get_min_version()' is notably
hard to move it to another file due to its dependency with isa_edata_arr[]
array, thus make it public and use it as is for now.
riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions() is kept public because it's used by
csr.c in write_misa().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-4-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
riscv_cpu_realize_tcg() was added to allow TCG cpus to have a different
realize() path during the common riscv_cpu_realize(), making it a good
choice to start moving TCG exclusive code to tcg-cpu.c.
Rename it to tcg_cpu_realizefn() and assign it as a implementation of
accel::cpu_realizefn(). tcg_cpu_realizefn() will then be called during
riscv_cpu_realize() via cpu_exec_realizefn(). We'll use a similar
approach with KVM in the near future.
riscv_cpu_validate_set_extensions() is too big and with too many
dependencies to be moved in this same patch. We'll do that next.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
[ Changes by AF:
- Renames to fix build failures after rebase
]
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
target/riscv/cpu.c needs to handle all possible accelerators (TCG and
KVM at this moment) during both init() and realize() time. This forces
us to resort to a lot of "if tcg" and "if kvm" throughout the code,
which isn't wrong, but can get cluttered over time. Splitting
acceleration specific code from cpu.c to its own file will help to
declutter the existing code and it will also make it easier to support
KVM/TCG only builds in the future.
We'll start by adding a new subdir called 'tcg' and a new file called
'tcg-cpu.c'. This file will be used to introduce a new accelerator class
for TCG acceleration in RISC-V, allowing us to center all TCG exclusive
code in its file instead of using 'cpu.c' for everything. This design is
inpired by the work Claudio Fontana did in x86 a few years ago in commit
f5cc5a5c1 ("i386: split cpu accelerators from cpu.c, using
AccelCPUClass").
To avoid moving too much code at once we'll start by adding the new file
and TCG AccelCPUClass declaration. The 'class_init' from the accel class
will init 'tcg_ops', relieving the common riscv_cpu_class_init() from
doing it.
'riscv_tcg_ops' is being exported from 'cpu.c' for now to avoid having
to deal with moving code and files around right now. We'll focus on
decoupling the realize() logic first.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230925175709.35696-2-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
This patch fixes guest reboot errors when using KVM.
There are two issues when rebooting a guest using KVM
1. When the guest initiates a reboot the host is unable to stop the vcpu
2. When running a SMP guest the qemu monitor system_reset causes a vcpu crash
This can be fixed by clearing the CSR values at reset and syncing the
MPSTATE with the host.
Signed-off-by: liguang.zhang <liguang.zhang@hexintek.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230913091332.17355-1-18622748025@163.com>
[ Changes by AF
- Fixup commit message
- Fixup patch style
]
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Enabling RVG will enable a set of extensions that we're not checking if
the user was okay enabling or not. And in this case we want to error
out, instead of ignoring, otherwise we will be inconsistent enabling RVG
without all its extensions.
After this patch, disabling ifencei or icsr while enabling RVG will
result in error:
$ ./build/qemu-system-riscv64 -M virt -cpu rv64,g=true,Zifencei=false --nographic
qemu-system-riscv64: RVG requires Zifencei but user set Zifencei to false
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-21-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Add a new cpu_cfg_ext_is_user_set() helper to check if an extension was
set by the user in the command line. Use it inside
cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() to verify if the user set a certain extension
and, if that's the case, do not change its value.
This will make us honor user choice instead of overwriting the values.
Users will then be informed whether they're using an incompatible set of
extensions instead of QEMU setting a magic value that works.
The reason why we're not implementing user choice for MISA extensions
right now is because, today, we do not silently change any MISA bit
during realize() time (we do warn when enabling bits if RVG is enabled).
We do that - a lot - with multi-letter extensions though, so we're
handling the most immediate concern first.
After this patch, we'll now error out if the user explicitly set 'zce' to true
and 'zca' to false:
$ ./build/qemu-system-riscv64 -M virt -cpu rv64,zce=true,zca=false -nographic
qemu-system-riscv64: Zcf/Zcd/Zcb/Zcmp/Zcmt extensions require Zca extension
This didn't happen before because we were enabling 'zca' if 'zce' was enabled
regardless if the user set 'zca' to false.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-20-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Before adding support to detect if an extension was user set we need to
handle how we're enabling extensions in riscv_init_max_cpu_extensions().
object_property_set_bool() calls the set() callback for the property,
and we're going to use this callback to set the 'multi_ext_user_opts'
hash.
This means that, as is today, all extensions we're setting for the 'max'
CPU will be seen as user set in the future. Let's change set_bool() to
isa_ext_update_enabled() that will just enable/disable the flag on a
certain offset.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-19-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
If we want to make better decisions when auto-enabling extensions during
realize() we need a way to tell if an user set an extension manually.
The RISC-V KVM driver has its own solution via a KVMCPUConfig struct
that has an 'user_set' flag that is set during the Property set()
callback. The set() callback also does init() time validations based on
the current KVM driver capabilities.
For TCG we would want a 'user_set' mechanic too, but we would look
ad-hoc via cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() if a certain extension was user set
or not. If we copy what was made in the KVM side we would look for
'user_set' for one into 60+ extension structs spreaded in 3 arrays
(riscv_cpu_extensions, riscv_cpu_experimental_exts,
riscv_cpu_vendor_exts).
We'll still need an extension struct but we won't be using the
'user_set' flag:
- 'RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig' will be our specialized structure, similar to what
we're already doing with the MISA extensions in 'RISCVCPUMisaExtConfig'.
DEFINE_PROP_BOOL() for all 3 extensions arrays were replaced by
MULTI_EXT_CFG_BOOL(), a macro that will init our specialized struct;
- the 'multi_ext_user_opts' hash will be used to store the offset of each
extension that the user set via the set() callback, cpu_set_multi_ext_cfg().
For now we're just initializing and populating it - next patch will use
it to determine if a certain extension was user set;
- cpu_add_multi_ext_prop() is a new helper that will replace the
qdev_property_add_static() calls that our macros are doing to populate
user properties. The macro was renamed to ADD_CPU_MULTIEXT_PROPS_ARRAY()
for clarity. Note that the non-extension properties in
riscv_cpu_options[] still need to be declared via qdev().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-18-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Let's change the other instances in realize() where we're enabling an
extension based on a certain criteria (e.g. it's a dependency of another
extension).
We're leaving icsr and ifencei being enabled during RVG for later -
we'll want to error out in that case. Every other extension enablement
during realize is now done via cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update().
The end goal is that only cpu init() functions will handle extension
flags directly via "cpu->cfg.ext_N = true|false".
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-17-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
During realize() time we're activating a lot of extensions based on some
criteria, e.g.:
if (cpu->cfg.ext_zk) {
cpu->cfg.ext_zkn = true;
cpu->cfg.ext_zkr = true;
cpu->cfg.ext_zkt = true;
}
This practice resulted in at least one case where we ended up enabling
something we shouldn't: RVC enabling zca/zcd/zcf when using a CPU that
has priv_spec older than 1.12.0.
We're also not considering user choice. There's no way of doing it now
but this is about to change in the next few patches.
cpu_cfg_ext_auto_update() will check for priv version mismatches before
enabling extensions. If we have a mismatch between the current priv
version and the extension we want to enable, do not enable it. In the
near future, this same function will also consider user choice when
deciding if we're going to enable/disable an extension or not.
For now let's use it to handle zca/zcd/zcf enablement if RVC is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-16-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The RISC-V KVM driver uses a CPUCFG() macro that calculates the offset
of a certain field in the struct RISCVCPUConfig. We're going to use this
macro in target/riscv/cpu.c as well in the next patches. Make it public.
Rename it to CPU_CFG_OFFSET() for more clarity while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-15-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We'll have future usage for a function where, given an offset of the
struct RISCVCPUConfig, the flag is updated to a certain val.
Change all existing callers to use edata->ext_enable_offset instead of
'edata'.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-14-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The 'any' CPU type was introduced in commit dc5bd18fa5 ("RISC-V CPU
Core Definition"), being around since the beginning. It's not an easy
CPU to use: it's undocumented and its name doesn't tell users much about
what the CPU is supposed to bring. 'git log' doesn't help us either in
knowing what was the original design of this CPU type.
The closest we have is a comment from Alistair [1] where he recalls from
memory that the 'any' CPU is supposed to behave like the newly added
'max' CPU. He also suggested that the 'any' CPU should be removed.
The default CPUs are rv32 and rv64, so removing the 'any' CPU will have
impact only on users that might have a script that uses '-cpu any'.
And those users are better off using the default CPUs or the new 'max'
CPU.
We would love to just remove the code and be done with it, but one does
not simply remove a feature in QEMU. We'll put the CPU in quarantine
first, letting users know that we have the intent of removing it in the
future.
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-07/msg02891.html
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-13-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The 'max' CPU type is used by tooling to determine what's the most
capable CPU a current QEMU version implements. Other archs such as ARM
implements this type. Let's add it to RISC-V.
What we consider "most capable CPU" in this context are related to
ratified, non-vendor extensions. This means that we want the 'max' CPU
to enable all (possible) ratified extensions by default. The reasoning
behind this design is (1) vendor extensions can conflict with each other
and we won't play favorities deciding which one is default or not and
(2) non-ratified extensions are always prone to changes, not being
stable enough to be enabled by default.
All this said, we're still not able to enable all ratified extensions
due to conflicts between them. Zfinx and all its dependencies aren't
enabled because of a conflict with RVF. zce, zcmp and zcmt are also
disabled due to RVD conflicts. When running with 64 bits we're also
disabling zcf.
MISA bits RVG, RVJ and RVV are also being set manually since they're
default disabled.
This is the resulting 'riscv,isa' DT for this new CPU:
rv64imafdcvh_zicbom_zicboz_zicsr_zifencei_zihintpause_zawrs_zfa_
zfh_zfhmin_zca_zcb_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbkb_zbkc_zbkx_zbs_zk_zkn_zknd_
zkne_zknh_zkr_zks_zksed_zksh_zkt_zve32f_zve64f_zve64d_
smstateen_sscofpmf_sstc_svadu_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-11-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Inside riscv_cpu_validate_v() we're always throwing a log message if the
user didn't set a vector version via 'vext_spec'.
We're going to include one case with the 'max' CPU where env->vext_ver
will be set in the cpu_init(). But that alone will not stop the "vector
version is not specified" message from appearing. The usefulness of this
log message is debatable for the generic CPUs, but for a 'max' CPU type,
where we are supposed to deliver a CPU model with all features possible,
it's strange to force users to set 'vext_spec' to get rid of this
message.
Change riscv_cpu_validate_v() to not throw this log message if
env->vext_ver is already set.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-10-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Use a helper in riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() to eliminate some of its
code repetition.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-9-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The code inside riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() became quite repetitive
after recent changes. Add a helper to hide the repetition away.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-8-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Our goal is to make riscv_cpu_extensions[] hold only ratified,
non-vendor extensions.
Create a new riscv_cpu_vendor_exts[] array for them, changing
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() and riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties()
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-7-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Create a new riscv_cpu_experimental_exts[] to store the non-ratified
extensions properties. Once they are ratified we'll move them back to
riscv_cpu_extensions[].
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() and riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() are
changed to keep adding non-ratified properties to users.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-6-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Add DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() and eliminate the ARRAY_SIZE() usage when
iterating in the riscv_cpu_options[] array, making it similar to what
we already do when working with riscv_cpu_extensions[].
We also have a more sophisticated motivation behind this change. In the
future we might need to export riscv_cpu_options[] to other files, and
ARRAY_LIST() doesn't work properly in that case because the array size
isn't exposed to the header file. Here's a future sight of what we would
deal with:
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1057:5: error: nested extern declaration of 'riscv_cpu_add_misa_properties' [-Werror=nested-externs]
n file included from ../target/riscv/kvm.c:19:
home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
| ^
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
1047 | for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
| ^~~~~~~~~~
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1059:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY'
1059 | ADD_UNAVAIL_KVM_PROP_ARRAY(obj, riscv_cpu_extensions);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
home/danielhb/work/qemu/include/qemu/osdep.h:473:31: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'const RISCVCPUMultiExtConfig[]'
473 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(x) ((sizeof(x) / sizeof((x)[0])) + \
| ^
./target/riscv/kvm.c:1047:29: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
1047 | for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_array); i++) { \
Homogenize the present and change the future by using
DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST() in riscv_cpu_options[].
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-5-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Future patches will split the existing Property arrays even further, and
the existing code in riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() will start to scale
bad with it because it's dealing with KVM constraints mixed in with TCG
constraints. We're going to pay a high price to share a couple of common
lines of code between the two.
Create a new kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() helper that will be
forked from riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() if we're running KVM. The
helper includes all properties that a KVM CPU will add. The rest of
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() body will then be relieved from having
to deal with KVM constraints.
The helper was declared in kvm_stubs.h, while being implemented in
cpu.c, to allow '--enable-debug' builds to work. The compiler won't
remove the kvm_riscv_cpu_add_kvm_properties() reference when
'kvm_enabled()' is false if we end up with an unused function. Even
though being a KVM only helper we can't implement it in kvm.c due to its
many dependencies inside cpu.c, so make it public in kvm_riscv.h and
keep its implementation in cpu.c for now. We'll move it to kvm.c in the
near future.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-4-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
After the introduction of riscv_cpu_options[] all properties in
riscv_cpu_extensions[] are booleans. This check is now obsolete.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-3-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
We'll add a new CPU type that will enable a considerable amount of
extensions. To make it easier for us we'll do a few cleanups in our
existing riscv_cpu_extensions[] array.
Start by splitting all CPU non-boolean options from it. Create a new
riscv_cpu_options[] array for them. Add all these properties in
riscv_cpu_add_user_properties() as it is already being done today.
'mmu' and 'pmp' aren't really extensions in the usual way we think about
RISC-V extensions. These are closer to CPU features/options, so move
both to riscv_cpu_options[] too. In the near future we'll need to match
all extensions with all entries in isa_edata_arr[], and so it happens
that both 'mmu' and 'pmp' do not have a riscv,isa string (thus, no priv
spec version restriction). This further emphasizes the point that these
are more a CPU option than an extension.
No functional changes made.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-ID: <20230912132423.268494-2-dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
GDB has XML support since 6.7 which was released in 2007.
It's time to remove support for old GDB versions without XML support.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Message-Id: <20230912224107.29669-11-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231009164104.369749-18-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
GDB has XML support since 6.7 which was released in 2007.
It's time to remove support for old GDB versions without XML support.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20230912224107.29669-10-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231009164104.369749-17-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
All implementations of gdb_arch_name() returns dynamic duplicates of
static strings. It's also unlikely that there will be an implementation
of gdb_arch_name() that returns a truly dynamic value due to the nature
of the function returning a well-known identifiers. Qualify the value
gdb_arch_name() with const and make all of its implementations return
static strings.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20230912224107.29669-8-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231009164104.369749-15-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Some subclasses overwrite gdb_core_xml_file member but others don't.
Always initialize the member in the subclasses for consistency.
This especially helps for AArch64; in a following change, the file
specified by gdb_core_xml_file is always looked up even if it's going to
be overwritten later. Looking up arm-core.xml results in an error as
it will not be embedded in the AArch64 build.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20230912224107.29669-7-akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20231009164104.369749-14-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Finish the convertion started with commit de6cd7599b
("meson: Replace softmmu_ss -> system_ss"). If the
$target_type is 'system', then use the target_system_arch[]
source set :)
Mechanical change doing:
$ sed -i -e s/target_softmmu_arch/target_system_arch/g \
$(git grep -l target_softmmu_arch)
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004090629.37473-13-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Software MMU is TCG specific. Here 'softmmu' is misused
for system emulation. Anyhow, since KVM is system emulation
specific, just rename as 'i386_kvm_ss'.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004090629.37473-10-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Add a check in 'softmmu-uaccess.h' that the header is only
include in system emulation, and rename it as 'uaccess.h'.
Rename the API methods:
- softmmu_[un]lock_user*() -> uaccess_[un]lock_user*()
- softmmu_strlen_user() -> uaccess_strlen_user().
Update a pair of comments.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004090629.37473-9-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004090629.37473-6-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Since we *might* have user emulation with softmmu,
replace the system emulation check by !user emulation one.
(target/ was cleaned from invalid CONFIG_SOFTMMU uses at
commit cab35c73be, but these files were merged few days
after, thus missed the cleanup.)
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004082239.27251-1-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
hvf_get_supported_cpuid() is only defined for x86 targets
(in target/i386/hvf/x86_cpuid.c).
Its declaration is pointless on all other targets.
All the calls to it in target/i386/cpu.c are guarded by
a call on hvf_enabled(), so are elided when HVF is not
built in. Therefore we can remove the unnecessary function
stub.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20231004092510.39498-3-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The only non standard type -- CPUArchState -- is forward
declared in "qemu/typedefs.h", so no particular header is
required here.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Roman Bolshakov <roman@roolebo.dev>
Tested-by: Roman Bolshakov <roman@roolebo.dev>
Message-ID: <20231004092510.39498-2-philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Remove extra 'i' variable to fix this warning :
../target/ppc/kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arch_put_registers’:
../target/ppc/kvm.c:963:13: warning: declaration of ‘i’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
963 | int i;
| ^
../target/ppc/kvm.c:906:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
906 | int i;
| ^
../target/ppc/kvm.c: In function ‘kvm_arch_get_registers’:
../target/ppc/kvm.c:1265:13: warning: declaration of ‘i’ shadows a previous local [-Wshadow=compatible-local]
1265 | int i;
| ^
../target/ppc/kvm.c:1212:9: note: shadowed declaration is here
1212 | int i, ret;
| ^
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-ID: <20231006053526.1031252-1-clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
